Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Signal information of bird song changes in human-dominated landscapes

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Communication systems rely upon specific social contexts and environments that permit effective transmission, and thus, are particularly vulnerable to disruption by anthropogenic disturbance. The acoustic environments of cities may affect conspecific interactions by altering the transmission or reception of song in ways that might ultimately influence fitness, however, the evolutionary and ecological consequences of altered songs remain poorly understood. We hypothesized that the relationship between bird song attributes and fitness metrics would be landscape-dependent, differing between urban and rural habitats. We investigated this hypothesis by measuring vocal and breeding behavior of 54 male Northern Cardinals (Cardinalis cardinalis) at nine sites distributed across a rural to urban landscape gradient in Columbus, Ohio in 2011. Interestingly, we found evidence that relationships between song attributes and male quality differed among landscapes. Shorter and slower songs were associated with larger males in more preferred territories (i.e. with denser vegetation), but only in rural landscapes. Across all landscapes, males that sang at high frequencies had nestlings in poorer condition, but otherwise song attributes were not associated with reproductive output or male provisioning ability. Our results suggest that urban landscapes change the function of song as a signal of quality and could reduce the usefulness of song as a predictor of reproductive performance. This is one of few studies to investigate signal relationships and potential fitness consequences of song variation in natural urban systems, thereby providing insight into micro-evolutionary processes operating within novel environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badyaev AV, Young RL, Oh KP et al (2008) Evolution on a local scale: developmental, functional, and genetic bases of divergence in bill form and associated changes in song structure between adjacent habitats. Evol Evol 62(1951–1964):1964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00428.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballentine B (2009) The ability to perform physically challenging songs predicts age and size in male swamp sparrows, Melospiza Georgiana. Anim Behav 77:973–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boogert NJ, Giraldeau LA, Lefebvre L (2008) Song complexity correlates with learning ability in zebra finch males. Anim Behav 76:1735–1741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann KL, Rodewald AD (2005) Forest restoration in urbanizing landscapes: interactions between land uses and exotic shrubs. Restor Ecol 13:334–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00042.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumm H, Slabbekoorn H (2005) Acoustic communication in noise. In: Advances in the Study of Behavior. Academic, pp 151–209

  • Buchanan KL, Catchpole CK (2000) Song as an indicator of male parental effort in the sedge warbler. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 267:321–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso GC (2011) Paradoxical calls: the opposite signaling role of sound frequency across bird species. Behav Ecol 23(2):237–241

  • Cardoso GC, Atwell JW (2012) On amplitude and frequency in birdsong: a reply to Zollinger et al. Anim Behav 84:e10–e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole CK (1987) Bird song, sexual selection and female choice. Trends Ecol Evol 2:94–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christie PJ, Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM (2004) Pitch shifts and song structure indicate male quality in the dawn chorus of black-capped chickadees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:341–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner RN, Anderson ME, Dickson JG (1986) Relationships among territory size, habitat, song, and nesting success of northern cardinals. Auk 103:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwallis CK, Uller T (2010) Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends Ecol Evol 25:145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.09.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry EP (2007) Evolution of bird song affects signal efficacy: an experimental test using historical and current signals. Evolution 61(8):1938–1945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Des Aunay GH, Slabbekoorn H, Nagle L et al (2014) Urban noise undermines female sexual preferences for low-frequency songs in domestic canaries. Anim Behav 87:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz M, Parra A, Gallardo C (2011) Serins respond to anthropogenic noise by increasing vocal activity. Behav Ecol 22:332–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling JL, Luther DA, Marra PP (2012) Comparative effects of urban development and anthropogenic noise on bird songs. Behav Ecol 23(1):201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn PO, Whittingham LA, Freeman-Gallant CR, DeCoste J (2008) Geographic variation in the function of ornaments in the common yellowthroat Geothlypis trichas. J Avian Biol 39:66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil D, Brumm H (2013) Acoustic communication in the urban environment: patterns, mechanisms, and potential consequences of avian song adjustments. Avian Urban Ecol Behav Physiol Adapt 69

  • Gil D, Gahr M (2002) The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross K, Pasinelli G, Kunc HP (2010) Behavioral plasticity allows short-term adjustment to a novel environment. Am Nat 176:456–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halfwerk W, Slabbekoorn H (2009) A behavioural mechanism explaining noise-dependent frequency use in urban birdsong. Anim Behav 78:1301–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfwerk W, Slabbekoorn H (2013) The impact of anthropogenic noise on avian communication and fitness. Avian Urban Ecol Behav Physiol Adapt 84

  • Halfwerk W, Bot S, Buikx J et al (2011) Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:14549–14554. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109091108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Halkin SL, Linville SU (1999) Northern cardinal (Cardinalis Cardinalis). The Birds of North America 440:32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamao S, Watanabe M, Mori Y (2011) Urban noise and male density affect songs in the great tit Parus major. Ethol Ecol Evol 23(2):111–119

  • Higginson AD, Reader T (2009) Environmental heterogeneity, genotype-by-environment interactions and the reliability of sexual traits as indicators of mate quality. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:1153–1159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Cardoso GC (2009) Are bird species that vocalize at higher frequencies preadapted to inhabit noisy urban areas? Behav Ecol 20:1268–1273. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson C, Andersson S (2007) Carotenoid diet and nestling provisioning in urban and rural great tits Parus Major. J Avian Biol 38:564–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakob EM, Marshall SD, Uetz GW (1996) Estimating fitness: a comparison of body condition indices. Oikos 77:61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Moller AP, Petrie M (2001) Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis. Q Rev Biol 76:3–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Job JR, Kohler SL, Gill SA (2016) Song adjustments by an open habitat bird to anthropogenic noise, urban structure, and vegetation. Behav Ecol arw105

  • Jones TM, Rodewald AD, Shustack DP (2010) Variation in plumage coloration of northern cardinals in urbanizing landscapes. Wilson J Ornithol 122:326–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH (1984) Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. Am Nat 124:309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaZerte SE, Slabbekoorn H, Otter KA (2016) Learning to cope: vocal adjustment to urban noise is correlated with prior experience in black-capped chickadees. Proc R Soc B The Royal Society 283:20161058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemon RE (1965) The song repertoires of cardinals (Richmondena cardinalis) at London, Ontario. Can J Zool 43(3):559–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard ML, Horn AG (2012) Ambient noise increases missed detections in nestling birds. Biol Lett 8:530–532. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0032

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leston LFV, Rodewald AD (2006) Are urban forests ecological traps for understory birds? An examination using northern cardinals. Biol Con 131:566–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luther DA, Derryberry EP (2012) Birdsongs keep pace with city life: changes in song over time in an urban songbird affects communication. Anim Behav 83:1059–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luther D, Magnotti J (2014) Can animals detect differences in vocalizations adjusted for anthropogenic noise? Anim Behav 92:111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.03.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luther DA, Phillips J, Derryberry EP (2016) Not so sexy in the city: urban birds adjust songs to noise but compromise vocal performance. Behav Ecol 27:332–340. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magura T, Tóthmérész B, Lövei GL (2006) Body size inequality of carabids along an urbanisation gradient. Basic Appl Ecol 7:472–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennill DJ, Badyaev AV, Jonart LM, Hill GE (2006) Male house finches with elaborate songs have higher reproductive performance. Ethology 112(2):174–180

  • Mockford EJ, Marshall RC (2009) Effects of urban noise on song and response behaviour in great tits. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:2979–2985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narango DL, Rodewald AD (2015) Urban-associated drivers of song variation along a rural–urban gradient. Behav Ecol 27:608–616. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth E, Zollinger SA, Brumm H (2012) Effect sizes and the integrative understanding of urban bird song. Am Nat 180(1):146–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara RB, Kotze DJ (2010) Do not log-transform count data. Methods Ecol Evol 1:118–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patricelli GL, Blickley JL (2006) Avian communication in urban noise: causes and consequences of vocal adjustment. Auk 123:639–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2017) _nlme: Linear and Nonlinear MixedEffects Models_. R package version 3.1-131. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme>

  • Read J, Jones G, Radford AN (2014) Fitness costs as well as benefits are important when considering responses to anthropogenic noise. Behav Ecol 25:4–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehsteiner U, Geisser H, Reyer HU (1998) Singing and mating success in water pipits: one specific song element makes all the difference. Anim Behav 55:1471–1481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ripmeester EA, Mulder M, Slabbekoorn H (2010) Habitat-dependent acoustic divergence affects playback response in urban and forest populations of the European blackbird. Behav Ecol 21:876–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchison G (1988) Song repertoires and the singing behavior of male northern cardinals. The Wilson Bulletin 100:583–603

  • Ritchison G, Klatt PH, Westneat DF (1994) Mate guarding and extra-pair paternity in northern cardinals. Condor 96:1055–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roca IT, Desrochers L, Giacomazzo M et al (2016) Shifting song frequencies in response to anthropogenic noise: a meta-analysis on birds and anurans. Behav Ecol 27:1269–1274. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodewald AD, Kearns LJ (2011) Shifts in dominant nest predators along a rural-to-urban landscape gradient. Condor 113(4):899–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodewald AD, Shustack DP (2008) Urban flight: understanding individual and population-level responses of Nearctic–Neotropical migratory birds to urbanization. J Anim Ecol 77:83–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodewald AD, Shustack DP, Jones TM (2011) Dynamic selective environments and evolutionary traps in human-dominated landscapes. Ecology 92:1781–1788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ, Brenowitz EA (1985) The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. Am Nat 126:87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlaepfer MA, Runge MC, Sherman PW (2002) Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol Evol 17:474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shochat E, Warren PS, Faeth SH, McIntyre NE, Hope D (2006) From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 21:186–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn H, den Boer-Visser A (2006) Cities change the songs of birds. Curr Biol 16:2326–2331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn H, Peet M (2003) Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424:267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn H, Yeh P, Hunt K (2007) Sound transmission and song divergence: a comparison of urban and forest acoustics. Condor 109:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaddle JP, Page LC (2007) High levels of environmental noise erode pair preferences in zebra finches: implications for noise pollution. Anim Behav 74:363–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallamy DW (2004) Do alien plants reduce insect biomass? Conserv Biol 18:1689–1692. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00512.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oort H, Otter KA, Fort KT, Holschuh CI (2006) Habitat quality, social dominance and Dawn chorus song output in black-capped chickadees. Ethology 112:772–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth Edition. Springer, New York

  • Verzijden MN, Ripmeester EAP, Ohms VR et al (2010) Immediate spectral flexibility in singing chiffchaffs during experimental exposure to highway noise. J Exp Biol 213:2575–2581. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.038299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vortman Y, Lotem A, Dor R et al (2011) The sexual signals of the East-Mediterranean barn swallow: a different swallow tale. Behav Ecol 22:1344–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren PS, Katti M, Ermann M, Brazel A (2006) Urban bioacoustics: it’s not just noise. Anim Behav 71:491–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner EM (2011) The consequences of anthropogenic disturbance on communication and the operation of sexual selection in the eastern bluebird (Sialia sialis). Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University

  • Wolfenbarger LLR (1999) Red coloration of male northern cardinals correlates with mate quality and territory quality. Behav Ecol 10:80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong BBM, Lowry H (2016) The struggle to be heard in an increasingly noisy world: a comment on Roca et al. Behav Ecol 27:1275–1276. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh PJ (2004) Rapid evolution of a sexually selected trait following population establishment in a novel habitat. Evolution 58:166–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01583.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zollinger SA, Podos J, Nemeth E et al (2012) On the relationship between, and measurement of, amplitude and frequency in birdsong. Anim Behav 84:e1–e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurr A, Ieno E, Smith GM (2007) Analysing ecological data (statistics for biology & health). Theatr Rec 67:02

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurr AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Science Foundation (DEB-0340879, DEB-0639429) and the Ohio Division of Wildlife and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the State Wildlife Grants Program to A.D. Rodewald. We thank numerous field technicians and graduate students for help with data collection, especially L. Kearns, B. Padilla, L. Rowse, S. Rose, M. McDermott, Z. Züst. We also thank D. Nelson, A. Poesel, E. Szeyller-Macolley and S. Wright for help with acoustic analysis. This manuscript was greatly improved by the advice supplied by two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Desiree L. Narango & Amanda D. Rodewald

  2. Department of Entomology and Wildlife Conservation, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA

    Desiree L. Narango

  3. Cornell Lab of Ornithology and Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA

    Amanda D. Rodewald

Authors
  1. Desiree L. Narango
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amanda D. Rodewald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Desiree L. Narango.

Ethics declarations

All animal handling was approved and conducted under IACUC# IS00000448 under The Ohio State University’s Animal Care and Use Program.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to report

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Narango, D.L., Rodewald, A.D. Signal information of bird song changes in human-dominated landscapes. Urban Ecosyst 21, 41–50 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0698-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0698-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation