Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of temperature and renal tissue thermal damage by holmium laser with different energy parameters during lithotripsy: in vitro porcine kidney model

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Holmium laser percutaneous nephrolithotripsy was simulated by porcine kidney calculus model in vitro to investigate thermal damage of renal tissue by different energy parameters of the holmium laser.

Methods

We placed human kidney calculus specimen in fresh vitro porcine kidney, then insert thermocouple temperature probes into the submucosa of the renal pelvis and reheated in a 37 °C water bath. A percutaneous nephrological sheath was used to penetrate the renal parenchyma with a moderate irrigation rate of 30 ml/min at 18 ℃. The Holmium laser was used to fragment the stones under a nephroscope, and the temperature was recorded.

Results

The four independent models were lithotripsy with 30 W and 60 W laser for 5 and 10 min, respectively; the mean temperature of 30 W vs. 60 W within 5 min was 36.06 °C vs. 39.21 °C (t = 5.36, P < 0.01) and the highest temperature was 43.60 °C vs. 46.60 °C; the mean temperature of 30 W vs. 60 W within 10 min was 37.91 °C vs. 40.13 ℃ (t = 5.28, P < 0.01), maximum temperature 46.80 ℃ vs. 49.20 ℃. Pathologically, each kidney was observed to have different degrees of thermal damage lesions, and the higher power and longer time the more severe the injury, but the injury was mainly limited to the uroepithelial and subepithelial tissues, with rare damage to renal tubules.

Conclusion

The higher laser excitation power and longer duration raised the intrarenal temperature significantly and caused a certain degree of thermal damage to the kidney tissue, but overall it was found to be safe and reliable. Urologists can avoid further side effects through surgical expertise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All relevant data are within the paper. The original data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Tok A, Akbulut F, Buldu I et al (2016) Comparison of microperc and minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy for medium-sized lower calyx stones. Urolithiasis 44(2):155–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Enikeev D, Herrmann TRW et al (2023) Thulium fiber laser in endourology: current clinical evidence. Curr Opin Urol 33(2):95–107. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Skolarikos A, Jung HU, Somani, B et al (2022) Guidelines Urolithiasis. In: EAU Guidelines Office: Arnhem, The Netherlands ISBN 978-94-92671-16-5

  4. Dong H, Peng Y, Li L, Gao X et al (2018) Prevention strategies for ureteral stricture following ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Asian J Urol 5(2):94–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gallegos H, Bravo JC et al (2021) Intrarenal temperature measurement associated with holmium laser intracorporeal lithotripsy in an ex vivo model. Cent Eur J Urol 74(4):588–594. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2021.0092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Simon H, Ralf P et al (2020) Thermal effects of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in an ex vivo porcine kidney model. World J Urol 38(3):753–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02808-5. (Epub 2019 May 16)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cecchetti W, Zattoni F, Nigro F et al (2004) Plasma bubble formation induced by holmium laser: an in vitro study [J]. Urology 63(3):586–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Felipe P, Eugenio V et al (2022) A practical guide for intra-renal temperature and pressure management during RIRS: what is the evidence telling us. J Clin Med 11(12):3429. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aldoukhi AH, Ghani KR, Hall TL et al (2017) Thermal response to high-power holmium laser lithotripsy. J Endourol 31:1308–1312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aldoukhi A, Hall T, Ghani K et al (2020) Analysis of laser fiber to stone distance during different modes of laser lithotripsy. J Urol 203:e626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mekayten M, Lorber A, Katafigiotis I et al (2019) Will stone density stop being a key factor in endourology? the impact of stone density on laser time using lumenis laser p120 w and standard 20 w laser—a comparative study. J Endourol 33:585–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ventimiglia E, Pauchard F, Quadrini F et al (2021) High- and low-power laser lithotripsy achieve similar results: a systematic review and meta-analysis of available clinical series. J Endourol 35:1146–1152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sapareto SA, Dewey WC (1984) Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 10:787–800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Izzard AS, Rizzoni D et al (2005) Small artery structure and hypertension: adaptive changes and target organ damage. J Hypertens 23(2):247–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Molina WR, Silva IN, Donalisio da Silva R et al (2015) Influence of saline on temperature profile of laser lithotripsy activation. J Endourol 29(2):235–239

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Foshan Health Commission Medical Research Project (Guangdong, China). No. 20220331.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WW: project development, data management, manuscript writing. ZX: project development, manuscript writing. MC: data management, manuscript editing. LX: data collection, pathological observation. YM: data collection. HZ: data collection.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhanping Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflict of interest with respect to the research, author-ship, and publication of this manuscript.

Ethical approval

Medical Ethics Committee of Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. IRB No. 2021138.

Informed consent

The experimental calculus was surgically removed from human. Patients signed informed consent for the calculus to be used in this study.

Approval of the research protocol by an institutional reviewer board

Foshan Health Commission Medical Research Project (China).

Registry and the registration no. of the study/trial

N/A.

Animal studies

N/A.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, W., Chen, M., Xie, L. et al. Comparison of temperature and renal tissue thermal damage by holmium laser with different energy parameters during lithotripsy: in vitro porcine kidney model. Int Urol Nephrol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-03943-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-03943-8

Keywords

Navigation