Abstract
In Soviet philosophy, two versions of Lenin’s theory of reflection are represented respectively by Mikhail Lifshits and Todor Pavlov. They both isolate and juxtapose two dialectical elements: reflection and creativity. Within this methodological dilemma, Lifshits’s ontognoseology is an original doctrine of our “mirror” attitude to the world whereby material being is the true subject, while man is a tool of its self-reflection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This is expressed in the following way in Materialism and Empiriocriticism: “That the conception of “matter” must also include thoughts […] is a muddle, for if such an inclusion is made, the epistemological contrast between mind and matter, idealism and materialism, a contrast upon which Dietzgen himself insists, loses all meaning. That this contrast must not be made “excessive,” exaggerated, metaphysical” (Lenin 1972, quoted from the Internet version in: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1908/mec/four8.htm).
See Marx/Engels (1974, 540): “Das Auge ist zum menschlichen Auge geworden, wie sein Gegenstand zu einem gesellschaftlichen, menschlichen, vom Menschen für den Menschen herrührenden”.
References
Georgiev, F. I. (1949). ’Vstupitel’naja stat’ja’. In T. Pavlov (Ed.), Teorija otrazhenija Osnovnye voprosy teorii poznanija dialekticheskogo materializma. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoj literatury.
Gutov, D. (2005). Die marxistisch-leninstische Asthetik in der postkommunistischen Epoche. Michael Lifshits. In B. Groys, A. von der Heiden, & P. Weibel (Eds.), Zuruck aus der Zukunft. Osteuropaische Kulturen im Zeitalter des Postkommunismus (pp. 709–737). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Gutov, D. (2007) Marksistsko-leninskaja estetika v postkommunisticheskuju epokhu. Mikhail Lifshits. In Svobodnaja mysl, Vol. 2, pp. 125–141.
Lenin, V. I. (1972). Materialism and Empiriocriticism. In Collected works, Vol. 14, Moscow: Progress 1972. Here quoted according to the Internet version, in: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1908/mec/four8.htm. Accessed 25. 6. 2016.
Lifshits, M. A. (2002). Lukács. In Voprosy filosofii, 12.
Lifshits, M. A. (2003). Dialog s Evaldom Ilyenkovym (Problema ideal’nogo). Moskva: Progress-Tradicija.
Lifshits, M. A. (2004). Chto takoe klassika? Ontognoseologija. Smysl mira. Istinnaja seredina, Moskva: Iskusstvo XXI vek.
Lifshits, M. A. (2010). Varia. Moskva: Grundrisse.
Lifshits, M. A. (2014). Bytie i soznanie. In http://mesotes.narod.ru/lifshiz/bitieisoznanie.htm. Accessed 11.11.2014.
Marx K., & Engels, F. (1974). Werke, 43 Bde., Ergänzungsband, Erster Teil, Dietz Verlag, Berlin/DDR.
Pavlov, T. (1949). Teorija otrazhenija. Osnovnye voprosy teorii poznanija dialekticheskogo materializma. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoj literatury.
Pavlov, T. (Ed.). (1969). Leninskaja teorija otrazhenija i sovremennost’. Moskva, Sofija: Nauka i iskusstvo.
Rozental, M. M. (Ed.). (1969). Lenin kak filosof. Moskva: Politizdat.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mareeva, E. Lifshits’ ontognoseology as a version of Lenin’s theory of reflection. Stud East Eur Thought 68, 295–305 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-016-9265-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-016-9265-6