Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Feed resources used for small ruminant nutrition in Sub-Saharan Africa: a case study of Uganda

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small ruminants are of great importance to the livelihoods of many people in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) since they act as a source of meat, income, hides and skins and for cultural identity. Despite their great importance, especially to rural smallholder farmers, their production in Africa is hindered by poor nutrition. The first stage of establishing development strategies to increase feed quality and quantity is to conduct a comprehensive inventory of the feed resources that are currently available, especially in SSA. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the availability and nature of the common feed resources that are used in the feeding of small ruminants in Uganda. This study involved a comprehensive review of various scientific, technical and economic literature that has been published up to date. Our results show that the available feed resources in Uganda can be grouped mainly into:- crop wastes and residues, agro-industrial by-products, conserved feeds, natural pastures and browse. The main feed resources for small ruminants in Uganda have been identified as natural pastures, which are generally characterised by a low nutritive value. However, browses are seen to have a high crude protein content and could be used as a supplement to grass forages and crop residues. It has been noted that farmers lack knowledge related to feed processing and management, in addition to a lack of policy governing feed quality. Therefore, there is a need to train farmers on how to process and utilise crop residues, in addition to proper feed management practices like pasture cultivation and conservation. It is also necessary to introduce widely new pasture species with better nutritional values that are suitable for the local production systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Amata, I. A., 2014. The use of non-conventional feed resources (NCFR) for livestock feeding in the tropics: a review. Journal of Global Biosciences, 3(2), 604-613

    Google Scholar 

  • Armson, B., Ekiri, A. B., Alafiatayo, R., & Cook, A. J., 2021. Small ruminant production in Tanzania, Uganda, and Ethiopia: A systematic review of constraints and potential solutions. Veterinary Sciences, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8010005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asizua, D., Mpairwe, D., Kabi, F., Mutetikka, D., Bareeba, F. B., Hvelplund, T., Weisbjerg, M. R., & Madsen, J., 2018. Effects of feeding systems on rumen environment, degradability and passage kinetics in Ankole × Friesian crossbred steers. Livestock Science, 210, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asizua, D., Mpairwe, D., Kabi, F., Mutetikka, D., Kamatara, K., Hvelplund, T., Weisbjerg, M. R., Mugasi, S. K., & Madsen, J., 2014. Growth performance, carcass and non-carcass characteristics of Mubende and Mubende×Boer crossbred goats under different feeding regimes. Livestock Science, 169, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakyusa, C., Nambi-kasozi, J., Lumu, R., Bareeba, F., Presto, M., Ivarsson, E., & Erik, J., 2012. Strategies for coping with feed scarcity among urban and peri-urban livestock farmers in Kampala , Uganda. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics, 113(2), 165–174. https://kobra.uni-kassel.de/handle/123456789/2012092441842

  • Balikowa, D., 2011. Dairy development in Uganda: A review of Uganda’s dairy industry. Ministry of Agriculture, Animal industry and Fisheries, Republic of Uganda and Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations and Dairy Development Authority. FAO and The Uganda National Apiculture Development Organisation (TUNADO), 3202, 1–215. http://www.fao.org/3/a-aq292e.pdf

  • Ben Salem, H., & Smith, T., 2008. Feeding strategies to increase small ruminant production in dry environments. Small Ruminant Research, 77(2–3), 174–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N., Dewey, C., Lukuyu, B., Grace, D., & de Lange, C., 2015. Nutritional Value and Seasonal Availability of Feed Ingredients for Pigs in Uganda. Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica, 48(3–4), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1515/ats-2015-0013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, J., & Aranguiz, A. A., 2019. Quick Scan of Uganda’s Forage Sub-Sector: Netherlands East African Dairy Partnership (NEADAP). Working Paper.

  • Dyness, M. M., Germana, H., Laswai, A., Ndikumana, J., & Zziwa, E., 2013. Chemical Composition and Nutritional Values of Feed Resources for Ruminants: Eastern and Central Africa (ECA) Table for Ruminants 2013. ASARECA (Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa), Entebbe. In Asareca.

  • Ebong, C., 1995. Acacia nilotica, Acacia seyal and Sesbania sesban as supplements to tef (Eragrostis tef) straw fed to sheep and goats. Small Ruminant Research, 18(3), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4488(95)00676-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebong, C., Byenkya, S. G., & Ndikumana, J., 1999. Effects of substituting calliandra leaf meal for soybean meal on intake, digestibility, growth and feed efficiency in goats. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 16(2), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.1999.9706284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO, 2011. Status and Trends of Animal Genetic Resources – 2010. http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/022/am649e.pdf

  • FAO, 2015. The second report on the state of the world ’ s Animal Genetic resources for food and Agriculture edited by B.D. Scherf & D. Pilling. FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments. Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4787e/index.html)

  • FAO, 2018. Tranforming livestock sector Uganda. What do long-term projections say? FAO, CA0887EN/1, 1–12. http://www.fao.org/3/CA0887EN/ca0887en.pdf

  • FAOSTAT, 2021. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT Statistical Database. [Rome]:FAO,.

  • Grimaud, P., Sserunjogi, M. L., & Grillet, N., 2017. An evaluation of milk quality in Uganda: value chain assessment and recommendations. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 7(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.16.2625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idibu, J., Kabi, F., & Mpairwe, D., 2016. Behavioural response of pure Ankole and crossbred (Ankole×Holstein) cows to seasonal pasture variations in south-western Uganda. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 174, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabasa, J. D., Opuda-Asibo, J., Thinggaard, G., & Ter Meulen, U., 2004. The mineral scoring technique and evaluation of indigenous browse species as natural mineral phytocentres for goats in African rangelands. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 36(4), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TROP.0000026666.86914.5d

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kabi, F., Bareeba, F. B., Havrevoll, & Mpofu, I. D. T., 2005. Evaluation of protein degradation characteristics and metabolisable protein of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) and locally available protein supplements. Livestock Production Science, 95(1–2), 143–153.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.12.013

  • Kabirizi, J., Kityali, A., Mpairwe, D., & Ssewannyana, E., 2005. Indigenous forage trees and shrubs as feed resources for intensive goat production in Uganda. Small Stock in Development, Proceedings of a Workshop on Enhancing the Contribution of Small Livestock to the Livelihoods of Resource-Poor Communities Masaka, Uganda, 15–19 November 2004, 101.

  • Kabirizi, J., Mpairwe, D., & Mutetikka, D., 2006. Improving dairy cattle productivity in smallholder farms in Uganda: Incorporating leguminous forages in farming systems. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katongole, B., Sabiiti, E., Bareeba, F., & Ledin, I., 2011. Utilization of market crop wastes as animal feed in urban and peri-urban livestock production in Uganda. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 35(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2011.554318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katongole, C. B., Bareeba, F. B., Sabiiti, E. N., & Ledin, I., 2008. Nutritional characterization of some tropical urban market crop wastes. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 142(3–4), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.09.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kawube, G., Alicai, T., Otim, M., Mukwaya, A., Kabirizi, J., & Talwana, H., 2014. Resistance of Napier grass clones to Napier grass Stunt Disease. African Crop Science Journal, 22(3), 229–236–236.

  • Kiggundu, M., Kabi, F., Mette, V., Nalubwama, S., & Odhong, C., 2014. Management and use of dairy cattle feed resources on smallholder certified organic pineapple farms in Central Uganda. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development-JAEID, 108(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.12895/jaeid.20142.253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukuyu, B., Baker, D., Baltenweck, I., Poole, J., Kabi, F., Katongole, C., & Wabwire, R., 2018. The Concentrate Feeds Supply chain in Uganda: emerging trends and implications on quality and access to smallholder farmers and chain efficiency. Heifer International, 262(1814), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumu, R., Katongole, C. B., Nambi-kasozi, J., Bareeba, F., Presto, M., Ivarsson, E., & Lindberg, J. E., 2013. Indigenous knowledge on the nutritional quality of urban and peri-urban livestock feed resources in Kampala , Uganda. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-013-0401-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mary, T., Ewa, W., Elly, N. S., & Denis, M., 2016. Feed resource utilization and dairy cattle productivity in the agro-pastoral system of South Western Uganda. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(32), 2957–2967. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajar2016.10785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAAIF and MFPED., 2004. Increasing incomes through exports: a plan for zonal agricultural production, agro-processing and marketing. 2004, Entebbe, Uganda,

  • Matovu, J., & Alçiçek, A., 2021. Recent advancement in goat nutri-tion. In: Kukovics S (ed) Goat Science: environment, health and economy. In IntechOpen, London. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99025

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matovu, J., Matovu, H., Magala, J., & Tainika, B., 2020. Ethno Medicinal Plants Used in the Management of Cattle Helminths in Kyanamukaaka Sub County , Uganda. EAS Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 1881(3), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.36349/easjvms.2020.v02i03.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migongo-Bake, W., 1992. Rumen dry-matter digestive efficiency of camels, cattle, sheep and Goats in a semi-arid environment in Eastern Africa. In The complementarity of feed resources for animal production in Africa: Proceedings of the joint feed resources networks workshop held in Gaborone, Botswana 4–8 March 1991 (Issue April). http://www.fao.org/wairdocs/ilri/x5519b/x5519b0c.htm

  • Mugerwa, S., Kabirizi, J. ., Njarui, D., & Mpairwe, D., 2012. Utilization of introduced forages by smallholder dairy farmers in Uganda. International Journal of Biosciences, 1(1), 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutimura, M., Ebong, C., Rao, I. M., & Nsahlai, I. V., 2019. Seasonal variation of livestock feed resources in semi-arid and humid environments of Rwanda. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal, 83(2), 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muwanika, B. V., Masembe, C., Nampanzira, D. K., & Kabi, F. (2016). Enhancing productivity of traditional goat phenotypes among small holder farmers of Uganda: The role of research. In Fifth African Higher Education Week and RUFORUM Biennial Conference 2016," Linking agricultural universities with civil society, the private sector, governments and other stakeholders in support of agricultural development in Africa, Cape Town", South Africa, 17–21 October 2016 (pp. 787–791). RUFORUM.

  • Muwanika, V. B., Nsubuga, D., Nampanzira, D. K., Kabi, F., & Masembe, C., 2019. Sedentarization among nomadic pastoralists of Uganda: which way to feed livestock? Agroforestry Systems, 93(6), 2037–2046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0308-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwebe, R., Ejobi, F., & Laker, C. D., 2011. Assessment of the Economic Viability of Goat Management Systems in Goma Sub County and Mukono Town Council in Mukono District, Uganda. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43(4), 825–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9769-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nampanzira, D. K., Kabasa, J. D., Katongole, C. B., Okello, S., & Tabuti, J. R. S., 2016. Natural gastro properties of Ficus natalensis, Rhuss natalensis and Harrisonia abyssinica in native East African goats. Livestock Science, 187, 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nampanzira, D. K., Kabasa, J. D., Nalule, S. A., Nakalembe, I., & Tabuti, J. R. S., 2015. Characterization of the goat feeding system among rural small holder farmers in the semi-arid regions of Uganda. SpringerPlus, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0961-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NEMA., 2007. State-of-the-environment report report for Uganda 2006/2007,Kampala, Uganda, 357 pages. http://www.nemaug.org

  • Nsubuga, D., Kalule, D., Muwanika, V. B., & Masembe, C., 2020. Nutritional properties of some browse species used as goat feed in Pastoral dry lands , Uganda. Agroforestry Systems, 94(3), 933–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00452-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ntakyo, P. R., Kirunda, H., Tugume, G., & Natuha, S., 2020. Dry Season Feeding Technologies: Assessing the Nutritional and Economic Benefits of Feeding Hay and Silage to Dairy Cattle in South-Western Uganda. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 10(03), 627–648. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2020.103041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okello, J., Okullo, J. B. L., Eilu, G., Nyeko, P., & Obua, J., 2018. Physicochemical composition of Tamarindus indica L. (Tamarind) in the agro-ecological zones of Uganda. Food Science and Nutrition, 6(5), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Onzima, R. B., Gizaw, S., Kugonza, D. R., Arendonk, J. A. M. Van, & Kanis, E., 2017. Production system and participatory identi fi cation of breeding objective traits for indigenous goat breeds of Uganda. Small Ruminant Research, February, 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2017.07.007

  • Onzima, R. B., Gizaw, S., Kugonza, D. R., Arendonk, J. A. M. Van, & Kanis, E., 2018. Production system and participatory identi fi cation of breeding objective traits for indigenous goat breeds of Uganda. Small Ruminant Research, 163(July 2017), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2017.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, B. K., Koge, J., Maass, B. L., Notenbaert, A., Peters, M., Groot, J. C., & Tittonell, P., 2020. Tropical forage technologies can deliver multiple benefits in Sub-Saharan Africa. A meta-analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 40, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00626-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phetogo, M., Kethusegile, R., Plaxedis Zvinorova, C., & Gondwe, T., 2020. Sustainable Utilization of Indigenous Goats in Southern Africa. Diversity, 12, (1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12010020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulina, G., Milán, M. J., Lavín, M. P., Theodoridis, A., Morin, E., Capote, J., Thomas, D. L., Francesconi, A. H. D., & Caja, G., 2018. Invited review: Current production trends, farm structures, and economics of the dairy sheep and goat sectors. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(8), 6715–6729. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-14015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Semakula, J., Mutetikka D., Kugonza, D.R., & Mpairw, D., 2010. Comparison of Breeding Systems by Smallholder Goat Keepers in the Humid Sub-humid and Semi-arid Agro-ecological Zones of Uganda. In Agricultural Journal 5, (2), 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swidiq, M., Jolly, K., Emmanuel, Z., & George, L., 2012. Utilization of crop residues and agro-industrial by-products in livestock feeds and feeding systems of Uganda. International Journal of Biosciences, 2(4), 82–89. http://www.innspub.net

  • Tabuti, J. R. S., & Lye, L. A., 2009. Fodder plants for cattle in Bulamogi, Uganda. African Study Monographs, 30(3), 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolera, A., Merkel, R. C., Goetsch, A. L., Sahlu, T., & Negesse, T., 2000. Debub University, Awassa College of Agriculture, P. O. Box 5, Awassa, Ethiopia E (Kika) de la Garza Institute for Goat Research, Langston University, P.O. Box 730, Langston, OK 73050, USA 1. 1996, 43–58.

  • Torsson, E., Berg, M., Misinzo, G., Herbe, I., Kgotlele, T., Päärni, M., Roos, N., Blomström, A. L., Ståhl, K., & Johansson Wensman, J., 2017. Seroprevalence and risk factors for peste des petits ruminants and selected differential diagnosis in sheep and goats in Tanzania. Infection Ecology and Epidemiology, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20008686.2017.1368336

  • Twinamatsiko, R., Nalule, A. S., & Okello, S., 2020. Drivers and restrictions of range pasture improvement by agro-pastoralists in Kiruhura District, Uganda. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 16(11), 1514–1530. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajar2020.14959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UBOS and MAAIF., 2009. National Livestock Census Report. Ministry of Agriculture AnimalIndustry and Fisheries (MAAIF) and Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS).

  • UBOS., 2021. Statistical Abstract. Statistical Abstract. https://www.ubos.org/

  • UBOS., 2008. Statistical Abstract. Uganda Bureau of Statistics, Kampala, Uganda. https://www.ubos.org/

  • Ug feed policy, 2005. Report: The republic of uganda: The national animal feeds policy. March, 8–17. https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/uga181883.pdf

  • Waiswa, D., Günlü, A., & Mat, B., 2021. Development opportunities for livestock and dairy cattle production in Uganda: A review. Research Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences 9(1): 18-24

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. T., 1991. Small ruminant production and the small ruminant genetic resource in tropical Africa (Vol. 88). Food & Agriculture Org.

  • Zoetis., 2019. African Livestock Productivity And Health Advancement In Sub-Saharan Africa. Available Online:

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CECAV–Veterinary and Animal Research Centre, Universidade de-Trás-Os-Montes E, Alto Douro, 5000-801, Vila Real, Portugal

    Jacob Matovu

  2. Department of Zootechnics, Universidade de-Trás-Os-Montes E Alto Douro, UTAD, 5000-801, Vila Real, Portugal

    Jacob Matovu

  3. Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey

    Ahmet Alçiçek

Authors
  1. Jacob Matovu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmet Alçiçek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JM: conceptualisation, methodology, formal analysis, writing-original draft preparation. AA: conceptualisation, writing—reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob Matovu.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

All authors approved the publication of this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Camelids

Guest Editor: Bernard Faye

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matovu, J., Alçiçek, A. Feed resources used for small ruminant nutrition in Sub-Saharan Africa: a case study of Uganda. Trop Anim Health Prod 55, 377 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03781-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03781-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation