Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of smallholder cattle farms on the environment: a study

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With increasing evidence of global warming, the pressure is building to limit greenhouse gas emission from many human activities including dairy production systems. In this context, the present study was conducted to estimate the carbon footprint (CF) of cattle milk produced in the Hisar district of Haryana, India. The data about feeding practices, crops grown, manure management systems, etc. was collected through personal interviews with cattle-rearing rural male farmers chosen through multistep random sampling. The life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was adopted to estimate carbon footprint, with the system boundary being “Cradle to farm gate.” The latest methodologies prescribed by the IPCC were used to estimate GHG emissions using the tier-2 approach. The current study has presented a detailed and recent GHG inventory from smallholder cattle farms at the village level. On the basis of the inventory analysis, a simplified life cycle-based analysis is used in order to quantify the carbon footprint of fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM). The carbon footprint of cattle milk was estimated at 2.13 kg CO2-eq/kilogram FPCM. Enteric fermentation was the most potent contributor to GHG, contributing around 35.5% of the total emissions, followed by manure management (13.8%) and soil management (8.2%). Further studies to accurately estimate carbon footprint are advocated besides suggesting ways to reduce GHG emissions and using efficient production technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during the current study are not publicly available due to some institutional reasons but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Adler, A. A., Doole, G. J., Romera, A. J. and Beukes, P. C. (2015). Managing greenhouse gas emissions in two major dairy regions of New Zealand: a system-level evaluation. Agricultural Systems, 135, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anika (2014). Animal Husbandry in Haryana: A Gender Analysis. Doctoral dissertation. Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Extension Education, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2019). 20th Livestock Census of India 2019. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India. https://www.dahd.nic.in/sites/default/filess/Key%20Results%2BAnnexure%2018.10.2019.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2023

  • APAT, (2003). Analysis of CO2 emission factors from the transport sector. https://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/Transport-CO2-Emissions.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2023.

  • Baek, C. Y., Lee, K. M. and Park, K. H. (2014). Quantification and control of the greenhouse gas emissions from a dairy cow system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 70, 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bussink, D. W. and Oenema, O. (1998). Ammonia volatilization from dairy farming systems in temperate areas: a review. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.51(1): 19-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, J. W. and Holden, N. M. (2005). Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system. Agricultural Systems.86: 97-114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chhabra, A., Manjunath, K. R., Panigrahy, S. and Parihar, J. S. (2013). Greenhouse gas emissions from Indian livestock. Climatic Change.117(1): 329-344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhingra, S., Singh, D. and Mehta, R. (2019). Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimates from AFOLU (Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use) Sector in India at the Subnational Level (Version/edition 3.0). New Delhi.

  • Dhoubhadel, S. P., Taheripour, F. and Stockton, M. C. (2016). Livestock Demand, Global Land Use Changes, and Induced Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Journal of Environmental Protection, 7(07), 985.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K., and Birthal, P. S. (2016). Greenhouse gases emission from livestock production system of India: An actual consumption approach. Indian Journal of Animal Science.86:1331-1336.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Y., Xia, B. and Chen, W. (2014). Carbon footprint of urban areas: an analysis based on emission sources account model. Environmental Science & Policy, 44, 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.07.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecoinvent database 2.01 (2010). Ecoinvent data. Dubendrof, Switzerland: Swiss cycle for life cycle inventories. 3(2): 44-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2017). Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model (GLEAM). Rome (Italy): Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). https://www.fao.org/3/i3437e/i3437e.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2023

  • Garg, M. R., Phondba, B. T., Sherasia, P. L. and Makkar, H. P. (2016). Carbon footprint of milk production under smallholder dairying in Anand district of Western India: a cradle-to-farm gate life cycle assessment. Animal Production Science.56(3): 423-436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geough, E. J., Little, S. M., Janzen, H. H., McAllister, T. A., McGinn, S. M. and Beauchemin, K. A. (2012). Life-cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from dairy production in Eastern Canada: A case study. Journal of Dairy Science.95(9): 5164-5175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, P. J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J. and Tempio, G. (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). https://www.fao.org/3/i3437e/i3437e.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2023

  • Guinée, J. B. and Lindeijer, E. (2002). Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 7(5), 311–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02978897

  • Herrero, M., Henderson, B., Havlík, P., Thornton, P. K., Conant, R. T., Smith, P. and Stehfest, E. (2016). Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector. Nature Climate Change, 6(5), 452-461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IDF (2015). Bulletin of the international dairy federation 479/2015, a common carbon footprint approach for the dairy sector. https://www.fil-idf.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Bulletin479-2015_A-common-carbon-footprint-approach-for-the-dairy-sector.CAT.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2023

  • IPCC (2006). IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (TFI). https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html. Accessed 10 June 2023

  • IPCC (2014). Climate change 2014 synthesis report. IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2023

  • IPCC (2019). Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (TFI). https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2019rf/index.html. Accessed 10 June 2023.

  • Ishwarlal, P. K. (2016). Carbon footprint analysis of buffalo milk production at organized and village level farm using life cycle assessment approach. Unpublished master's Dissertation. Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, India.

  • ISO (2006a). Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Principle and framework. ISO 14040:2006. Vol. 44. Geneva, Switzerland.

  • ISO (2006b). Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Requirements and guidelines. ISO14044:2006. Vol. 44. Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Jha, A. K., Singh, K., Sharma, C., Singh, S. K. and Gupta, P. K. (2011). Assessment of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Livestock in India. Journal of Earth Science and Climatic Change.2(1).

  • Kumar, A. and Singh, D. K. (2008). Livestock production systems in India: an appraisal across agro-ecological regions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(902-2016-67979).

  • NATCOM. (2004). India’s Initial National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India. 392. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/indnc2.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2023

  • Owen, E., Kitalyi, A., Jayasuriya, N. and Smith, T. (2005). Livestock and wealth creation: improving the husbandry of animals kept by resource-poor people in developing countries. Nottingham University Press, UK 500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahuja N, Pandey N, Mandal K, Bandyopadhyay C (2014). GHG mitigation in India: an overview of the current policy landscape. Working Paper. Washington, USA.

  • Park, Y. S., Egilmez, G., and Kucukvar, M. (2016). Energy and endpoint impact assessment of agricultural and food production in the United States: a supply chain-linked ecologically-based life cycle assessment. Ecological Indicators, 62, 117-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patra, A. K. (2012). Estimation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Indian livestock. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 14(10), 2673-2684.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phetteplace, H. W., Johnson, D. E. and Seidl, A. F. (2001). Greenhouse gas emissions from simulated beef and dairy livestock systems in the United States. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.60 (1): 99-102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pirlo, G. and Care, S. (2013). A simplified tool for estimating carbon footprint of dairy cattle milk. Italian Journal of Animal Science.12(4): 81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotz, C. A., Montes, F. and Chianese, D. S. (2010). The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment. Journal of Dairy Science.93(3): 1266-1282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlinson, P., Steele, M., and Nefzaoui, A. (2008). Livestock and global climate change. In Proceedings of the International Conferences in Hammamet. 17-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schils, R. L. M., Verhagen, A., Aarts, H. F. M. and Šebek, L. B. J. (2005). A farm level approach to define successful mitigation strategies for GHG emissions from ruminant livestock systems. Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 71(2), 163-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shilpi K, Naik SN, Dahiya RP (2018). GIS-Based Assessment of Methane Emission from Livestock in India. Dairy and Vet Sci J; 7 (5): 555721. https://doi.org/10.19080/JDVS.2018.07.555721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, K. K., Mohini, M., Jha, A. K. and Gupta, P. K. (2005). Methane emission estimates from enteric fermentation in Indian livestock: Dry matter intake approach. Current Science.119-127.

  • Swamy, M. and Bhattacharya, S. (2006). Budgeting anthropogenic greenhouse gas emission from Indian livestock using country-specific emission coefficients. Current Science.1340-1353.

  • Tubiello, F. N., Salvatore, M., Cóndor Golec, R. D., Ferrara, A., Rossi, S., Biancalani, R. and Flammini, A. (2014). Agriculture, forestry and other land use emissions by sources and removals by sinks. Rome, Italy.

  • Vergé, X. P. C., Maxime, D., Dyer, J. A., Desjardins, R. L., Arcand, Y., & Vanderzaag, A. (2013). Carbon footprint of Canadian dairy products: calculations and issues. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(9), 6091-6104. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6563.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Rakesh Kumar and Ekta Rani. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Gautam Singh, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ekta Rani.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, R., Singh, G. & Rani, E. Impact of smallholder cattle farms on the environment: a study. Trop Anim Health Prod 55, 236 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03652-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03652-x

Keywords

Navigation