Abstract
There is growing evidence that species are able to coexist in communities through niche separation, and that consistent community structuring can take place at the biogeographical scale, as the same biotic interactions can determine species’ fate at large scales. In this study, we document niche differentiation at a larger scale within a specific plant community of softwater lakes in Western Europe. Five species were selected for their relative frequency and wide geographical distribution within the dataset that we collected. Their niches were modelled both from presence–absence data and from ordinal abundance data, using mixed regression techniques (generalized linear mixed models and proportional odds mixed models, respectively). The modelled realized niches differed among the species on the West-European scale, although strict separation was not shown and geographical coverage is not complete. Plant strategy characterization of the species supported the assumption that functional traits underpin the niche differentiation among the species through fitness trade-offs. Mechanistic experimental research at a range of spatial scales is needed to test the importance of different community structuring mechanisms at the biogeographical scale, such as biotic interactions and environmental filtering.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- GLMM:
-
Generalized linear mixed model
- POMM:
-
Proportional odds mixed model
- VIF:
-
Variance inflation factor
References
Amarasekare P (2003) Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis: spatial coexistence mechanisms. Ecol Lett 6:1109–1122. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00530.x
Arts GH (2002) Deterioration of Atlantic soft water macrophyte communities by acidification, eutrophication and alkalinisation. Aquat Bot 73:373–393
Arts GHP, Den Hartog C (1990) Phytogeographical aspects of the west European soft-water macrophyte flora. Acta Bot Neerlandica 39:369–378
Austin MP (1990) Community theory and competition in vegetation. In: Grace JB, Tilman D (eds) Perspectives on plant competition. The Blackburn Press, Caldwell, pp 215–238
Austin MP (1999) A silent clash of paradigms: some inconsistencies in community ecology. Oikos 86:170–178
Austin MP (2007) Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecol Model 200:1–19. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.005
Austin M, Smith T (1989) A new model for the continuum concept. Vegetatio 83:35–47. doi:10.1007/BF00031679
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2011) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-42
Bloemendaal FHJL, Roelofs JGM (1988) Waterplanten en waterkwaliteit. Koninklijke Nederlandse Natuurhistorische Vereniging, Utrecht
Bobbink R, Hicks K, Galloway J, Spranger T, Alkemade R, Ashmore M, Bustamante M, Cinderby S, Davidson E, Dentener F (2010) Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 20:30–59
Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White J-SS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
Bornette G, Puijalon S (2011) Response of aquatic plants to abiotic factors: a review. Aquat Sci 73:1–14
Brouwer E, Bobbink R, Roelofs JG (2002) Restoration of aquatic macrophyte vegetation in acidified and eutrophied softwater lakes: an overview. Aquat Bot 73:405–431
Canty A, Ripley B (2012) boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R package version 1.3-4
Christensen RHB (2012) ordinal—regression models for ordinal data. R package version 2012.01-19
Crawley MJ, Harral JE (2001) Scale dependence in plant biodiversity. Science 291:864–868
Davison AC, Hinkley DV (1997) Bootstrap methods and their applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dierssen K (1975) Littorelletea uniflorae. J. Cramer, Vaduz
Elith J, Leathwick JR (2009) Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:677–697. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159
European Commission (2007) Interpretation manual of European Union habitats
Fitter A (1978) An atlas of the wild flowers of Britain and Northern Europe. Collins, London
Franklin J, Miller JA (2009) Mapping species distributions. Spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University Press, New York
Gaudet CL, Keddy PA (1988) A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits. Nature 334:242–243
Ginzburg LR, Jensen CXJ (2004) Rules of thumb for judging ecological theories. Trends Ecol Evol 19:121–126. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.11.004
Gonzalez R, Nelson TO (1996) Measuring ordinal association in situations that contain tied scores. Psychol Bull 119:159
Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester
Grime JP (1988) Comparative plant ecology. A functional approach to common British species. Unit Comparative Plant Ecology (NERC), Department of Plant Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties. Wiley, Chichester
Guisan A, Harrell FE (2000) Ordinal response regression models in ecology. J Veg Sci 11:617–626
Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186
Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, New York
Harrell FE, with contributions from many other users (2012) Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 3.9-3
