Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interfacial Fracture Toughness of Multilayer Composite Structures

  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

The interfaces in multilayer composite structures are susceptible to delamination due to the combination of active tensile and shear loads under operating conditions. A four-layer center crack composite beam in four-point bending is simulated to determine the interfacial fracture energy of the multilayer structure. The crack is propagating along the interface between the second and third layers. Based on the Euler–Bernoulli theory, the strain energy of the four-layer composite beam is derived. Strain energies before and after the propagation of the interfacial crack are calculated, which results in determining strain energy release rates. Analytical results for those rates are validated with the numerical data obtained by the finite element method. The effect of layer thickness of the composite beam on the interfacial fracture toughness is investigated through a parametric study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. T. Seyhan, M. Tanoglu, and K. Schulte, “Mode I and mode II fracture toughness of E-glass non-crimp fabric/carbon nanotube (CNT) modified polymer based composites,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 75, 5151–5162 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. J. Lee, J. O. Lim, and J. S. Huh, “Mode II interlaminar fracture behavior of carbon bead-filled epoxy/glass fiber hybrid composite,” Polym. Compos., 21, 343–352 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. X. K. Zhu and J. A. Joyce, “Review of fracture toughness (G, K, J, CTOD, CTOA) testing and standardization,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 85, 1–46 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. B. Pereira and A. B. de Morais, “Mode II interlaminar fracture of glass/epoxy multidirectional laminates,” Composites: Part A, 35, 265–272 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. A. Carlsson, J. W. Gillespie, Jr, and R. B. Pipes, “On the analysis and design of the end notched flexure (ENF) specimen for mode II testing,” J. Compos. Mater., 20, 594–604 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Wang and T. Vu-Khanh, “Use of end-loaded-split (ELS) test to study stable fracture behavior of composites under mode II loading,” Compos. Struct., 36, 71–79 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Schuecker and B. D. Davidson, “Effect of friction on the perceived mode II delamination toughness from three- and four-point bend end notched flexure tests,” in: P. E. Grant and C. Q. Rousseau (Eds.), Composite Structures: Theory and Practice, ASTM STP 1383 (2000), pp. 334–344.

  8. A. B. de Morais, A. B. Pereira, M. F. S. F. de Moura, and A. G. Magalhães, “Mode III interlaminar fracture of carbon/epoxy laminates using the edge crack torsion (ECT) test,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 69, 670–676 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. B. de Morais and A. B. Pereira, “Mode III interlaminar fracture of carbon/epoxy laminates using a four-point bending plate test,” Composites: Part A, 40, 1741–1746 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. T. S. Yeung, D. C. C. Lam, and M. M. F. Yuen, “Specimen design for mixed mode interfacial fracture properties measurement in electronic packages,” J. Electr. Packag., 122, 67–72 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S.-C. Her.

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Prochnosti, No. 1, pp. 212 – 217, January – February, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Her, SC., Su, WB. Interfacial Fracture Toughness of Multilayer Composite Structures. Strength Mater 47, 186–191 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-015-9646-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-015-9646-y

Keywords

Navigation