Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative Estimation of Fracture Resistance Test Methods: Zirconia Ceramics

  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

The fracture of zirconia ceramics both at macro (specimen bending with a stress raiser in the tensile region) and micro (Rockwell indentation with specimen edge chipping) levels was studied. Experimental data, plotted on the classification diagram of brittle materials at their micro and macrofracture (FR - KIc relation), did not fall on the baseline constructed by chipping results of simple single-phase ceramics, demonstrating a significant difference in the properties of zirconia ceramics (Y-TZP, Mg-PSZ, and composite ZrO2/Al2O3 as compared to those of single-phase materials, which must not be overlooked in such an important application as dentistry. Therefore, the behavior of those ceramics on microfracture was studied with the Edge Chipping EF method. It involves the chipping of a polished rectangular prismatic specimen with an indenter impressed near its sharp edge. The edge chipping of tested specimens was effected with a Rockwell indenter as the basic instrument, and the additional ones were a standard Vickers indenter and a diamond cone with a tip radius of 400 μm. Analysis of the test results also included fracture toughness data on examined ceramics obtained with the SEVNB method, which involves bending of a prismatic specimen with a transverse through sharp V-notch in the tensile region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Chevalier, “What future for zirconia as a biomaterial?,” Biomaterials, 27, No. 4, 535–543 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. C. Garvie, R. H. J. Hannink, and R. T. Pascoe, “Ceramic steel?,” Nature, 258, 703–704 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. G. A. Gogotsi, “Fracture behaviour of Mg-PSZ ceramics: Comparative estimations,” Ceram. Int., 35, 2735–2740 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. ISO 23146, Fine Ceramics (Advanced Ceramics, Advanced Technical Ceramics) – Test Methods for Fracture Toughness of Monolithic Ceramics – Single-Edge V-Notch Beam (SEVNB) Method, Switzerland (2008).

  5. G. A. Gogotsi, V. Y. Galenko, and G. de Souza, “Dental Y-TZP ceramics: local fracture resistance,” Strength Mater., 53, No. 3, 471–476 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-021-00308-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. A. Gogotsi, “The use of brittleness measure (χ) to represent mechanical behavior of ceramics,” Ceram. Int., 15, 127–129 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. P. Timoshenko and J. N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, McGraw-Hill, New York (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. R. Anstis, P. Chantikul, B. R. Lawn, and D. B. Marshall, “A critical evaluation of indentation techniques for measuring fracture toughness: direct crack measurements,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 64, 533–538 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. D. Quinn and R. C. Bradt, “On the Vickers indentation fracture toughness test,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 90, 673–680 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. N. B. Thomsen, D. M. Stump, and L. M. Keer, “Surface uplift and implications of zirconia toughened ceramics,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 38, 233–245 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Bravo-Leon, Y. Morikava, M. Kawahara, and M. J. Moyo, “Fracture toughness of nanocrystalline tetragonal zirconia with low yttria content,” Acta Mater., 50, No. 18, 4555–4562 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. G. D. Quinn, J. J. Kubler, and R. J. Gettings, Fracture Toughness of Advanced Ceramics by the Surface Crack in Fracture (SCF) Method: a VAMAS Round Robin, VAMAS Report, No. 17, USA (1994).

  13. E. A. Almond and N. J. McCormick, “Constant-geometry edge flaking of brittle materials,” Nature, 321, 53–55 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. G. A. Gogotsi and S. P. Mudrik, “Fracture barrier estimation by the edge fracture test method,” Ceram. Int., 35, 1871–1875 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. G. A. Gogotsi, V. I. Galenko, S. P. Mudrik, et al., “Fracture resistance estimation of elastic ceramics in edge flaking: EF baseline,” J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 30, No. 6, 1223–1228 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. J. Kruzic, D. K. Kim, K. J. Koester, and R. O. Ritchie, “Indentation techniques for evaluating the fracture toughness of biomaterials and hard tissues,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2, No. 4, 384–395 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. A. Gogotsi.

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Mitsnosti, No. 5, pp. 96 – 107, September – October, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gogotsi, G.A. Comparative Estimation of Fracture Resistance Test Methods: Zirconia Ceramics. Strength Mater 54, 841–849 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-022-00460-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-022-00460-w

Keywords

Navigation