Hartley S, Kunin WE (2003) Scale dependency of rarity, extinction risk, and conservation priority. Conserv Biol 17:1559–1570
Heegaard E (2002) The outer border and central border for species–environmental relationships estimated by non-parametric generalised additive models. Ecol Model 157:131–139
Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978
Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Huisman J, Weissing FJ (1999) Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos. Nature 402:407–410
Hultén E, Fries M (1986) Atlas of the North European vascular plants: north of the Tropic of Cancer. Koeltz, Königstein
Hutchinson HE (1957) Concluding Remarks. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 22:415–427
Jiménez-Valverde A, Lobo JM, Hortal J (2008) Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling. Divers Distrib 14:885–890. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00496.x
Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:101–108. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.013
Kautsky L (1988) Life strategies of aquatic soft bottom macrophytes. Oikos 53:126–135
Keddy PA (1989) Competition. Chapman & Hall, London
Keddy PA (2001) Competition, 2nd edn. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Keddy PA, Twolanstrutt L, Wisheu IC (1994) Competitive effect and response rankings in 20 wetland plants—are they consistent across 3 environments. J Ecol 82:635–643
Keddy P, Gaudet C, Fraser LH (2000) Effects of low and high nutrients on the competitive hierarchy of 26 shoreline plants. J Ecol 88:413–423
Kleyer M, Bekker RM, Knevel IC, Bakker JP, Thompson K, Sonnenschein M, Poschlod P, van Groenendael JM, Klimeš L, Klimešová J, Klotz S, Rusch GM, Hermy M, Adriaens D, Boedeltje G, Bossuyt B, Dannemann A, Endels P, Götzenberger L, Hodgson JG, Jackel A-K, Kühn I, Kunzmann D, Ozinga WA, Römermann C, Stadler M, Schlegelmilch J, Steendam HJ, Tackenberg O, Wilmann B, Cornelissen JHC, Eriksson O, Garnier E, Peco B (2008) The LEDA Traitbase: a database of life-history traits of the Northwest European flora. J Ecol 96:1266–1274. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01430.x
Kneitel JM, Chase JM (2004) Trade-offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence. Ecol Lett 7:69–80
Knevel IC, Bekker RM, Bakker JP, Kleyer M (2003) Life-history traits of the northwest European flora: the LEDA database. J Veg Sci 14:611–614
Kunin WE (1998) Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales. Science 281:1513–1515
Lacoul P, Freedman B (2006) Environmental influences on aquatic plants in freshwater ecosystems. Environ Rev 14:89–136. doi:10.1139/a06-001
Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M, Gonzalez A (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology: the metacommunity concept. Ecol Lett 7:601–613. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x
Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967
Levine JM, HilleRisLambers J (2009) The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity. Nature 461:254–257. doi:10.1038/nature08251
Londo G (1984) The decimal scale for relevés of permanent quadrats. In: Knapp R (ed) Sampling methods and taxon analysis in vegetation science. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp 45–49
Lucassen ECHE, Bobbink R, Oonk MMA, Brandrud TE, Roelofs JGM (1999) The effects of liming and reacidification on the growth of Juncus bulbosus: a mesocosm experiment. Aquat Bot 64:95–103
Maillette L, Keddy PA (1989) 2 plants with contrasting architectures—growth responses to light gradients. Can J Bot 67:2825–2828
McKane RB, Johnson LC, Shaver GR, Nadelhoffer KJ, Rastetter EB, Fry B, Giblin AE, Kielland K, Kwiatkowski BL, Laundre JA, Murray G (2002) Resource-based niches provide a basis for plant species diversity and dominance in arctic tundra. Nature 415:68–71
Miller TE, Burns JH, Munguia P, Walters EL, Kneitel JM, Richards PM, Mouquet N, Buckley HL (2005) A critical review of twenty years’ use of the resource-ratio theory. Am Nat 165:439–448
Mouquet N, Loreau M (2002) Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. Am Nat 159:420–426
Mueller-Dombois M, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York
Murphy KJ (2002) Plant communities and plant diversity in softwater lakes of northern Europe. Aquat Bot 73:287–324
Murphy KJ, Rørslett B, Springuel I (1990) Strategy analysis of submerged lake macrophyte communities—an international example. Aquat Bot 36:303–323
Pietsch W (1977) Beitrag zur Soziologie und Ökologie der europäischen Littorelletea- und Utricularietea-Gesellschaften. Feddes Repert 88:141–245
Pietsch W (1985) Chorologische Phänomene in Wasserpflanzengesellschaften Mitteleuropas. Vegetatio 59:97–109
R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://www.R-project.org
Rahbek C (2005) The role of spatial scale and the perception of large-scale species-richness patterns. Ecol Lett 8:224–239
Raudenbusch SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park
Rodriguez-Oubina J, Romero MI, Ortiz S (1997) Communities of the class Littorelletea uniflorae in the northwest Iberian Peninsula. Acta Bot Gallica 144:155–169
Roelofs JGM, Bobbink R, Brouwer E, de Graaf MCC (1996) Restoration ecology of aquatic and terrestrial vegetation on non-calcareous sandy soils in The Netherlands. Acta Bot Neerlandica 45:517–541
