Abstract
A kinetic study for dry reforming of methane over Ni–Ce/Al2O3 catalyst was performed, taking into account both the main reactions and the catalyst deactivation. The catalyst was prepared by a sequential wet impregnation process, with loadings of 5 wt.% Ni and 10 wt.% Ce. Experimental tests were carried out in a fixed bed reactor between 475 and 550 °C and several spatial times, using nitrogen as diluent. Several kinetic equations were compared. The best fit of experimental data was achieved using a Langmuir–Hinshelwood mechanism which takes into account the presence of two active sites. Pre-exponential factor and activation energy were calculated. the kinetics of deactivation was also determined. The relationship between catalyst activity and coke concentration was also studied. Several deactivation equations were considered in order to choose the best fit with experimental data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aramouni NAK, Touma JG, Tarboush BA, Zeaiter J, Ahmad MN (2018) Catalyst design for dry reforming of methane: analysis review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:2570–2585
Khoshtinat Nikoo M, Amin NAS (2011) Thermodynamic analysis of carbon dioxide reforming of methane in view of solid carbon formation. Fuel Process Technol 92:678–691
Alenazey FS (2014) Utilizing carbon dioxide as a regenerative agent in methane dry reforming to improve hydrogen production and catalyst activity and longevity. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:18632–18641
Drif A, Bion N, Brahmi R, Ojala S, Pirault-Roy L, Turpeinen E, Seelam PK, Keiski RL, Epron F (2015) Study of the dry reforming of methane and ethanol using Rh catalysts supported on doped alumina. Appl Catal A 504:576–584
Steinhauer B, Kasireddy MR, Radnik J, Martin A (2009) Development of Ni-Pd bimetallic catalysts for the utilization of carbon dioxide and methane by dry reforming. Appl Catal A 366:333–341
Usman M, Wan Daud WMA, Abbas HF (2015) Dry reforming of methane: Influence of process parameters: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45:710–744
Sengupta S, Ray K, Deo G (2014) Effects of modifying Ni/Al2O3 catalyst with cobalt on the reforming of CH4 with CO2 and cracking of CH4 reactions. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:11462–11472
Laosiripojana N, Sutthisripok W, Assabumrungrat S (2005) Synthesis gas production from dry reforming of methane over CeO2 doped Ni/Al2O3: influence of the doping ceria on the resistance toward carbon formation. Chem Eng J 112:13–22
Ay H, Üner D (2015) Dry reforming of methane over CeO2 supported Ni, Co and Ni-Co catalysts. Appl Catal B 179:128–138
Herguido J, Menéndez M (2017) Advances and trends in two-zone fluidized-bed reactors. Curr Opin Chem Eng 17:15–21
El Solh T, Jarosch K, de Lasa H (2003) Catalytic dry reforming of methane in a CREC riser simulator kinetic modeling and model discrimination. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:2507–2515
Gokon N, Yamawaki Y, Nakazawa D, Kodama T (2011) Kinetics of methane reforming over Ru/γ-Al2O3-catalyzed metallic foam at 650–900 °C for solar receiver-absorbers. Int J Hydrog Energy 36:203–215
Kathiraser Y, Oemar U, Saw ET, Li Z, Kawi S (2015) Kinetic and mechanistic aspects for CO2 reforming of methane over Ni based catalysts. Chem Eng J 278:62–78
Mark MF, Maier WF, Mark F (1997) Reaction kinetics of the CO2 reforming of methane. Chem Eng Technol 20(6):361–370
Benguerba Y, Virginie M, Dumas C, Ernst B (2017) Methane dry reforming over Ni-Co/Al2O3: kinetic modelling in a catalytic fixed-bed reactor. Int J Chem React Eng 15(6)
Özkara-Aydınoğlu Ş, Erhan Aksoylu A (2013) A comparative study on the kinetics of carbon dioxide reforming of methane over Pt–Ni/Al2O3 catalyst: effect of Pt/Ni ratio. Chem Eng J 215–216:542–549
Wang S, Lu GQ (1999) A comprehensive study on carbon dioxide reforming of methane over Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalysts. Ind Eng Chem Res 38(7):2615–2625
Pakhare D, Spivey J (2014) A review of dry (CO2) reforming of methane over noble metal catalysts. Chem Soc Rev 43:7813–7837
