Abstract
Arterial and venous thrombotic events in COVID-19 cause significant morbidity and mortality among patients. Although international guidelines agree on the need for anticoagulation, it is unclear whether full-dose heparin anticoagulation confers additional benefits over prophylactic-dose anticoagulation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of heparin full-dose anticoagulation in hospitalized non-critically ill COVID-19 patients. We searched Pubmed/Medline, EMBASE, Clinicaltrials.gov, medRxiv.org and Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials dated up to April 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing full-dose heparin anticoagulation to prophylactic-dose anticoagulation or standard treatment in hospitalized non-critically ill COVID-19 patients were included in our pooled analysis. The primary endpoint was the rate of major thrombotic events and the co-primary endpoint was the rate of major bleeding events. We identified 4 studies, all of them multicenter, randomizing 2926 patients. Major thrombotic events were 23/1524 (1.5%) in full-dose heparin anticoagulation versus 57/1402 (4.0%) in prophylactic-dose [relative risk (RR) 0.39; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25–0.62; p˂0.01; I2 = 0%]. Clinical relevant bleeding events occurred in 1.7% (26/1524) among patients treated with heparin full anticoagulation dose compared to 1.1% (15/1403) in prophylactic-dose group (RR 1.60; 95% CI 0.85–3.03; p = 0.15; I2 = 20%). Mortality was 6.6% (101/1524) versus 8.6% (121/1402) (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.33–1.19; p = 0.15). In this meta-analysis of high quality multicenter randomized trials, full-dose anticoagulation with heparin was associated with lower rate of major thrombotic events without differences in bleeding risk and mortality in hospitalized non critically ill COVID-19 patients.
Study registration PROSPERO, review no. CRD42022301874.
Similar content being viewed by others
Highlights
-
Full anticoagulation reduces thrombosis in hospitalized non-critically ill COVID-19 patients
-
Full anticoagulation does not increase bleeding in hospitalized non-critically ill COVID-19
-
We present findings of meta-analysis of multicenter randomized controlled trials
-
Anticoagulation with full-dose heparin/LMWH is overall beneficial to COVID-19 patients
-
Randomized evidence supports the use of full-dose heparin/LMWH in COVID-19 patients
Introduction
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection lead to death over 6 million of people worldwide and it represents a challenge for all healthcare systems [1] .
There is increasing evidence that SARS-CoV-2 infection causes immune-mediated micro-thrombosis due to endothelial injury and vascular inflammation, which has been linked to development of COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multiple organ failure. In particular, several studies suggested that immunothrombosis has a key role in hypoxemic respiratory failure, the most common presentation of severe COVID-19. The term MicroCLOTS (Microvascular COVID-19 lung vessels obstructive thromboinflammatory syndrome) has been suggested to describe this particular type of ARDS [2] . Therefore, it has been hypothesized that early initiation of anticoagulation may prevent further disease progression. However, the best timing of initiation of anticoagulation remains to be determined. Furthermore, it is unclear whether full-dose therapeutic anticoagulation may confer additional advantage over a prophylactic regimen.
Prior clinical trials [3, 4] and meta-analyses [5, 6] showed contrasting results in terms of clinical benefits of anticoagulation. This heterogeneity in findings is probably related to the inclusion in meta-analyses of non- randomized controlled trials (RCTs), inclusion of patients with highly variable disease severity (from outpatients to patients requiring ICU admission) and lack of data from the most recent trials.
We therefore conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of available RCTs to investigate efficacy and safety of full-dose anticoagulation with heparin in hospitalized, non-critically ill patients with COVID-19.
Methods
This systematic review and meta-analysis was reported according to the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [7] and Cochrane methodology [8] . The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022301874).
The review question was designed with the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Study design) framework: Population: hospitalized, non-critically ill COVID-19 patients; Intervention: full-dose anticoagulation with heparin; Comparison: no full-dose anticoagulation (including standard treatment, placebo, or prophylactic-dose anticoagulation); Outcome: any of the primary and secondary outcomes as listed below; Study design: randomized controlled trials.
Search strategy and study selection
Two trained, independent authors searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, medRxiv.org, the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials and Clinicaltrials.gov (last updated April 2022) for appropriate studies. In addition, references of review articles and included RCTs were screened to identify additional studies. Studies were only included if there was agreement between the two authors and disagreements were resolved by discussion involving a third reviewer. No language restrictions were applied. We designed a search strategy to include RCTs comparing therapeutic-dose of heparin anticoagulation to heparin prophylactic-dose utilization in hospitalized non-critically ill COVID-19 patients. Inclusion criteria were: (1) randomized trials, (2) that enrolled hospitalized, non-critically ill adults (age ≥ 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of respiratory SARS-CoV-2 viral infection (RT-PCR or antigen testing) irrespective of age, gender or ethnicity, (3) comparing full-dose anticoagulation with heparin versus no full-dose anticoagulation. Exclusion criteria were: studies enrolling critically ill patients (defined according to Authors of each individual study), pediatric patients, non-hospitalized patients, a non-parallel design, a non-randomized or quasi-randomized study design. We performed our search strategy on PubMed and Embase in advanced mode with Boolean operators (all search strategies are available in the Supplementary material).
Study outcomes
The primary outcome of our study was the rate of major thrombotic events, defined according to Authors of each individual study. Co-primary outcome was rate of major bleeding events, defined according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) [9] .
Secondary outcomes were: all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up available; need for mechanical ventilation; a composite of death or need for mechanical ventilation; need for ICU admission; a composite of death or need for ICU admission.
Data abstraction and risk of bias assessment
Two trained authors separately abstracted data on study sample size patients, treatment type and dose, major thrombotic events (arterial and venous), clinical relevant bleeding events, need of ICU admission data (if this was missing we used intubation rate), need of intubation or any mechanical ventilation, and mortality at the longest follow-up available. We contacted by e-mail authors of the studies to obtain additional from investigators when not available in manuscripts (Supplementary material Table 1).
Risk of bias of included trials was assessed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and using the recommended version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of- bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) [10] . We assessed separately the fours items and we evaluated the potential risk of bias as “Low”, “Some concerns” or “High” for each study. RCTs included in the final analysis were assessed as high quality with low risk of bias. Small study effect and publication bias were assessed for primary endpoint by visual inspection funnel plot. Funnel plot asymmetry was assessed with Egger’s linear regression method performed using STATA 13 (StataCorp. 2013. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP).
Statistical analysis
All computations related to the outcomes were performed with RevMan 5.4.1 (Review Manager, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark).
Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes using the Mantel–Haenszel statistical method and we presented RR with 95% confidence intervals (CI). For pooled outcome analyses, a p value of less than or equal to 0.05 was considered significant.
All analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle whenever possible. For trials which did not report intention-to-treat data we used data as available in the manuscript.
Heterogeneity analysis
Heterogeneity was firstly assessed through visual inspection of the forest plots, and then estimated using the I2 statistic. Statistical heterogeneity hypothesis was tested using RevMan 5.4.1 (Review Manager, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) and we considered an I2 of 25%, 26–50%, and > 50% as low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively. Fixed-effects model was used in case of low statistical heterogeneity, while random-effects model was used in case of moderate-to-high statistical heterogeneity.
Results
Study characteristics
Our database and reference scanning initially yielded a total of 230 articles (Fig. 1). A total of 4 studies randomizing 2926 patients (1524 receiving full-dose heparin anticoagulation and 1402 receiving control treatment) were included in the analysis [11,12,13,14] . All studies were multicenter and had prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (administered according to local practice and guidelines, and clinician judgement) as control treatment.
In terms of populations the trials enrolled patients from 12 different countries in 4 continents and all included studies were published in 2021 (Table 1 shows the main characteristics of the included studies). Overall, risk of bias analysis showed that all included trials were at low risk of bias [15] (Fig. 2).
Quantitative data synthesis
Major thrombotic events (arterial and venous) occurred in 1.5% (23/1524) among patients treated with heparin therapeutic-dose compared to 4.0% (57/1402) in those that received prophylactic-dose [relative risk (RR) 0.39; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25–0.62; p ˂ 0.01; I2 = 0%; Egger’s test p = 0.47] (Fig. 3).
Sequential removal of each trial did not change magnitude and direction of treatment effect for the primary outcome (lowest RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.16–0.58; p˂0.01; I2 = 0%; removing ATTACC; ACTIV-4a; REMAP-CAP and highest RR 0.45; 95% (CI 0.25–0.83; p = 0.01; I2 = 0%; removing HEP).
Clinical relevant bleeding events occurred in 1.7% (26/1524) among patients treated with heparin full anticoagulation dose compared to 1.1% (15/1403) in prophylactic-dose group (RR 1.60; 95% CI 0.85–3.03; p = 0.15; I2 = 20%) (Fig. 4).
Mortality at the longest follow-up available among patients treated with heparin therapeutic-dose was 6.6% (101/1524) compared to 8.6% (121/1402) in those that received prophylactic-dose (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.33–1.19; p = 0.15; I2 = 58%) (Fig. 5).
All secondary endpoints showed a trend in favour of full-dose anticoagulation as reported in Table 2 and Supplementary material Figs. 1–5.
Discussion
Key findings
The main finding of our systematic review and meta-analysis is that heparin full-dose anticoagulation treatment (either enoxaparin, bemiparin, other LMWH, or UFH) significantly reduced major thrombotic events in hospitalized non critically ill COVID-19 patients, with no differences in the risk of bleeding events and mortality.
Relationship to previous studies
Few meta-analyses summarized this topic but they included heterogeneous treatment (e.g., RCT on rivaroxaban rather than heparin) and settings (e.g., mixing critically and non-critically ill studies) [16] . In 2021 Reis et al. reported that therapeutic-dose anticoagulation may decrease a composite of any thrombotic event or death with a risk of major bleeding [5] . Similarly, Wills et al. found that full-dose anticoagulation compared to prophylaxis decreased the risk of venous thromboembolism events but increased major bleeding events risk [17] . In another meta-analysis, Sholzberg M. et al.; 2021 found a reduction in the composite outcome of death or invasive mechanical ventilation [odds ratio (OR) 0.77; 95% CI 0.60–0.98], and death or any thrombotic event in moderately ill patients (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.45–0.77) with a nonsignificant increase in major bleeding. We added to their analysis since we identified and included a further RCT [6] . Compared to previous studies, noteworthy aspects of our meta-analysis are the decisions to focus our attention only on full-dose anticoagulation with heparin and to evaluate only non-critically ill patients.
Notably, full-dose anticoagulation in critically-ill patients seems to increase bleeding without being able to improve clinically relevant outcomes. Our meta-analysis can help to improve the management of hospitalized non-critically ill COVID-19 patients since it suggests that the minimal non significant increase in bleeding is couterbalanced by an important reduction in thrombotic events with a trend towards a mortality reduction and an improvement in all clinically relevant outcomes.
Our study aims to investigate full-dose anticoagulation with heparin (either enoxaparin, bemiparin, other LMWH, or UFH). There are plausible biological explanations for anti-viral ancillary beneficial properties of heparin and we considered this when planning our systematic review and meta-analysis.
Significance of study findings and what this study adds to our knowledge
Among hospitalized adults with COVID-19 venous thromboembolism (VTE) such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and arterial thromboembolism (ATE) such as myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke are common and affects morbidity and mortality [18,19,20,21] . Furthermore, patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are likely subjected to the formation of immune mediated pulmonary micro-clots caused by endothelial injury and vascular inflammation [2] . We decided to focus our attention on non-critically ill patients in the hypothesis that full-dose anticoagulation is likely capable of being an effective prophylaxis against immunothrombotic events and in preventing their progression [22] . If COVID-19 MicroCLOTS are similar to the immune-thrombosis model, they are probably resistant to anticoagulants drugs thus heparin may stop the progression of the coagulation cascade avoiding the increase in thrombi size, but is not able to dissolve clots [23] . This aspect may be an explanation of conflicting results of other previous studies that grouped critical and non-critical patients without distinction. In critically ill patients heparin may not be capable of acting on the advanced state of immunothrombi formation characteristic of MicroCLOTS. This particular thrombosis of microcirculation is likely responsive to anticoagulantion only at an early stage of the disease and the correct timing of anticoagulative regimen may be important to prevent the evolution of lung damage.