Rørslett B (1989) An integrated approach to hydropower impact assessment 2. Submerged macrophytes in some Norwegian hydroelectric lakes. Hydrobiologia 175:65–82
Rösch H, Van Rooyen MW, Theron GK (1997) Predicting competitive interactions between pioneer plant species by using plant traits. S Afr J Bot 8:489–494
Schaminée JHJ, Westhoff V, Arts GHP (1992) Die Strandlinggesellschaften (Littorelletea Br.-Bl. et Tx. 43) der Niederlande, in europäischem Rahmen gefasst. Phytocoenologia 20:529–558
Schoof-van Pelt MM (1973) Littorelletea: a study of the vegetation of some amphiphytic communities of western Europe. PhD Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen
Silvertown J (2004) Plant coexistence and the niche. Trends Ecol Evol 19:605–611. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.003
Smolders AJP, Lucassen E, Roelofs JGM (2002) The isoetid environment: biogeochemistry and threats. Aquat Bot 73:325–350
Szmeja J, Clément B (1990) Comparaison de la structure et du déterminisme des Littorelletea uniflorae en Poméranie (Pologne) et en Bretagne (France). Phytocoenologia 19:123–148
Thuiller W, Albert C, Araújo MB, Berry PM, Cabeza M, Guisan A, Hickler T, Midgley GF, Paterson J, Schurr FM, Sykes MT, Zimmermann NE (2008) Predicting global change impacts on plant species’ distributions: future challenges. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 9:137–152. doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2007.09.004
Thuiller W, Albert CH, Dubuis A, Randin C, Guisan A (2010) Variation in habitat suitability does not always relate to variation in species’ plant functional traits. Biol Lett 6:120–123
Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Tilman D (2004) Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:10854–10861
Vanderhaeghe F, Smolders AJP, Ruysschaert S, Roelofs JGM, Hoffmann M (2005) Understanding the realised niche of an amphibious softwater plant, Eleocharis multicaulis. Arch Für Hydrobiol 163:329–348. doi:10.1127/0003-9136/2005/0163-0329
Vanderhaeghe F, Smolders AJP, Roelofs JGM, Hoffmann M (2013) Water table and species identity outweigh carbon and nitrogen availability in a softwater plant community. Acta Oecol 47:57–67. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2012.09.001
Vaughan IP, Ormerod SJ (2005) The continuing challenges of testing species distribution models. J Appl Ecol 42:720–730. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01052.x
Venterink HO, Güsewell S (2010) Competitive interactions between two meadow grasses under nitrogen and phosphorus limitation: competition under N and P limitation. Funct Ecol 24:877–886. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01692.x
Verbyla D, Litvaitis J (1989) Resampling methods for evaluating classification accuracy of wildlife habitat models. Environ Manag 13:783–787. doi:10.1007/BF01868317
Weiher E, van der Werf A, Thompson K, Roderick M, Garnier E, Eriksson O (1999) Challenging Theophrastus: a common core list of plant traits for functional ecology. J Veg Sci 10:609–620
Westoby M (1998) A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant Soil 199:213–227
Westoby M, Wright IJ (2006) Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. Trends Ecol Evol 21:261–268. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.004
Wetzel RG (2001) Limnology. Lake and River Ecosystems. Academic Press, London
Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York
Willby NJ, Abernethy VJ, Demars BOL (2000) Attribute-based classification of European hydrophytes and its relationship to habitat utilization. Freshw Biol 43:43–74
Wisz MS, Pottier J, Kissling WD, Pellissier L, Lenoir J, Damgaard CF, Dormann CF, Forchhammer MC, Grytnes J-A, Guisan A, Heikkinen RK, Høye TT, Kühn I, Luoto M, Maiorano L, Nilsson M-C, Normand S, Öckinger E, Schmidt NM, Termansen M, Timmermann A, Wardle DA, Aastrup P, Svenning J-C (2013) The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling. Biol Rev 88:15–30. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00235.x
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to the many scientists, colleagues and friends who helped in finding appropriate sampling locations. We especially mention (in alphabetical order) C. Aguiar, G.H.P. Arts, F. Bioret, D. Boeye, A.M. Darwell, G. De Blust, J. Dirkx, I. Edgar & family, L. Gora, J. Jansen, R.A. Jones, J.A. Molina, F. Pinet, K. Rombouts, K. Urban, J. van Groenendael, W. Van Landuyt and L. van Tweel-Groot. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. We further thank the owners and nature managers that gave access to the sampled softwater lakes. We thank J. Eygensteyn, R. Steeno and J. Bernaerts for their advice when doing the chemical analyses. The first author did part of this work as Ph.D. fellow of the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Anne Bonis.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vanderhaeghe, F., Ruysschaert, S., van den Berg, L.J.L. et al. Coexistence and niche differentiation at large spatial scale in a West-European softwater plant community. Plant Ecol 217, 369–382 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-016-0579-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-016-0579-8