Abstract
The rapid expansion of urban areas in which natural and semi-natural areas are replaced by human infrastructure, is a major threat to biodiversity worldwide. However, little is known about how the structure of biotic communities is affected by urbanization in the tropics. Here, we tested the effect of land use types and pond size in urban and rural areas on frog species richness and community composition in central Brazil. We selected 20 ponds differing in size and surrounding levels of urbanization and native vegetation cover. We quantified relationships between environmental variables and species richness and community composition using a Poisson GLM and a distance-based Redundancy Analysis (db-RDA), respectively. Variation in species richness was positively related to pond size and negatively related to the amount of urbanization in a 500 m buffer around ponds. Community composition was mainly driven by species turnover than by nestedness, with turnover being explained primarily by urbanization and native vegetation cover. Our results indicate that urbanization negatively influences species richness. Moreover, as the amount of urbanization increased, several species were replaced by other taxa better adapted to urban environments. Our results indicate that understanding the effects of urbanization on amphibians in tropical cities might improve conservation strategies, such as preserving large ponds in urban environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel PD (1996) Water pollution problems and solutions. In: Water pollution biology. 2 ed. CRC Press. pp 1–27
Aida N, Sasidhran S, Kamarudin N et al (2016) Woody trees, green space and park size improve avian biodiversity in urban landscapes of Peninsular Malaysia. Ecol Indic 69:176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.025
Almeida-Gomes M, Rocha CF, Vieira MV (2016) Local and landscape factors driving the structure of tropical anuran communities: Do ephemeral ponds have a nested pattern? Biotropica 48(3):365–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12285
Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM et al (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x
ArcGIS (2010) [GIS software]. Version 10.0. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc
Arrhenius O (1921) Species and Area. J of Ecol 9:95–99
Ashley EP, Robinson JT (1996) Road mortality of amphibians, reptiles and other wildlife on the Long Point Causeway, Lake Erie. Ontario. Can Field Nat 110(3):403–412
Baker BJ, Richardson JML (2006) The effect of artificial light on male breeding-season behaviour in green frogs, Rana clamitans melanota. Can J of Zool 84(10):1528–1532. https://doi.org/10.1139/z06-142
Banks-Leite C, Ewers RM, Metzger JP (2012) Unraveling the drivers of community dissimilarity and species extinction in fragmented landscapes. Ecol 93(12):2560–2569. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-2054.1
Barton K (2018) MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.42.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
Baselga A, Orme D, Villeger S, et al (2018) betapart: Partitioning Beta Diversity into Turnover and Nestedness Components. R package version 1.5.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=betapart
Baselga A (2010) Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol and Biogeogr 19:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x
Batáry P, Kurucz K, Suarez-Rubio M, Chamberlain DE (2018) Non-linearities in bird responses across urbanization gradients: A meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol 24(3):1046–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13964
Beavan L, Sadler J, Pinder C (2001) The invertebrate fauna of a physically modified urban river. Hydrobiol 445:97–108. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017584105641
Bender MG, Leprieur F, Mouillot D et al (2017) Isolation drives taxonomic and functional nestedness in tropical reef fish faunas. Ecography 40(3):425–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02293
Borges-Matos C, Aragón S, da Silva MNF et al (2016) Importance of the matrix in determining small-mammal assemblages in an Amazonian forest-savanna mosaic. Biol Conserv 204:417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.037
Bounas A, Keroglidou M, Toli EA et al (2020) Constrained by aliens, shifting landscape, or poor water quality? Factors affecting the persistence of amphibians in an urban pond network. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 30(5):1037–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3309
Boyer R, Grue CE (1995) The need for water quality criteria for frogs. Environmental Health Perspectives 103(4):352–357. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.95103352
Bräuniger C, Knapp S, Kühn I, Klotz S (2010) Testing taxonomic and landscape surrogates for biodiversity in an urban setting. Landsc and Urban Plan 97(4):283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.001
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological methods & research 33(2):261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644
Callaghan CT, Major RE, Lyons MB et al (2018) The effects of local and landscape habitat attributes on bird diversity in urban greenspaces. Ecosphere 9(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2347
Carr LW, Fahrig L (2001) Effect of road traffic on two amphibian species of differing vagility. Conserv Biol 15(4):1071–1078. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041071.x
Chao A (1987) Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biom 783–791.
