Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services provision by small public urban green spaces: perspectives from different cultural backgrounds

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the rise of the ecosystem services concept, urban nature has gained significant value. Numerous studies have been conducted to delineate both the dependent and independent variables to consider when evaluating the regulating, provisioning, and supporting ecosystem services. Concerning the provisioning of cultural ecosystem services, urban green spaces operate in accordance with the ways people engage with them. These interactions are shaped by the design of green spaces and the cultural backgrounds of the population. In this study, we aimed to identify the various interactions between urban residents and specific small public urban green spaces, to evaluate people’s perceptions of the services they offer, and to determine which urban green spaces are deemed suitable by residents for enhancing ecosystem service provision. Employing a comparative approach, we assessed the same green spaces, i.e., pocket parks and street alignments, in the cities of Hamedan (Iran) and Bucharest (Romania), both of which have inhabitants with distinct cultural backgrounds. We administered similar surveys in the two cities and compiled a dataset of the responses. Employing cluster analysis and statistical analysis, we unveiled similarities and disparities in terms of interactions with green spaces in the two cities. Our findings demonstrate that although interactions with the chosen small public urban green spaces are comparable in Hamedan and Bucharest, the desires for future expansion of green spaces differ between the cities. These findings hold importance for practitioners and decision-makers, affirming that universal solutions for managing urban green spaces are non-existent, and that strategies should instead be tailored to the beneficiaries of such spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  • Almeida DQ, Barros H, Ribeiro AI (2022) Residential and school green and blue spaces and intelligence in children: the Generation XXI birth cohort. Sci Total Environ 813:151859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alpopi C, Colesca SE (2010) Urban air quality. A comparative study of major European capitals. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management 5:92–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson E, Tengö M, McPhearson T, Kremer P (2015) Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability. Ecosyst Serv 12:165–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annerstedt van den Bosch, M, Mudu P, Uscila V, Barrdahl M, Kulinkina A, Staatsen B, Swart W, Kruize H, Zurlyte I, Egorov AI (2016) Development of an urban green space indicator and the public health rationale. Scand J Public Health 44:159–167

  • Aram F, Solgi E, Holden G (2019) The role of green spaces in increasing social interactions in neighborhoods with periodic markets. Habitat Int 84:24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badiu DL, Onose DA, Niță MR, Lafortezza R (2018) From red to green? A look into the evolution of green spaces in a post-socialist city. Landsc Urban Plann 187:156–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balai Kerishnan P, Maruthaveeran S (2021) Factors contributing to the usage of pocket parks―A review of the evidence, vol 58. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening

  • Balai Kerishnan P, Maruthaveeran S, Maulan S (2020) Investigating the usability pattern and constraints of pocket parks in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 50.

  • Baur JWR, Tynon JF, Gómez E (2013) Attitudes about urban nature parks: a case study of users and nonusers in Portland, Oregon. Landsc Urban Plann 117:100–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazrafshan M, Spielhofer R, Hayek UW, Kienast F, Grêt-Regamey A (2023) Greater place attachment to urban parks enhances relaxation: examining affective and cognitive responses of locals and bi-cultural migrants to virtual park visits. Landsc Urban Plann 232:104650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake A (2013) Pocket parks. Open Space Seattle, 2100

  • Cârlan I, Haase D, Große-Stoltenberg A, Sandric I (2020) Mapping heat and traffic stress of urban park vegetation based on satellite imagery-A comparison of Bucharest, Romania and Leipzig, Germany. Urban Ecosyst 23:363–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen DA, Marsh T, Williamson S, Han B, Derose KP, Golinelli D, McKenzie TL (2014) The potential for pocket parks to increase physical activity. Am J Health Promotion 28:S19–S26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp, N., 2013. IBM SPSS statistics for windows. (Version 22.0).

