Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Variation in urban forest productivity and response to extreme drought across a large metropolitan region

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growth and survival of urban trees and maintenance of urban forest canopy are important considerations in adaptation of urban regions to climate change, especially in relation to increasing frequency of extreme climatic events such as drought. However, urban forest growth and drought response may vary considerably within large urban landscapes across gradients in land use, urbanization, forest composition and structure, and environmental factors. We quantified urban forest growth and resilience and resistance to extreme drought in the greater Chicago metropolitan region based on patterns of annual basal area production from increment core analysis. We evaluated variation in growth and drought response in relation to a broad urban to rural gradient, land-use categories, local-scale environmental predictors, and forest community characteristics. Urban forest growth varied greatly among land-use classes and major genera. Plot-level variation in productivity was predicted most strongly (R2 = 0.53) by total plot-level basal area, canopy height, species composition, soil and ground-cover characteristics, and position within the urban-rural gradient. Urban forest growth was strongly related to regional meteorological drought. In periods of extreme drought conditions growth declined in the year of the drought (i.e., was not resistant to drought effects), but was highly resilient to drought in the subsequent 5 year period. Drought response did not vary consistently across land-use classes or among major genera, and site or community characteristics had little explanatory power in predicting drought response. Improved understanding of factors driving variation in urban forest growth and drought response could help inform adaptation-focused urban forest management strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonzo M, McFadden JP, Nowak DJ, Roberts DA (2016) Mapping urban forest structure and function using hyperspectral imagery and lidar data. Urban For Urban Green 17:135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold TW (2010) Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike's Information Criterion. J Wildl Manag 74:1175–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartens J, Grissino-Mayer HD, Day SD, Wiseman PE (2012) Evaluating the potential for dendrochronological analysis of live oak (Quercus virginiana Mill.) from the urban and rural environment—An explorative study. Dendrochronologia 30:15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit L, Skelly J, Moore L, Dochinger L (1982) Radial growth reductions of Pinus strobus L. correlated with foliar ozone sensitivity as an indicator of ozone-induced losses in eastern forests. Can J For Res 12:673–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijoor NS, McCarthy HR, Zhang D, Pataki DE (2012) Water sources of urban trees in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. Urban Ecosystems 15:195–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone CG, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Schwarz K, Buckley GL (2010) Landscape, vegetation characteristics, and group identity in an urban and suburban watershed: why the 60s matter. Urban Ecosystems 13:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles M, Jones M, McBride J, Bell T, Dunn C (2005) Temporal instability in Chicago’s upland old growth forests. Chicago Wilderness Journal 3:5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt L, Lewis AD, Fahey R, Scott L, Darling L, Swanston C (2016) A framework for adapting urban forests to climate change. Environ Sci Pol 16:393–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breshears DD et al (2005) Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:15144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Breshears DD et al (2008) Tree die-off in response to global change-type drought: mortality insights from a decade of plant water potential measurements. Front Ecol Environ 7:185–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn A, Korpela M, Biondi F, Campelo F, Merian P, Qeadan F, Zang C (2016) Dendrochronology Program Library in R, http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/dplr/

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA, Schwarz K (2007) Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: reconceptualizing land cover and a framework for classification. Front Ecol Environ 5:80–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, He X, Cui M, Davi N, Zhang X, Chen W, Sun Y (2011) The effect of anthropogenic activities on the reduction of urban tree sensitivity to climatic change: dendrochronological evidence from Chinese pine in Shenyang city. Trees 25:393–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark J, Kjelgren R (1990) Water as a limiting factor in the development of urban trees. J Arboric 16:203–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook EA, Krusic PJ (2016) The North American Drought Atlas. http://iridl.ldeo.columbia.edu/SOURCES/.LDEO/.TRL/.NADA2004/.pdsi-atlas.html

  • Cook ER, Kairiukstis LA (1990) Methods of dendrochronology: applications in the environmental sciences. Springer Science & Business Media

  • Cregg BM, Dix ME (2001) Tree moisture stress and insect damage in urban areas in relation to heat island effects. J Arboric 27:8–17

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Amato AW, Bradford J, Fraver S, Palik BJ (2011) Looking back to inform the future: The effects of thinning and stand complexity on drought tolerance within Pinus resinosa systems. Paper presented at the Eighth North Aemrican Forest Ecology Workshop: Forest Ecology in a Managed Landscape., Roanoke, VA

  • Fahey RT, Bialecki MB, Carter DR (2013) Tree growth and resilience to extreme drought across an urban land-use gradient. Arboricult. Urban For. 39:279–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritts HC (1976) Tree Rings and Climate. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Suárez A, Butler C, Baillie M (2009) Climate signal in tree-ring chronologies in a temperate climate: a multi-species approach. Dendrochronologia 27:183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill S, Handley J, Ennos A, Pauleit S (2007) Adapting cities for climate change: the role of the green infrastructure. Built Environment 33:115–133

  • Gillner S, Bräuning A, Roloff A (2014) Dendrochronological analysis of urban trees: climatic response and impact of drought on frequently used tree species. Trees 28:1079–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillner S, Vogt J, Roloff A (2013) Climatic response and impacts of drought on oaks at urban and forest sites. Urban For Urban Green 12:597–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove JM et al (2006) Data and methods comparing social structure and vegetation structure of urban neighborhoods in Baltimore, Maryland. Soc Nat Resour 19:117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove JM, Locke DH, O’Neil-Dunne JP (2014) An ecology of prestige in New York City: Examining the relationships among population density, socio-economic status, group identity, and residential canopy cover. Environ Manag 54:402–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu H, Singh A, Townsend PA (2015) Detection of gradients of forest composition in an urban area using imaging spectroscopy. Remote Sens Environ 167:168–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu H, Townsend PA (2017) Mapping forest structure and uncertainty in an urban area using leaf-off lidar data. Urban Ecosystems 20:497–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iakovoglou V, Thompson J, Burras L (2002) Characteristics of trees according to community population level and by land use in the US Midwest. J Arboric 28:59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Iakovoglou V, Thompson J, Burras L, Kipper R (2001) Factors related to tree growth across urban-rural gradients in the Midwest, USA. Urban Ecosystems 5:71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson LR, Cook EA (2000) Urban forest cover of the Chicago region and its relation to household density and income. Urban Ecosystems 4:105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jim C (1998) Physical and chemical properties of a Hong Kong roadside soil in relation to urban tree growth. Urban Ecosystems 2:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirshen P, Ruth M, Anderson W (2008) Interdependencies of urban climate change impacts and adaptation strategies: a case study of Metropolitan Boston USA. Clim Chang 86:105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjelgren RK, Clark JR (1992) Microclimates and Tree Growth in Three Urban Spaces. J Environ Hortic 10:139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko Y, Lee J-H, McPherson EG, Roman LA (2015) Long-term monitoring of Sacramento Shade program trees: Tree survival, growth and energy-saving performance. Landsc Urban Plan 143:183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey P, Bassuk N (1992) Redesigning the Urban Forest from the Ground Below. A New Approach to Specifying Adequate Soil Volumes for Street Trees. Arboricultural Journal 16:25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litvak E, McCarthy HR, Pataki DE (2012) Transpiration sensitivity of urban trees in a semi-arid climate is constrained by xylem vulnerability to cavitation. Tree Physiol 32:373–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCann KS (2000) The diversity–stability debate. Nature 405:228–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, US

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (2006) PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. MjM Software Design. Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA. Version 5.2

  • McDonnell MJ et al (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1:21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson EG, Nowak D, Heisler G, Grimmond S, Souch C, Grant R, Rowntree R (1997) Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. Urban Ecosystems 1:49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medley KE, McDonnell MJ, Pickett ST (1995) Forest landscape structure along an urban to rural gradient. Prof Geogr 47:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA et al. (2007) Global climate projections. In: Soloman et al (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, pp 747–845

  • Moser A, Rötzer T, Pauleit S, Pretzsch H (2016) The urban environment can modify drought stress of small-leaved lime (Tilia cordata mill.) and black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) Forests 7:71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muir P, McCune B (1988) Lichens, tree growth, and foliar symptoms of air pollution: are the stories consistent? J Environ Qual 17:361–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (2016) National Centers for Environmental Information, https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/

  • Nowak DJ, Crane DE (2002) Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environ Pollut 116:381–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Hoehn RE, Walton JT, Bond J (2008) A ground-based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Arboricult. Urban For. 34:347–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ, Dwyer JF (2007) Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems. In: Urban and community forestry in the northeast. Springer, pp 25–46

  • Nowak DJ, Hoehn III RE, Bodine AR, Crane DE, Dwyer JF, Bonnewell V, Watson G (2013) Urban trees and forests of the Chicago region. USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, Resource Bulletin NRS-84, Newtown Square, PA, USA

  • Nowak DJ, Kuroda M, Crane DE (2004) Tree mortality rates and tree population projections in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Urban For Urban Green 2:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J et al. (2016) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package. version 2.4–1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

  • Ordóñez C, Duinker PN (2014) Assessing the vulnerability of urban forests to climate change. Environ Rev 22:311–321. doi:10.1139/er-2013-0078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordóñez C, Duinker PN (2015) Climate change vulnerability assessment of the urban forest in three Canadian cities. Clim Chang 131:531–543. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1394-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan E, Bassuk N (1985) Effects of Soil Type and Compaction on the Growth of Ailanthus altissima seedlings. J Environ Hortic 3:158–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Pataki DE, McCarthy HR, Litvak E, Pincetl S (2011) Transpiration of urban forests in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. Ecol Appl 21:661–677. doi:10.1890/09-1717.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA et al (2008) Beyond urban legends: an emerging framework of urban ecology, as illustrated by the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. Bioscience 58:139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretzsch H et al (2015) Crown size and growing space requirement of common tree species in urban centres, parks, and forests. Urban For Urban Green 14:466–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raciti SM, Hutyra LR, Newell JD (2014) Mapping carbon storage in urban trees with multi-source remote sensing data: Relationships between biomass, land use, and demographics in Boston neighborhoods. Sci Total Environ 500:72–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roman LA, Scatena FN (2011) Street tree survival rates: Meta-analysis of previous studies and application to a field survey in Philadelphia, PA, USA. Urban For Urban Green 10:269–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santamour FS (2004) Trees for urban planting: diversity uniformity, and common sense. In: 7th Conference of the Metropolitan Tree Planting Alliance (METRA), pp 57–65

  • Stokes MA, Smiley TL (1996) An introduction to tree-ring dating. University of Arizona Press, Tuscon

    Google Scholar 

  • SYSTAT (2014) Sigmaplot v. 13, SYSTAT Software Inc., Chicago

  • Theobald DM (2004) Placing exurban land-use change in a human modification framework. Front Ecol Environ 2:139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US-Census-Bureau (2010) US Census Bureau Data, www.census.gov

  • USDA (2016) U.S. Drought Monitor. http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/AboutUSDM.aspx

  • Vogt JM, Watkins SL, Mincey SK, Patterson MS, Fischer BC (2015) Explaining planted-tree survival and growth in urban neighborhoods: A social–ecological approach to studying recently-planted trees in Indianapolis. Landsc Urban Plan 136:130–143. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.11.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voortech (2005) Measure J2X. Holderness, NH

  • Whitlow TH, Bassuk NL (1987) Trees in Difficult Sites. J Arboric 13:10–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Xian G, Homer C, Dewitz J, Fry J, Hossain N, Wickham J (2011) The change of impervious surface area between 2001 and 2006 in the conterminous United States. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 77:758–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipperer WC (2002) Species composition and structure of regenerated and remnant forest patches within an urban landscape. Urban Ecosystems 6:271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipperer WC, Sisinni SM, Pouyat RV, Foresman TW (1997) Urban tree cover: an ecological perspective. Urban Ecosystems 1:229–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the USDA Forest Service – National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council (NO. 12-DG- 11132544-406) as well as the Center for Tree Science at The Morton Arboretum. The original Chicago Region Tree Census data were provided by the USDA Forest Service and The Morton Arboretum and we are indebted to all who worked to collect and process those data. Field data collection was conducted by Corrine Erickson, Miles Schwartz-Sax, Chris Burns, and Kevin Garbis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert T. Fahey.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 625 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bialecki, M.B., Fahey, R.T. & Scharenbroch, B. Variation in urban forest productivity and response to extreme drought across a large metropolitan region. Urban Ecosyst 21, 157–169 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0692-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0692-z

Keywords

Navigation