Skip to main content
Log in

Multivariate analysis to evaluate genetic groups and production traits of crossbred Holstein × Zebu cows

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this research was to try to unveil the relationship between production traits and genotypic proportions of crossbred dairy cattle using principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis. The herd consists of crossbred animals of Holstein (H) and Zebu (Z) (Gir and Guzerat) in different genotypic proportions; the composition of which varies from 12.5 to 100.0 % of the genetic group H. For this study, 834 milk production records from 257 cows from the years 1997 to 2014 were analyzed. The animals were all managed at a farm located in northeastern Brazil. The variables in the PCA were total milk yield per lactation (MY), milk yield adjusted to 305 days (MY305), lactation length (LL), and proportion of H and Z breeding. This analysis reduced the size of the sample space from the original five variables to two principal components (PCs) that together explained 89.4 % of the total variation. MY, MY305, LL, and genotypic proportion of H all contributed positively to PC1. The genotypic proportion of Z contributed negatively, which established a contrast between H and Z. Further cluster analysis identified two distinct groups when considering production performance and genotype of the animals. The high-performance group was predominantly Holstein breeding, while the lower performing group consisted mostly of Zebu. Under the environmental and management conditions in which this research was conducted, the best performances for the traits considered were achieved from cows whose genotypic proportion was between 38.0 and 94.0 % Holstein breeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Associação Brasileira de Criadores de Girolando (ABCG). Produção de leite no Brasil e participação da genética Girolando com ênfase em reprodução. In: Girolanda, Técnico. 2010. http://www.girolando.com.br/index.php?paginasSite/girolando,3,pt. Accessed 4 Nov. 2015.

  • Balancin Júnior, A., Prata, M.A., Moreira, H.L., Versesi Filho, A.E., Cardoso, V.L. and Faro, L.E., 2014. Avaliação de desempenho produtivo e reprodutivo de animais mestiços do cruzamento Holandês × Gir, Boletim de Indústria Animal, 71, 357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.D., 1988. Chemometrics: a textbook. In: D.L. Massart, B.G.M. Vandeginste, S.N. Deming, Y. Michotte and L. Kaufman, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988, Chemometrics, 2, 298–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, V., Roso, V.M., Severo, J.L.P., Queiroz, S.A. And Fries, L.A, 2003. Formando lotes uniformes de reprodutores múltiplos e usando-os em acasalamentos dirigidos, em populações Nelore, Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 32, 834–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D.S. and Mackay, F.C., 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Edition 4 ed. Endimburg: Benjami Cummings

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, I., Antunes, G.R., Paiva, D.S., Lange, C.C., Guimarães, S.E.F. and Martins, M.F., 2011. Differential expression of genes during mastitis in Holstein-Zebu crossbreed dairy cows, Genetics and molecular research, 10, 1295–303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • González, A., Luque, M., Rodero, E., González, C., Aguilera, R., Jiménez, J., Sepúlveda, N., Bravo, S. and Herrera, M., 2011. Use of morphometric variables for differentiating Spanish hound breeds, International Journal of Morphology, 29, 1248–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães, J.D., Alves, N.G., Costa, E.P., Silva, M.R., Costa, F.M.J., Zamperlini, B., 2002. Eficiências reprodutiva e produtiva em vacas das raças Gir, Holandês e Cruzadas Holandês x Zebu, Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 31, 641–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadegowda, A.K.G., Piperova, L.S. and Erdman, R.A., 2008. Principal component and multivariate analysis of milk long-chain fatty acid composition during diet-induced milk fat depression, Journal of dairy science, 91, 749–759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lê, S., Josse, J. and Husson, F., 2008. FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis, Journal of Statistical Software, 25, p. 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meira, C. T., Pereira, I. G., Farah, M. M., Pires, A. V., Garcia, D. A. and Cruz, V. A. R., 2013. Seleção de características morfofuncionais de cavalos da raça Mangalarga Marchador por meio da análise de componentes principais, Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 65, 1843–1848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neser, F.W.C., Erasmus, G. J. and Scholtz, M.M., 2008. The use of a cluster analysis in across herd genetic evaluation for beef cattle, South African Journal of Animal Sciences, 38, 51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Paiva, A.L.C., Teixeira, R.B., Yamaki, M., Menezes, G.R.O., Leite, C. D. S. and Torres, R.A., 2010. Análise de componentes principais em características de produção de aves de postura, Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 39, 285–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perotto, D., Kroetz, I.A. and Rocha, J.L., 2010. Milk production of crossbred Holstein × Zebu cows in the northeastern region of Paraná State, Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 39, 758–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rencher, A.C., 2002. Methods of multivariate analysis, (John Wiley & Sons, New York)

  • Santos, D.J.A., Peixoto, M.G.C.D., Borquis, R.R.A., Verneque, R.S., Panetto, J.C.C. and Tonhati, H., 2013. Genetic parameters for test-day milk yield, 305-day milk yield, and lactation length in Guzerat cows, Livestock Science, 152, 114–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, E.F.N., Santoro, K.R., Ferreira, R.L.C. and Santos, E.S., 2010. Formação de grupos produtivos em vacas leiteiras por meio de componentes principais, Revista Brasileira Biométrica, 28, 15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Savegnago, R.P., Caetano, S.L., Ramos, S.B., Nascimento, G.B., Schmidt, G.S., Ledur, M.C. and Munari, D.P., 2011. Estimates of genetic parameters, and cluster and principal components analyses of breeding values related to egg production traits in a White Leghorn population, Poultry Science, 90, 2174–2188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Team, R.C.R. 2015. A language and environment for statistical computing. In: Viena: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org. Accessed 4 Jul. 2015.

  • Ventura, H.T., Lopes, P.S., Peloso, J.V. Guimarães, S.E.F., Carneiro, A.P.S. and Carneiro, P.L.S., 2012. Use of multivariate analysis to evaluate genetic groups of pigs for dry-cured ham production, Livestock Science, 148, 214–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zampar, A. and Mourão, G.M., 2009. Implicações da utilização de cruzamentos em gado de leite. In: Radar Técnico-Melhoramento Genético-MilkPoint. http://www.milkpoint.com.br/radar-tecnico/melhoramento-genetico. Accessed: 10 Jul. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the São Lucas Farm for providing the data for this study and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento Pessoal de Nível Superior/Brazil for the financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angelina Bossi Fraga.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This paper does not cause any conflict of interest including financial, personal, or other relationships with other people or organizations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fraga, A.B., de Lima Silva, F., Hongyu, K. et al. Multivariate analysis to evaluate genetic groups and production traits of crossbred Holstein × Zebu cows. Trop Anim Health Prod 48, 533–538 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0985-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0985-2

Keywords

Navigation