Skip to main content
Log in

Lifshits’ ontognoseology as a version of Lenin’s theory of reflection

  • Published:
Studies in East European Thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Soviet philosophy, two versions of Lenin’s theory of reflection are represented respectively by Mikhail Lifshits and Todor Pavlov. They both isolate and juxtapose two dialectical elements: reflection and creativity. Within this methodological dilemma, Lifshits’s ontognoseology is an original doctrine of our “mirror” attitude to the world whereby material being is the true subject, while man is a tool of its self-reflection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This is expressed in the following way in Materialism and Empiriocriticism: “That the conception of “matter” must also include thoughts […] is a muddle, for if such an inclusion is made, the epistemological contrast between mind and matter, idealism and materialism, a contrast upon which Dietzgen himself insists, loses all meaning. That this contrast must not be made “excessive,” exaggerated, metaphysical” (Lenin 1972, quoted from the Internet version in: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1908/mec/four8.htm).

  2. See Marx/Engels (1974, 540): “Das Auge ist zum menschlichen Auge geworden, wie sein Gegenstand zu einem gesellschaftlichen, menschlichen, vom Menschen für den Menschen herrührenden”.

References

  • Georgiev, F. I. (1949). ’Vstupitel’naja stat’ja’. In T. Pavlov (Ed.), Teorija otrazhenija Osnovnye voprosy teorii poznanija dialekticheskogo materializma. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoj literatury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutov, D. (2005). Die marxistisch-leninstische Asthetik in der postkommunistischen Epoche. Michael Lifshits. In B. Groys, A. von der Heiden, & P. Weibel (Eds.), Zuruck aus der Zukunft. Osteuropaische Kulturen im Zeitalter des Postkommunismus (pp. 709–737). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutov, D. (2007) Marksistsko-leninskaja estetika v postkommunisticheskuju epokhu. Mikhail Lifshits. In Svobodnaja mysl, Vol. 2, pp. 125–141.

  • Lenin, V. I. (1972). Materialism and Empiriocriticism. In Collected works, Vol. 14, Moscow: Progress 1972. Here quoted according to the Internet version, in: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1908/mec/four8.htm. Accessed 25. 6. 2016.

  • Lifshits, M. A. (2002). Lukács. In Voprosy filosofii, 12.

  • Lifshits, M. A. (2003). Dialog s Evaldom Ilyenkovym (Problema ideal’nogo). Moskva: Progress-Tradicija.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifshits, M. A. (2004). Chto takoe klassika? Ontognoseologija. Smysl mira. Istinnaja seredina, Moskva: Iskusstvo XXI vek.

  • Lifshits, M. A. (2010). Varia. Moskva: Grundrisse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifshits, M. A. (2014). Bytie i soznanie. In http://mesotes.narod.ru/lifshiz/bitieisoznanie.htm. Accessed 11.11.2014.

  • Marx K., & Engels, F. (1974). Werke, 43 Bde., Ergänzungsband, Erster Teil, Dietz Verlag, Berlin/DDR.

  • Pavlov, T. (1949). Teorija otrazhenija. Osnovnye voprosy teorii poznanija dialekticheskogo materializma. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoj literatury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, T. (Ed.). (1969). Leninskaja teorija otrazhenija i sovremennost’. Moskva, Sofija: Nauka i iskusstvo.

  • Rozental, M. M. (Ed.). (1969). Lenin kak filosof. Moskva: Politizdat.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Mareeva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mareeva, E. Lifshits’ ontognoseology as a version of Lenin’s theory of reflection. Stud East Eur Thought 68, 295–305 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-016-9265-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-016-9265-6

Keywords

Navigation