Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Determination of in vitro digestibility of forage species used in ruminant feeding

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the evaluation of the quality of forage resources, the main parameter that defines it is the digestibility of dry matter, which together with the amount of neutral and acidic detergent fibers and crude protein constitutes the basic information to assess forages which are supplied in the diet of the cattle. This research was carried out at the University of Los Llanos (Villavicencio, Colombia), and its objective was to determine the digestibility of three forages in cattle through three different in vitro techniques: inoculation with ruminal fluid and with feces and enzymatic digestibility technique, making the comparison with the in situ technique in order to validate the techniques and equipment that are being used for these procedures. The following species were evaluated: Pennisetum purpureum (PP), Tithonia diversifolia (TD), and Bauhinia variegata (BV), assessing the curve and rate of degradation of dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and total protein (TP) (0 to 72 h). A design of repeated measures was used, under which the analysis of variance was carried out to determine the ranges of deviation between the techniques and thus establish the trend of the data; the variables evaluated were the DM, NDF, and TP digestibilities of the three forages using the four techniques (three in vitro and one in situ). After verifying the differences between the variances of the digestibilities and checking the sphericity assumption with the Mauchly test, multiple comparisons were made with the Bonferroni test with a significance of 5%. The digestibility of DM, NDF, and TP varied between 38.62 and 44.22, 54.18 and 66.97, and 47.54 and 57.05%; 49.07 and 70.70, 72.52 and 75.44, and 62.61 and 74.02%; 29.93 and 34.84, 26.21 and 70.88, and 25.67 and 50.60% respectively in forages PP, TD, and BV, depending on the technique used for their estimation. Despite finding statistically significant differences between several of the comparisons made in the digestibility techniques, a high coefficient of determination and a high correlation between the in vitro estimations with respect to the in situ estimation were found; therefore, it is possible to use these techniques routinely thus avoiding the need to have cattle with fistulae to perform digestibility tests, with enzymatic digestibility technique being the most practical one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AOAC., 2005. Official methods of analysis of the AOAC. 18th Ed. Method 934.01. Association of official analytical chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

  • Araujo, F.O. and Vergara, L.J., 2007. Propiedades físicas y químicas del rumen. In: XX Reunión ALPA, XXX Reunión APPA-Cusco-Perú. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal, 15 (1): 133-140. Acceced 04 Nov 2018, from: http://www.bioline.org.br/pdf?la07044.

  • Arce, C., Arbaiza, T., Carcelén, F. and Lucas, O., 2003. Estudio comparativo de la digestibilidad de forrajes mediante dos métodos de laboratorio. Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú, 14 (1): 7-12. https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v14i1.1586.

  • Arreaza, L.C., Sánchez, D.E. and Abadía, B., 2005. Degradabilidad ruminal de fracciones de carbohidratos en forrajes tropicales determinada por metodos in vitro e in situ. Revista Corpoica, 6 (1): 52-57. doi: https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol6_num1_art:37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardis, A.C., González, H. and Martínez, A., 2002. Suspensión de excretas de ganado vacuno como fuente de inóculo para efectuar la digestibilidad in vitro de especies forrajeras. In: XXIV Congreso de Producción Animal. Acceced 06 Nov 2018, from: http://www.unne.edu.ar/unnevieja/Web/cyt/cyt/agrarias/a-023.pdf.

  • Davies, Z.S., Mason, D., Brooks, A.E., Griffith, G.W., Merry, R.J. and Theodorou, M.K., 2000. An automated system for measuring gas production from forages inoculated with rumen fluid and its use in determining the effect of enzymes on grass silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 83 (3-4): 205-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00138-8.

  • Duarte, F., Castro, G., Gutiérrez, E. and Tena, J., 2000. Engorda de toretes con ensilaje de estiércol de cerdo con melaza y paja de sorgo y suplementos proteinicos. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 12 (3): # 26. Acceced 07 Nov 2018, from: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd12/3/duar123b.htm.

  • Gallego, L.A., Mahecha, L. and Angulo, J., 2014. Potencial forrajero de Tithonia diversifolia Hemsl. A Gray en la producción de vacas lecheras. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 25 (2): 393-403. doi: https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v25i2.15454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaviria, X., Rivera, J. and Barahona, R., 2015. Calidad nutricional y fraccionamiento de carbohidratos y proteína en los componentes forrajeros de un sistema silvopastoril intensivo. Pastos y Forrajes, 38 (2): 194-201. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2691/269139251007.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraldo, L. A, Gutiérrez, L. A. and Rúa, C., 2007. Comparación de dos técnicas in vitro e in situ para estimar la digestibilidad verdadera en varios forrajes tropicales. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 20 (3): 269-279. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rccp/v20n3/v20n3a05.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, J.M., Yepes, S.A. and Barahona, R., 2013. Caracterización nutricional del residuo del cultivo de la seta Agaricus bisporus como alimento potencial para bovinos. Revista CES Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, 8 (1): 34-56. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a563/a6a2240759f1f6f6cfa2123d8d8659c3b515.pdf?_ga=2.177015973.1246941066.1588021740-419425058.1588021740.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, M., Resillez, A.A., Pedraza, R.M. and Martínez, S.J., 2012. Heces ovinas depuestas como inóculo en la técnica de producción de gases para la valoración nutritiva de forrajes. Revista de Producción Animal, 24 (2): 1-5. https://www.academia.edu/26190315/Heces_ovinas_depuestas_como_in%C3%B3culo_en_la_t%C3%A9cnica_de_producci%C3%B3n_de_gases_para_la_valoraci%C3%B3n_nutritiva_de_forrajes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán, M.L., 2011. Comparación de inóculos microbianos en la determinación de la digestibilidad in vitro, (Bovine Feeding Specialist Thesis, National University of Cordoba). https://rdu-demo.unc.edu.ar/handle/123456789/456.

  • Henkin, Z., Ungar, E.D., Davsh, L., Perevolotsky, A., Yehuda, Y., Sternbergs, M., Voet, H., and Landau, S.Y., 2011. Effects of cattle grazing on herbage quality in herbaceous Mediterranean rangeland. Grass and Forages Science, 66 (4): 516-525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00808.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IDEAM, 2014. Información Histórica, Climatografía de las principales ciudades, Cartas Climatológicas - Medidas Mensuales, Aeropuerto Vanguardia. In: Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales. Acceced 05 Nov 2018, from: http://institucional.ideam.gov.co/jsp/index.jsf.

  • Kebede, G., Feyissa, F., Assefa, G., Alemayehu, M., Mengistu, A., Kehaliew, A., Melese, K., Mengistu, S., Tadesse, E., Wolde, S. and Arbera, M., 2016. Chemical composition and in-vitro organic matter digestibility of napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schumach) accessions in the mid and highland areas of Ethiopia. International Journal of Livestock Research, 6 (4): 41-59. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20160317124016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahecha, L., Gallego, L.A. and Peláez, F.J., 2002. Situación actual de la ganadería de carne en Colombia y alternativas para impulsar su competitividad y sostenibilidad. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 15 (2): 213-225. https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/rccp/article/view/323816/20781002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, S., Pedraza, R.M., González, M., González, C.E. and Guevara, G., 2005. Influence of the donor animal on the in vitro gas production with the use of voided bovine faeces. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 17 (11): #129. Acceced 10 Nov 2018, from: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd17/11/mart17129.htm.

  • Nava, J. J, Gutiérrez, E., Herrera, R.S., Zavala, F., Olivares, E., Treviño, J.E., Bernal, H. and Valdés, C., 2013. Rendimiento y composición química del pasto CT-115 (Pennisetum purpureum) establecido a dos densidades y en dos fechas de siembra en Marín, Nuevo León, México. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola, 47 (4): 419-424. Acceced 10 Nov 2018, from: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1930/193029815016.pdf.

  • Noguera, R. R, Ortiz, D.M. and Gallego, N., 2011. Comparación de líquido ruminal vacuno y caprino como fuente de inóculo en la técnica in vitro de producción de gases. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 23 (11): Art #225. Acceced 13 Nov 2018, from: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/11/nogu23225.htm.

  • Omed, H.M., Lovett, D.K. and Axford, R.F., 2000. Forage evaluation in ruminant nutrition. In: Givens, D., Owen, E.O., Axford, R.F. and Omed, H. M (Eds), Faeces as a source of microbial enzymes for estimating digestibility. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. pp. 135-154.

  • Orskov, E. and McDonald, I., 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 92 (2): 499-503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osuga, I.M., Abdulrazak, S.A., Muleke, C.I. and Fujihara, T., 2012. Potential nutritive value of various parts of wild sunflower (Tithonia diversifolia) as source of feed for ruminants in Kenya. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 10 (2): 632-635. https://doi.org/10.1234/4.2012.3069.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Posada, S.L., Solano, R.N., Rodríguez, N.M. and Costa, A., 2012. Comparación de métodos para la determinación del valor energético de alimentos para rumiantes. Revista MVZ Córdoba, 17 (3): 3184-3192. doi: https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintero, B., Clavero, T., Castro, C., del Villar, A. and Araujo, O., 1995. Efecto de los factores climáticos y altura de corte sobre el valor nutritivo y producción de materia seca del pasto elefante enano (Pennisetum purpureum Schum. cv. Mott). Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía, 12 (1): 81-94. http://agronomiajournal.com/index.php/path/article/view/444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rincón, Á., Bueno, G., Mauricio, Á., Pardo, O., Pérez, O. and Caidedo, S., 2010. Establecimiento, manejo y utilización de recursos forrajeros en sistemas ganaderos de suelos ácidos. Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria, CORPOICA, Villavicencio, Colombia.

  • Roa, M.L. and Muñoz, J., 2012. Evaluación de la degradabilidad in situ en bovinos suplementados con cuatro especies arbóreas. Revista MVZ Córdoba, 17 (1): 2900-2907. doi: https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogerio, M., Owen, E., Mould, F.L., Givens, I., Theodorou, M.K., France, J., Davies, D.R. and Dhanoa, M.S., 2001. Comparison of bovine rumen liquor and bovine faeces as inoculum for an in vitro gas production technique for evaluating forages. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 89 (1-2): 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00234-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, P., Wouters, A.P. and Kariuki, J.N., 2011. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and cutting stage on yield and quality of napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum). Wageningen UR Livestock Research, Naivasha, Kenya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessema, Z.K. and Alemayehu, M., 2010. Management of napier grass (Pennisetum Purpureum (L.) Schumach) for high yield and nutritional quality in Ethiopia: a review. Ethiopian Journal of Animal Production, 10 (1): 73-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessema, Z.K., de Boer, R.M., Baars, R.M. and Prins, H.H., 2011. Changes in soil nutrients, vegetation structure and herbaceous biomass in response to grazing in a semi-arid savanna of Ethiopia. Journal of Arid Environments, 75 (7): 662-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, J. and Terry, R., 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage Science, 18 (2): 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, G., Arbaiza, T., Carcelén, F. and Lucas, O., 2009. Comparación de las técnicas in situ, in vitro y enzimática (celulasa) para estimar la digestibilidad de forrajes en ovinos. Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú, 20 (1): 5-9. https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v20i1.348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valencia, L., Restrepo, J., Cerón, D.E. and Herrera, W.F., 2010. Determinación de la digestibilidad in vivo en ovinos utilizando dietas a base de forrajes tropicales. Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental, 1 (1): 25 - 29. https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Westhuizen, H.C., Snyman, H.A. and Fouché, H.J., 2005. A degradation gradient for the assessment of rangeland condition of a semi-arid sour veld in southern Africa. African Journal of Range and Forage Science, 22 (1): 47-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.2989/10220110509485861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B. and Lewis B.A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74 (10): 3583-3597. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, J.E., Mejía, G., Bedoya, J. and Gómez, J.F., 2013. Estimación de la técnica in vitro de gases frente a otras técnicas de digestibilidad. Spei Domus. 9 (18): 59-70. https://doi.org/10.16925/sp.v9i18.547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vega J.I., 2016. Determinación de la digestibilidad in vitro de pajas mediante dos métodos: incubación con líquido rumian y digestibilidad enzimática, (Bovine Feeding Specialist Thesis, National University of Cordoba). (Zootechnist Veterinarian Medical Thesis. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11799/49813.

  • Verdecia, D.M., Ramírez, J.L., Leonard, I., Álvarez, Y., Bazán, Y., Bodas, R., Andrés, S., Álvarez, J., Giráldez, F. and López, S., 2011. Calidad de la Tithonia diversifolia en una zona del Valle del Cauto. REDVET, Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria. 12 (5): 1-13. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/636/63622168004.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Los Llanos University (Project Code: C01-F01-013-2016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AGROFORESTERIA Group, School of Agro-Livestock Sciences and Natural Resources, Universidad de los Llanos, Villavicencio, Colombia

    César Augusto Navarro Ortiz & María Ligia Roa Vega

Authors
  1. César Augusto Navarro Ortiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. María Ligia Roa Vega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to César Augusto Navarro Ortiz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Navarro Ortiz, C.A., Roa Vega, M.L. Determination of in vitro digestibility of forage species used in ruminant feeding. Trop Anim Health Prod 52, 3045–3059 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02325-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02325-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation