Abstract
A 42-day study was conducted to consider the effect of composite enzyme (Natuzyme®) supplementation on production parameters, intestinal segment measurements, and nutrient digestibility of broiler chickens fed low energy and protein (LEP) diets. Two hundred male Ross 308 broiler chicks consisting of 4 groups were divided into five pens (10 chicks/pen). The first group (control) received a standard diet without composite enzyme (CE) supplementation, whereas the LEP0, LEP0.25, and LEP0.50 groups received LEP supplemented with CE at 0, 0.25, and 0.50 g/kg feed, respectively. Compared to birds in the control group, supplementation of 0.50 g/kg CE to LEP diet offset (P < 0.05) the poor feed intake (FI), body weight gain (BWG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and cost/kg gain observed among LEP0 and LEP0.25 groups on days 0–21, 22–42, and 0–42. Birds in the LEP0, followed by the LEP0.25 group, had decreased (P < 0.05) ileum weight, villi height, villus height, and crypt depth ratio (VH/CD), and deeper crypt depth of duodenum and ileum compared to birds in the control group. However, the aforementioned parameters were improved in the LEP0.50 group. Likewise, supplementation of CE at 0.50 g/kg to broiler diet having LEP improved (P < 0.05) digestibility of energy, fiber, and protein on day 42. In conclusion, CE supplemented at 0.50 g/kg diet ameliorated the negative effect caused by feeding LEP diets on production parameters, ileum weight, villi height, VH/CD, and deeper crypt depth of duodenum and ileum as well as energy, fiber, and protein digestibility of broiler chickens.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.
References
Abdallh, M.E. Ahiwe, E.U., Musigwa, S., Chang’a, E.P., Al-Qahtani, M., Cadogan, D. J., & Iji, P.A. (2020). Energy and protein utilization by broiler chickens fed diet containing cottonseed meal and supplemented with a composite enzyme product. British Poultry Science, 61, 424-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2020.1736266
Abu-Tayyeb, M, Jahan, I, Hossain M. A, Hossain, M. M, Akter, N., & Nath, B K. (2019). The Responses of Exogenous Enzymes (Multi-Enzymes) on the Productivity and Stage of Production of Broilers Fed Vegetable-sourced Diets. International Journal of Poultry Science, 18, 515-522. https://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2019.515.522.
Ahiwe, E. U., Omede, A. A., Abdallh, M. B., & Iji, P. (2018). Managing Dietary Energy Intake by Broiler Chickens to Reduce Production Costs and Improve Product Quality. In B. Yücel, and T. Taşkin (Eds.), Animal Husbandry and Nutrition. Intech Open. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76972.
Ani, A. O., Kalu, I., Ugwuowo, L. C., & Iloh, E. A. (2013). Dietary effect of rice milling waste and supplementary enzyme on performance of broiler chicks. African Journal of Biotechnology, 12 (34), 5326-5332. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2013.12900.
AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). (2007). Official methods of analysis (18th ed.). Washington, DC, USA.
Attia, G.A., Metwally, A.E., Beheiry, R.R., & Farahat, M.H. (2021). Effect of a carbohydrase supplementation to diets varying in metabolizable energy level on the performance, carcass traits, caecal microbiota, intestinal morphology, and nutrient digestibility in broiler chickens. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 20(1), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2021.1875337.
Aviagen. (2018). Ross 308 Management Handbook. Available at: https://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross-BroilerHandbook2018-EN.pdf.
Aviagen, (2019). Ross 308 Nutrient specifications. Available at:http://eu.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/RossBroilerNutritionSpecs2019-EN.pdf.
Barbosa, S. A. P. V., Corrêa, G. S. S., Corrêa, A. B., Oliveira, C. F. S., Vieira, B. S., Figueiredo, E. M. Caramori Júnior, J. G., & Lima Neto, H. R. (2020). Effects of different proteases on commercial laying hens at peak production. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 49:e20200026. https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920200026.
Brenes, A., Smith, M., Guenter, W., & Marquardt, R.R. (1993). Effect of enzyme supplementation on the performance and digestive tract size of broiler chickens fed wheat- and barley-based diets. Poultry Science,72,1731–1739. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0721731.
Cardinal, K.M., de Moraes, M.L., IAndretta, I., Schirmann, G.D. Belote, B.L. Barrios, M.A., Santin, E., & Ribeiro, A.M.L. (2019). Growth performance and intestinal health of broilers fed a standard or low-protein diet with the addition of a protease. Brasileira de Zootecnia 48: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180232
Chalghoumi, R., Mohamed, M., Alhazen, A., & Oakley, B. (2020). Evaluation of two commercial dietary enzyme products in broiler chicken fed reduced energy diets based on corn and soybean meal. Large Animal Review, 26, 31-37. Avalaible at: https://www.largeanimalreview.com/index.php/lar/article/view/87/64.
