Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning to represent exact numbers

  • S.I.: Intensionality in Mathematics
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article focuses on how young children acquire concepts for exact, cardinal numbers (e.g., three, seven, two hundred, etc.). I believe that exact numbers are a conceptual structure that was invented by people, and that most children acquire gradually, over a period of months or years during early childhood. This article reviews studies that explore children’s number knowledge at various points during this acquisition process. Most of these studies were done in my own lab, and assume the theoretical framework proposed by Carey (The origin of concepts, 2009). In this framework, the counting list (‘one,’ ‘two,’ ‘three,’ etc.) and the counting routine (i.e., reciting the list and pointing to objects, one at a time) form a placeholder structure. Over time, the placeholder structure is gradually filled in with meaning to become a conceptual structure that allows the child to represent exact numbers (e.g., There are 24 children in my class, so I need to bring 24 cupcakes for the party.) A number system is a socially shared, structured set of symbols that pose a learning challenge for children. But once children have acquired a number system, it allows them to represent information (i.e., large, exact cardinal values) that they had no way of representing before.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. My thanks to an anonymous reviewer for suggesting this clarification.

  2. Thanks to an anonymous reviewer for suggesting this phrasing.

References

  • Almoammer, A., Sullivan, J., Donlan, C., Marušič, F., Žaucer, R., O’Donnell, T., & Barner, D. (2013). Grammatical morphology as a source of early number word meanings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(46), 18448–18453. doi:10.1073/pnas.1313652110.

  • Barner, D., Libenson, A., Cheung, P., & Takasaki, M. (2009). Cross-linguistic relations between quantifiers and numerals in language acquisition: Evidence from Japanese. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(4), 421–440. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, H., La Mont, K., Lipton, J., Dehaene, S., Kanwisher, N., & Spelke, E. (2006). Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children. Cognition, 98(3), 199–222. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. (1998). Conceptual role semantics. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy (pp. 242–256). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P., & Wynn, K. (1997). Linguistic cues in the acquisition of number words. Journal of Child Language, 24, 511–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. (2005). The development of arithmetical abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(1), 3–18. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00374.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. (2010). Foundational numerical capacities and the origins of dyscalculia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(12), 534–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B., Reeve, R., Reynolds, F., & Lloyd, D. (2008). Numerical thought with and without words: Evidence from indigenous Australian children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(35), 13179–13184. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806045105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Condry, K. F., & Spelke, E. S. (2008). The development of language and abstract concepts: The case of natural number. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(1), 22–38. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, K., Eng, K., & Barner, D. (2012). Does learning to count involve a semantic induction? Cognition, 123(1), 162–173. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S. (2009). Origins of mathematical intuitions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156(1), 232–259. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04469.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., ... Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428.

  • Feigenson, L., & Carey, S. (2003). Tracking individuals via object-files: Evidence from infants’ manual search. Developmental Science, 6(5), 568–584. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 307–314. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fluck, M., & Henderson, L. (1996). Counting and cardinality in English nursery pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(4), 501–517. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01215.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuson, K. C. (1988). Children’s counting and concepts of number (Vol. xiv). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R., & Butterworth, B. (2005). Number and language: How are they related? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(1), 6–10. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (2004). Language and the origin of numerical concepts. Science, 306(5695), 441–443. doi:10.1126/science.1105144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurford, J. R. (1987). Language and number: The emergence of a cognitive system. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard, V., Pica, P., Spelke, E. S., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Exact equality and successor function: Two key concepts on the path towards understanding exact numbers. Philosophical Psychology, 21(4), 491–505. doi:10.1080/09515080802285354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, V., Streri, A., & Spelke, E. S. (2014). Toward exact number: Young children use one-to-one correspondence to measure set identity but not numerical equality. Cognitive Psychology, 72, 27–53. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Locuniak, M. N., & Ramineni, C. (2007). Predicting first-grade math achievement from developmental number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 850–867. doi:10.1037/a0014939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, N. C., & Levine, S. C. (2009). Socioeconomic variation, number competence, and mathematics learning difficulties in young children. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15(1), 60–68. doi:10.1002/ddrr.46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Corre, M., & Carey, S. (2007). One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles. Cognition, 105(2), 395–438. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Corre, M., Van de Walle, G., Brannon, E. M., & Carey, S. (2006). Re-visiting the competence/performance debate in the acquisition of the counting principles. Cognitive Psychology, 52(2), 130–169. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. M., Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (2008). The generative basis of natural number concepts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 213–218. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. C., Suriyakham, L. W., Rowe, M. L., Huttenlocher, J., & Gunderson, E. A. (2010). What counts in the development of young children’s number knowledge? Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1309–1319. doi:10.1037/a0019671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P., Le Corre, M., Shui, R., Jia, G., & Carey, S. (2003). Effects of plural syntax on number word learning: A cross-linguistic study. Presented at the Boston University conference on language development (BUCLD), Boston, MA.

  • McCrink, K., & Spelke, E. S. (2010). Core multiplication in childhood. Cognition, 116(2), 204–216. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muldoon, K., Lewis, C., & Freeman, N. (2009). Why set-comparison is vital in early number learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(5), 203–208. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negen, J., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2012). Number-concept acquisition and general vocabulary development. Child Development, 83(6), 2019–2027. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01815.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieder, A., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32(1), 185–208. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piantadosi, S. T., Jara-Ettinger, J., & Gibson, E. (2014). Children’s learning of number words in an indigenous farming-foraging group. Developmental Science, 17(4), 553–563. doi:10.1111/desc.12078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rips, L. J., Asmuth, J., & Bloomfield, A. (2006). Giving the boot to the bootstrap: How not to learn the natural numbers. Cognition, 101(3), B51–B60. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rips, L. J., Bloomfield, A., & Asmuth, J. (2008). From numerical concepts to concepts of number. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(06), 623–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarnecka, B. W., & Carey, S. (2008). How counting represents number: What children must learn and when they learn it. Cognition, 108(3), 662–674. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarnecka, B. W., & Gelman, S. A. (2004). Six does not just mean a lot: Preschoolers see number words as specific. Cognition, 92(3), 329–352. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarnecka, B. W., Kamenskaya, V. G., Yamana, Y., Ogura, T., & Yudovina, Y. B. (2007). From grammatical number to exact numbers: Early meanings of “one”, “two”, and “three” in English, Russian, and Japanese. Cognitive Psychology, 55(2), 136–168. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarnecka, B. W., & Lee, M. D. (2009). Levels of number knowledge during early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(3), 325–337. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.02.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarnecka, B. W., & Wright, C. E. (2013). The idea of an exact number: Children’s understanding of cardinality and equinumerosity. Cognitive Science. doi:10.1111/cogs.12043.

  • Scholl, B. J., & Leslie, A. M. (1999). Explaining the infant’s object concept: Beyond the perception/cognition dichotomy. In E. Lepore & Z. Pylyshyn (Eds.), What is cognitive science (pp. 26–73). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, T. J. (1998). Computational evidence for the foundations of numerical competence. Developmental Science, 1(1), 71–78. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, V., Itakura, S., Kutsuki, A., & Siegal, M. (2011). Learning to count begins in infancy: Evidence from 18 month olds’ visual preferences. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1720), 2979–2984. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slusser, E. B., Ditta, A., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2013). Connecting numbers to discrete quantification: A step in the child’s construction of integer concepts. Cognition, 129, 31–41. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slusser, E. B., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2011). Find the picture of eight turtles: A link between children’s counting and their knowledge of number word semantics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(1), 38–51. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E. S., & Tsivkin, S. (2001). Initial knowledge and conceptual change: Space and number. In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 70–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, P., Klein, A., & Wakeley, A. (2004). Enhancing young children’s mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 99–120. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, K. (1990). Children’s understanding of counting. Cognition, 36(2), 155–193. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(90)90003-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, K. (1992a). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358(6389), 749–750. doi:10.1038/358749a0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, K. (1992b). Children’s acquisition of the number words and the counting system. Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 220–251. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90008-P.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NSF Grant 0953521 to the author. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, 2203 Social and Behavioral Sciences Gateway, Irvine, CA, 92697-5100, USA

    Barbara W. Sarnecka

Authors
  1. Barbara W. Sarnecka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara W. Sarnecka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarnecka, B.W. Learning to represent exact numbers. Synthese 198 (Suppl 5), 1001–1018 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0854-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0854-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation