Skip to main content
Log in

Kin, Friend and Community Social Capital: Effects on Well-Being and Prospective Life Conditions in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of social capital on perceived and predicted wellbeing in three East Asian countries. On the basis of a multi-layered approach to measuring social capital by both trust in and interactions with kin, friends and neighbors, an individual’s happiness, life satisfaction, and the prospective life conditions over three life course phases are estimated using regression techniques. Trust generally is correlated with an individual’s well-being, but the degree of covariation differs across different types of trust. These exists a persistent, substantial influence of community involvement on perceived well-being and predicted life condition in old age. Trust in neighbors is not necessary for those with high community involvement, which is a major explanatory factor in predicting well-being in old age. In addition, the estimation outcomes from the interaction model do not suggest that the dark side of such trust is a concern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The difference in size of the sample is mainly due to differential allocation of funds for surveys in these three countries. China was approached but decided not to participate in this project..

  2. Some advocacy groups also call themselves a community, for example, gay or online communities, although they are not “community-based” (Arneil 2006). This study does not include this type of relationships in analysis, while recognizing its increased significance in East Asia.

  3. An often-used indicator of generalized trust, “trust in most people” is also included in the SoWSA. It is not used here, for the reason that kin, friends and neighbors conceptually are part of “most people” and thus redundancy becomes a concern. Therefore, trust in strangers is chosen as a proxy for generalized trust.

  4. The SoWSA survey also collected information about the degree of warmth a respondent felt with relatives. A preliminary analysis did not show a substantial effect of those on the three perceived types of well-being. I also found the degree of familiarity with people in the neighborhood to be only thinly correlated with personal well-being. I decided to not include these two factors in further estimation.

  5. Among Japanese, for those who reported having an income, their standardized income was calculated and then divided into three groups (high, middle, and low, each constituting approximately 33.3%). Respondents who had no income or did not report income were assigned to a fourth group. The four groups are recoded into a set of dummy variables, with the low income group used as a reference in estimation. This way I am still able to compare the effect of income on perceived life conditions. The coefficients of the missing group are of less interest in this study. Only a few respondents lacked income information in South Korea and Taiwan; they were not included in the analysis.

  6. The Breusch-Pagan test of independence with SUR models rejects the assumption that the dependent variables are uncorrelated for each country sample.

  7. I calculated the turning point of the quadratic function (= |b1/2b2|) for the first equation, which is approximately at 64 years of age. The second one is at 75, which is unrealistically high. The third one is at 59 years old.

  8. I designated high as one standard deviation (SD) larger than the mean, and low as one SD smaller than the mean. Medium indicates the average score.

References

  • Arneil, B. (2006). Diverse communities: The problem with social capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auh, S., & Cook, C. C. (2009). Quality of community life among rural residents: An integrated model. Social Indictors Research, 94, 377–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D., & Palmer, R. J. (2006). Examining the effects of perceptions of community and recreation participation on quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 75, 395–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benfield, E. C. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian, Y., & Huang, X. (2015). Beyond the strength of social ties: Job search networks and entry-level wage in urban China. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 961–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov, C. (2015). Social trust fosters an ability to help those in need: Jewish refugees in the Naziera. Political Studies, 63, 951–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. B., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science and Medicine, 66, 1733–1749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood: Westport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.-H. (2014). Urbanization, community and urban-rural relations. Sociology and Taiwan (4th ed., pp. 423–450). Chuliu: Taipei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.-J. J. (2009). The distribution and return of social capital in Taiwan. In R.-M. Hsung, N. Lin, & R. L. Breiger (Eds.), Contexts of social capital: Social networks in markets, communities, and families (pp. 193–215). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W.-C. (2012). How education enhances happiness: Comparison of mediating factors in four East Asian countries Wan-Chi Chen. Social Indicators Research, 106, 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., & Hou, F. (2019). The effect of unemployment on life satisfaction: A cross-national comparison between Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States. Applied Research Quality Life, 14, 1035–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y.-H., F, F.-C., & Adamczyk, A. (2016). Changing attitudes toward homosexuality in Taiwan, 1995–2012. Chinese Sociological Review, 48, 317–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, H. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramm, J. M., van Dijk, H., & Nieboer, A. P. (2012). The importance of neighborhood social cohesion and social capital for the well being of older adults in the community. The Gerontologist, 53, 142–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daoud, N., Haque, N., Gao, M. et al. (2016). Neighborhood settings, types of social capital and depression among immigrants in Toronto. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 51, 529–538.

