Skip to main content
Log in

Endocrine-metabolic adaptations in Dorper ewes: comparison between single and twin pregnancies during gestation, parturition, and postpartum

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The experiment was conducted at Araí & Zumbi farm on sixty healthy Dorper ewes to compare blood glucose, hormonal profile, and insulin resistance evaluation in sheep from conception until 48 h postpartum in single and twin pregnancies. All experimental ewes raised under semi-intensive management system. Sixty animals were selected from 150 estrous synchronized and pregnant ewes. The animals were divided into two groups based on single (G1, n = 30) and twin pregnancies (G2, n = 30). Blood samples were collected at nine time points: immediately after fixed-time artificial insemination (D0); at 30 days (D30), 90 days (D90), 120 days (D120), 130 days (D130), and 140 days (D140) of pregnancy; on the delivery day (DD); and at 24 h (PD1) and 48 h (PD2) postpartum. The results of blood glucose, insulin, glucagon, cortisol, and thyroid hormones (T3 and T4) levels showed significant differences over the analyzed sample times; however, only cortisol showed differences within groups, with the G1 having higher values than the G2 group. The interaction of the groups × nine sample times showed a significant result (P = 0.001) only for glucagon. The number of fetuses directly interfered with the glucagon profile throughout gestation. The glucose, cortisol, glucagon, and the homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA IR) concentrations increased at DD and decreased at PD1 and PD2. T3 and T4 showed different behaviors among the sample times. T3 values presented a decrease from D0 to D90, followed by an increase from D90 to DD. Otherwise, for T4 values, a decrease from D90 to D130 was observed, followed by an increase from D130 to D140. Despite the changes found in the endocrine system and metabolism in Dorper ewes throughout pregnancy, the nutritional management ensured a healthy status during pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum in single and twin gestation, whose HOMA IR profiles remained identical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors assure that the data and materials support the published claims and comply with field standards. The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable for this article.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science of São Paulo State University (FMVZ/UNESP) and the Laboratory of Experimental Research on Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (FMB/UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo State, for the infrastructure and equipment used to conduct the experiment and the Araí & Zumbi farm, Pardinho, São Paulo State, for the use of the animals and for assistance with sample collection.

Funding

The study was financially supported by the São Paulo State Research Support Foundation (FAPESP) through regular grant to the research project [Process 2015/08714–8] and covering all the laboratory costs, including commercial ELISA kits, cartridge for portable blood gas analyzer (blood glucose), and other consumables and the Coordination of Improvement of Personal Higher Education (CAPES) for the PhD Scholarship granted that guaranteed the exclusivity and financial support for doctoral student (Santarosa, B.P.) to execute the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.P. Santarosa: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, and writing—original draft. D.O.L. Ferreira: conceptualization, investigation, and methodology. H.B. Hooper: translation and writing—review & editing. Y.K. Sinzato: formal analysis, investigation, and methodology. D.C. Damasceno: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, and methodology. D.M. Polizel: statistical analysis. E.G. Fioratti: writing—review & editing. V.H. Santos: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, and methodology. A.A. da Silva: visualization, supervision, and writing—review & editing. R.C. Gonçalves: funding acquisition, visualization, and supervision. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bianca P. Santarosa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All the procedures used in this study have been approved by the Animal Use Ethics Committee of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University, Botucatu Campus (Protocol No. 189/2014).

Consent for publication

All authors agreed to have the findings of this research published.

Research involving human participants

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santarosa, B.P., Ferreira, D.O.L., Hooper, H.B. et al. Endocrine-metabolic adaptations in Dorper ewes: comparison between single and twin pregnancies during gestation, parturition, and postpartum. Trop Anim Health Prod 54, 307 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03306-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03306-4

Keywords

Navigation