Skip to main content
Log in

External validation of a proposed prognostic model for the prediction of 1-year postoperative eGFR after living donor nephrectomy

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of this study was to externally validate the recently proposed prognostic model for the prediction of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 1 year after living donor nephrectomy.

Methods

130 living kidney donors (median age at donation 52.3 years, range 24.7–75.6 years) were investigated before and after donation between March 2000 and April 2016. Preoperative eGFR values varied between 61.7 and 148.4 ml/min (mean: 89, median: 88). Observed eGFR 1 year after transplantation (±45 days) ranged between 36.3 and 97.1 ml/min (mean: 55, median: 53). 70.8% of donors displayed eGFR values < 60 ml/min 1 year after donation. Predicted eGFR 1 year after donation was determined using the prognostic model proposed by Benoit et al. (Int Urol Nephrol 49(5):793–801. doi:10.1007/s11255-017-1559-1, 2017): postoperative eGFR ml/min/1.73 m2 = 31.71 + (0.521 × eGFR in ml/min prior to donation −0.314 × Age in years at donation). Pearson correlation and receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC-curve) were used to assess external validity of the proposed prognostic model to predict postoperative eGFR in ml/min and eGFR < 60 ml/min.

Results

The correlation between predicted and observed eGFR 1 year after donation was significant (p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.594). The area under the ROC-curve (AUROC) demonstrated a high sensitivity and specificity for predicted eGFR values < 60 ml/min (AUROC = 0.866).

Conclusions

The proposed prognostic model for the prediction of postoperative eGFR was successfully validated in our cohort. We therefore consider the model as generally applicable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cecka JM (1999) The UNOS scientific renal transplant registry. Clin Transpl 1–21

  2. Opelz G, Wujciak T, Dohler B, Scherer S, Mytilineos J (1999) HLA compatibility and organ transplant survival. Collaborative transplant study. Rev Immunogenet 1(3):334–342

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Park YH, Min SK, Lee JN, Lee HH, Jung WK, Lee JS, Lee JH, Lee YD (2004) Comparison of survival probabilities for living-unrelated versus cadaveric renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 36(7):2020–2022. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.08.122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozkurt S, Karavelioglu Y, Kalcik M, Musmul A (2017) Assessment of long-term cardiovascular effects of unilateral nephrectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 49(5):867–873. doi:10.1007/s11255-017-1553-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ibrahim HN, Foley R, Tan L, Rogers T, Bailey RF, Guo H, Gross CR, Matas AJ (2009) Long-term consequences of kidney donation. N Engl J Med 360(5):459–469. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0804883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lentine KL, Patel A (2012) Risks and outcomes of living donation. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 19(4):220–228. doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2011.09.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Reese PP, Boudville N, Garg AX (2015) Living kidney donation: outcomes, ethics, and uncertainty. Lancet 385(9981):2003–2013. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62484-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Benoit T, Game X, Roumiguie M, Sallusto F, Doumerc N, Beauval JB, Rischmann P, Kamar N, Soulie M, Malavaud B (2017) Predictive model of 1-year postoperative renal function after living donor nephrectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 49(5):793–801. doi:10.1007/s11255-017-1559-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG (2015) Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Ann Intern Med 162(1):55–63. doi:10.7326/M14-0697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, Marsh J, Stevens LA, Kusek JW, Van Lente F, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology C (2007) Expressing the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate with standardized serum creatinine values. Clin Chem 53(4):766–772. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2006.077180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143(1):29–36. doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dols LF, Kok NF, Ijzermans JN (2010) Live donor nephrectomy: a review of evidence for surgical techniques. Transpl Int 23(2):121–130. doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2009.01027.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis GR, Brook NR, Waller JR, Bains JC, Veitch PS, Nicholson ML (2004) A comparison of traditional open, minimal-incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 17(10):589–595. doi:10.1007/s00147-004-0770-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saito T, Uchida K, Ishida H, Tanabe K, Nitta K (2015) Changes in glomerular filtration rate after donation in living kidney donors: a single-center cohort study. Int Urol Nephrol 47(2):397–403. doi:10.1007/s11255-014-0861-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (reference number: 01EO1302).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulf Kulik.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Regarding the patients’ clinical data, as an observational retrospective study, according to the Professional Code of the German Medical Association (article B.III. § 15.1), neither informed consent nor approval of the ethics committee was needed for this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kulik, U., Gwiasda, J., Oldhafer, F. et al. External validation of a proposed prognostic model for the prediction of 1-year postoperative eGFR after living donor nephrectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 49, 1937–1940 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1683-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1683-y

Keywords

Navigation