  • Cucu A, Ciocănea CM, Onose DA (2011) Distribution of Urban Green Spaces - an indicator of topophobia - topophilia of urban residential neighborhoods. Case Study of 5th District of Bucharest, Romania. Forum geografic. Studii şi cercetări de geografie şi protecţia mediului 10, 276–286

  • Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd JW, Chan KM, Costanza R, Elmqvist T, Flint CG, Gobster PH (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:8812–8819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Danta D (1993) Ceausescu’s Bucharest. Geogr Rev, 170–182

  • Daryaee T (2012) The Oxford handbook of Iranian history. OUP USA

  • Dobbs C, Vasquez A, Olave P, Olave M (2021) Cultural urban ecosystem services. Urban ecology in the global south. Springer, pp 245–264

  • Doost Mohammadian H, Rezaie F (2019) Sustainable innovative project management: response to improve livability and quality of life: case studies: Iran and Germany. Inventions 4:59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer LK, Honold J, Botzat A, Brinkmeyer D, Cvejić R, Delshammar T, Elands B, Haase D, Kabisch N, Karle S (2018) Recreational ecosystem services in European cities: Sociocultural and geographical contexts matter for park use. Ecosyst Serv 31:455–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilidis AA, Niță MR, Onose DA, Badiu DL, Năstase II (2019) Methodological framework for urban sprawl control through sustainable planning of urban green infrastructure. Ecol Ind 96:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilidis AA, Popa A-M, Nita MR, Onose DA, Badiu DL (2020) Planning the unknown: perception of urban green infrastructure concept in Romania. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, p 126649

  • Gavrilidis AA, Popa A-M, Onose DA, Gradinaru SR (2022) Planning small for winning big: small urban green space distribution patterns in an expanding city. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 78:127787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi K, Behzadfar M, Borhani K, Nouri Z (2022) Geographic information system based combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for exploring the spatial justice of accessing urban green spaces, a comparative study of district 22 of Tehran. Ecol Ind 144:109455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grădinaru SR, Onose DA, Oliveira E, Slave AR, Popa AM, Gavrilidis AA (2023) Equity in urban greening: evidence from strategic planning in Romania. Landsc Urban Plann 230:104614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grădinaru SR, Hersperger AM (2019) Green infrastructure in strategic spatial plans: evidence from European urban regions, vol 40. Urban Forestry & Urban greening, pp 17–28

  • Grigorescu I, Kucsicsa G, Mitrică B (2015) Assessing spatio-temporal dynamics of urban sprawl in the Bucharest metropolitan area over the last century. Land use/cover Changes in Selected Regions in the World 10:19–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini F, Sajadzadeh H, Aram F, Mosavi A (2021) The impact of local green spaces of historically and culturally valuable residential areas on place attachment. Land 10:351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ianoş I, Sorensen A, Merciu C (2017) Incoherence of urban planning policy in Bucharest: its potential for land use conflict. Land Use Policy 60:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INS (2022) POP107D - LEGALLY RESIDENT POPULATION, by age group and ages, sex, counties and localities at January 1st. In: Statistics, N.I.o. (Ed.). Tempo

  • Ioja C, Patroescu M, Nita M, Rozylowicz L, Vanau G, Ioja A, Onose D (2010) Categories of residential spaces by their accessibility to urban parks-indicator of sustainability in human settlements case study: Bucharest. WSEAS Trans Environ Dev 5:307–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Iojă CI, Rozylowicz L, Pătroescu M, Niţă MR, Vânău GO (2011) Dog walkers’ vs. other park visitors’ perceptions: the importance of planning sustainable urban parks in Bucharest, Romania. Landsc Urban Plann 103:74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iojă CI, Grădinaru SR, Onose DA, Vânău GO, Tudor AC (2014a) The potential of school green areas to improve urban green connectivity and multifunctionality. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 13:704–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iojă CI, Niţă MR, Vânău GO, Onose DA, Gavrilidis AA (2014b) Using multi-criteria analysis for the identification of spatial land-use conflicts in the Bucharest Metropolitan Area. Ecol Ind 42:112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamebozorg Z, Najafi A, Fakhar Z (2020) Investigating the Spatial Organization Traditional Neighborhoods of Hamedan and its impact on Social relations. Revista Ciências Humanas 13

