Abstract
Aqueous gels such as biopolymer gels, mucus, and high water content hydrogels are often qualitatively described as lubricious. In hydrogels, mesh size, ξ, has been found to be a controlling parameter in friction coefficient. In the tribology of aqueous gels, we suggest that the Weissenberg number (Wi) is a useful parameter to define different regimes, and following the original formulations in rheology, Wi is given by the polymer relaxation time (ηξ3/kBT) multiplied by the shear rate due to fluid shear through a single mesh (V/ξ): Wi = ηVξ2/kBT. At sliding speeds below a Weissenberg number of approximately 0.1, Wi < 0.1, the friction coefficient is velocity-independent and scales with mesh size to the − 1 power, µ ∝ ξ−1. De Gennes’ scaling concepts for elastic modulus, E, give a dependence on polymer mesh size to the − 3 power, E ∝ ξ−3, and following Hertzian contact analysis, the contact area is found to depend on the mesh size squared, A ∝ ξ2. Combining these concepts, the shear stress, τ, and therefore the lubricity of aqueous gels, is predicted to be highly dependent on the mesh size, τ ∝ ξ−3. Studies aimed at elucidating the fundamental mechanism of lubricity in biopolymer gels, mucus, and hydrogels have wrestled with comparisons across mesh size, which can be extremely difficult to accurately quantify. Using scaling concepts relating polymer mesh size to water content reveals that shear stress decreases rapidly with increasing water content, and plots of shear stress as a function of swollen water content are suggested as a useful method to compare aqueous gels of unknown mesh size. As a lower bound, these data are compared against estimates of fluid shear stress for free and bound water flowing through a mesh size estimated by the water content of the gels. The results indicate that the strong dependence on lubricity is likely due to a synergistic combination of a low viscosity solvent (water) coupled to a system that has a decreasing friction coefficient, modulus, and the resulting contact pressure with increasing water content. Although the permeability, K, of aqueous gels increases dramatically with water content (and mesh size), K ≅ ξ2/η, the stronger decrease of the elastic modulus and subsequent decrease in contact pressure due to an increase in the contact length, predicts that the draining time under contact, t, actually increases strongly with increasing water content and mesh size, t ∝ ξ2. Consistent with the finding of extremely high water content aqueous gels on the surfaces of biological tissues, these high water content gels are predicted to be optimal for lubrication as they are both highly lubricious and robust at resisting draining and sustaining hydration.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Following Milner’s predictions [62], the hydrodynamic penetration depth due to a simple shear flow in a region alongside a semi-dilute polymer network (e.g., hydrogel) would be essentially the mesh size, ξ.
References
Spencer, N.D. (ed.): Aqueous Lubrication. World Scientific (2014)
Seror, J., Zhu, L., Goldberg, R., Day, A.J., Klein, J.: Supramolecular synergy in the boundary lubrication of synovial joints. Nat. Commun. 6, 6497 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7497
Iuster, N., Tairy, O., Driver, M.J., Armes, S.P., Klein, J.: Cross-linking highly lubricious phosphocholinated polymer brushes: effect on surface interactions and frictional behavior. Macromolecules. 50, 7361–7371 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01423
Dunn, A.C., Sawyer, W.G., Angelini, T.E.: Gemini interfaces in aqueous lubrication with hydrogels. Tribol. Lett. 54, 59–66 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-014-0308-1
Dunn, A.C., Urueña, J.M., Huo, Y., Perry, S.S., Angelini, T.E., Sawyer, W.G.: Lubricity of surface hydrogel layers. Tribol. Lett. 49, 371–378 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-012-0076-8
Perry, S.S., Yan, X., Limpoco, F.T., Lee, S., Müller, M., Spencer, N.D.: Tribological properties of poly(l-lysine)-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) films: influence of polymer architecture and adsorbed conformation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 1, 1224–1230 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/am900101m
Pitenis, A.A., Manuel Urueña, J., Cooper, A.C., Angelini, T.E., Sawyer, W.G.: Superlubricity in Gemini hydrogels. J. Tribol. 138, 042103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032890
Li, A., Benetti, E.M., Tranchida, D., Clasohm, J.N., Schönherr, H., Spencer, N.D.: Surface-grafted, covalently cross-linked hydrogel brushes with tunable interfacial and bulk properties. Macromolecules. 44, 5344–5351 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ma2006443
Gong, J.P., Kurokawa, T., Narita, T., Kagata, G., Osada, Y., Nishimura, G., Kinjo, M.: Synthesis of hydrogels with extremely low surface friction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 5582–5583 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja003794q
Pitenis, A.A., Manuel Urueña, J., Nixon, R.M., Bhattacharjee, T., Krick, B.A., Dunn, A.C., Angelini, T.E., Sawyer, W.G.: Lubricity from entangled polymer networks on hydrogels. J. Tribol. 138, 042102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032889
Rudy, A., Kuliasha, C., Uruena, J., Rex, J., Schulze, K.D., Stewart, D., Angelini, T., Sawyer, W.G., Perry, S.S.: Lubricous hydrogel surface coatings on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Tribol. Lett. 65, 3 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-016-0783-7
Klein, J., Kumacheva, E., Mahalu, D., Perahia, D., Fetters, L.J.: Reduction of frictional forces between solid surfaces bearing polymer brushes. Nature. 370, 634–636 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/370634a0
Shoaib, T., Heintz, J., Lopez-Berganza, J.A., Muro-Barrios, R., Egner, S.A., Espinosa-Marzal, R.M.: Stick–slip friction reveals hydrogel lubrication mechanisms. Langmuir. 34, 756–765 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02834
Shoaib, T., Espinosa-Marzal, R.M.: Insight into the viscous and adhesive contributions to hydrogel friction. Tribol. Lett. 66, 96 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-018-1045-7
Gong, J.P.: Friction and lubrication of hydrogels -its richness and complexity. Soft Matter. 2, 544 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1039/b603209p
Liu, J., Gong, J.: Hydrogel friction and lubrication. In: Spencer, N.D. (ed.) Aqueous Lubrication. World Scientific, Singapore (2014)
Benz, M., Chen, N., Israelachvili, J.: Lubrication and wear properties of grafted polyelectrolytes, hyaluronan and hylan, measured in the surface forces apparatus. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 71A, 6–15 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30123
de Beer, S., Kutnyanszky, E., Schön, P.M., Vancso, G.J., Müser, M.H.: Solvent-induced immiscibility of polymer brushes eliminates dissipation channels. Nat. Commun. 5, 3781 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4781
de Beer, S., Kenmoé, G.D., Müser, M.H.: On the friction and adhesion hysteresis between polymer brushes attached to curved surfaces: rate and solvation effects. Friction. 3, 148–160 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-015-0078-2
Li, A., Ramakrishna, S.N., Kooij, E.S., Espinosa-Marzal, R.M., Spencer, N.D.: Poly(acrylamide) films at the solvent-induced glass transition: adhesion, tribology, and the influence of crosslinking. Soft Matter. 8, 9092 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/c2sm26222c
Nalam, P.C., Gosvami, N.N., Caporizzo, M.A., Composto, R.J., Carpick, R.W.: Nano-rheology of hydrogels using direct drive force modulation atomic force microscopy. Soft Matter. 11, 8165–8178 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5SM01143D
Baumberger, T., Caroli, C., Ronsin, O.: Self-healing slip pulses along a gel/glass interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 075509 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.075509
Kim, J., Dunn, A.C.: Soft hydrated sliding interfaces as complex fluids. Soft Matter. 12, 6536–6546 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SM00623J
Reale, E.R., Dunn, A.C.: Poroelasticity-driven lubrication in hydrogel interfaces. Soft Matter. 13, 428–435 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SM02111E
De Gennes, P.G.: Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1979)
Cone, R.A.: Barrier properties of mucus. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 61, 75–85 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2008.09.008
Tominaga, T., Takedomi, N., Biederman, H., Furukawa, H., Osada, Y., Gong, J.P.: Effect of substrate adhesion and hydrophobicity on hydrogel friction. Soft Matter. 4, 1033 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1039/b716465c
Kii, A., Xu, J., Gong, J.P., Osada, Y., Zhang, X.: Heterogeneous polymerization of hydrogels on hydrophobic substrate. J. Phys. Chem. B. 105, 4565–4571 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp003242u
Sudre, G., Hourdet, D., Cousin, F., Creton, C., Tran, Y.: Structure of surfaces and interfaces of poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide hydrogels. Langmuir. 28, 12282–12287 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/la301417x
Pitenis, A.A., Urueña, J.M., Schulze, K.D., Nixon, R.M., Dunn, A.C., Krick, B.A., Sawyer, W.G., Angelini, T.E., Sawyer, G., Angelini, T.E.: Polymer fluctuation lubrication in hydrogel Gemini interfaces. Soft Matter. 10, 8955–8962 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4SM01728E
Urueña, J.M., Pitenis, A.A., Nixon, R.M., Schulze, K.D., Angelini, T.E., Sawyer, W.G.: Mesh size control of polymer fluctuation lubrication in Gemini hydrogels. Biotribology. 1–2, 24–29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2015.03.001
Urueña, J.M., McGhee, E.O., Angelini, T.E., Dowson, D., Sawyer, W.G., Pitenis, A.A.: Normal load scaling of friction in Gemini hydrogels. Biotribology. 13, 30–35 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2018.01.002
Dealy, J.M.: Weissenberg and Deborah numbers—their definition and use. Rheol. Bull. 79, 14–18 (2010)
Poole, R.: The Deborah and Weissenberg numbers. Rheol. Bull. 53, 32–39 (2012)
White, J.L.: Dynamics of viscoelastic fluids, melt fracture and the rheology of fiber spinning. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 8, 2339–2357 (1964)
Reiner, M.: The Deborah number. Phys. Today. 17, 62 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3051374
Schulze, K.D., Hart, S.M., Marshall, S.L., O’Bryan, C.S., Urueña, J.M., Pitenis, A.A., Sawyer, W.G., Angelini, T.E.: Polymer osmotic pressure in hydrogel contact mechanics. Biotribology. 11, 3–7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2017.03.004
Hertz, H.: Über die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. J. für die reine Angew. Math. 92, 156–171 (1882)
Vogel, V., Sheetz, M.: Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 265–275 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1890
Luo, T., Mohan, K., Iglesias, P.A., Robinson, D.N.: Molecular mechanisms of cellular mechanosensing. Nat. Mater. 12, 1064–1071 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3772
Pitenis, A.A., Urueña, J.M., Hart, S.M., O’Bryan, C.S., Marshall, S.L., Levings, P.P., Angelini, T.E., Sawyer, W.G.: Friction-induced inflammation. Tribol. Lett. 66, 81 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-018-1029-7
Bhattacharjee, T., Kabb, C.P., O’Bryan, C.S., Urueña, J.M., Sumerlin, B.S., Sawyer, W.G., Angelini, T.E.: Polyelectrolyte scaling laws for microgel yielding near jamming. Soft Matter. 14, 1559–1570 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SM01518F
Beer, S., Müser, M.H., de Beer, S., Müser, M.H.: Alternative dissipation mechanisms and the effect of the solvent in friction between polymer brushes on rough surfaces. Soft Matter. 9, 7234 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3sm50491c
Yashima, S., Takase, N., Kurokawa, T., Gong, J.P.: Friction of hydrogels with controlled surface roughness on solid flat substrates. Soft Matter. 10, 3192–3199 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3SM52883A
Lee, S., Spencer, N.D.: Sweet, hairy, soft, and slippery. Science. 319, 575–576 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1153273
Bonnevie, E.D., Baro, V.J., Wang, L., Burris, D.L.: In situ studies of cartilage microtribology: roles of speed and contact area. Tribol. Lett. 41, 83–95 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-010-9687-0
Moore, A.C., Burris, D.L.: An analytical model to predict interstitial lubrication of cartilage in migrating contact areas. J. Biomech. 47, 148–153 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.09.020
Moore, A.C., Burris, D.L.: Tribological rehydration of cartilage and its potential role in preserving joint health. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 25, 99–107 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2016.09.018
Canal, T., Peppas, N.A.: Correlation between mesh size and equilibrium degree of swelling of polymeric networks. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 23, 1183–1193 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820231007
Schmitz, T.L., Action, J.E., Ziegert, J.C., Sawyer, W.G.: The difficulty of measuring low friction: uncertainty analysis for friction coefficient measurements. J. Tribol. 127, 673 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1843853
Burris, D.L., Sawyer, W.G.: Addressing practical challenges of low friction coefficient measurements. Tribol. Lett. 35, 17–23 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-009-9438-2
Raviv, U., Laurat, P., Klein, J.: Fluidity of water confined to subnanometre films. Nature. 413, 51–54 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35092523
Raviv, U.: Fluidity of bound hydration layers. Science. 297, 1540–1543 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1074481
Lieleg, O., Vladescu, I., Ribbeck, K.: Characterization of particle translocation through mucin hydrogels. Biophys. J. 98, 1782–1789 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.012
Datta, S.S., Preska Steinberg, A., Ismagilov, R.F.: Polymers in the gut compress the colonic mucus hydrogel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 7041–7046 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602789113
Lai, S.K., Wang, Y.-Y., Wirtz, D., Hanes, J.: Micro- and macrorheology of mucus. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 61, 86–100 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2008.09.012
Crockett, R., Grubelnik, A., Roos, S., Dora, C., Born, W., Troxler, H.: Biochemical composition of the superficial layer of articular cartilage. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 82A, 958–964 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31248
Larson, R.J.: Water content, organic content, and carbon and nitrogen composition of medusae from the northeast Pacific. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 99, 107–120 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(86)90231-5
Lucas, C.H.: Biochemical composition of Aurelia aurita in relation to age and sexual maturity. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 183, 179–192 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(94)90086-8
Sterner, O., Aeschlimann, R., Zürcher, S., Scales, C., Riederer, D., Spencer, N.D., Tosatti, S.G.P.: Tribological classification of contact lenses: from coefficient of friction to sliding work. Tribol. Lett. 63, 9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-016-0696-5
Erdemir, A., Martin, J.-M.: Superlubricity. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)
Milner, S.T.: Hydrodynamic penetration into parabolic brushes. Macromolecules. 24, 3704–3705 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00012a036
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge research funding from Alcon Laboratories, and appreciate the many scholarly discussions on lubrication and scaling concepts in gels with Profs. Thomas Angelini, David Burris, Alison Dunn, and Cyrus Safinya.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pitenis, A.A., Sawyer, W.G. Lubricity of High Water Content Aqueous Gels. Tribol Lett 66, 113 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-018-1063-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-018-1063-5