Ginsburg JM, Piña J, El Solh T, de Lasa H (2005) Coke formation over a nickel catalyst under methane dry reforming conditions: thermodynamic and kinetic models. Ind Eng Chem Res 44(14):4846–4854
Ayodele BV, Khan MR, Lam SS, Cheng CK (2016) Production of CO-rich hydrogen from methane dry reforming over lanthania-supported cobalt catalyst: kinetic and mechanistic studies. Int J Hydrog Energy 41(8):4603–4615
Wang S, Lu GQ, Millar GJ (1996) Carbon dioxide reforming of methane to produce synthesis gas over metal-supported catalysts: state of the art. Energy Fuel 10:896–904
Wang S, Lu GQ (2000) Reaction kinetics and deactivation of Ni-based catalysts in CO2 reforming of methane. React Eng Pollut Prev 8:75–84
Osaki T, Horiuchi T, Suzuki K, Mori T (1997) Catalyst performance of MoS2 and WS2 for the CO2-reforming of CH4 suppression of carbon deposition. Appl Catal A 155(2):229–238
Foo SY, Cheng K, Nguyen TH, Adesina AA (2010) Kinetic study of methane CO2 reforming on Co–Ni/Al2O3 and Ce–Co–Ni/Al2O3 catalysts. Catal Today 164:221–226
Barroso Quiroga MM, Castro Luna AE (2007) Kinetic analysis of rate data for dry reforming of methane. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:5265–5270
Fan MS, Abdullah AZ, Bhatia S (2009) Catalytic technology for carbon dioxide reforming of methane to synthesis gas. Chem Cat Chem 1:192–208
Benguerba Y, Dehimi L, Virginie M, Dumas C, Ernst B (2015) Modelling of methane dry reforming over Ni/Al2O3 catalyst in a fixed-bed catalytic reactor. React Kinet Mech Catal 114:109–119
Richardson JT, Paripatyadar SA (1990) Carbon dioxide reforming of methane with supported rhodium. Appl Catal 61:293–309
Snoeck JW, Froment GF, Fowles M (1997) Kinetic study of the carbon filament formation by methane cracking on a nickel catalyst. J Catal 169:250–262
Snoeck JW, Froment GF, Fowles M (2002) Steam/CO2 reforming of methane. Carbon filament formation by the Boudouard reaction and gasification by CO2, by H2, and by steam: kinetic study. Ind Eng Chem Res 41:4252–4265
Chein RY, Hsu WH, Yu CT (2017) Parametric study of catalytic dry reforming of methane for syngas production at elevated pressures. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:14485–14500
Monzón A, Romeo E, Borgna A (2003) Relationship between the kinetic parameters of different catalyst deactivation models. Chem Eng J 94(1):19–28
Corella J, Adanez J, Monzón A (1988) Some intrinsic kinetic equations and deactivation mechanisms leading to deactivation curves with a residual activity. Ind Eng Chem Res 27:375–381
Świrk K, Gálvez ME, Motak M, Grzybek T, Da Costa P (2018) Syngas production from dry methane reforming over yttrium-promoted nickel-KIT-6 catalysts. Int J Hydrog Energy 44(1):274–286
Gimeno MP, Soler J, Herguido J, Menéndez M (2010) Counteracting catalyst deactivation in methane aromatization with a two zone fluidized bed reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:996–1000
Yus M, Soler J, Herguido J, Menéndez M (2018) Glycerol steam reforming with low steam/glycerol ratio in a two-zone fluidized bed reactor. Catal Today 299:317–327
Ugarte P, Durán P, Lasobras J, Soler J, Menéndez M, Herguido J (2017) Dry reforming of biogas in fluidized bed: process intensification. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:13589–13597
Corella J, Asúa JM (1982) Kinetic equations of mechanistic type with nonseparable variables for catalyst deactivation by coke. Models and data analysis methods. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 21:55–61
Chen D, Lødeng R, Anundskås A, Olsvik O, Holmen A (2001) Deactivation during carbon dioxide reforming of methane over Ni catalyst: microkinetic analysis. Chem Eng Sci 56:1371–1379
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Ministry of Science and Technology (Spain) for financial support through Project ENE 2013-44350R.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zambrano, D., Soler, J., Herguido, J. et al. Kinetic Study of Dry Reforming of Methane Over Ni–Ce/Al2O3 Catalyst with Deactivation. Top Catal 62, 456–466 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-019-01157-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-019-01157-2