Several international guidelines recommend heparin-based anticoagulation therapy in all COVID-19 hospitalized patients [24,25,26,27,28,29] . Despite all these recommendations, the proper dosage of anticoagulant therapy (prophylactic-dose vs full-dose) and the exact time to start anticoagulants remain research objects [30, 31] . The overall results of our meta-analysis show a trend in favour of benefits of full-dose anticoagulation in hospitalized non-critically ill COVID-19 patients. It is imperative to note that all clinical benefits of heparin full-dose anticoagulation regarding clinical worsening must be weighted after a careful evaluation of the bleeding risk for each patient and case-by-case considerations are necessary to better balance the thrombotic risk with that of bleeding.
Our results confirm that, within the context of mild-to-moderate illness, hospitalized, non-critically ill COVID-19 patients benefit from heparin full-dose anticoagulation as prevention for major thrombotic events (arterial and venous). On the other hand heparin full-dose anticoagulation may theoretically increase bleeding risk but the effect size is small and the overall effect on survival seems to be beneficial according to our meta-analysis.
In addition to antithrombotic benefits heparin shows anti-inflammatory, and potentially antiviral effects [32, 33] . The molecular mechanisms of these pleiotropic effects are not fully understood. It is reported in scientific literature that LMWH binds with high affinity to IFNγ fully inhibiting the interaction with its cellular receptor. Furthermore, it influences the biological activity of IL-6 by binding either IL-6 or IL-6/IL-6Rα. These molecular interactions are likely the basis of the anti-inflammatory action of LMWH and better clarify its ability to favourably influence conditions such as COVID-19 characterized by overexpression of these chemical mediators [34] . More clinical evidence is without doubt required to better clarify these aspects related to heparin full-dose anticoagulation usage in hospitalized non critically ill COVID-19 patients.
Strengths and limitations of the study
The main originality of our study is represented by the high quality and design of the RCTs that we included in the meta-analysis: they were all at low risk of bias. The choice to include only randomized trials allowed us to minimize differences between groups and potential confounders to achieve more transparency and reproducibility. The inclusion of RCTs from different countries and different healthcare realities during a pandemic emergency increases the external validity of the findings. Furthermore, statistical heterogeneity was low in most of the analyses. We are aware that meta-analyses should be considered hypothesis-generating rather than confirmative. Therefore, more adequately powered multicenter RCTs are required before definitive answers on full-dose heparin anticoagulation efficacy and safety can be provided.
Conclusions
Evidence from high-quality randomized trials suggests a significative reduction of major thrombotic events in COVID-19 non-critically ill patients receveing full-dose heparin anticoagulation when compared to propylactic-dose anticoagulation with only a trend towards an improvement in survival.
References
World Health Organization (WHO) Weekly epidemiological update on COVID-19 - 20 April 2022 Edition 88, Emergency Situational Updates
Ciceri F, Beretta L, Scandroglio AM, Colombo S, Landoni G, Ruggeri A et al (2020) Microvascular COVID-19 lung vessels obstructive thromboinflammatory syndrome (MicroCLOTS): an atypical acute respiratory distress syndrome working hypothesis. Crit Care Resusc 22:95–97
Lawler PR, Goligher EC, Berger JS et al (2021) Therapeutic anticoagulation with heparin in noncritically ill patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 385:790–802
Goligher EC, Bradbury CA, McVerry BJ et al (2021) Therapeutic anticoagulation with heparin in critically ill patients with Covid 19. N Engl J Med 385:777–789
Reis S, Popp M, Schmid B et al (2021) Safety and efficacy of intermediate- and therapeutic-dose anticoagulation for hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 11(1):57. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010057
Sholzberg M, da Costa BR, Tang GH et al (2021) Randomized trials of therapeutic heparin for COVID-19: A meta-analysis. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 5(8):e12638. https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12638
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/. Accessed 22 Mar 2019
Schulman S, Kearon C, The Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (2005) Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost 3:692–694
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898
ATTACC Investigators, ACTIV-4a Investigators, REMAP-CAP Investigators, Lawler PR, Goligher EC, Berger JS, Neal MD, McVerry BJ, Nicolau JC, Gong MN, Carrier M, Rosenson RS, Reynolds HR, Turgeon AF, Escobedo J, Huang DT, Bradbury CA, Houston BL, Kornblith LZ, Kumar A, Kahn SR, Cushman M, McQuilten Z, Slutsky AS, Kim KS, Gordon AC, Kirwan BA, Brooks MM, Higgins AM, Lewis RJ, Lorenzi E, Berry SM, Berry LR, Aday AW, Al-Beidh F, Annane D, Arabi YM, Aryal D, Baumann Kreuziger L, Beane A, Bhimani Z, Bihari S, Billett HH, Bond L, Bonten M, Brunkhorst F, Buxton M, Buzgau A, Castellucci LA, Chekuri S, Chen JT, Cheng AC, Chkhikvadze T, Coiffard B, Costantini TW, de Brouwer S, Derde LPG, Detry MA, Duggal A, Džavík V, Effron MB, Estcourt LJ, Everett BM, Fergusson DA, Fitzgerald M, Fowler RA, Galanaud JP, Galen BT, Gandotra S, García-Madrona S, Girard TD, Godoy LC, Goodman AL, Goossens H, Green C, Greenstein YY, Gross PL, Hamburg NM, Haniffa R, Hanna G, Hanna N, Hegde SM, Hendrickson CM, Hite RD, Hindenburg AA, Hope AA, Horowitz JM, Horvat CM, Hudock K, Hunt BJ, Husain M, Hyzy RC, Iyer VN, Jacobson JR, Jayakumar D, Keller NM, Khan A, Kim Y, Kindzelski AL, King AJ, Knudson MM, Kornblith AE, Krishnan V, Kutcher ME, Laffan MA, Lamontagne F, Le Gal G, Leeper CM, Leifer ES, Lim G, Lima FG, Linstrum K, Litton E, Lopez-Sendon J, Lopez-Sendon Moreno JL, Lother SA, Malhotra S, Marcos M, Saud Marinez A, Marshall JC, Marten N, Matthay MA, McAuley DF, McDonald EG, McGlothlin A, McGuinness SP, Middeldorp S, Montgomery SK, Moore SC, Morillo Guerrero R, Mouncey PR, Murthy S, Nair GB, Nair R, Nichol AD, Nunez-Garcia B, Pandey A, Park PK, Parke RL, Parker JC, Parnia S, Paul JD, Pérez González YS, Pompilio M, Prekker ME, Quigley JG, Rost NS, Rowan K, Santos FO, Santos M, Olombrada Santos M, Satterwhite L, Saunders CT, Schutgens REG, Seymour CW, Siegal DM, Silva DG Jr, Shankar-Hari M, Sheehan JP, Singhal AB, Solvason D, Stanworth SJ, Tritschler T, Turner AM, van Bentum-Puijk W, van de Veerdonk FL, van Diepen S, Vazquez-Grande G, Wahid L, Wareham V, Wells BJ, Widmer RJ, Wilson JG, Yuriditsky E, Zampieri FG, Angus DC, McArthur CJ, Webb SA, Farkouh ME, Hochman JS, Zarychanski R (2021) Therapeutic anticoagulation with heparin in noncritically ill patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 385(9):790–802. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2105911
Marcos-Jubilar M, Carmona-Torre F, Vidal R, Ruiz-Artacho P, Filella D, Carbonell C, Jiménez-Yuste V, Schwartz J, Llamas P, Alegre F, Sádaba B, Núñez-Córdoba J, Yuste JR, Fernández-García J, Lecumberri R, BEMICOP Investigators (2022) Therapeutic versus prophylactic bemiparin in hospitalized patients with nonsevere COVID-19 pneumonia (BEMICOP Study): an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Thromb Haemost 122(2):295–299. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1667-7534
Spyropoulos AC, Goldin M, Giannis D, Diab W, Wang J, Khanijo S, Mignatti A, Gianos E, Cohen M, Sharifova G, Lund JM, Tafur A, Lewis PA, Cohoon KP, Rahman H, Sison CP, Lesser ML, Ochani K, Agrawal N, Hsia J, Anderson VE, Bonaca M, Halperin JL, Weitz JI, HEP-COVID Investigators (2021) Efficacy and safety of therapeutic-dose heparin vs standard prophylactic or intermediate-dose heparins for thromboprophylaxis in high-risk hospitalized patients with COVID-19: the HEP-COVID randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 181(12):1612–1620. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6203. Erratum in: JAMA Intern Med 2022;182(2):239
Sholzberg M, Tang GH, Rahhal H, AlHamzah M, Kreuziger LB, Áinle FN, Alomran F, Alayed K, Alsheef M, AlSumait F, Pompilio CE, Sperlich C, Tangri S, Tang T, Jaksa P, Suryanarayan D, Almarshoodi M, Castellucci LA, James PD, Lillicrap D, Carrier M, Beckett A, Colovos C, Jayakar J, Arsenault MP, Wu C, Doyon K, Andreou ER, Dounaevskaia V, Tseng EK, Lim G, Fralick M, Middeldorp S, Lee AYY, Zuo F, da Costa BR, Thorpe KE, Negri EM, Cushman M, Jüni P, RAPID trial investigators (2021) Effectiveness of therapeutic heparin versus prophylactic heparin on death, mechanical ventilation, or intensive care unit admission in moderately ill patients with covid-19 admitted to hospital: RAPID randomised clinical trial. BMJ 375:n2400. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2400
McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT (2020) Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): an R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Syn Meth 2020:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1411
Lopes RD, de Barros-E-Silva PGM, Furtado RHM, Macedo AVS, Bronhara B, Damiani LP, Barbosa LM, de Aveiro-Morata J, Ramacciotti E, de Aquino-Martins P, de Oliveira AL, Nunes VS, Ritt LEF, Rocha AT, Tramujas L, Santos SV, Diaz DRA, Viana LS, Melro LMG, de AlcântaraChaud MS, Figueiredo EL, Neuenschwander FC, Dracoulakis MDA, Lima RGSD, de Souza Dantas VC, Fernandes ACS, Gebara OCE, Hernandes ME, Queiroz DAR, Veiga VC, Canesin MF, de Faria LM, Feitosa-Filho GS, Gazzana MB, Liporace IL, de Oliveira TA, Maia LN, Machado FR, de Matos SA, Conceição-Souza GE, Armaganijan L, Guimarães PO, Rosa RG, Azevedo LCP, Alexander JH, Avezum A, Cavalcanti AB, Berwanger O, ACTION Coalition COVID-19 Brazil IV Investigators (2021) Therapeutic versus prophylactic anticoagulation for patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 and elevated D-dimer concentration (ACTION): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 397(10291):2253–2263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01203-4
Wills NK, Nair N, Patel K, Sikder O, Adriaanse M, Eikelboom J, Wasserman S (2022) Efficacy and safety of intensified versus standard prophylactic anticoagulation therapy in patients with Covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.05.22271947
De Cobelli F, Palumbo D, Ciceri F, Landoni G, Ruggeri A, Rovere-Querini P, D’Angelo A, Steidler S, Galli L, Poli A, Fominskiy E, Calabrò MG, Colombo S, Monti G, Nicoletti R, Esposito A, Conte C, Dagna L, Ambrosio A, Scarpellini P, Ripa M, Spessot M, Carlucci M, Montorfano M, Agricola E, Baccellieri D, Bosi E, Tresoldi M, Castagna A, Martino G, Zangrillo A (2021) Pulmonary vascular thrombosis in COVID-19 pneumonia. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 35(12):3631–3641. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2021.01.011
Klok FA, Kruip MJHA, van der Meer NJM, Arbous MS, Gommers D, Kant KM, Kaptein FHJ, van Paassen J, Stals MAM, Huisman MV, Endeman H (2020) Confirmation of the high cumulative incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19: an updated analysis. Thromb Res 191:148–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.041
Nopp S, Moik F, Jilma B, Pabinger I, Ay C (2020) Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 4(7):1178–1191. https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12439
Roncon L, Zuin M, Barco S et al (2020) Incidence of acute pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med 82:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2020.09.006
Miesbach W, Makris M (2020) COVID-19: coagulopathy, risk of thrombosis, and the rationale for anticoagulation. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 26:1076029620938149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029620938149
Sofia R, Carbone M, Landoni G, Zangrillo A, Dagna L (2022) Anticoagulation as secondary prevention of massive lung thromboses in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Eur J Intern Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2022.04.009
Cuker A, Tseng EK, Nieuwlaat R et al (2021) American Society of Hematology living guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19: May 2021 update on the use of intermediate intensity anticoagulation in critically ill patients. Blood Adv. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005493
Spyropoulos AC, Levy JH, Ageno W et al (2020) Scientific and Standardization Committee communication: clinical guidance on the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost 18(8):1859–1865. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14929
Barnes GD, Burnett A, Allen A et al (2020) Thromboembolism and anticoagulant therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: interim clinical guidance from the anticoagulation forum. J Thromb Thrombolysis 50(1):72–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-020-02138-z
Moores LK, Tritschler T, Brosnahan S et al (2020) Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of VTE in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Chest 158(3):1143–1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.559
Bikdeli B, Madhavan MV, Jimenez D et al (2020) COVID-19 and thrombotic or thromboembolic disease: implications for prevention, antithrombotic therapy, and follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 75(23):2950–2973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.031
Information on COVID-19 Treatment, Prevention and Research. COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines. https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/. Accessed 5 Oct 2021
Giannis D, Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC (2022) Anticoagulant therapy for COVID-19: what we have learned and what are the unanswered questions? Eur J Intern Med 96:13–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2021.11.003
Haider Z, Rajalingam K, Khalid T, Oswal D, Dwarakanath A (2021) Intermediate dose thromboprophylaxis in SARS-CoV-2 related venous thrombo embolism. Eur J Intern Med 88:141–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2021.03.025
Buijsers B, Yanginlar C, Maciej-Hulme ML, de Mast Q, van der Vlag J (2020) Beneficial non-anticoagulant mechanisms underlying heparin treatment of COVID-19 patients. EBioMedicine 59:102969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102969
Mycroft-West CJ, Su D, Pagani I, Rudd TR, Elli S, Gandhi NS, Guimond SE, Miller GJ, Meneghetti MCZ, Nader HB, Li Y, Nunes QM, Procter P, Mancini N, Clementi M, Bisio A, Forsyth NR, Ferro V, Turnbull JE, Guerrini M, Fernig DG, Vicenzi E, Yates EA, Lima MA, Skidmore MA (2020) Heparin inhibits cellular invasion by SARS-CoV-2: structural dependence of the interaction of the spike S1 receptor-binding domain with heparin. Thromb Haemost 120(12):1700–1715. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721319
Litov L, Petkov P, Rangelov M, Ilieva N, Lilkova E, Todorova N, Krachmarova E, Malinova K, Gospodinov A, Hristova R, Ivanov I, Nacheva G (2021) Molecular mechanism of the anti-inflammatory action of heparin. Int J Mol Sci 22(19):10730. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910730
Acknowledgements
None.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EP: Conceptualization, Visualization, Data curation, Writing—Review & Editing, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft. AB: Conceptualization, Visualization, Data curation, Writing—Review & Editing, Writing—original draft. SF: Conceptualization, Visualization, Data curation, Writing—original draft. GF: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing—original draft, Supervision. GL: Conceptualization, Project Administration, Data curation, Visualization Writing—original draft, Writing—Review & Editing, Supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pilia, E., Belletti, A., Fresilli, S. et al. Efficacy and safety of heparin full-dose anticoagulation in hospitalized non-critically ill COVID-19 patients: a meta-analysis of multicenter randomized controlled trials. J Thromb Thrombolysis 54, 420–430 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-022-02681-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-022-02681-x