Skip to main content
Log in

What Kind of Information is Brain Information?

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neural systems process information. This platitude contains an interesting ambiguity between multiple senses of the term “information.” According to a popular thought, the ambiguity is best resolved by reserving semantic concepts of information for the explication of neural activity at a high level of organization, and quantitative concepts of information for the explication of neural activity at a low level of organization. This article articulates the justification behind this view, and concludes that it is an oversimplification. An analysis of the meaning of claims about Shannon information rates in the spiking activity of neurons is then developed. On the basis of that analysis, it is shown that quantitative conceptions of information are more intertwined with semantic concepts than they seem to be, and, partially for that reason, are also more philosophically interesting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Versions of this idea are supported, for example, in Skyrms (2010), Harms (2006), Godfrey-Smith and Martínez (2013), and Calcott and Griffiths (2017).

  2. For a discussion of this issue, see Chapter 8 of Dennett (2017).

  3. Notice that this strategy entails, but is not entailed by, the necessary condition for the attribution of semantic properties mentioned above. This places Dennett’s approach to semantic information within the naturalistic tradition.

  4. But see Rathkopf (2017) for a recent exception.

References

  • Bennett MR, Hacker PMS (2003) Philosophical foundations of neuroscience, 1st edn. Wiley, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Borst A, Theunissen FE (1999) Information theory and neural coding. Nat Neurosci 2(11):947–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calcott B, Griffiths PE, Pocheville A (2017) Signals that make a difference. Br J Philos Sci

  • Cao R (2012) A teleosemantic approach to information in the brain. Biol Philos 27(1):49–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayan P, Abbott LF (2001) Theoretical neuroscience, vol 10. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (1989) The intentional stance. MIT press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (1996) Darwin’s dangerous idea: evolution and the meanings of life. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (2017) From bacteria to bach and back: the evolution of minds. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P (2011) Signals: evolution, learning, and information, by Brian Skyrms. Mind 120(480):1288–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P, Martínez M (2013) Communication and common interest. PLoS Comput Biol 9(11):e1003282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P, Sterelny K (2008) Biological information. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford fall 2008 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms WF (2006) What is information? three concepts. Biol Theory 1(3):230–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch K, McLean J, Berry M, Sterling P, Balasubramanian V, Freed MA (2004) Efficiency of information transmission by retinal ganglion cells. Curr Biol 14(17):1523–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy W, Baxter RA (2002) Energy-efficient neuronal computation via quantal synaptic failures. J Neurosci 22(11):4746–4755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5(4):115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meister M, Berry MJ (1999) The neural code of the retina. Neuron 22(3):435–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ovsepian SV, Dolly JO (2011) Dendritic snares add a new twist to the old neuron theory. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(48):19113–19120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccinini G, Scarantino A (2011) Information processing, computation, and cognition. J Biol Phys 37(1):1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathkopf C (2017) Neural information and the problem of objectivity. Biol Philos 32(3):321–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieke F, Warland D, Bialek W (1993) Coding efficiency and information rates in sensory neurons. EPL (Europhys Lett) 22(2):151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford ST, Bassler BL (2012) Bacterial quorum sensing: its role in virulence and possibilities for its control. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Med 2(11):a012427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of information. University of Illinois Press, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpee T, Rust NC, Bialek W (2004) Analyzing neural responses to natural signals: maximally informative dimensions. Neural Comput 16(2):223–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms B (2010) Signals: evolution, learning, and information. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vinga S (2013) Information theory applications for biological sequence analysis. Brief Bioinform 15(3):376–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Rathkopf.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rathkopf, C. What Kind of Information is Brain Information?. Topoi 39, 95–102 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9512-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9512-6

Keywords

Navigation