Skip to main content
Log in

From Practitioner to Researcher: Designing the Dissertation Process for Part Time Coursework Masters Students

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coursework Masters degrees that are offered as block release programmes provide opportunities for access to postgraduate education for adult students while in full time employ. These students attend structured contact modules after which they return to home and work and a distance format of study. However, these courses are generally characterised by low completion rates and lengthy time to completion, particularly of the research dissertation. While various explanations for this problem have been offered, for example, students’ non-academic commitments and supervisor–student-relations, our particular concern in this paper is students’ reading and writing practices in the transition from professional work practice and Masters coursework to the research dissertation. This paper proposes a systemic design to improve student reading and writing in this transition, and the proposal is illustrated using a block release coursework Masters programme in Management at a South African university. The design draws on interpretive systems ideas to think about the different levels of institutional and disciplinary context that impact on the research dissertation. We also use an academic literacies perspective—the concepts of literacy practice, language identity and power in particular—to think about reading and writing. This design incorporates components that include system elements, relationships, purpose and feedback that facilitate interaction between the conventions of the research practice, what the student brings to the practice, and the agency of the student.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson C, Day K, McLaughlin P (2008) Student perspectives on the dissertation process in a Masters degree concerned with professional practice. Stud Contin Educ 30:33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bánáthy B (1988) Systems inquiry in education. Syst Pract. 1(2):193–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bánáthy B (1999) Systems thinking in higher education. Syst Res Behav Sci 16:133–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton D, Hamilton M (2000) Literacy practices. In: Barton D, Hamilton M, Ivanič R (eds) Situated literacies: reading and writing in context. Routledge, London, pp 7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton D, Hamilton M, Ivanič R (2000) Introduction: exploring situated literacies. In: Barton D, Hamilton M, Ivanič R (eds) Situated literacies: reading and writing in context. Routledge, London, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianco MJ (n.d.) The research paper: step 1: the concept paper. http://www.marthabianco.com/Courses/Cities/concept.html. Accessed 14 July 2016

  • Blackmore C, Morris D (2001) Systems and environmental decision making—postgraduate open learning with the Open University. Syst Pract Action Res 14:681–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke E (1996) Academic and non-academic differences: perceptions of graduate non-English speaking background students. TESL-EJ 2(1):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler G (2011) Supervisor perceptions of the academic literacy requirements of postgraduate students at the University of Pretoria. J Lang Teach 45:7–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr-Chellman AA (2000) Distance education: a reflective action research project and its systemic implications for higher education. Syst Pract Action Res 13:587–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1970) Operations research as a profession. Manage Sci 17:B37–B53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg SR, Ross-Smith A (2003) Revising the boundaries: management education and learning in a postpositivist world. Acad Manag Learn Educ 2:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conole G (2009) Capturing and representing practice. In: Tait A, Vidal M, Bernath U, Szucs A (eds) Distance and e-learning in transition: learning innovation, technology and social challenges. Wiley, London, pp 579–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Conole G, Wills S (2013) Representing learning designs—making design explicit and shareable. Educ Media Int 50:24–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans T (2002) Part-time research students: are they producing knowledge where it counts? High Educ Res Dev 21:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough N (2001) Language and power, 2nd edn. Longman, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick T, Edwards R, Sawchuk P (2011) Emerging approaches to educational research: tracing the sociomaterial. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL (2010) The relationship of ‘systems thinking’ to action research. Syst Pract Action Res 23:269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gharajedaghi J (2011) Systems thinking: managing chaos and complexity: a platform for designing business architecture. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlitt L (2006) Validating a pre-formed identity or unsettling prior experience? Experiences of working students entering studies in management. Perspect Educ 24(3):109–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzhausen SM (2005) The supervisor’s accountability versus postgraduates’ responsibility within the academic writing arena. S Afr J High Educ 19:89–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanič R (1998) Writing and identity: the discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2000) Systems approaches to management. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamler B, Thomson P (2006) Helping doctoral students write: pedagogies for supervision. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea MR (2004) Academic literacies: a pedagogy for course design. Stud High Educ 29:739–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea MR, Stierer B (2000) Editors’ introduction. In: Lea MR, Stierer B (eds) Student writing in higher education: new contexts. SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea MR, Street BV (2006) The “academic literacies” model: theory and applications. Theory Pract 45:368–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillis TM (2001) Student writing: access, regulation and desire. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean D, MacIntosh R, Grant S (2002) Mode 2 management research. Br Acad Manag 13:189–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer. Chelsea Green Publishing, Vermont

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner P (2016) Postgraduates at UCT: some recent figures [presentation]. University of Cape Town, 23 May

  • Midgley G (2000) Systemic intervention: philosophy, methodology, and practice. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2000) An idea ahead of its time: the history and development of soft systems methodology. Syst Pract Action Res 13:733-755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow W (2009) Bounds of democracy: epistemological access in higher education. HSRC Press, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda A, Gupta R (2014) Making academic research more relevant: a few suggestions. IIMB Manag Rev 26:156–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phakiti A, Li L (2011) General academic difficulties and reading and writing difficulties among Asian ESL postgraduate students in TESOL at an Australian university. RELC J 42:227–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth S, Schütz A (2015) Ten systems: toward a canon of function systems. Cybernetics and Human Knowing. 22(4):11–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayed Y, Kruss G, Badat S (1998) Students’ experience of postgraduate supervision at the University of the Western Cape. J Furth High Educ 22:275–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw C (2015) Change? What change? Mature management students’ construal of learning events in a systems thinking course at a South African university. Syst Pract Action Res 28:315–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh MKM (2014) Challenges in academic reading and overcoming strategies in taught Master programmes: a case study of international graduate students in Malaysia. High Educ Stud 4:76–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Spickard J (2005) What is a concept paper? http://www.mcguire-pickard.com/Resources/The%20Concept%20Paper.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2016

  • Stierer B (2000) Schoolteachers as students: academic literacy and the construction of professional knowledge within Master’s courses in education. In: Lea MR, Stierer B (eds) Student writing in higher education: new contexts. SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham, pp 179–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Valero P (2004) Socio-political perspectives on mathematics education. In: Valero P, Zevenbergen R (eds) Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education. Kluwer, Boston, pp 5–23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderstraeten R (2004) The social differentiation of the educational system. Sociology 38(2):255–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuber-Skerrit O, Knight N (1986) Problem definition and thesis writing: workshops for the postgraduate student. High Educ 15:89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corrinne Shaw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaw, C., le Roux, K. From Practitioner to Researcher: Designing the Dissertation Process for Part Time Coursework Masters Students. Syst Pract Action Res 30, 433–446 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-016-9402-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-016-9402-7

Keywords

Navigation