  • Kanō H (1978) City development and occupational change in Iran: a case study of Hamadan. The Developing Economies 16:298–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerishnan PB, Maruthaveeran S (2021) Factors contributing to the usage of pocket parks―A review of the evidence, vol 58. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, p 126985

  • Ko H, Son Y (2018) Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services in urban green spaces: a case study in Gwacheon, Republic of Korea. Ecol Ind 91:299–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Rosa D, Spyra M, Inostroza L (2016) Indicators of cultural Ecosystem Services for urban planning: a review. Ecol Ind 61:74–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee AC, Maheswaran R (2011) The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. J Public Health 33:212–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Light D, Young C (2015) Public space and the material legacies of Communism in Bucharest. In: Stan L, Vancea D (eds) Post-communist Romania at 25: linking past, Present and Future. Lexington Books, pp 41–62

  • Macintyre VG, Cotterill S, Anderson J, Phillipson C, Benton JS, French DP (2019) “I would Never Come Here Because I’ve Got My Own Garden”: Older Adults’ Perceptions of Small Urban Green Spaces. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public health 16, 1994

  • Majekodunmi M, Emmanuel R, Jafry T (2020) A spatial exploration of deprivation and green infrastructure ecosystem services within Glasgow city, vol 52. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening

  • Mogra S, Khamidi MF, Fadli F (2023) Insight into vegetation inclusion along urban roads: a pilot study on the preferences of expatriate roadside users in downtown Doha, Qatar Landsc Online, 1108–1108

  • Naghibi M, Faizi M, Ekhlassi A (2021) Design possibilities of leftover spaces as a pocket park in relation to planting enclosure. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 64

  • Nawrath M, Kowarik I, Fischer LK (2019) The influence of green streets on cycling behavior in European cities. Landsc Urban Plann 190:103598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordh H, Østby K (2013) Pocket parks for people – A study of park design and use. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 12:12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill B (2009) The political agency of cityscapes: spatializing governance in Ceausescu’s Bucharest. J Social Archaeol 9:92–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onete M, Pop OG, Gruia R (2010) Plants as indicators of environmental conditions of urban spaces from central parks of Bucharest. Environ Eng Manage J (EEMJ) 9

  • Pamukcu-Albers P, Ugolini F, La Rosa D, Grădinaru SR, Azevedo JC, Wu J (2021) Building green infrastructure to enhance urban resilience to climate change and pandemics. Landscape Ecol 36(3):665–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peschardt KK, Schipperijn J, Stigsdotter UK (2012) Use of Small Public Urban Green Spaces (SPUGS). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11:235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E, Bieling C (2013) Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33:118–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey Gozalo G, Barrigón Morillas JM, Montes González D (2019) Perceptions and use of urban green spaces on the basis of size. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, p 46

  • Riechers M, Barkmann J, Tscharntke T (2016) Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green. Ecosyst Serv 17:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riechers M, Noack EM, Tscharntke T (2017) Experts’ versus laypersons’ perception of urban cultural ecosystem services. Urban Ecosyst 20:715–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera E, Timperio A, Loh VHY, Deforche B, Veitch J (2021) Critical factors influencing adolescents’ active and social park use: a qualitative study using walk-along interviews, vol 58. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening

  • Rokach L, Maimon O (2005) Clustering methods. Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook. Springer, pp 321–352

  • Scăunaș S, Păunescu C, Merciu G-L (2019) Spatial-temporal analysis of Land Cover and Use Changes using Gis Tools. Case Study Băneasa Neighborhood, Bucharest. J Appl Eng Sci 90

  • Schrijnen PM (2000) Infrastructure networks and red–green patterns in city regions. Landsc Urban Plann 48:191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sipala M, La Rosa D (2021) From Preferences of Social Groups to Planning and Management Solutions of Green Spaces in Bucharest. International Conference on Innovation in Urban and Regional Planning. Springer, pp. 53–62

  • Slave AR, Iojă IC, Hossu CA, Grădinaru SR, Petrișor AI, Hersperger AM (2023) Assessing public opinion using self-organizing maps. Lessons from urban planning in Romania. Landsc Urban Plann 231:104641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreetheran M, van den Bosch CCK (2014) A socio-ecological exploration of fear of crime in urban green spaces – A systematic review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 13:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stålhammar S, Pedersen E (2017) Recreational cultural ecosystem services: how do people describe the value? Ecosyst Serv 26:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Centre of Iran (2016) Population and Household of the Country by Province and Sub-province (Shahrestan). In: Statistical Centre of Iran (Ed.)

  • Stoia NL, Niţă MR, Popa AM, Iojă IC (2022) The green walk—An analysis for evaluating the accessibility of urban green spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 75

  • Suditu B (2012) Urban sprawl - the legal context and territorial practices in Romania. Hum Geographies 6

  • Sun X, Wang L, Wang F, Soltani S (2020) Behaviors of seniors and impact of spatial form in small-scale public spaces in Chinese old city zones. Cities 107.

  • Ugolini F, Massetti L, Calaza-Martínez P, Cariñanos P, Dobbs C, Ostoić SK, …, Sanesi G (2020) Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use and perceptions of urban green space: an international exploratory study, vol 56. Urban forestry & urban greening, p 126888

  • Wallace KJ (2007) Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biol Conserv 139:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen M, Zhang X, Harris CD, Holt JB, Croft JB (2013) Spatial disparities in the distribution of parks and green spaces in the USA. Ann Behav Med 45(Suppl 1):S18–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolch JR, Byrne J, Newell JP (2014) Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: the challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landsc Urban Plann 125:234–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zandmoghadam MR (2022) The conditions of New cities in Iran and the important role of Urban Planning in constructing New cities (case of study: District 14 of Tehran Municipality). IAU Int J Social Sci 12:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Han M (2021) Pocket parks in English and Chinese literature: a review, vol 61. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, p 127080

  • Zhou C, Xie M, Zhao J, An Y (2022) What Affects the Use Flexibility of Pocket Parks? Evidence from Nanjing, China. Land 11

  • Zwierzchowska I, Hof A, Iojă I-C, Mueller C, Poniży L, Breuste J, Mizgajski A (2018) Multi-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services of parks in central European cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 30:84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CNCS/CCCDI – UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P1-1.1-TE-2019-1543, within PNCDI III, Contribution of small urban green infrastructure in achieving environmental justice (SmallGreen). We thank Melissa Dawes for support with language proofing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Regional Geography and Environment, Universtiy of Bucharest, N. Balcescu 1, Sector 1, Bucharest, 010041, Romania

    Athanasios-Alexandru Gavrilidis & Diana-Andreea Onose

  2. Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, N. Balcescu 1, Sector 1, Bucharest, 010041, Romania

    Athanasios-Alexandru Gavrilidis, Ana-Maria Popa, Diana-Andreea Onose & Raluca-Andreea Slave

  3. Department of Urban Planning and Design, College of Art and Architecture, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    Kianoush Zakerhaghighi

  4. Department of Urban Planning and Design, College of Art and Architecture, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran

    Seyedeh Zahra Akbarian

  5. Land-Use Systems Group, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Simona R. Grădinaru

Authors
  1. Athanasios-Alexandru Gavrilidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kianoush Zakerhaghighi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ana-Maria Popa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Seyedeh Zahra Akbarian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Diana-Andreea Onose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Simona R. Grădinaru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Raluca-Andreea Slave
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.A.G., K.Z., S.Z.A., A.M.P. S.R.G. wrote the main manuscript text, A.A.G., K.Z., A.M.P., S.Z.A., D.A.O., R.A.S. collected, processed and analysed the data, A.A.G., A.M.P., R.A.S. prepared figures, D.A.O., S.R.G. supervised. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana-Maria Popa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gavrilidis, AA., Zakerhaghighi, K., Popa, AM. et al. Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services provision by small public urban green spaces: perspectives from different cultural backgrounds. Urban Ecosyst (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01480-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01480-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation