1 Introduction

Fretting between two bodies in contact typically results in damage in the form of either wear and/or fatigue [1]. It is known that rates and mechanisms of damage in fretting depend upon (amongst other things) both temperature and fretting frequency, and in recent work by the current authors, it was argued that these two do not act independently of each other [2]. The temperature affects the progress of fretting via: (1) the mechanical properties of the bodies undergoing fretting; (2) the rate of oxide formation on the fretting surfaces; (3) changes to the way that oxide particles thus formed either are retained in the contact (and potentially develop into a glaze) or are expelled from the contact [3, 4]. The fretting frequency can also affect these three influences as a result of: (1) temperature changes in the region of the contact due to the variation of the friction power dissipation; (2) changes in the time between interactions of an asperity in the contact (which will influence the oxidation of the nascent metal which takes place); (3) changes in the motion of debris particles and thus their retention in (or egress from) the contact [2, 5]. Details of these three primary mechanisms of influence will now be addressed.

The yield stress of a metal generally falls as the temperature is increased [6], and therefore, it is expected that fretting tests conducted at a higher environmental temperature will exhibit more significant plastic deformation. It was suggested by Kapoor [7] that plasticity by ratcheting can result in crack formation parallel to the surface leading to delamination. Moreover, Fouvry et al. [8] also argued that global surface shear plasticity can lead to high fretting wear rate.

Early work by Hurricks [9] classified the mechanisms of fretting wear into three stages, as follows:

  1. 1.

    Initial stage: direct metal—metal contact on the opposing surfaces leads to material adhesion and transfer between the surfaces;

  2. 2.

    Intermediate stage: oxide debris begins to be generated. It can either cause abrasion of the fretting bodies or begins to develop into a debris bed within the contact which will be constantly broken down and reformed;

  3. 3.

    Steady-state stage: a stable debris bed develops in the contact which acts as a third body solid lubricant between the fretting surfaces.

Previous studies [10,11,12,13] indicate that the presence of the oxide debris in the fretting contact can significantly influence the wear behaviour, with Godet [10] proposing the concept of the debris acting as the third body between the wearing surfaces which prevents direct contact between the primary surfaces. Iwabuchi et al. [14] studied the role of the debris by artificially supplying oxide particles into the contact (as opposed to the oxides being formed by the wear process itself) and concluded that the formation of a stable and compacted oxide layer will result in a reduction in wear, but if such a layer does not develop, the wear rate will be increased by the oxide particles acting as an abrasive. In further experiments to understand the role of the oxide in fretting, Colombie et al. [12] performed tests which were periodically interrupted to allow removal of the debris from the contact; these tests provided further evidence regarding the significance of the debris bed in determining fretting behaviour.

Temperature may have a significant influence on the way that the debris bed builds up within the fretting contact as follows:

  1. 1.

    The rate of oxide formation: in general, the oxidation rate of metals increases rapidly with temperature, and this will be as relevant in fretting as it is in normal thermal oxidation;

  2. 2.

    The nature of the oxide: it is well known that in steels, the dominant thermal oxidation product is dependent upon the temperature at which the oxidation occurs. In this regard, Hurricks [15, 16] argued that the oxide debris layer formed in fretting would contain more Fe3O4 rather than α-Fe2O3 under high temperature. Moreover, Kayaba and Iwabuchi [17] suggested that the wear rate depended upon the nature of the oxide layer, with wear rates falling as the fraction of Fe3O4 increased;

  3. 3.

    The retention of oxide debris in the fretting contact and the development of a stable debris bed: it has been argued that as the temperature rises, there is an increase in the free energy of the debris particles which are forming in the fretting contact which encourages their mutual adhesion and retention within the contact and thus their formation into a stable and compacted debris bed [18]. In addition, it has been argued that Fe3O4 adheres more strongly than Fe2O3 onto the wearing surfaces which again encourages the formation of a stable debris bed [19, 20].

After the formation of a compacted debris layer (steady-state stage), further consolidation of this layer may occur due to sintering, resulting in the formation of a protective glaze layer. The glaze is a smoothly burnished outer region of the debris bed itself [21]; it has been argued that its formation is directly related to the completion of the debris particle sintering process [13, 22]. Despite sintering being a process which is normally considered to be significant when the homologous temperature is above 0.5, [23], Pearson et al. [24] argued that debris sintering occurred at temperatures as low as 85 °C in fretting of a high-strength steel.

It is clear that oxide debris plays a major role in determining behaviour in the intermediate and steady-state stages of fretting. Moreover, it can be seen that both the temperature and the fretting frequency have a significant influence on fretting wear via changes in the oxidation rate and subsequent behaviour of the oxide debris within the contact. In this work, both environmental temperature and fretting frequency (since fretting frequency also exerts a strong influence on the contact temperature [25]) were varied to study their effects on fretting behaviour of a stainless steel. Extending our previous work [2], tests of different (and extended) durations were conducted in order that the evolution of damage can be understood.

2 Experimental Procedure

The experimental methods and materials used in this work have been described in detail in previous work [2] but will be outlined again here for completeness.

2.1 Specimen, Test Procedures and Conditions

Fretting experiments were conducted on 304 stainless steel specimens; the chemical composition of which is presented in Table 1. Specimens were assembled in a cylinder-on-flat arrangement (Fig. 1) with a normal load, P, being applied via a deadweight (Fig. 2). An electromagnetic vibrator (EMV) was used to develop the fretting motion perpendicular to the axis of the cylindrical specimen (Fig. 1). The far-field displacement of the upper specimen mounting block (USMB) was measured through a capacitance displacement sensor, with this position data being used to control the motion of the USMB. A piezoelectric load cell was used to measure the tangential force (Q) across the contact. Both the USMB displacement and the tangential force were recorded continuously at the rate of 200 samples per fretting cycle and were plotted against each other as fretting loops. A schematic fretting loop is presented in Fig. 3. The slip amplitude (δ*) refers to slip that occurs in the contact and is not the same as the applied displacement amplitude (Δ*) which is the parameter which is used to control the motion of the USMB. The slip amplitude is smaller than the displacement amplitude due to contact and rig compliances. The combined system stiffness, S, is defined as the gradient of the steep side of the fretting loop (see Fig. 3) [27, 28]; in this work, the system stiffness, S, was estimated to lie in the range of 30–37 MN m−1. The energy dissipated per fretting cycle (E d) can be measured from a fretting loop and the energy-based coefficient of friction (μ E) derived from this as follows:

Table 1 Chemical composition of 304 stainless steel (wt %) measured by atomic emission spectroscopy (Foundry Master, Oxford Instruments, UK)
Fig. 1
figure 1

Cylinder-on-flat specimen arrangement in fretting test: W = 10 mm, R = 6 mm, P = 450 N, and Δ* = 50 µm [26]

Fig. 2
figure 2

Main components of fretting apparatus [26]

Fig. 3
figure 3

Schematic fretting loop

$$\mu_{\text{E}} = \frac{{E_{\text{d}} }}{4 P \delta^{*} }$$

Electrical heaters in the system allowed independent control of the temperature of each specimen which was measured and controlled via open wire thermocouples which were welded onto the top surface of each specimen. To minimise the influence of the temperature rise induced by the frictional power dissipation on the temperature measurements of the thermocouples, the thermocouples have been welded at the end of each specimen which is approximately 20 mm away from the fretting contact itself. In this programme of work, both specimens were maintained at the same temperature. As a modification to the test set-up employed in previous work [2], a layer of thermal insulation was used to cover the whole test area to limit heat flow and reduce thermal gradients.

Tests were performed with temperatures between ambient and 275 °C at two fretting frequencies (20 and 200 Hz). Test conditions are summarised in Table 2.

Table 2 Fretting test conditions

2.2 Estimation of Wear Volume and Wear Rate

Following a fretting test, both specimens were lightly swabbed with industrial methylated spirit to remove loose debris. The topography of the wear scars on both the flat and cylindrical specimens was evaluated with a Bruker contour GT-I interferometer. The profilometric data relating to the surface outside the wear scar were extrapolated to create a reference surface (representing the surface profile of before wear occurred). The volume below each reference surface was regarded as the wear volume (\(V_{\text{Flat}}^{ - }\) and \(V_{\text{Cyl}}^{ - }\) for the flat and cylindrical specimens, respectively) and the volume of material above these surfaces was regarded as transferred volume (\(V_{\text{Flat}}^{ + }\) and \(V_{\text{Cyl}}^{ + }\) for the flat and cylindrical specimens, respectively) (see Fig. 4). The total wear and transfer volumes for the couple (\(V^{ - }\) and \(V^{ + }\), respectively) are defined as the sum of the respective volumes for the flat and cylindrical specimens. A number of tests were repeated, and typically, the reproducibility in wear volumes was ~5%.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Schematic diagram indicating the assessment of transfer and wear volume

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using back-scattered electron (BSE) imaging was used to characterise the wear scars, in both plan and sectional views. The BSE images were used to identify the distribution of the lower contrast oxide debris within the wear scars. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) in the SEM was also employed to identify the nature of various regions within the scars.

3 Experimental Results

Tests with different number of cycles (10, 30, 100, 500 k cycles) were performed at three temperatures (Amb, 125 °C, 275 °C) for both frequencies to study the evolution of the wear behaviour. Figure 5 shows the development of the μ E through the tests. It can be seen that at both frequencies, μ E were highest at 125 °C and lowest at 275 °C. At 20 Hz, frequent fluctuation in μ E (of the order of ~0.1) was observed at room temperature, indicating the instability of the contact surfaces in this condition. At 275 °C for both fretting frequencies, the μ E dropped very quickly after ~20,000–50,000 cycles and became relatively stable after this, with a slight long-term reduction being observed. The μ E at 125 °C was in general high and relatively stable, although some fluctuations were observed in the first 200,000 cycles. The fluctuations observed were generally less significant at the higher fretting frequency.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Energy-based coefficient of friction (\(\mu_{\text{E}}\)) as a function of number of cycles under three test temperatures (Amb, 125 °C, 275 °C) at fretting frequencies of (a) 20 Hz and (b) 200 Hz

Figure 6 shows the evolution of both the wear and transfer volumes up to half a million cycles. At room temperature, material transfer volumes are almost zero throughout the whole process for both frequencies. The wear volumes increase approximately linearly with the number of fretting cycles for both frequencies, with the wear volumes observed at 20 Hz being almost twice as large as those observed at 200 Hz. At 275 °C, both wear and transfer volumes were very low at both frequencies and remain very close to each other across the range of test durations examined. At the lower frequency, the wear and transfer volumes slowly increased with increasing number of fretting cycles; however, at the higher fretting frequency, they remained almost constant with increasing numbers of fretting cycles (i.e. the instantaneous wear rate tended towards zero). It should be noted that at both frequencies, the transfer volumes are slightly higher than the wear volumes at this test temperature, which indicates that there is an increase in the total material volume after fretting (due to these oxides having a Pilling–Bedworth ratio significantly greater than unity).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Wear volume (\(V^{ - }\)) and transfer volume (\(V^{ + }\)) as a function number of cycles under three test temperatures (ambient, 125 °C, 275 °C) and two fretting frequencies (20, 200 Hz)

There is clearly a transition between the behaviour at room temperature and the behaviour at 275 °C. At the intermediate temperature of 125 °C, the behaviour is significantly different at the two frequencies, indicating that the transition temperature is dependent upon frequency. At 200 Hz, the behaviour at 125 °C is very similar to that observed at room temperature; in both cases, the wear volumes increased approximately linearly with the number of cycles (with very similar magnitudes), whilst the transfer volumes remained very low across the number of cycles. This indicates that at this frequency, the transition between low temperature and high temperature behaviour occurs somewhere between 125 and 275 °C. However, at 20 Hz, very different behaviour is observed at 125 °C compared to that at room temperature. Initially, at 125 °C, both the wear rate and transfer rate were high, and almost equal to each other (indicating limited material loss from the contact, and instead, material redistribution). However, by the point that 100,000 cycles have been reached, the wear volume is significantly larger than the transfer volume, but both of these were very large compared to their respective volumes observed in any of the other tests at this number cycles, which is one of most distinguishing features of this test. However, uniquely within this test, it is clear that a significant change in the wear behaviour has occurred at around 100,000 cycles; prior to 100,000 cycles being reached, wear and transfer volumes increased rapidly, but after 100,000 cycles, the increase in wear volume was very slow, exhibiting a rate similar to that observed at the higher temperature of 275 °C. The transfer volume at 100,000 cycles is actually larger than that which is observed in the tests following 500,000 cycles, but it should be noted that this does not necessarily imply a reduction (due to repeatability and confidence issues) but does imply that again the rate of change in the transfer volume is very low in this region.