Christie FJ, Cassis G, Hochuli DF (2010) Urbanization affects the trophic structure of arboreal arthropod communities. Urban Ecosyst 13(2):169–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-009-0115-x
Coleman BD, Mares MA, Willig MR, Hsieh YH (1982) Randomness, area, and species richness. Ecol 63(4):1121–1133
Connor EF, McCoy ED (2001) Species-area relationships. Encycl of Biodivers 5:397–411
Crump ML, Scott NJ (1994) Visual encounter survey. In: Heyer, W.R.Donnelly, MA; McDiarmid, R.W, Donnelly, Heyek, L.C, and Foster, M.S. (Eds) Measuring and monitoring Biological diversity, Standard Methods for Amphibians Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C: pp 84–91
Dickman CR (1987) Habitat fragmentation and vertebrate species richness in an urban environment. J of Appl Ecol 24(2):337–351
Doan TM (2003) Which methods are most effective for surveying rain forest herpetofauna? J of Herpetol 37(1):72–81. https://doi.org/10.1670/0022-1511(2003)037[0072:WMAMEF]2.0.CO;2
Du N, Ottens H, Sliuzas R (2010) Spatial impact of urban expansion on surface water bodies - A case study of Wuhan, China. Landsc Urban Plan 94(3–4):175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.002
Egger S (2006) Determining a sustainable city model. Env Modell Softw 21(9):1235–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.04.012
Fernández-Juricic E (2002) Can human disturbance promote nestedness? A case study with breeding birds in urban habitat fragments. Oecologia 131(2):269–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0883-y
Ferreira CMM, de Aquino Ribas AC, de Souza FL (2017) Species composition and richness of anurans in Cerrado urban forests from central Brazil. Acta Herpetol 12(2):157–165. https://doi.org/10.13128/Acta_Herpetol-18179
Ficetola GF, De Bernardi F (2004) Amphibians in a human-dominated landscape: the community structure is related to habitat features and isolation. Biol Conserv 119(2):219–230
Ficetola GF, Marziali L, Rossaro B et al (2011) Landscape–stream interactions and habitat conservation for amphibians. Ecol Appl 21(4):1272–1282
Ficken K, Byrne PG (2013) Heavy metal pollution negatively correlates with anuran species richness and distribution in south‐eastern Australia. Austral Ecol 38:523–533
Findlay CS, Lenton J, Zheng L (2001) Land-use correlates of anuran community richness and composition in southeastern Ontario wetlands. Ecoscience 8(3):336–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2001.11682661
Fischer JD, Cleeton SH, Lyons TP, Miller JR (2012) Urbanization and the predation paradox: the role of trophic dynamics in structuring vertebrate communities. Biosci 62(9):809–818. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.6
Flint WD, Harris RN (2005) The efficacy of visual encounter surveys for population monitoring of Plethodon punctatus (Caudata: Plethodontidae). J Herpetol 39(4):578–584. https://doi.org/10.1670/255-04A.1
Gagné SA, Fahrig L (2007) Effect of landscape context on anuran communities in breeding ponds in the National Capital Region. Canada. Landsc Ecol 22(2):205–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9012-3
González-Oreja JA, De La Fuente-Díaz AA, Hernández-Santín L et al (2012) Can human disturbance promote nestedness? Songbirds and noise in urban parks as a case study. Landsc Urban Plan 104(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.09.001
Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE et al (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319(5864):756–760
Grover MC (2006) Comparative effectiveness of nighttime visual encounter surveys and cover object searches in detecting salamanders. Herpetol Conserv Biol 1(2):93–99
Hamer AJ, McDonnell MJ (2008) Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanising world: a review. Biol Conserv 141(10):2432–2449
Hanski I (1994) Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 9(4):131–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(94)90177-5
Hill MJ, Biggs J, Thornhill I et al (2017) Urban ponds as an aquatic biodiversity resource in modified landscapes. Glob Chang Biol 23(3):986–999. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13401
Hopkins WA, Rowe CL (2010) Interdisciplinary and hierarchical approaches for studying the effects of metals and metalloids on amphibians. In: Sparling DW, Linder G, Bishop CA, Krest S. (Eds) Ecotoxicology of Amphibians and Reptiles, 2nd, pp. 325–336. SETAC Press, Pensacola, FL
Hu A, Li S, Zhang L et al (2018) Prokaryotic footprints in urban water ecosystems: A case study of urban landscape ponds in a coastal city, China. Env Pollut 242:1729–1739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.097
IUCN (2020) The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2020-2. https://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 15 May 2020
Johnson PT, Hoverman JT, McKenzie VJ et al (2013) Urbanization and wetland communities: applying metacommunity theory to understand the local and landscape effects. J Appl Ecol 50(1):34–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12022
Jones EL, Leather SR (2013) Invertebrates in urban areas: a review. Eur J Entomol 109(4):463–478
Jupke JF, Schäfer RB (2020) Should ecologists prefer model-over distance-based multivariate methods? Ecol Evol 10(5):2417–2435. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6059
Kinzig AP, Grove JM (2001) Urban-suburban ecology. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 733–745
Knutson MG, Sauer JR, Olsen DA et al (1999) Effects of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, USA. Conserv Biol 13(6):1437–1446. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98445.x
Leibold MA, Chase JM (2018) Process in metacommunities. In: Metacommunity ecology, Princeton University Press, pp 49–88
Leon E, Peltzer PM, Lorenzon R et al (2019) Effect of traffic noise on Scinax nasicus advertisement call (Amphibia, Anura) Iheringia. Ser Zool 109. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019007
Lima NG, Oliveira U, Souza RC, Eterovick PC (2019) Dynamic and diverse amphibian assemblages: Can we differentiate natural processes from human induced changes?. PloS One 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214316
Lizée MH, Manel S, Mauffrey JF et al (2012) Matrix configuration and patch isolation influences override the species–area relationship for urban butterfly communities. Landsc Ecol 27(2):159–169
Lourenço-de-Moraes R, Malagoli LR, Guerra V et al (2018) Nesting patterns among Neotropical species assemblages: can reserves in urban areas be failing to protect anurans? Urban Ecosyst 21(5):933–942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0767-5
Lüdecke D (2019) sjstats: Statistical functions for regression models (Version 0.17.3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1284472, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjstats
Maxwell SL, Fuller RA, Brooks TM, Watson JE (2016) Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nat News 536(7615):143–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/536143a
McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK (2008) The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions. Landsc Ecol 23(10):1143–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9253-4
McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA, Groffman P et al (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradiente. Urban Ecosyst 1:21–36. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014359024275
McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127(3):247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005
McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11(2):161–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4
McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14(11):450–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01679-1
Melo GL, Sponchiado J, Cáceres NC, Fahrig L (2017) Testing the habitat amount hypothesis for South American small mammals. Biol Conserv 209:304–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.031
Menin M, Waldez F, Lima AP (2011) Effects of environmental and spatial factors on the distribution of anuran species with aquatic reproduction in central Amazonia. The Herpetol J 21(4):255–261
Menke SB, Guénard B, Sexton JO et al (2011) Urban areas may serve as habitat and corridors for dry-adapted, heat tolerant species; an example from ants. Urban Ecosyst 14(2):135–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-010-0150-7
Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conserv Biol 16(2):330–337
Moore AA, Palmer MA (2005) Invertebrate biodiversity in agricultural and urban headwater streams: implications for conservation and management. Ecol Appl 15(4):1169–1177. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1484
Nagelkerke NJD (1991) A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biom 78:691–692. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/78.3.691
Naimi B, Hamm NAS, Groen TA et al (2014) Where is positional uncertainty a problem for species distribution modelling? Ecography 37:191–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00205.x
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M et al (2019) vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 2.5-6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
Olden JD (2006) Biotic homogenization: a new research agenda for conservation biogeography. J Biogeogr 33(12):2027–2039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01572.x
Olden JD, Rooney TP (2006) On defining and quantifying biotic homogenization. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15(2):113–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00214.x
Parris KM (2006) Urban amphibian assemblages as metacommunities. J Anim Ecol 75(3):757–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01096.x
Parris KM, Amati M, Bekessy SA et al (2018) The seven lamps of planning for biodiversity in the city. Cities 83:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.06.007
Piano E, Souffreau C, Merckx T et al (2019) Urbanization drives cross-taxon declines in abundance and diversity at multiple spatial scales. Glob Chang Biol 26(3):1196–1211. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14934
Pillsbury FC, Miller JR (2008) Habitat and landscape characteristics underlying anuran community structure along an urban–rural gradient. Ecol Appl 18(5):1107–1118. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1899.1
PLANURB – Agência Municipal de Meio Ambiente e Planejamento Urbano (2019) In Perfil Socioeconômico Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul 26:41–76. http://www.capital.ms.gov.br/sisgran/#/. Accessed 5 Nov 2019
Preston FW (1960) Time and space and the variation of species. Ecol 41(4):612–627
Rádková V, Bojková J, Křoupalová V et al (2014) The role of dispersal mode and habitat specialisation in metacommunity structuring of aquatic macroinvertebrates in isolated spring fens. Freshw Biol 59(11):2256–2267. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12428
Ribeiro JF, Walter BMT (1998) Fitofisionomias do bioma Cerrado. In: Sano SM, Almeida Sp. (eds). Cerrado: ambiente e flora. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Cerrados, pp 89–166
Rubbo MJ, Kiesecker JM (2005) Amphibian breeding distribution in an urbanized landscape. Conserv Biol 19(2):504–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.000101.x
Salomão RP, Alvarado F, Baena-Díaz F et al (2019) Urbanization effects on dung beetle assemblages in a tropical city. Ecol Indic 103:665–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.045
Sá RO, Tonini JFR, van Huss H et al (2018) Multiple connections between Amazonia and Atlantic Forest shaped the phylogenetic and morphological diversity of Chiasmocleis Mehely, 1904 (Anura: Microhylidae: Gastrophryninae). Mol Phylogenetics Evol 130:198–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2018.10.021
Schwartz MW, Thorne JH, Viers JH (2006) Biotic homogenization of the California flora in urban and urbanizing regions. Biol Conserv 127(3):282–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.017
Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR (2003) Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conserv Biol 17(5):1219–1228. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02177.x
Slipinski P, Zmihorski M, Czechowski W (2012) Species diversity and nestedness of ant assemblages in an urban environment. Eur J Entomol 109(2):197–206
Specziár A, Árva D, Tóth M et al (2018) Environmental and spatial drivers of beta diversity components of chironomid metacommunities in contrasting freshwater systems. Hydrobiol 819(1):123–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3632-x
Stefanidis K, Papastergiadou E (2012) Relationships between lake morphometry, water quality, and aquatic macrophytes, in greek lakes. Fresenius Env Bull 21(10):3018–3026
Sun JW, Narins PM (2005) Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate. Biol Conserv 121(3):419–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.017
R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
United Nations (2018) World urbanization prospects, the 2018 Revision. Available at: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/index.htm. Accessed 31 July 2020
Wells KD (2007) The ecology and behavior of amphibians. University of Chicago Press, 1148 pp
Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monog 30:280–338
Williams CB (1943) Area and number of species. Nat 152:264–267. https://doi.org/10.1038/152264a0
Yi YZ, Sheridan JA (2019) Effects of traffic noise on vocalisations of the rhacophorid tree frog Kurixalus chaseni (Anura: Rhacophoridae) in Borneo. Raffles Bull Zool 67:77–82. https://doi.org/10.26107/rbz-2019-0007
Youngquist MB, Inoue K, Berg DJ, Boone MD (2017) Effects of land use on population presence and genetic structure of an amphibian in an agricultural landscape. Landsc Ecol 32(1):147–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0438-y
Zhang W, Li B, Shu X et al (2016) Responses of anuran communities to rapid urban growth in Shanghai, China. Urban For Urban Green 20:365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.005
Zhang X, Liu Y, Zhou L (2018) Correlation analysis between landscape metrics and water quality under multiple scales. Int J Env Res Public Health 15(8):1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081606
Acknowledgments
This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001 and Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul – UFMS/MEC – Brasil.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CCG and MAG conceived the idea, designed the study and collected field data. CCG, MAG, and DBP performed the data analyses. All authors commented on drafts and gave final approval for publication.
Corresponding author
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ganci, C.C., Provete, D.B., Püttker, T. et al. High species turnover shapes anuran community composition in ponds along an urban-rural gradient. Urban Ecosyst 25, 633–642 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01174-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01174-8