Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Vulnerability of native and exotic urban birds to housing densification and changing gardening and landscaping trends

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Variation in densities of native and exotic urban-adapted birds across suburban habitats may reveal levels of adaptation that predict vulnerability to habitat modification over time. We investigated the densities of the eight most common exotic and native birds in a southern hemisphere city across suburbs of varying housing density, vegetative cover and garden vegetation characteristics to determine whether avian population densities are maintained across variations in habitat structure that mirror current temporal trends in land use and landscaping/gardening preferences. We also tested whether densities of birds in residential areas bordering undeveloped patches were higher due to spill-over from patches. Densities of all four native species were highest in undeveloped patches and these species were largely absent from high density housing areas. While densities of two exotic species (blackbird, song thrush) were slightly higher in suburbs with greater vegetation complexity, they were still present in higher density housing suburbs in significant numbers. Common starlings were similarly abundant across all residential habitats and house sparrow density increased in higher density housing areas. Blackbirds appeared least vulnerable to housing densification and landscaping and gardening trends because they were abundant across all habitats, including undeveloped patches. Densities of native birds were higher in residential areas bordering undeveloped patches indicating spill-over was occurring and emphasising the role that patches could play in boosting city-wide native bird abundances. Native birds are vulnerable to reductions in garden size and vegetation complexity that should have little or positive effects on populations of common exotic species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bathgate M (2006) Dunedin City Residential Capacity Study. District Plan Monitoring Series Research Report 2006/1. www.cityofdunedin.com/res_capacity

  • Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6(2):506–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB (2001) Creating a homogeneous avifauna. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 459–486

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham P, Laake J, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to distance sampling. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Catterall CP, Cousin JA, Piper S, Johnson G (2010) Long-term dynamics of bird diversity in forest and suburb: decay, turnover or homogenization? Diversity Distrib 16:559–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caula SA, Sirami C, Marty P, Martin J-L (2010) Value of an urban habitat for the native Mediterranean avifauna. Urban Ecosyst 13:73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chace JF, Walsh JJ (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 74:46–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clergeau P, Croci S, Jokimäki J, Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M-L, Dinetti M (2006) Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: analysis at different European latitudes. Biol Conserv 127:336–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman GJ (2010) Birds as indicators of sustainable management practices on New Zealand kiwifruit orchards. MSc dissertation, University of Otago, Dunedin

  • Committee LAE (2005) Crazy paving: the environmental importance of London’s front gardens. Greater London Authority, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Conole LE (2011) Diverse response of exotic birds to urbanization. Natureza & Conservação 9(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conole LE, Kirkpatrick JB (2011) Functional and spatial differentiation or urban bird assemblages at the landscape scale. Landsc Urban Plan 100:11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croci S, Butet A, Clergeau P (2008) Does urbanization filter birds on the basis of their biological traits? Condor 110(2):223–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks KR, Suarez AV, Bolger DT (2004) Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape. Biol Conserv 115:451–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels GD, Kirkpatrick JB (2006) Does variation on garden characteristics influence the conservation of birds in suburbia? Biol Conserv 133:326–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly R, Marzluff JM (2004) Importance of reserve size and landscape context to urban bird conservation. Conserv Biol 18(3):733–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans KL, Chamberlain DE, Hatchwell BJ, Gregory RD, Gaston KJ (2011) What makes an urban bird? Glob Chang Biol 17:32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Juricic E (2000) Bird community composition patterns in urban parks of Madrid: the role of age, size and isolation. Ecol Res 15:373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman AND (1999) Bird counts in Kennedy’s bush scenic reserve, port hills, Christchurch. Notornis 46:388–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C, Buck O (2003) Development of an ecological mapping methodology for urban areas in New Zealand. Landsc Urban Plan 63:161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RA, Tratalos J, Gaston KJ (2009) How many birds are there in a city of half a million people? Diversity Distrib 15:328–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garaffa PI, Filloy J, Bellocq MI (2009) Bird community responses along urban–rural gradients: does the size of the urbanized area matter? Landsc Urban Plan 90:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germaine SS, Rosenstock SS, Schweinsburg RE, Richardson WS (1998) Relationships among breeding birds, habitat and residential development in greater Tuscon, Arizona. Ecol Appl 8(3):68–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green DM, Baker MG (2003) Urbanization impacts on habitat and bird communities in a Sonoran desert ecosystem. Landsc Urban Plan 63:225–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall T (2008) Where have all the gardens gone? Australian Planner 45(1):30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall T (2010) Life and Death of the Australian Backyard. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedblom M, Söderström B (2010) Landscape effects on birds in urban woodlands: an analysis of 34 Swedish cities. J Biogeogr 37:1302–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson P, French K, Major RE (2007) Avian movement across abrupt ecological edges: differential responses to housing density in an urban matrix. Landsc Urban Plan 79:266–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikin K, Knight E, Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J, Manning AD (2012) The influence of native versus exotic streetscape vegetation on the spatial distribution of birds in suburbs and reserves. Diversity Distrib. doi:10.1111/j.1472–4642.2012.00937x