  • Douglass, M. (2014). The Saemaul Undong in historical perspective and in the contemporary world. Learning from the South Korean Developmental Success (pp. 136–171). Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engbers, T. A., Thompson, M. F., & Slaper, T. F. (2017). Theory and measurement in social capital research. Social Indicators Research, 132,, 537–558.

  • Fahrmeir, L., Kneib, T., Lang, S., & Marx, B. (2013). Regression: Models, methods and applications. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y. (2004). Taiwan: No civil society, no democracy. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Civil society and political change in Asia: Expanding and contracting democratic space (pp. 164–190). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiebig, D. G. (2003). Seemingly unrelated regression. In B. H. Baltagi (Ed.), A companion to theoretical econometrics (pp. 101–121). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedkin, N. E. (2004). Social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 409–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanville, J. L., Paxton, P., & Wang, Y. (2015). Social capital and generosity: A multilevel analysis. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45, 526–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorodnichenko, Y., & Roland, G. (2012). Understanding the individualism-collectivism cleavage and its effects: Lessons from cultural psychology. In M. Aoki & G. Roland (Eds.), Institutions and comparative economic development (pp. 213–236). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellevik, O. (2017). The U-shaped age–happiness relationship: Real or methodological artifact? Quality & Quantity, 51, 177–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hori, M., & Kamo, Y. (2018). Gender differences in happiness: The effects of marriage, social roles, and social support in East Asia. Applied Research Quality Life, 13, 839–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L.-L., & Hsu, J.-Y. (2011). From cultural building, economic revitalization to local partnership? The changing nature of community mobilization in Taiwan. International Planning Studies, 16, 131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Consortium for Social Well-Being Studies. 2019. Social Well-Being Survey in Asia, 2015–2017: Japan, South Korea, Taiwan [Data Set]. Senshu University, Seoul National University, Academia Sinica [Producer]. Korea Social Science Data Archive [Distributor]. https://kossda.snu.ac.kr/handle/20.500.12236/23427.

  • Kim, H. (2017). A community energy transition model for urban areas: The energy self-reliant village program in Seoul, South Korea. Sustainability, 9, 1260. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krys, K., Zelenski, J. M., Capaldi, C. A., Park, J., Van Tilburg, W., Van Osch, Y., et al. (2019). Putting the “we” into well-being: Using collectivism-themed measures of well-being attenuates well-being’s association with individualism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 256–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, E. M., Rogers, R. G., Zajacova, A., et al. (2019). Marital happiness, marital status, health, and longevity. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20, 1539–1561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2020). Bonding and bridging social capital and their associations with self‐evaluated community resilience: A comparative study of East Asia. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 31–44.

  • Lee, S. J., & Kim, Y. (2017). Achieving community well-being through community participatory governance: The case of Saemaul Undong. In R. Philipps & C. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of community well-being research (pp. 115–128). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, H., Shaw, D., Liao, P., & Duan, H. (2020). The effects of income on happiness in East and South Asia: Societal values matter? Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 391–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (2002). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N., Ao, D., & Song, L. (2009). Production and returns of social capital: Evidence from Urban China. In R.-M. Hsung, N. Lin, & R. L. Breiger (Eds.), Contexts of social capital: Social networks in markets, communities, and families (pp. 163–192). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. P., & Yi, C.-C. (2013). A comparative analysis of intergenerational relations in East Asia. International Sociology, 28, 297–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., & Spitze, G. D. (1994). Family neighbors. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 453–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macionis, J. J. (1978). The search for community in modern society: An interpretation. Qualitative Sociology, 1, 130–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masland, J. W. (1946). Neighborhood associations in Japan. Far Eastern Survey, 15, 355–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth, D. J. (1988). The Walking tractor: Trojan horse in the Cheju Island Landscape. Korean Studies, 12, 14–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekkanen, R. (2004). Japan: Social capital without advocacy. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Civil society and political change in Asia: Expanding and contracting democratic space (pp. 223–255). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Vickstrom, E. (2011). Diversity, social capital and cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 461–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. B. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J. (2018). What types of indicators should be used to capture community well-being comprehensively? International Journal of Community Well-being, 1, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J., & Cornwell, T. (2001). Further validation of the Sirgy et al. measure of community quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 56, 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Son, J. (2013). Social capital and institutional constraints: A comparative analysis of China, Taiwan and the US. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, S. V., Lochner, K. A., & Kawachi, I. (2003). Neighborhood differences in social capital: A compositional artifact or a contextual construct? Health and Place, 9, 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi, H., & Kaufman, G. (2017). Filial norms, co-residence, and intergenerational exchange in Japan. Social Science Quarterly, 98, 1518–1535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanwattana, P. (2012). Significance of Institutionalization and Changes of Chonaikai (Neighborhood Association) in Japanese Society. Policy Science (Ritsumeikan University), 19, 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardos, R. (2009). Social capital in communities, development and integration: The four village case study in Hungary, 2000. In R.-M. Hsung, N. Lin, & R. L. Breiger (Eds.), Contexts of social capital: Social networks in markets, communities and families (pp. 216–243). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, M.-C. & Wang, W.-T. (2019). Intergenerational exchange in East Asia: A new look at financial transfers. Comparative Sociology, 18, 173–203.

  • Tsai, M.-C., Sen, Y.-S., Chen, Y.-F., Tai, T.-O., Yeh, H.-J., & Liao, C.-H. (2018). International comparative survey on lifestyle and values: A report on the Taiwan survey. The Senshu Social Well-being Review, 5, 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uehara, E.S. (1995). Reciprocity reconsidered: Gouldner's ‘moral norm of reciprocity’ and social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 483–502.

  • Van Der Gaag, M., & Webber, M. (2008). Measurement of individual social capital. In I. Kawachi, S. V. Subramanian, & D. Kim (Eds.), Social capital and health (pp. 29–49). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele, T.J. (2019). Measures of community well-being: A template. International Journal of Community Well-being, 2, 253–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2012). Happiness, also known as “life satisfaction” and “subjective well-being”. In K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 63–77). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villalonga-Olivesa, E., & Kawachib, I. (2017). The dark side of social capital: A systematic review of the negative health effects of social capital. Social Science and Medicine, 194, 105–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Scheve, C., Esche, F., & Schupp, J. (2017). The emotional timeline of unemployment: Anticipation, reaction, and adaptation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18, 1231–1254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, T. (2016). Marriage and subjective well-being: How and why context matters. Social Indicators Research, 126, 1025–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S.-C., & Fowler, P.J. (2019). Social cohesion, neighborhood collective efficacy, and adolescent subjective well-being in urban and rural Taiwan. American Journal of Community Psychology, 63, 499–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W.-S., & Wang, N.-L. (2012). A comparative study of life and marital satisfaction in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Applied Ethics Research, 52, 115–139. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazaki, K. (2016). Basic descriptive statistics of Japan social well-being survey. The Senshu Social Well-being Review, 2, 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, J., Lim, H.-C., Eun, Y. N., Kim, D.-K., & Kim, E. S. (2016). Survey design and descriptive outcomes of Korean Survey. The Senshu Social Well-being Review, 3, 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, W., Subramanian, S. V., Mitchell, A. D., Lee, D. T., Wang, J., & Kawachi, I. (2007). Does social capital enhance health and well-being? Evidence from rural China. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. (2011). Social network and physical-psychological health among urban and rural residents. In Y. Bian (Ed.), Relational sociology: Theories and studies (pp. 186–204). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-Chang Tsai.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsai, MC. Kin, Friend and Community Social Capital: Effects on Well-Being and Prospective Life Conditions in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. Soc Indic Res 154, 489–510 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02570-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02570-x

Keywords

Navigation