Skip to main content
Log in

Necessary Identities: From Bernard Williams to Feminist Critique

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the fruitful concept of necessary identity, put forward by Bernard Williams in Shame and Necessity (1993) in order to explain a peculiar kind of social identity. Firstly, we will investigate the foundation of this concept, by analyzing Williams’s account of personal practical identity. To this end, we will discuss the role played by luck and necessity in Williams’ understanding of personal practical identity. Secondly, we will focus on the analysis of necessary identities by addressing two historical examples given by Williams. In the second part of the paper, we will consider a debate that followed Williams’s concept of necessary identity, which was taken up by Margaret Walker in light of feminist accounts about necessary identity constitution. In Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics (2007) Walker deepens Williams’s position by focusing on the invisible mechanisms of social power and misrecognition that perpetuate the immutability of some social identities; as a model of the perpetuation of necessary identities we will discuss Angela Davis’s positions in Women, Race and Class. From a feminist perspective, we will investigate gender identity as a necessary identity which personal character develops within. From a point of view of the affective situation, we are particularly interested in examining necessary identities as a dispositive where emotion repertoire takes place. Dwelling on the link between Williams’s and Walker’s accounts sheds new light on how personal development and emotion regulation take place within a practical identity that stems from asymmetrical relations of power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. On Williams’s account, character is a basic element that distinguishes a person from another and it is composed by projects: «an individual person has a set of desires, concerns or, as I shall often call them, projects, which help to constitute a character». Character is made up by life-projects that give a person «a reason for living this life, in the sense that he has no desire to give up and make room for others, but they do not require him to lead a distinctive life».

  2. Williams distinguishes between accidental luck and constitutive luck throughout the examples of the fictious Gaugin and Anna Karenina.

  3. In Shame and Necessity Williams explores the role of shame in Ancient Greek literature in order to overcome the dichotomy between shame and guilt, whereby guilt should be morally superior to shame, and to reflect on contemporary issues, especially about social justice questions.

  4. In Shame and Necessity, p. 107, Williams writes: «It was important for the ideology of this institution that the slaves were mostly barbarians, people who did not speak Greek, usually from the north and the northeast. […] The supply of slaves had to be renewed, and this was by no means necessarily a matter of regular warfare. The skills involved in capturing people to be slaves are said by Aristotle to be “a kind of hunting”; being a slave trader was regarded as both dangerous and unpopular».

  5. This is attested by numerous characters in pieces of Ancient Greek literature, as Tekmessa in Iliad or Hecuba and the suppliants in Euripides’s tragedies: being enslaved was a life disaster for which there was nothing to do but sorrow.

  6. Williams notices that in Athens a manumitted slave was a metic, a status that carried fewer rights than being a citizen but was already far away from being a slave.

  7. To the extent that Aristotle had tried to establish it on natural basis (Politics, 1253b, pp. 20, 23).

  8. Williams notices that if free Greeks had thought of chattel slavery as a just institution, they would also have thought that the slaves themselves—free people captured into slavery, for instance—would have been mistaken to complain about it. Most people did not suppose the justice of slavery due to its necessity: a further argument would be needed, as the one Aristotle tried to find.

  9. Woman is considered a social identity for females whereas citizens was referred to free males.

  10. Contrary to the perspective endorsed by Martha Nussbaum (Nussbaum 2001, 2004) and traceable back to Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics and Rhetoric.

References

  • Bartky SL (1990) Femininity and domination: studies in the phenomenology of oppression. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker A (2017) Gender in the history of early modern politcal thought. Hist J 60(4):843–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib S (1987) The genderalized and the concrete other. In: Kittay EF, Meyers DT (eds) Women and moral theory. Rowman and Littlefiled, New Jersey, pp 154–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1987) Distinction: a social critique of the judgment of taste. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler J (1990) Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun C (2004) An apology for moral shame. J Political Philos 12(2):127–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card C (1990) Gender and moral luck. In: Rorty AO, Flanagan O, Rorty AO (eds) Indentity, character, and morality. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Card C (1996) The unnatural lottery. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Card C (2002) Responsibility ehics, shared understandings, and moral communities. Hypatia 17(1):141–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombetti G, Krueger J (2015) Scaffoldings of the affective mind. Philos Psychol 28(8):1157–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane A (2013) Slavery as a management practice: exploring the conditions and capabilities for human exploitation. Acad Manag Rev 38(1):49–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis A (1981) Women, race and class. Random House, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Desalvo A, Egan J, Kabat M, Stoller R (2017) The tip of the iceberg: media coverage of slave labour in Argentina. Latin Am Perspect 44(6):50–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanon F (1952) Peau noire, masques blancs. Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser N (2014) Fortune del femminismo. Dal capitalismo regolato dallo Stato alla crisi. Ombre Corte, Verona

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussi A (2018) Per una teoria della vergogna. ETS, Pisa

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths P, Scarantino A (2005) Emotions in the wild. In: Robbins P, Aydede M (eds) The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 437–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth A (1993) Riconoscimento e disprezzo. Sui fondamenti di un’etica post-tradizionale. Rubbettino, Messina

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth A (2017) La libertà Negli altri. Saggi di filosofia sociale. Il Mulino, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks B (2021) Il Femminismo è per tutti. Tam, Napoli

    Google Scholar 

  • Longoni G (2021) Femminismo contemporaneo tra neoliberismo e alternativa del 99%. Politica e Società 3:431–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus H, Nurius P (1986) Possible selves. Am Psychol 9:954–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Maur I (2018) Die epistemische relevanz des fühlens – habitualisierte affektive intentionalität im verstehensprozess. Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück

    Google Scholar 

  • von Maur I (2023) The situatednesss of shame and shaming: ‘little worlds’ and social transformation. In: Fussi A, Rodogno R (eds) The moral psychology of shame. Rowman and Littlefiled, London, pp 161–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty M (2005) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M (2001) Upheavals of thought: the intelligence of emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M (2004) Emotions as judgements of value and importance. In: Solomon RC (ed) Thinking about feeling: contemporary philosophers on emotion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 183–199

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Okumu J (2007) Personal identity, projects and morality. Bernard Williams’s early writings. Ethical Perspect 14(1):13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson B, Fischer AH, Manstead AS (2005) Emotions in social relations: cultural, group, and interpersonal processes. Psychology Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rottenberg C (2020) L’ascesa del femminismo neoliberista. Ombre Corte, Verona

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scarantino A (2004) Affordances explained. In: Proceedings of the 2002 biennal meeting of the philosophy of science association, p 949–961

  • Scott J (1986) Gender: an useful category in historical analysis. Am Hist Rev 91:1053–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelman E (1988) Inessential woma: probelms of exclusion in feminist thought. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason KK (2015) Shame, violence and morality. Philos Phenomenol Res 91(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomason KK (2018) Naked: the dark side of shame and moral life. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomason KK (2023) Shame, gender and self-making. In: Fussi A, Rodogno R (eds) The moral psychology of shame. Rowman & Littlefield, London, pp 205–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban Walker M (1991) Moral luck and the virtues of impure agency. Metaphilosophy 22(1):14–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban Walker M (1997) Picking up pieces: lives, stories and integrity. In: Meyers DT (ed) Feminists rethink the self. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 174–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban Walker M (2007) Moral understandings: a feminist study in ethics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Velleman D (2001) The genesis of shame. Philos Public Affairs 30(1):27–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams B (1972) Morality. An introduction to ethics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams B (1973) Problems of the self. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams B (1981) Moral luck. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams B (1993) Shame and necessity. University of California Press, Berkeley-Los Angeles

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margherita Giannoni.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fussi, A., Giannoni, M. Necessary Identities: From Bernard Williams to Feminist Critique. Topoi (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09980-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09980-9

Keywords

Navigation