Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of dairy husbandry practices and farm types on raw milk quality collected by different categories of dairy processors in the Peruvian Andes

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In developing countries, milk quality is often mismanaged in relation to husbandry practices, collection logistics, and the production of small batches. This paper investigates how the management of milk quality from farm to dairy processor impacts on both chemical and hygienic indicators, in a context characterized by farm scale diversity, the co-existence of formal and informal markets, and high milk demand. It is based on an analysis of the chemical and hygienic quality of milk samples collected over a 12-month period from 20 farms and three dairy processors. Data from the farmers’ husbandry practices and the logistics of milk collection were also collected. A large range of quality profiles and farming practices were observed. This diversity is explained by rainfall and temperature pattern, farm size which affects hygienic quality, and lack of efficient logistics between farms and dairy processors. The findings indicate that in a context of high demand for milk and poor private and public regulations, milk quality is impacted upon by poor stakeholders’ management practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belli, P., Cantafora, A.F., Stella, S., Barbieri, S., & Crimella, C., 2013. Microbiological survey of milk and dairy products from a small scale dairy processing unit in Maroua (Cameroon). Food control 32, 366–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonfoh, B., Roth, C., Traoré, A.N., Fané, A., Simbé, C.F., Alfaroukh, I.O., Zinsstag, J., 2006. Effect of washing and disinfecting containers on the microbiological quality of fresh milk sold in Bamako (Mali). Food Control 17, 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botaro, B.G., Gameiro, A.H., and Santos, M.V.D., 2013. Quality based payment program and milk quality in dairy cooperatives of Southern Brazil: an econometric analysis. Scientia Agricola 70, 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, U., Lopez-Villalobos, N., Garrick, D. J., and Shalloo, L., 2010. Development and application of a processing model for the Irish dairy industry. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 5091–5100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gargouri, A., Hamed, H., Ben Ali, B., Elfeki, A., and Gdoura, R., 2014. Evaluation of Tunisian milk quality in dairy herds: Inter‐relationship between chemical, physical and hygienic criteria. Animal Science Journal.

  • Gillah, K. A., Kifaro, G.C., and Madsen, J., 2014. Effects of management practices on yield and quality of milk from smallholder dairy units in urban and peri-urban Morogoro, Tanzania. Tropical animal health and production, 1–7.

  • Helrich, K.C., 1990. Official methods of Analysis of the AOAC. Volume 2. No. Ed. 15. Association of Official Analytical Chemists Inc..

  • IDF. 1990. Handbook on milk collection in warm developing countries IDF special issue N 9002. pp.1–148. Brussels, Belgium.

  • INEI., 2010. Junín: Series Estadísticas 2000–2009. Oficina Departamental de Estadística e Informática de Junín.

  • Larsen, M. K., Nielsen, J. H., Butler, G., Leifert, C., Slots, T., Kristiansen, G. H., and Gustafsson, A. H., 2010. Milk quality as affected by feeding regimens in a country with climatic variation. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 2863–2873.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le Gal, P.-Y., Kuper, M., Moulin, C.-H., Puillet, L., Sraïri, M.T., 2007. Dispositifs de coordination entre industriel, éleveurs et périmètre irrigué dans un bassin de collecte laitier au Maroc. Cahiers Agricultures 16, 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moges, N., Hailemariam, T., Fentahun, T., Chanie, M., and Melaku, A., 2012. Bovine Mastitis and Associated Risk Factors in Small Holder Lactating Dairy Farms in Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria 9, 441–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radder, S.K., Bhanj, S., 2011. Perceptions of Dairy Farmers of Gadag district in northwestern part of Karnataka state, India regarding Clean Milk Production. Veterinary World 4, 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, A.C.O., Cassoli, L.D., Machado, P.F., Ruegg, P.L., 2009. Evaluation of an on-farm test to estimate somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 990–995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samal, L., and Pattanaik, A. K., 2014. Dairy Production in India-Existing Scenario and Future Prospects. International Journal of Livestock Research 4, 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, N., Singh, N.K., and Bhadwal, M.S., 2011. Relationship of somatic cell count and mastitis: An overview. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 24, 429–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, J. W., 2009. Feeding for milk components and profit. Extension publication - North Dakota State University.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the EU’s AgTrain Erasmus Mundus program and the TFESSD of the World Bank for financially supporting this research. The authors are also grateful for the fieldwork assistance provided by Mario Viera and Teresa Alvarado.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo Fuentes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fuentes, E., Bogue, J., Gómez, C. et al. Effects of dairy husbandry practices and farm types on raw milk quality collected by different categories of dairy processors in the Peruvian Andes. Trop Anim Health Prod 46, 1419–1426 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-014-0658-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-014-0658-6

Keywords

Navigation