Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

‘The Rise of Mass Poverty’? Breadline Britain/Poverty and Social Exclusion (1983–2012) Evidence Revisited

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 01 November 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Mack and Lansley’s consensual deprivation method determines poverty rates based on the proportions unable to afford possessions or activities that are deemed to be necessities by at least 50% of survey respondents. Using the method, Breadline Britain/Poverty and Social Exclusion studies found that Britain’s poverty rate increased steadily from 14% (in 1983) to 30% (in 2012), despite noticeable stability in what the surveys’ respondents regarded as necessities. This article contends that the poverty rise was fuelled by changes over time to the list of potential necessities put to respondents. An analysis of only potential necessities voted on in all available surveys (1983, 1999 and 2012) and newly invented items, using Mack and Lansley’s preferred poverty measure, found the poverty rate fell by more than half between 1983 and 2012; similarly, when various other measures were used, the 1983 result was nearly always the worst. In showing how different methodological choices produce different results, the findings point to the need for further debate about possible refinements to the consensual deprivation method. Our suggestions include standardising the procedure for developing lists of potential necessities so that findings from different times and places are more comparable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Lansley and Mack (2015) and Institute for Fiscal Studies data

Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, A., & Morelli, S. (2016). The challenge of measuring UK wealth inequality in the 2000s. Fiscal Studies, 37(1), 13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, P. (1984). Poverty and its Beholders. New Society, 18 October, 95–98.

  • Bailey, N., & Bramley, G. (2018). Introduction. In G. Bramley & N. Bailey (Eds.), Poverty and exclusion in the UK—The dimensions of disadvantage (Vol. 2, pp. 1–23). Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bárcena-Martin, E., Lacomba, B., Moro-Egidio, A., & Pérez-Moreno, S. (2014). Country differences in material deprivation in Europe. Review of Income and Wealth, 60(4), 802–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedük, S. (2018). Understanding Material Deprivation for 25 EU Countries: Risk and level perspectives, and distinctiveness of zeros. European Sociological Review, 34(2), 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G., & Bailey, N. (Eds.). (2018). Poverty and Exclusion in the UK: Volume 2—The dimensions of disadvantage. Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, R., Innes, D., & O’Dea, C. (2016). Household wealth in Great Britain: Distribution, composition and changes 2006–12. Fiscal Studies, 37(1), 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cribb, J., Joyce, R., & Phillips, D. (2012). Living standards, poverty and inequality in the UK: 2012. IFS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Oliveira, F., Nandy, S., Assis, A., Vedovato, L., & Vecchio, D. (2021). What Brazilians think about the necessities of life and acceptable living standards: a pilot study in São Paulo City. Paper presented at UK Social Policy Association online conference, July 7–9.

  • DHSS (Department of Health and Social Security). (1987). Promoting better health. HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, A. (2021). Necessities Laid Bare: An examination of possible justifications for Peter Townsend’s purely relative definition of poverty. Journal of Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279421000532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., & Pantazis, C. (Eds.). (1997). Breadline Britain in the 1990s. Summerleaze House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., Levitas, R., Pantazis, C., Patsios, D., Payne, S., Townsend, P., Adelman, L., Ashworth, K., Middleton, S., Bradshaw, J., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (2000). Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., Mack, J., Lansley, S., Main, G., Nandy, S., Patsios, D., & Pomati, M. (2013). The Impoverishment of the UK. PSE UK first results: Living Standards. (Project Report). PSE.

  • Guio, A., Gordon, D., Najera, H., & Pomati, M. (Eds.). (2017). Revising the EU material deprivation variables. Eurostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guio, A., & Pomati, M. (2017). How do European citizens cope with economic shocks: The longitudinal order of deprivation. In A. B. Atkinson, D. Guio, & E. Marlier (Eds.), Monitoring social inclusion in Europe (pp. 385–300). Eurostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halleröd, B. (1994). A new approach to the direct consensual measure of poverty. Social Policy Research Centre, Sydney (Australia), Discussion Paper no. 50.

  • Halleröd, B. (2006). Sour grapes: Relative deprivation, adaptive preferences and the measurement of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, 35(3), 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halleröd, B., Bradshaw, J., & Holmes, H. (1997). Adapting the consensual definition of poverty. In D. Gordon & C. Pantazis (Eds.), Breadline Britain in the 1990s (pp. 213–234). Summerleaze House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, D., Padley, M., Stone, J., & Valadez-Martinez, L. (2020). The low income gap: A new indicator based on a minimum income standard. Social Indicators Research, 149, 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilmakunnas, I., & Mäkinen, L. (2021). Age differences in material deprivation in Finland: How do consensus and prevalence-based weighting approaches change the picture? Social Indicators Research, 154, 393–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansley, S., & Mack, J. (2015). Breadline Britain: The rise of mass poverty. OneWorld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, J., & Lansley, S. (1985). Poor Britain. Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, J., & Lansley, S. (1997). Foreword. In D. Gordon and C. Pantazis (Eds.). Breadline Britain in the 1990s. (pp. xix–xxiii). Summerleaze House.

  • Main, G., & Bradshaw, J. (2014). Children’s necessities: Trends over time in perceptions and ownership. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 22(3), 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, S. (2004). Poverty or preference: What do ‘consensual deprivation indicators’ really mean? Fiscal Studies, 25(2), 201–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ONS (Office for National Statistics). (2020). Average household income, UK: Financial year ending: Provisional. ONS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantazis, C., Gordon, D., & Levitas, R. (Eds.). (2006). Poverty and Social Exclusion: The millennium survey. Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piachaud, D. (1981). Peter Townsend and the Holy Grail. New Society, 10 September, 419–21.

  • Pomati, M., & Nandy, S. (2020). Measuring multidimensional poverty according to national definitions: Operationalising target 1.2 of the sustainable development goals. Social Indicators Research, 148, 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlingson, K. (2008). Wealth. In T. Ridge & S. Wright (Eds.), Understanding inequality, poverty and wealth (pp. 15–36). Policy Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. Penguin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Bosch, K. (2000). Identifying the poor: Using subjective and consensual measures. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. (1987). Consensual approaches to the definition of poverty: Towards an alternative methodology. Journal of Social Policy, 16(2), 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G., & Noble, M. (2013). Does widespread lack undermine the socially perceived necessities approach to defining poverty? Evidence from South Africa. Journal of Social Policy, 42(1), 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Dunn.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: In the original publication of the article, the coauthor name Clare Saunders was missed in the author group and the affiliation of the corresponding author Andrew Dunn was processed incorrectly. Both are updated in this correction.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dunn, A., Saunders, C. ‘The Rise of Mass Poverty’? Breadline Britain/Poverty and Social Exclusion (1983–2012) Evidence Revisited. Soc Indic Res 164, 929–946 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02980-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02980-z

Keywords

Navigation