Skip to main content
Log in

Variability in residual feed intake and nutrient utilization in Murrah buffalo heifers

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A feeding trial with 18 Murrah buffalo heifers (238 ± 63 kg; 1.7 ± 0.4 years old) was conducted for 57 days, and feed intake and body weight were recorded followed by 7 days of urine and feces collection. Heifers were grouped into low (RFI-I) and high (RFI-II) feed efficiency groups by regressing DMI (g head−1 day−1) on BWG (g head−1 day−1) and mid-test MBW (kg). RFI-II heifers had slightly higher DMI (g head−1 day−1 and expressed per unit of BW, %BW, MBW, mid-test BW, and mid-test MBW) and all associated nutrient intakes, BWG, feed efficiency traits (FCR, CPCR), digestibility of nutrients, and retentions of crude protein and fat over RFI-I heifers. The corresponding intake values (kg head−1 day−1) for RFI-I versus RFI-II were the following: DMI (6.73 ± 0.56 vs 6.51 ± 0.50), CPI (0.99 ± 0.008 vs 0.97 ± 0.07), DOMI (5.06 ± 0.47 vs 5.11 ± 0.42), and TDNI (4.95 ± 0.47 vs 5.00 ± 0.42). BWG (669 ± 52 vs 776 ± 47 g head−1 day−1), feed efficiency traits (FCR: 10.32 ± 1.16 vs 8.77 ± 1.04 and CPCR: 1.52 ± 0.17 vs 1.30 ± 0.16), N balance (38 ± 9 vs 45 ± 8 g N head−1 day−1), and protein and fat retentions (239 ± 57 vs 282 ± 51 g CP head−1 day−1 and 430 ± 6 vs 494 ± 59 g fat head−1 day−1) of RFI-I were less than RFI-II heifers, respectively. Based on the predicted RFI values, RFI-II buffalo heifers could be selected for feed efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AOAC Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Official methods of analysis of AOAC International 2005 18th edition. USA.

  • Archer J A, Arthur P F, Herd R M, Parnell P F and Pitchford W S 1997 Optimum post weaning test for measurement of growth rate, feed intake and feed efficiency in British breed cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 75:2024–2032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Archer J A, Pitchford W S, Hughes T E and Parnell P F 1998 Genetic and phenotypic relationships between food intake, growth, efficiency and body composition of mice post weaning and at maturity. Animal Science, 67:171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur P F and Herd R M 2005 Efficiency of feed utilization by livestock — Implications and benefits of genetic improvement. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 85: 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur P F, Archer J A, Johnston D J, Herd R M, Richardson E C and Parnell P F 2001 Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency and other post weaning traits in Angus cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 79:2805–2811.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basarab J A 2012 Feed Efficiency in Beef Cattle: RFI and its Economic Benefits; 16th World Hereford Conference; 14 July 2012, Calgary, Alberta, Canada)

  • Basarab J A, Price M A, Aalhus, J L, Okine, E K, Snelling W M, and Lyle, K L 2003 Residual feed intake and body composition in young growing cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 83:189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry D P, Crowley J J 2013 Genetics of feed efficiency in dairy and beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 91(4):1594–613. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5862.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatti J A, Younas M, Abdullah M, Babar M E and Nawaz H 2009 Feed intake, weight gain and haematology in Nili-Ravi buffalo heifers fed on mott grass and berseem fodder substituted with saltbush (Atriplex amnicola). Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 29(3): 133–137.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Durunna O N, Mujibi F D N, Goonewardene L, Okine E K, Basarab J A, Wang Z and Moore S S 2011 Feed efficiency differences and reranking in beef steers fed grower and finisher diets. Journal of Animal Science, 89(1):158–167. Doi:10.2527/jas.2009-2514. Epub 2010 Sep 3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell C L and Jenkins T G 1985 Cow type and the nutritional environment: Nutritional aspects. Journal of Animal Science, 61:725–741.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb D J and McAllister T A 1999 The impact of feed intake and feeding behavior of cattle on feedlot and feed bunk management. Proceedings of 20th Western Nutrition Conference. D. Korver and J Morrison (ed), pp101 –116.

  • Herd R M and Bishop S C 2000 Genetic variation in residual feed intake and its association with other production traits in British Hereford cattle. Livestock Production Science, 63:111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney G A, Knee B W, Graham J F and Knott S A 2004 The length of test required to measure live weight change when testing for feed efficiency in cattle. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 44: 411–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly A K, McGee M, Crews D H Jr., Sweeney T, Boland T M and Kenny D A 2010 Repeatability of feed efficiency, carcass ultrasound, feeding behavior, and blood metabolic variables in finishing heifers divergently selected for residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science, 88(10):3214–3225. Doi:10.2527/jas.2009-2700. Epub2010Jun4.

  • Koch R M, Swinger L A, Chambers D and Gregory K E 1963 Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 22:486–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montano-Bermudez, M, Nielsen M K and Deutscher G H 1990 energy requirements for maintenance of crossbred beef cattle with different genetic potential for milk. Journal of Animal Science, 68(8): 2279–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nair P V, Verma A K, Dass R S* and Mehra U R 2004 Growth and Nutrient Utilization in Buffalo Calves Fed Ammoniated Wheat Straw Supplemented with Sodium Sulphate. Australian Journal of Animal Science, Vol 17, No. 3: 325–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRC 2000 Nutrient Requirements of beef Cattle. 7th revised edition, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

  • NRC 2001 Nutrient Requirements for dairy Cattle. 7th edition, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon R K, Bailey D R C, Weingardt R and Berg R T 1990 Growth efficiency in mice selected for increased body weight. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 70(2): 371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengar S S, Tomar S K and Katiyar K C 1999 Feed intake and nutrient utilization in buffalo heifers fed paddy straw based complete feeds. Indian Journal Animal Nutrition, 10 (4), 362 – 365

    Google Scholar 

  • Udeybir, Mandal A B and Yadav P S 2000 Comparative dry matter intake and nutrient utilization efficiency in growing cattle and buffaloes-an analysis of observed results. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 17 (1):56–63

  • Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A 1991 Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10):3583–3597.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Basarab J A, Goonewardene L A, Crews D H Jr, Ramsey P, Lyle K L, French N, Okine E K and Moore S S 2005 Test duration for residual feed intake in commercial Bulls. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 4 (10): 825–830.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Dairy Cattle Nutrition Division of the National Dairy Research Institute of India; Department of Agricultural Research and Education under the Ministry of Agriculture and the Office of Director General of ICAR; Department of Science and Technology, Government of India; and Felicitation by Federation of Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) for funding the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tegene Negesse.

Ethics declarations

The feeding and digestibility trials were conducted with acceptable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of animal rights

No violation of animal rights.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Negesse, T., Datt, C. & Kundu, S.S. Variability in residual feed intake and nutrient utilization in Murrah buffalo heifers. Trop Anim Health Prod 48, 1577–1584 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1130-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1130-6

Keywords

Navigation