Skip to main content
Log in

Time of day modified the time required for semen collection with electroejaculation and slightly affected the quality of fresh semen in rams

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim was to compare some stress responses to electroejaculation (EE), and the quality of fresh semen, when ram semen is collected at dawn (06:00 h), noon (12:00 h), or evening (18:00 h). Twelve Corriedale rams were used, and semen was collected from four rams at each study time on three different days, with a Latin-square design. The time required for EE, the number of vocalizations emitted, heart rate, and rectal temperature were recorded, and fresh semen was evaluated. The time required for EE was shorter at evening than at dawn and noon (399.3 s, 480.6 s, and 460.2 s respectively; pooled SEM = 72.1; P = 0.03). The percentage of sperm with progressive motility was greater at noon than dawn (59.7% and 50.3%; pooled SEM = 5.8; P = 0.05). Curvilinear velocity was greater at dawn than evening (117.0 µm/s and 95.5 µm/s; pooled SEM = 7.1; P = 0.04), slow linear velocity was greater at evening than at dawn and noon (13.1 µm/s, 9.3 µm/s, and 8.5 µm/s respectively; pooled SEM = 1.7, P = 0.05), and the slow average path velocity was greater at evening than dawn and noon (16.2 µm/s, 11.7 µm/s, and 10.8 µm/s respectively; pooled SEM = 1.9, P = 0.05). In conclusion, the collection time modified the time required for electroejaculation and had only slight effects on the quality of fresh semen. Overall, the time of the day appears to have only slight effects on semen collection and quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author at reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Sofía Rodríguez for helping in the laboratory, Augusto Ryonosuke and Juliana Dantas for helping in the semen collection, and Milton Pintos, Nadia Carballo, and María Pedrozo for the handling of the rams. We acknowledge INIFAP (Mexico), for supporting JC Orihuela studies in Uruguay.

Funding

We acknowledge and state “The research that gives rise to the results presented in this publication received funds from the Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación under the code POS_NAC_D_2020_1_164576”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.C. Orihuela: study design, coordination and development of the experiment, analysis and data interpretation, and writing of the manuscript. L. Pinto-Santini, F. Beracochea, J. Giriboni, and M. Viera: development of the experiment, critical review with important contributions to the manuscript. P. Siveira: sample analysis and review of the manuscript. R. Ungerfeld: study design, development of the experiment, review of data analysis and interpretation, and review and writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Carlos Orihuela.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was performed as part of a PhD project. Approval was granted by the Comisión de Ética en el Uso de Animales (CEUA Ethical Committee) of the Facultad de Veterinaria of the Universidad de la República, Uruguay.

Consent to participate

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Consent for publication

All authors have agreed to the publish manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orihuela, J.C., Pinto-Santini, L., Beracochea, F. et al. Time of day modified the time required for semen collection with electroejaculation and slightly affected the quality of fresh semen in rams. Trop Anim Health Prod 55, 144 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03564-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03564-w

Keywords

Navigation