Culling, C. F. A., Alliston, R. T., & Barr, W. T. (1985). Connective tissue. Pages 642–647 in Cellular Pathology Technique. C. F. A. Culling and W. T. Barr, ed. Butterworths, London, UK. eBook ISBN: 9781483192192. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/books/cellular-pathology-technique/culling/978-0-407-72903-2.
Dairo, F.A.S., Adesehinwa, A.O.K., Oluwasola, TA., & Oluyemi, J.A. (2010). High and low dietary energy and protein levels for broiler chickens. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5, 2030-2038. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR10.254.
Dei, H.K.. (2011). Soybean as a Feed Ingredient for Livestock and Poultry, Recent Trends for Enhancing the Diversity and Quality of Soybean Products, Dora Krezhova, IntechOpen, https://doi.org/10.5772/17601. Available at: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/22604.
Du Plessis, R.E., & Van Rensburg, C.J. (2014). Carbohydrase and protease supplementation increased the performance of broilers fed maize-soybean-based diets with restricted metabolizable energy content. South African Journal for Animal Science, 44, 262- 270. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v44i3.8.
FX-rate.net. (2021). Convert Dollar to Naira- USD to NGN exchange rate. Available at: https://fx-rate.net. (Accessed 16 September 2021).
Hoffman, A.L., Kemanian, A.R., & Forest, C.E. (2020). The response of maize, sorghum, and soybean yield to growing-phase climate revealed with machine learning. Environmental Research Letters, 15, 094013. Available at: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7b22.
Idahor, K. (2013). Alternative feedstuffs utilization in Nigerian poultry industry: Potentials, problem and prospects. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 69, 666-675. https://doi.org/10.1017/50043933913000664.
Iwuji, T. C., Nwapi, D. O., Ogbuewu, I. P., Kadurumba, E. O., Egenuka, F. C., & Okere, P. C. (2017). Management, blood and reproductive parameters of rabbits reared in Imo State. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 44, 230–247. https://doi.org/10.51791/njap.v44i2.1017.
Jha, R., & Mishra, P. (2021). Dietary fiber in poultry nutrition and their effects on nutrient utilization, performance, gut health, and on the environment: a review. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 12, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00576-0.
Jin, L.Z., Ho, Y.W., Abdullah, N., & Jalaludin, S. (2000). Digestive and bacterial enzyme activities in broilers fed diets supplemented with Lactobacillus cultures. Poultry Science, 79, 886-91. https://doi:org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.6.886.
Laudadio, V., Passantino, L., Perillo, A., Lopresti, G., Passantino, A., Khan, R. U., & Tufarelli, V. (2012). Productive performance and histological features of intestinal mucosa of broiler chickens fed different dietary protein levels. Poultry Science, 91, 265–270. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01675.
Law, F.L., Zulkifli, I., Soleiman, F.A., Liang, B. J, & Awad, E. A. (2018). The effect of low protein diets and protease supplementation on broiler chickens in a hot and humid tropical environment. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 31, 1291-1300. https://doi.org/10.5713/2Fajas.17.0581.
Low, A. G. (1990). Protein evaluation in pigs and poultry: In: feed evaluation. Wiseman, J and Cole, D.J.A. (Editors), Bullerworths, London. Pp 91-114.
Mael, S.H., Diarra, S.S., & Devi, A. (2020). Maintenance of broiler performance on commercial diet diluted with copra meal and supplemented with feed enzyme. Animal Production Science, 60, 1514-1520.
Mahmood, T, Mirza Nawaz, H, Shahid, M., Athar M., & Hussain, M. (2017). Effect of supplementing exogenous protease in low protein poultry by-product meal-based diets on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in broilers. Animal Feed. Science and Technology, 228, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.01.012.
Minitab 17 Statistical Software. (2013). [Computer Software] State College, PA, USA: Minitab, Inc.
Mohammadigheisar, M., & Kim, I.H. (2018). Addition of a protease to low crude protein density diets of broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46, 1377-1381. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1512862.
Ndazigaruye., G., Kim, D.H., Kang, C.W., Joo, Y.J., Lee, S.R., & Lee, K.W. (2019). Effects of low-protein diets and exogenous protease on growth performance, carcass traits, intestinal morphology, cecal volatile fatty acids, and serum parameters in broilers. Animal, 9, 2-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/2Fani9050226.
Novak, C.L., Yakout, H.M., & Remus, J. (2008). Response to varying dietary energy and protein with or without enzyme supplementation on Leghorn Performance and Economics. 2. Laying Period. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 17(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2006-00126.
NRC (1994). Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9ed. Washington: National Academy of Sciences. 155p.
Ogbuagu, D., Nwahiri, U., Osuebi, E., Mbuka-Nwosu, I., & Onwuagba, C. (2019). Investigating temperature and nutrients as drivers of primary productivity in aquatic environment. Scientific Research, 7, 92-107. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2019.77008.
Osaki, M. (1995). Comparison of productivity between tropical and temperate maize. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 41(3), 439-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.1995.10419606.
Palic, D., Okanovic, D., Psodorov, D., Dzinic, N., Slobodan, lilac, S. Zekic, V., & Milic. D. (2012). Prediction of metabolizable energy of poultry feeds by estimating in vitro organic matter digestibility. African Journal of. Biotechnology, 11, 7313-7317. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.3335
Perić, L., Milošević, N., Dukić-Stojčić, M., Bjedov, S., & Rodić, V. (2008). Effect of enzymes on performances of broiler chickens. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandary 24, 45-51. https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH0806045P
Ravindran, V. (2013). Feed enzymes: The science, practice, and metabolic realities. Journal of Applied Poultry. Research, 22, 628-636.
Salami, R.I., & Odunsi, A.A. (2019). Performance of broiler chickens fed 8% crude fiber diets at three energy levels with or without enzyme during the starter and finisher phases. International Journal of Poultry Science, 18, 423-430. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2019.423.430.
Sarica, S., Yurtseven, S., & Pola, I. (2020). Supplementing diets for broilers that are low in crude protein and amino acids with protease. South African Journal of Animal Science, 50, 521-528. https://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2019.423.430.
Sundu, B., Kumar, A., & Dingle, J. (2005). Response of birds fed increasing levels of palm kernel meal supplemented with enzymes. Australian Poultry Science Symposium, 17, 227–228. Avaialble at: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20073008856.
Tejeda, O.J., & Kim, W.K.. (2021). Role of Dietary Fiber in Poultry Nutrition. Animals, 11, 461. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020461.
Thirumalaisamy, G., Muralidharan, J., Senthilkumar, S., Sayee, R.H., & Priyadharsini, M. (2019). Cost-effective feeding of poultry. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 5, 3997-4005. ISSN 2278-3687 (O). Available at: https://www.ijset.net/journal/1410.pdf.
Wang Z.R., Qiao, S.Y., Lu W.Q., & Li, D.F. (2005). Effects of enzyme supplementation on performance, nutrient digestibility, gastrointestinal morphology, and volatile fatty acid profiles in the hindgut of broilers fed wheat-based diets. Poultry Science, 84, 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.6.875.
Wickramasuriya, S. S., Macelline, S. P., Cho, H. M., Hong, J. S., Patterson, R., & Heo, J. M. (2021). Multi-carbohydrase application into energy and amino acid deficient broiler diets: A strategy to enhance performance of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 63, 1328–1343. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e104.
Zaghari, M., Majdeddin, M., Taherkhani, R., & Morave, H. (2008). Estimation of nutrients equivalency value of natuzyme and its effect on broiler chick’s performance. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 17, 446-453. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2008-00007.
Zanella, A, Isakomur,a N.K., Silversides, F.G., Fiqueirdo,. A., & Park, M. (1999). Effect of enzyme supplementation of broiler diets based on maize and soybeans. Poultry Science, 78, 561. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.4.561
Zang, J. J., Piao, X. S., Huang, D. S., Wang, J. J., Ma, X., & Ma. Y. X.(2009). Effects of feed particle size and feed form on growth performance, nutrient metabolizability, and intestinal morphology in broiler chickens. Asian-australasian Journal of Animal Science, 22,107–112. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80352.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, E.U.A., O.A.O., I.E, and O.O.E.; data curation, E.U.A and I.P.O; formal analysis, EUA and O.A.O.; methodology, E.U.A, I.E., and H.O.O; supervision, E.U.A, O.O.E, I.E.; validation, N.O.A, H.O.O, and I.P.O; writing—original draft, EUA, O.A.O., and I.P.O; writing—review and editing, I.P.O and N.O.A. The authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The experiment was conducted in compliance with the guidelines of the Animal Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Technology, Owerri (reference number: 2021-034).
Consent for publication
All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ahiwe, E.U., Ejiofor, I., Oladipupo, O.A. et al. Effect of composite enzyme supplementation on production parameters, intestinal segment measurements, and apparent nutrient digestibility of broiler chickens fed low energy and protein diets. Trop Anim Health Prod 54, 399 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03402-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03402-5