In light of the significant change in wear rate at 100,000 cycles in Fig. 6c, further tests were conducted for 100,000 cycles with a range of temperatures bracketing that at which the transition was observed at 20 Hz (100, 150 and 200 °C) under both low and high frequencies. Figure 7 shows the total wear volume (\(V^{ - }\)) and total material transfer volume (\(V^{ + }\)) as a function of test temperature at 100,000 cycles at fretting frequencies of both 20 and 200 Hz. At this number of cycles, it can be seen that the fretting wear behaviour is strongly dependent on both the test temperature and the fretting frequency (although it is recognised that these observations are only relevant for this selected test duration). At 20 Hz, almost no material transfer occurs (but only wear) when fretting is conducted at room temperature. With increasing temperature, both wear and transfer volumes increase, with the highest values recorded being from the tests conducted at 125 °C. Both volumes then decrease as the test temperature is further increased with low wear and transfer volumes being observed at the highest temperature of 275 °C; moreover, the wear and transfer volumes are very similar at this test temperature. It should be noted that at 125 °C, the wear volume is extremely high compared to that observed at the other test temperatures (almost twice as that observed at room temperature and around six times as that observed at 275 °C), although it is noted that the transfer volume also exhibits its highest value at the same temperature. In light of the changes observed at 125 °C for testing conducted at 20 Hz, this frequency-dependent temperature is referred to as a critical temperature. For the 200 Hz case, in general, both the wear and transfer volumes are either comparable to or lower than those observed in the tests conducted at the lower frequency. No critical temperature with very high wear and transfer volumes is observed. However, the same trend of an increase in wear volume followed by a decrease for both frequencies is evident. It should be noted that at both frequencies, the transfer volume is higher than the wear volume at 275 °C.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Wear volume (\(V^{ - }\)) and transfer volume (\(V^{ + }\)) as a function of test temperature at 100,000 cycles at fretting frequencies (a) 20 Hz and (b) 200 Hz

Figure 8 shows the average surface profiles across the wear scars on the flat specimens at three temperatures [namely the lowest (RT) and highest (275 °C) temperatures examined, along with the critical temperature identified for the 20-Hz case (125 °C)] for both fretting frequencies at 100,000 cycles. At the lower frequency (Fig. 8a), only material removal has occurred at room temperature. At test temperature of 125 °C, the scar is much wider and deeper, with significant material build-up occurring at both sides of the scar. With a further increase in temperature to 275 °C, the scar is much smaller again, but unlike the profile at room temperature, there is still significant material build-up at the scar edges. The profiles from scars generated by fretting at the higher frequency (Fig. 8b) have both similarities and differences in comparison with those from tests conducted at the lower frequency. At room temperature, obvious material build-up on the flat specimen can be observed across the scar width. As this build-up is not compensated for elsewhere in the scar, this indicates that in this case, a fraction of the material lost from the cylindrical specimen (see \(V^{ - }\) at this number of cycles in Fig. 6b) has been transferred to the flat specimen. Similar to the lower frequency, the scar gets much deeper at test temperature of 125 °C, but it is much less deep than the scar generated at 20 Hz; also, there is no substantial build-up of material at the edges of the scar as was seen for the lower frequency test. The scar profiles following testing at 275 °C are similar in size and shape at both the high and low frequencies.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Average surface profiles across the wear scars on the flat specimens as a function of test temperatures at 100,000 cycles at fretting frequencies of (a) 20 Hz and (b) 200 Hz

Figure 9 shows the BSE SEM images of the plan view of the wear scars on the flat specimens following fretting for increasing numbers of cycles at 20 Hz at the three selected temperatures. At room temperature, the scars keep growing in width with the increase in the number of fretting cycles. All the scars are evenly covered with oxide-based debris, but the debris layer exhibits a lighter grey contrast than the debris layers generated at the other temperatures, indicating that it has a more metallic character (or is significantly thinner). Regions with clear metallic features (much brighter contrast regions) can be observed spread across the scars, even in the scar following fretting for 500,000 cycles; this indicates that the oxide layer has been lost from these areas. At 125 °C, even following only 10,000 cycles of fretting, localised regions of severe damage and debris build-up can be seen. This variation in the degree of damage across the width of the SEM image (about 4 mm in width) persists in the wear scar following fretting for 100,000 cycles, but has largely been eliminated following fretting for 500,000 cycles. The three-dimensional surface profiles of the flat specimens with different numbers of cycles exhibit this localisation of damage (Fig. 10), indicating that the regions where damage appears to be more prevalent are in fact very deep in the middle of the scar and have associated significant build-up of material (oxide-based debris or displaced substrate material) outside the main contact area. This localisation of damage along with regions with clear metallic character within the scar exists at the lower number of cycles, but have been broadly eliminated (being replaced by an oxide-based debris layer with almost complete coverage) following fretting for 500,000 cycles. At 275 °C, the scar is covered with a compacted and complete oxide-based debris layer even following fretting for only 10,000 cycles (with very little evidence of any regions with strongly metallic character). There is only very slight growth in the width of the wear scar as the number of fretting cycles increases even up to 500,000 cycles; in addition, the morphology of the wear scar surface appears to be almost independent of the number of cycles. It should be noted that the wear damage following testing at both room temperature and 275 °C is uniformly distributed along the contact line; therefore, only the three-dimensional surface profiles of the tests under 125 °C (which exhibit localisation of damage) have been presented.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Back-scattered electron SEM plan-view micrographs of wear scars on the flat specimens as a function of temperature and number of cycles at fretting frequency of 20 Hz

Fig. 10
figure 10

Topography of the surface of the flat specimen with the increase in fretting cycles with a test temperature of 125 °C and a fretting frequency of 20 Hz. The height information is indicated by colour, with the colour scale marker being calibrated in micrometres (Color figure online)

To study the structure of the oxide layers on the wear scars, the flat specimens from the tests fretted for 100,000 cycles have been sectioned and examined via BSE SEM imaging. The top row in Fig. 11 shows overviews of the whole scars at the three temperatures, with the images below providing higher magnification images of certain regions within the scars. At room temperature, there is partial coverage of the wear scar surface with oxide debris layers. In these regions, the oxide layer is thick (about 20 µm), with evidence that shear damage occurs within the oxide debris layer itself (as indicated by the cross-hatch pattern of damage); similar patterns of oxide shear in fretting have been reported elsewhere [29]. At 125 °C, significant material build-up towards the edges of the scar is observed; this material is metallic substrate material (as opposed to oxide debris) which has been plastically deformed and pushed above the original surface. Towards the edges of the main scars, a thick (about 30 µm) and compacted oxide debris layer is partly formed on the worn surface. Large (~1 µm) metallic particles (very bright compared to the surrounding oxide-based debris) can be observed inside the layer. The oxide in the middle of the scar is much thinner, but again exhibits the presence of metallic particles within the debris. At 275 °C, the whole scar is covered with thin (~5 µm) but highly compacted oxide layer. EDX analysis has been performed on the oxide layers for all test temperatures. The results qualitatively indicate that the debris layers have a higher oxide content at 125 and 275 °C.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Back-scattered electron SEM cross-sectional micrographs of wear scars on the flat specimens with different temperatures (ambient, 125 °C, 275 °C) at 100,000 cycles with fretting frequency of 20 Hz

Given that there appears to be a change in damage mechanism in the samples fretted at 125 °C and 20 Hz between 100,000 cycles and 500,000 cycles, a further cross section was examined following fretting for 500,000 cycles under these conditions, with the SEM images being shown in Fig. 12. Following 500,000 cycles, a thick (about 20 µm) oxide-based debris layer has been observed to cover almost all of the scar; whilst exhibiting fairly full coverage, it is not as compact as the debris observed following fretting at 275 °C.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Back-scattered electron SEM cross-sectional micrographs of wear scars on the flat specimens with test temperature of 125 °C at 500,000 cycles with fretting frequency of 20 Hz

Figure 13 shows the BSE SEM images of the plan view of the wear scars on the flat specimens following fretting for increasing numbers of cycles at 200 Hz at the three selected temperatures. After 10,000 cycles, clear metallic surfaces are exposed in the middle of the scar at all three test temperatures. At room temperature, only small part of the scar at the edges is covered with oxide; this increases at higher test temperatures, but the whole scar is not covered, even at 275 °C. At room temperature, as the number of fretting cycles increases, the wear scar starts to become evenly covered with oxide-based debris but clear metallic features can still be observed; there is a similarity between the scars generated at 20 and 200 Hz for the larger numbers of cycles. At 125 °C, with the development of the wear scar, localised regions of severe damage can again be seen, but these appear to be less significant than those observed in the tests at this temperature at 20 Hz. The majority of the scar is covered with oxide-based debris after 30,000 cycles, but clear metallic features can also be observed. The oxide layer developed at this test appears to be less dense and compact than the one developed at 125 °C under 20 Hz. At 275 °C, the fretting scar is almost completely covered with a compacted oxide-based debris layer after 30,000 cycles; there is a little change in the width and nature of the wear scar following 30,000 cycles, which is similar to the behaviour observed at same temperature under fretting at 20 Hz.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Back-scattered electron SEM plan-view micrographs of wear scars on the flat specimens as a function of temperature and number of cycles at fretting frequency of 200 Hz

To study the structure of oxide layers on the wear scars, the flat specimens from the tests fretted at 200 Hz for 100,000 cycles have been sectioned and examined via BSE SEM imaging in the same way as for the tests conducted at 20 Hz. BSE SEM images of the cross sections are presented in Fig. 14. At room temperature, an oxide layer is observed on the two sides of the wear scar which is more compacted than the oxide layer of observed following fretting at the same test temperature under 20 Hz; furthermore, EDX analysis indicates a higher oxygen content in the debris layer in the sample fretting at the higher frequency. Following fretting at 125 °C, the debris layer is very different to that observed following fretting at the same temperature at 20 Hz; at 200 Hz, the debris layer is thin (about 5 µm) at the sides and no oxide layer is formed at the centre; moreover, there is no evidence of metallic particles being incorporated into the debris layer structure. However, as the temperature is increased further to 275 °C, the differences between the oxide-based debris layers at the two fretting frequencies diminish; at 275 °C, the debris layer is again thin and highly compacted.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Back-scattered electron SEM cross-sectional micrographs of wear scars on the flat specimens with different temperatures (Amb, 125 °C, 275 °C) at 100,000 cycles with fretting frequency of 200 Hz

For all the wear scars shown in Fig. 14 generated following fretting at 200 Hz, cracking in the bulk material was observed below the scar. Moreover, the degree and severity of the cracking observed increase with increasing test temperature. No such cracking was observed in any of the tests following fretting at 20 Hz (see Figs. 11, 12).

4 Discussion

It is clear that both test temperature and fretting frequency exert strong influences on the wear behaviour for the system examined. Their variation will cause changes in the underlying physical processes which together govern the overall fretting wear behaviour (i.e. the surface damage). These changes in the physical processes can either promote surface damage or protect the worn surface from further damage. An interaction diagram (Fig. 15) has been developed to describe the main physical processes which directly influence the wear behaviour and to relate these to changes in the parameters which were controlled in the text matrix, namely temperature and frequency. Specifically, the diagram indicates how a change in the two controlled parameters (either a positive or negative change) will influence the basic physical processes (either positively or negatively) and thus how the damage will be influenced. For example, an increase in temperature will result in an increase in the oxidation rate and thus an increase in the amount of oxide formed. The influence of this on damage is less clear:

Fig. 15
figure 15

Interaction diagram, linking the experimental parameters with the main features which influence the wear behaviour in terms of surface damage

  • The oxide may act in an abrasive manner and thus the increase in the amount of oxide formed would lead to an increased wear (note that on the interaction diagram (Fig. 15), this is described via a decrease in temperature);

  • The higher temperature may also result in an increased tendency for oxide agglomeration which promotes formation of a stable oxide layer from the oxide debris which has formed; such a debris bed will protect the worn surface and lead to reduced wear.

In addition, the diagram (Fig. 15) indicates that a higher temperature will also result in a reduction in the bulk material strength which increases the plastic deformation and bulk material redistribution in the contact.

Similarly, an increase in fretting frequency can increase the temperature in the contact due to higher frictional power dissipation. However, an increase in fretting frequency will also result in a reduction in the inter-pass time (time between asperity interactions for a given asperity) which will reduce the oxide formation per cycle. This may reduce abrasion, but may also inhibit the formation of the debris bed at the same time. As such, the physical processes linked to changes in temperature and fretting frequency clearly compete against each other, and thus the change in the damage mechanism (and wear rate) will depend upon which of the influences is dominant.

The SEM images from the top of the wear scar on the flat specimens for the low frequency tests in Fig. 9 show that at room temperature, the wear scar keeps increasing in size as fretting proceeds, with no significant change in appearance (indicating no change in mechanism); this is in accord with the constant wear rate as observed in Fig. 6. Clear metallic features are observed in all the wear scars, even with the highest numbers of fretting cycles, suggesting that the oxide debris bed is continually broken down and that a stable oxide layer to protect the wearing surface does not form. This continual formation and removal of the oxide layer in the fretting scar may explain the significant fluctuations (of about 0.1) in μ E recorded throughout this test (Fig. 5a).

In contrast, the SEM images for the tests conducted at the highest temperature (275 °C) in Fig. 9 indicate that the wear scar developed to form a thick, protective debris bed in the first 10,000 cycles and thereafter did not significantly increase in width. The scar is covered with a complete, compacted oxide layer without any metallic features being observed. The μ E recorded in tests conducted at this test temperature dropped quickly and became low and stable after 20,000 cycles (see Fig. 5a). Together, these indicate that a stable oxide layer has formed and acted as a stable third body between the fretting surfaces; it has functioned as a solid lubricant and has protected the substrate material from further damage.

The comparison of the cross-sectional SEM images (Fig. 11) provides more details regarding the differences in the way that the oxide debris behaves at these two temperatures. The oxide debris formed at room temperature only covers part of the surface and appears to be loose and friable. At 275 °C, the oxide layer formed is thin but much more compacted. The higher temperature results in higher inter-particle force between individual the oxide debris particles [18], which encourages the retention of the debris inside the contact; additionally, the high temperature results in sintering which further enhances stability of the debris bed. In addition, EDX analysis indicates a higher oxygen level in the debris layer formed at the higher temperature.

At the critical temperature (125 °C) at 20 Hz, the wear scar developed quickly in the first 100,000 cycles, but then became stable, and grew very little with further increases in the number of fretting cycles. The plan-view SEM images (Fig. 9) of scars generated at this temperature indicate that damage occurs in specific patches in the initial stages (unlike the pattern of damage seen in any other tests). The damage gradually fills in all along the scar as the number of fretting cycles increases. Very clear metallic features are observed in the wear scar in the early stages of fretting; however, the scar becomes almost completely covered with oxides in the later stages. A cross section through the wear scar after 100,000 cycles (Fig. 11) indicates that only a thin oxide debris existed at the centre of the scar; it is suggested that this is not a protective debris layer. In contrast, at the sides of the scar, a thick (about 20 µm) oxide layer exists. Following 500,000 cycles, the nature of the debris in the centre of the wear scar has changed; a relatively thick oxide layer has formed and covered much of the scar (Fig. 12). The very significant reduction in wear rate following 100,000 cycles (see Fig. 6) indicates that this oxide layer must be protective in nature; in contrast to the oxide layer formed at the highest temperature, this layer is thick (about 20 µm) and is less compacted. A change in wear behaviour has clearly occurred under this fretting condition. The oxidation rate at 125 °C will be higher than at room temperature [30]. However, the formation of the stable oxide layer takes longer than at 275 °C as the temperature is not high enough to rapidly sinter the debris particles into a dense bed.

It is notable that at 100,000 cycles, the net wear volume (\(V^{ - } - V^{ + }\)) at the critical temperature is very similar to that observed at room temperature (see Fig. 7a). This indicates that the very deep scar observed at 125 °C is associated with material redistribution. As indicated in Fig. 16, there is a significant reduction in the strength of 304 stainless steel between room temperature and 300 °C (the yield strength drops from almost 300 MPa to <150 MPa over this range). It should also be noted that the redistribution of material starts to occur only at some positions along the contact and gradually covers the whole wear scar as the number of fretting cycles increases (see Figs. 9, 10). This indicates that the formation and breakdown of the thick oxide layer (observed in Figs. 11, 12) at the critical temperature may cause the actual contact between the fretting specimens to be concentrated in just a few places; this can result in very high contact pressures at those positions which go on to cause the very uneven damage across the contact line as observed in Fig. 10. The contact pressure concentration together with the reduction in strength at 125 °C results in a much higher degree of plastic deformation of the bulk material due to the tractional forces in fretting. The bulk material at the centre is therefore pushed to the sides and forms the significant build-up of material at the edges of the scar (see Figs. 8, 11). When the temperature is further increased to 275 °C, the formation of the stable debris bed results in (1) a reduction in the tractional force (see Fig. 11) due to a reduction in the coefficient of friction and (2) uniform contact surfaces without high-pressure concentration; in addition, the wear scar becomes much shallower, thus reducing the tractional forces associated with the ploughing effect [31]. Despite the yield stress of the substrate itself reducing further at this increased temperature, the dense debris later formed is clearly able to shield the substrate material since no gross plastic deformation is observed.

Fig. 16
figure 16

Yield strength of 304 stainless steel as a function of temperature [6]

The plan-view SEM images for the high frequency (200 Hz) fretting tests (Fig. 13) show that at all three temperatures examined, significant portions of the metal surface are exposed (without any covering of oxide-based debris) in the early stages of scar development. This indicates that less oxide is formed within the same numbers of fretting cycles because of the reduction in inter-pass time. This reduction in the rate of oxide formation may result in a reduction in the rate of abrasion, and also a reduction in the rate of material being lost from the contact in the form of oxide, both of which will contribute to the reduction in wear rate compared to that observed at the lower fretting frequency (Fig. 6). In the tests conducted at 125 °C and 200 Hz, no discontinuity in the development of the wear volume with number of cycles was observed (Fig. 6); the wear volume increases almost linearly with the number of cycles with the rate being almost the same as the rate observed at the room temperature. This indicates that no fully protective oxide layer has been formed by 500,000 cycles. Figure 13 shows that at 125 °C, the scar surface which is evident following 500,000 cycles still has significant metallic character, which indicates that the oxide is being lost and reformed within the contact. Its inability to build a protective debris bed results from the shorter inter-pass time; this is despite the increase in contact temperature that will result from the higher frictional power dissipation at this frequency (estimated to be of the order of 70–150 K by Jin et al. [5]), and indicates that the effect of the reduced inter-pass time dominates over that of the increased temperature. In addition, material build-up only appears at some positions along the wear scar, and it is much less significant compared to that observed in the low frequency test (see Fig. 14). At the highest temperature examined (275 °C), the oxidation rate is high enough that (despite the shorter inter-pass times at this high fretting frequency) a stable oxide debris bed has been able to form, which has resulted in the associated low rates of wear being observed.

Cracks are observed both in the cross-sectional (Fig. 14) SEM images for the high frequency tests. This implies that fretting fatigue dominated the damage at some stage of the fretting process. Because of the lower oxidation rate of the high frequency test at the early stage, more direct metal to metal contacts are expected at the first few thousands cycles. This can lead to more material adhesion and less gross sliding wear, which may result in the cracks observed. Furthermore, the increase in fretting frequency would cause significant reduction in fretting fatigue life [32], which makes cracks more likely to occur under high fretting frequency, even at the same number of cycles. The cracks get longer and the damage areas increase with increasing temperature. The reduction in strength of the bulk material as shown in Fig. 16 is the underlying feature which governs this behaviour.

5 Conclusions

The mechanisms and rates of fretting wear for 304 stainless steel were found to be significantly influenced by both environmental temperature and fretting frequency. At low temperatures, fretting was associated with the formation of oxide debris which was continually expelled from the contact as wear proceeded. As the temperature was increased, the mechanisms changed such that the oxide which was formed was retained in the contact and developed into a protective oxide bed which resulted in very much reduced rates of wear. The temperature at which this transition takes place is dependent upon the fretting frequency. The influence of these two parameters (temperature and fretting frequency) on the mechanisms and rates of fretting are complex and interdependent, relating to rates of formation of oxide, the tendency for the oxide formed to be either retained in or rejected from the contact, and the changes in the strength and fatigue behaviour of the materials. Many influences compete, but those which influence the tendency of the oxide to be retained in the contact and form a protective debris bed are found to be dominant.