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimäki J, Suhonen J, Inki K, Jokinen S (1996) Biogeographical comparison of winter bird assemblages in urban environments in Finland. J Biogeogr 23:379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DN, Wieneke J (2000) The suburban bird community of Townsville revisited: changes over 16 years. Corella 24:53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim HC, Sodhi NS (2004) Responses of avian guilds to urbanization in a tropical city. Landsc Urban Plan 66:199–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loram A, Tratalos J, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent and structure of the resource in five major cities. Landscape Ecol 22:601–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loss SR, Ruiz MO, Brawn JD (2009) Relationships between avian diversity, neighbourhood age, income, and environmental characteristics of an urban landscape. Biol Conserv 142:2578–2585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Smallbone LT, Sheffield KJ (2012) Environmental and socio-economic factors related to urban bird communities. Austral Ecol. doi:10.1111/j.1442–9993.2012.02383x

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludvig É, Vanicsek I, Török J, Csörgö T (1995) The effect of nest-height on the seasonal pattern of breeding success in blackbirds Turdus merula. Ardea 83:411–418

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor-Fors I, Schondube JE (2011) Gray vs. Green urbanization: relative importance of urban features for urban bird communities. Basic Appl Ecol 12:372–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod CJ, Newson SE, Blackwell G, Duncan RP (2009) Enhanced niche opportunities: can they explain the success of New Zealand’s introduced bird species? Diversity Distrib 15(1):41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason CF (2006) Avian species richness and numbers in the built environment: can new housing developments be good for birds? Biodivers Conserv 15:2365–2378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu R, Freeman C, Aryal J (2007) Mapping private gardens in urban areas using object oriented techniques and very high resolution satellite imagery. Landsc Urban Plan 81:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity and conservation. Bioscience 52(10):883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (2005) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14(11):450–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melles SJ (2005) Urban bird diversity as an indicator of human social diversity and economic inequality in Vancouver, British Columbia. Urban Habitat 3:25–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Meurk CD, Zvyagna N, Gardner RO, Forrester G, Wilcox M, Hall G, North H, Belliss S, Whaley K, Sykes B, Cooper J, O’Halloran K (2009) Environmental, social and spatial determinants of urban arboreal character in Auckland, New Zealand. In: McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK, Breuste JH (eds) Ecology of towns and cities: a comparative approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 287–307

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moller AP, Diaz M, Flenste-Jensen E, Grim T, Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Jokimäki J, Mänd R, Markó G, Tryjanowski P (2012) High urban population density of birds reflects their timing of urbanization. Oecologia 170:867–875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons H, French K, Major RE (2003) The influence of remnant bushland on the composition of suburban bird assemblages in Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 66:43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauleit S, Ennos R, Golding Y (2005) Modelling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change-a study in Mersyside, UK. Landsc Urban Plan 71:295–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry T, Nawaz R (2008) An investigation into the extent and impacts of hard surfacing of domestic gardens in an area of Leeds, United Kingdom. Landsc Urban Plan 86:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savard J-P, Clergeau P, Mennechez G (2000) Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landsc Urban Plan 48:131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw LM, Chamberlain D, Evans M (2008) The house sparrow Passer domesticus in urban areas: reviewing a possible link between post-decline distribution and human socioeconomic status. J Ornithol 149:293–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17(4):170–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shochat E, Lerman SB, Anderies JM, Warren PS, Faeth SH, Nilon CH (2010) Invasion, competition, and biodiversity loss in urban ecosystems. Bioscience 60(3):199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RM, Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Thompson K (2005) Urban domestic gardens (V): relationships between landcover composition, housing and landscape. Landsc Ecol 20:235–253

  • Sol D, Bartomeus I, Griffin AS (2012) The paradox of invasion in birds: competitive superiority or ecological opportunism? Oecologia 169:553–564. doi:10.1007/s00442–011–2203-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas L, Laake JL, Strindberg S, Marques FFC, Buckland ST, Borchers D, Anderson DR, Burnham K, Hedley SL, Pollard JH, Bishop JRB, Marques TA (2006) Distance 5.0. Release ‘2’1. St Andrews, Scotland, Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, University of St. Andrews, UK. http://www.ruwpa.st-and.ac.uk/distance/

  • Thomas L, Buckland ST, Rexstad EA, Laake JL, Strindberg S, Hedley SL, Bishop JRB, Marques TA, Burnham KP (2009) Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. J Appl Ecol 4:5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Tratalos J, Fuller RA, Evans KL, Davies RG, Newson SE, Greenwood JJD, Gaston KJ (2007) Bird densities are associated with household densities. Global Change Biol 13:1685–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Heezik Y, Seddon P (2012) Accounting for detectability when estimating avian abundance in an urban area. NZ J Ecol

  • van Heezik Y, Smyth A, Mathieu R (2008a) Diversity of native and exotic birds across an urban gradient in a New Zealand city. Landsc Urban Plan 87:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Heezik YM, Ludwig K, Whitwell S, McLean IG (2008b) Nest survival of birds in an urban environment in New Zealand. NZ J Ecol 32:155–165

    Google Scholar 

  • van Heezik YM, Dickinson KJM, Freeman C (2012) Closing the gap: communicating to change gardening practices in support of native biodiversity in urban private gardens. Ecol Soc 17 (1):34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES–04712–170134

  • van Heezik Y, Freeman C, Porter S, Dickinson KJM (2013) Garden size, householder knowledge and socio-economic status influence plant and bird diversity at the scale of individual gardens. Ecosystems. doi:10.1007/s10021–013–9694–8

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rensberg BJ, Peacock DS, Robertson MP (2009) Biotic homogenization and alien bird species along an urban gradient in South Africa. Landsc Urban Plan 92:233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek K, Van Orshoven J, Hermy M (2011) Measuring extent, location and change of imperviousness in urban domestic gardens in collective housing projects. Landsc Urban Plan 100:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite E, Closs GP, van Heezik Y, Dickinson KJM (2012) Resource availability and foraging of silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis) in urban trees. Emu http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MU11093

  • White JG, Antos MJ, Fitzsimons JA, Palmer GC (2005) Non-uniform bird assemblages in urban environments: the influence of streetscape vegetation. Landsc Urban Plan 71:123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson PR, Taylor R, Thomas BW (1988) Effect of topography on seasonal distribution of forest birds in the Ohikanui, lower Buller and Inangahua valleys, North Westland. Notornis 35:217–243

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Yolanda van Heezik & Amy Louise Adams

Authors
  1. Yolanda van Heezik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amy Louise Adams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yolanda van Heezik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Heezik, Y., Adams, A.L. Vulnerability of native and exotic urban birds to housing densification and changing gardening and landscaping trends. Urban Ecosyst 19, 1551–1563 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0379-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0379-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation