Skip to main content
Log in

Herbage intake of dairy cows in mixed sequential grazing with breeding ewes as followers

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the hypothesis that mixed sequential grazing of dairy cows and breeding ewes is beneficial. During the seasons of spring–summer 2013 and autumn–winter 2013–2014, 12 (spring–summer) and 16 (autumn–winter) Holstein Friesian cows and 24 gestating (spring–summer) and lactating (autumn–winter) Pelibuey ewes grazed on six (spring–summer) and nine (autumn–winter) paddocks of alfalfa and orchard grass mixed pastures. The treatments “single species cow grazing” (CowG) and “mixed sequential grazing with ewes as followers of cows” (MixG) were evaluated, under a completely randomized design with two replicates per paddock. Herbage mass on offer (HO) and residual herbage mass (RH) were estimated by cutting samples. The estimate of herbage intake (HI) of cows was based on the use of internal and external markers; the apparent HI of ewes was calculated as the difference between HO (RH of cows) and RH. Even though HO was higher in CowG, the HI of cows was higher in MixG during spring–summer and similar in both treatments during autumn–winter, implying that in MixG the effects on the cows HI of higher alfalfa proportion and herbage accumulation rate evolving from lower residual herbage mass in the previous cycle counteracted that of a higher HO in CowG. The HI of ewes was sufficient to enable satisfactory performance as breeding ewes. Thus, the benefits of mixed sequential grazing arose from higher herbage accumulation, positive changes in botanical composition, and the achievement of sheep production without negative effects on the herbage intake of cows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Améndola, R., Castillo, E. and Martínez, P.A. 2006. Forage Resource Profiles. Mexico. FAO, Rome, Italy (http://www.fao.org/ag/agp/agpc/doc/counprof/PDF%20files/Mexico-English.pdf Accessed 09 May 2017).

  • Cosgrove, G.P. and Edwards, G.R. 2007. Control of grazing intake. In: Pasture and Supplements for Grazing Animals. Rattray, P.V., Brookes I.M., and Nicol, A.M. (Eds.). New Zealand Society of Animal Production, Occasional Publication No. 14. Hamilton, New Zealand, 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Alexis, S., Sauvant, D. and Boral, M. 2014. Mixed grazing systems of sheep and cattle to improve live weight gain: a quantitative review. Journal of Agricultural Science, 152, 655–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dear, B.S., Virgona, J.M., Spandrel, G.A., Swan, A.D. and Orchard, B.A. 2007. Lucerne, phalaris and wallaby grass in short-term pasture phases in two Eastern Australian wheat belt environments. 1. Importance of initial perennial density on their persistence and recruitment, and on the presence of weeds. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 58, 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, M.D., Davies, D.A., Vale, J.E., Hirst, W.M. and Wright, I.A. 2007. Effects on animal performance and sward composition of mixed and sequential grazing of permanent pasture by cattle and sheep. Livestock Science, 110, 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández Garay, A., Martínez Hernández, Pedro A., Zaragoza Esparza, J., Vaquera Huerta, H., Osnaya Gallardo, F., Joaquín Torres, B.M. and Velazco Zebadúa, M.E. 2012. Caracterización del rendimiento de forraje de una pradera de alfalfa-ovillo al variar la frecuencia e intensidad del pastoreo. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 35, 259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isselstein, J., Griffith, B.A., Pradel, P. and Venerus, S. 2007. Effects of livestock breed and grazing intensity on biodiversity and production in grazing systems. 1. Nutritive value of herbage and livestock performance. Grass and Forage Science, 62, 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G.B., Alpuerto, J.B., Tracy, B.F. and Fukao, T. 2017. Physiological effect of cutting height and high temperature on regrowth vigor in orchard grass. Frontiers in Plant Science www.frontiersin.org, Volume 8, Article 805.

  • Nicol, A.M. and Brookes, I.M. 2007. The metabolisable energy requirements of grazing livestock. In: Pasture and Supplements for Grazing Animals. Rattray, P.V., Brookes I.M., and Nicol, A.M. (Eds.). New Zealand Society of Animal Production, Occasional Publication No. 14. Hamilton, New Zealand, 151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Prieto, L.A., Peyraud, J.L. and Delagarde, R. 2011. Substitution rate and milk yield response to corn silage supplementation of late-lactation dairy cows grazing low-mass pastures at 2 daily allowances in autumn. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 3592–3604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Prieto, L.A., Peyraud, J.L. and Delagarde, R. 2012. Does pre-grazing herbage mass really affect herbage intake and milk production of strip-grazing dairy cows? Grass and Forage Science, 68, 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez-Mella, M., Hernández-Mendo, O., Améndola-Massiotti, R.D., Ramírez-Bribiesca, E.J., Mendoza-Martínez, G.D. and Burgueño-Ferreira, J.A. 2010. Productive response of grazing dairy cows to fresh chopped maize supplementation under a small farming system in the Mexican Highlands. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42, 1377–1383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (Statistical Analysis System). 2004. SAS/STAT 9.1 User’s Guide. SAS Publishing. Cary, North Carolina, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Y., Jiang, H., Zhai, G. and Cai, Q. 2013. Effects of cutting height on shoot regrowth and forage yield of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in a short-term cultivation system. Grassland Science, 59, 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sollenberger, L., Coleman, S.W. and Vendramini, J.M.B. 2013. As interações entre plantas e herbívoros em pastagens. In: Forragicultura: Ciência, Tecnologia y Gestão dos Recursos Forrageiros. Reis, R.A.,Bernardes, T.F. and Siqueira, G.R. (Eds). Gráfica Multipress Jaboticabal SP. Brasil. pp: 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villalba, J.J., Cabassu, R. and Gunter, S.A. 2015. Forage choice in pasturelands: Influence on cattle foraging behavior and performance. J. Anim. Sci., 93:1729–1740.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, I.A., Jones, J.R. and Parsons, A.J. 2001. Effects of grazing by sheep or cattle on sward structure and subsequent performance of weaned lambs. Grass and Forage Science, 56, 138–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Daniel Améndola-Massiotti.

Ethics declarations

Statement of animal rights

The study was carried out in accordance with guidelines of the Research Ethics Committee of the EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiménez-Rosales, J.D., Améndola-Massiotti, R.D., Burgueño-Ferreira, J.A. et al. Herbage intake of dairy cows in mixed sequential grazing with breeding ewes as followers. Trop Anim Health Prod 50, 531–536 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1464-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1464-8

Keywords

Navigation