Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing Social Sustainability Through the Planning of Third Places: A Theory-Based Framework

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With constantly changing societal needs, along with population growth and increasing urbanisation pressures, open public spaces are constantly competing against other land-uses to accommodate the increasing urban pressures. Societies and cities call for an approach to reclaim public space for public use, to provide opportunities for people to meet and interact, and to develop a sense of belonging to a place. It is for this reason that social sustainability is becoming a crucial consideration within the urban context, seeking balance between economic developments, environmental challenges and the demands and preferences of modern societies. This article includes various theories and literature, reflecting on the importance of social sustainability in the urban context and the role of the Third Place in facilitating social sustainability. The concept of Third Places is considered as any space other than our homes (First Place) or work (Second Place), manifesting as a component of well-defined public places designed to enhance civic identity, quality of life, social capital and community revitalisation, whilst improving economic development. The Third Place concept is thus introduced in this article as an umbrella concept combining the physical realm and design of the social space and is considered from the perspective of the place-making approach, the lively planning approach and the green urbanism approach. These approaches were collectively employed as part of a qualitative enquiry to inform a theory-based framework to enhance social sustainability through the planning of Third Places. Although social sustainability has become increasingly influential in the urban planning context, limited research to guide urban planning approaches towards enhanced social sustainability exist, especially within the South African context. The lack of practical application of existing planning theories has resulted in the widening of the theory–practice gap and alternative approaches should be considered to enhance social sustainability. The proposed theory-based framework, based on the theory and literature of this article, will finally aim to inform the study of Third Place consideration for enhanced social sustainability within the South African planning context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Thatcher (2014)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew, J. (2011). Space and place: Handbook of geographical knowledge. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahern, J. (2007). Green infrastructure for cities: The spatial dimension. In V. Novotny & P. Brown (Eds.), Cities of the future: Towards integrated sustainable water and landscape (pp. 267–283). London: IWA Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahern, J. (2011). From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape and Urban Planning,100(4), 34–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Bishawi, M., & Ghadban, S. S. (2011). A methodological approach for reading urban open space. ArchNet-IJAR,5(1), 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hagla, K. (2008). Towards a sustainable neighbourhood: The role of open spaces. ArchNet-IJAR,2(2), 162–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alidoust, S., Bosman, C., & Holden, G. (2015). Socially healthy ageing: The importance of Third Places, soft edges and walkable neighbourhoods. Paper presented at the State of Australian Cities Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, 9–11 December 2015. Retrieved February 12, 2018 from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sara_Alidoust/publication/309752006_Socially_Healthy_Ageing_The_Importance_of_Third_Places_Soft_Edges_and_Walkable_Neighbourhoods/links/5821c08708ae5385869fdf3c/Socially-Healthy-Ageing-The-Importance-of-Third-Places-Soft-Edges-and-Walkable-Neighbourhoods.pdf.

  • Arefi, M. (1999). Non-place and placelessness as narratives of loss: Rethinking the notion of place. Journal of Urban Design,4(2), 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assefa, G., & Frostell, B. (2007). Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies. Technology in Society,29(1), 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atiqul, H. A. Q., & Shah, M. D. (2011). Urban green spaces and an integrated approach to sustainable environment. Journal of Environmental Protection,2, 601–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnasco, A., Ghirotto, L., & Sasso, L. (2014). Theoretical sampling. Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltimore City Department of Planning. (2010). Downtown open space plan. Retrieved February 12, 2018 from http://www.godowntownbaltimore.com/docs/openspaceplan.pdf.

  • Barter, N., & Bebbington, J. (2010). Pursuing environmental sustainability. St. Andrews: St. Andrews Sustainability Institute: University of St. Andrews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basiago, A. D. (1999). Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. The Environmentalist,19(2), 145–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatley, T., & Newman, P. (2013). Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities. Sustainability,5(8), 3328–3345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, A., & Stoll, L. (2010). Creating Third Places: Places where communities gather. Downtown Economics, 172, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biart, M. (2002). Social sustainability as part of the social agenda of the European community. In T. Ritt (Ed.), Soziale Nachhaltigkeit: Von der Umweltpolitik zur Nachhaltigkeit (Vol. 149, pp. 5–10).

  • Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of social capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A. E., Copnell, B., & Hall, H. (2018). The development of theoretical sampling in practice. Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research,25, 561–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabras, I., & Mount, M. (2017). Assessing the impact of pubs on community cohesion and well-being in the English countryside. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,29(1), 489–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, B. H. (2015). A study of Third Place: Benefits of shared leisure practices in public gathering places, PhD Thesis. Tennessee: Murfreesboro.

  • Carmona, M. (2003). Is the grass greener…? Learning from international innovations in urban green space management. Retrieved March 15, 2017 from http://www.cabe.org.uk/publications/is-the-grass-greener.

  • Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public space. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco, M., & Bilal, U. (2016). A sign of the times: To have or to be? Social capital or social cohesion? Social Science and Medicine,159, 127–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S., Lambert, D., Kim, S., Roberts, R., & Park, W. (2011). Relationship between value of open space and distance from housing locations within a community. Journal of Geographical Systems,13(4), 393–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, D. P. (2010). The development and use of a land-use suitability model in spatial planning in South Africa, Masters dissertation. Potchefstroom: NWU.

  • Cilliers, E. J., & Cilliers, S. S. (2016). Planning for green infrastructure: Options for South African cities. Johannesburg: South African Cities Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, E. J., & De Jong, N. (2013). Planning for lively spaces: Adding value to old spaces (South African approach). In 49th ISOCARP conference, Brisbane, 1–4 October 2013.

  • Cilliers, E. J., Timmermans, W., Van den Goorbergh, F., & Slijkhuis, J. S. A. (2012). The lively cities (LICI) background document: LICI theory and planning approaches. Part of the LICI project (Lively Cities, made possible by INTERREG IVB North West Europe, European Regional Development Fund, European Territorial Cooperation, 2007–2013. Wageningen University of Applied Sciences, Van Hall Larenstein).

  • Cilliers, E. J., Timmermans, W., Van den Goorbergh, F., & Slijkhuis, J. S. A. (2014). Designing public spaces through the lively planning integrative perspective. Environment, Development and Sustainability,17(6), 1367–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, E. J., Timmermans, W., Van den Goorbergh, F., & Slijkhuis, J. S. A. (2015). Green place-making in practice: From temporary spaces to permanent places. Journal of Urban Design,20(3), 349–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Lonetree Colorado. (2013). Lonetree design guidelines. Retrieved February 12, 2019 from http://cityoflonetree.com/planning/DesignGuidelines/.

  • Cloete, A. (2014). Social cohesion and social capital: Possible implications for the common good. Verbum et Ecclesia,35(3), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colantonio, A. (2009). Social sustainability: A review and critique of traditional versus emerging themes and assessment methods. Retrieved January 13, 2018 from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/35867/.

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988a). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988b). The creation and destruction of social capital: Implications for the law. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, & Public Policy, 3, 375–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press (Division of Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Commissioner for Children and Young People. (2011). Caring for the future growing up today: Building spaces and places for children and young people. Retrieved August 17, 2017 from https://www.ccyp.wa.gov.au/files/Building%20spaces%20and%20places%20for%20children%20and%20young%20people.pdf.

  • Cortese, C., Haase, A., Grossmann, K., & Ticha, I. (2013). Governing social cohesion in shrinking cities: The cases of Ostrava, Genoa and Leipzig. European Planning Studies,22(10), 2050–2066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, R. (2015). Reframing the problem of public space in the sustainable city. Retrieved March 6, 2017 from https://www.rc21.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/B2-Cowley.pdf.

  • Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A short introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, A. P. (2011). Rethinking Oldenburg: Third Places and generation Y in a developing country context. Retrieved November 9, 2017 from http://scholarworks.umass.edu/refereed/ICHRIE_2011/Friday/7.

  • Cuthill, M. (2009). Strengthening the social in sustainable development: Developing a conceptual framework for social sustainability in a rapid urban growth region in Australia. Sustainable Development, 18(6), 362–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, M. (1988). The writing of history. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, N. (2014). Addressing social issues in rural communities by planning for lively places and green spaces, Masters thesis. Potchefstroom: North-West University.

  • Draucker, C. B., Martsolf, D. S., Ross, R., & Rusk, T. B. (2007). Theoretical sampling and category development in grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research,17(8), 1137–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eizenberg, E., & Jabareen, Y. (2017). Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework. Sustainability,9(68), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union. (2010). Making our cities attractive and sustainable: How the EU contributes to improving the urban environment. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feil, A. A., & Schreiber, D. (2017). Sustainability and sustainable development: Unravelling overlays and scope of their meanings. Cad. EBAPE.BR,14(3), 667–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times. (2018). Definition of environmental sustainability. Retrieved September 23, 2018 from http://lexicon.ft.com/Term?term=environmental-sustainability.

  • Friedmann, J. (2010). Place and place-making in cities: A global perspective. Planning Theory & Practice,11(2), 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauteng City-Region Observatory (GCRO). (2013). A framework for a green infrastructure planning approach in the Gauteng City-Region. Retrieved September 25, 2018 from http://www.gcro.ac.za/media/reports/GCRO_Green_Assets_Report_Digital_version__book.pdf.

  • Giddings, B., Hopwood, B., & O’Brien, G. (2002). Environment, economy and society: Fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustainable Development,10(4), 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, M. V. (2003). Theory of attachment and place attachment. In M. Bonnes, T. Lee, & M. Bonaiuto (Eds.), Psychological theories for environmental issues (pp. 137–170). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Aldine Transactions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, C. S., & Moretto, E. M. (2011). A framework of indicators to support urban green area planning: A Brazilian case study. Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences,1(1), 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodland, R., & Daly, H. (1996). Environmental sustainability: Universal and non-negotiable. Ecological Applications,6(4), 1002–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardoy, J., Mitlin, D., & Satthertwaite, D. (1992). Environmental problems in Third World cities. London: Earthscan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. (2003). Your Third Place or mine? Public libraries and local communities. Public Library Journal,18(2), 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-place-ing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In CSCW. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, pp. 67–76.

  • Herreros, F. (2004). The problem of forming social capital: Why trust?. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, P. (2013). Third Places and social interaction in deprived neighbourhoods in Great Britain. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,28(2), 221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobart City Council. (2010). Hobart public spaces and public life, a city with people in mind. Retrieved July 18, 2017 from http://www.hobartcity.com.au/Hobart/A_City_with_People_in_Mind.

  • Janmaat, J. G. (2011). Social cohesion as real-life phenomenon: Assessing the explanatory power of the universalist and particularist perspectives. Social Indicators Research,100(1), 61–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffres, L. W., Bracken, C. C., Jian, G., & Casey, M. F. (2009). The impact of Third Places on community quality of life. Applied Research in Quality of Life,4(4), 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karacor, E. (2014). PlaceMaking approachment to accomplish social sustainability. European Journal of Sustainable Development,4, 253–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development,47(3), 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawachi, I. (1999). Social capital and community effects on population and individual health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,896(1), 120–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlman, T., & Farrington, J. (2010). What is sustainability? Retrieved November 8, 2017 from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/11/3436.

  • Lamit, H., Ghahramanpouri, A., & Nia, S. S. (2013). A behavioral observation of street liveliness in Meldrum Walk, Johor Bahru of Malaysia. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies,4(1), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanham, K. F. (2007). Planning as placemaking: Tensions of scale, culture and identity. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepofsky, J., & Fraser, J. C. (2003). Building community citizens: Claiming the right to place-making in the city. Urban Studies,40(1), 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levent, T. B., Vreeker, R., & Nijkamp, P. (2004). Multidimensional evaluation of green spaces: A comparative study on European cities. Retrieved February 17, 2017 from www.dare.ubvu.vu.nl/bitstream/1871/8928/1/20040017.pdf.

  • Littig, B., & Griebler, E. (2005). Social sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development,8(1), 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., Mao, F., Zhou, W., Li, Q., Haung, J., & Zhu, X. (2007). Accessibility assessment of urban green space: A quantitative perspective. Beijing: Tsinghua University School of Architecture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loudier, C., & Dubois, J. L. (2001). Public spaces: Between insecurity and hospitality. Retrieved June 5, 2018 from http://www.ocs.polito.it/biblioteca/verde/uk_PARTIE201_C133.134.pdf.

  • Louw, H. A., & Bredenkamp, I. M. (1999). The implications of democratization on access to higher education in South Africa. Unpublished report: Technikon Southern Africa, South Africa.

  • Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, R. (2008). Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. Journal of Cleaner Production,16(17), 1838–1846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of urban space: An inquiry into a socio-spatial process. Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manley, K., & Rose, T. M. (2014). Green urbanism and diffusion issues. Retrieved September 8, 2018 from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/81183/1/SB14%20paper%20authors%20copy.pdf.

  • Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, P., & Besemer, K. (2015). Social networks, social capital and poverty: Panacea or placebo? Journal of Poverty & Social Justice,23(3), 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, S., & Mazumdar, S. (2004). Religion and place attachment: A study of sacred places. Journal of Environmental Psychology,24(3), 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, C. (2008). Child friendly cities and land use planning: Implications for children’s health. Environments Journal,35(3), 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, V., & Basson, J. K. (2010). Third Places and the social life of streets. Environment and Behavior,42(6), 779–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensah, C. A. (2014). Urban green spaces in Africa: Nature and challenges. International Journal of Ecosystem,4(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesch, G. S., & Manor, O. (1998). Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment. Environment and Behavior,30(4), 227–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moir, S., & Carter, K. (2012). Diagrammatic representations of sustainability: A review and synthesis. In S. D. Smith (Ed.), Proceedings of 28th annual ARCOM conference (pp. 1479–1489), 3–5 September 2012, Edinburgh, Association of Researchers in Construction Management.

  • Morelli, J. (2011). Environmental sustainability: A definition for environmental professionals. Journal of Environmental Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.14448/jes.01.0002.

  • Mpe, R., & Ogra, A. (2014). Making great places in slums/informal settlements. In Proceedings of the conference planning Africa 2014: Making great places. Retrieved June 15, 2018 from http://www.planningafrica.org.za/images/banners/History-Documents/01.%20SAPI%202014%20Conference%20Proceedings.pdf.

  • Nassar, U. (2013). Principles of green urbanism: The absent value in Cairo, Egypt. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity,3(4), 339–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Development co-operation report 2011. Retrieved August 15, 2017 from http://www.oecd.org/dac/developmentco-operationreport2011.htm.

  • Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg, R., & Brissett, D. (1982). The Third Place. Qualitative Sociology,5(4), 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxoby, R. (2009). Understanding social inclusion, social cohesion and social capital. International Journal of Social Economics,36(12), 1133–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacky, J., Wittmann, M., & Frantisak, L. (2015). Evaluation of urban open spaces sustainability. Retrieved September 10, 2017 from https://dspace.vutbr.cz/bitstream/handle/11012/42779/PALACKYAESOP2015FULLPAPERFINAL.pdf?sequence=13.

  • Palys, T. (2008). Purposive sampling. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, 2:697–698. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. (2014). Proposals for the development of green spaces in urban areas [personal interview]. March 10, 2014. Durban.

  • Power, A. (2004). Sustainable communities and sustainable development: A review of sustainable communities. Retrieved October 21, 2017 from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/28313/1/CASEreport23.pdf.

  • Prange, M. (2014). Urban Design tools to improve child-friendly green spaces [personal interview]. April 14, 2014. Durban.

  • Project for Public Spaces. (2012). Placemaking and the future of cities. Retrieved August 13, 2018 from https://www.pps.org/article/placemaking-and-the-future-of-cities.

  • Project for Public Spaces. (2014). What makes a successful place? Retrieved April 21, 2017 from http://www.pps.org/reference/grplacefeat/.

  • Project for Public Spaces. (2015). Public places and spaces. Retrieved April 19, 2015 from http://www.pps.org/places/.

  • Project for Public Spaces and Metropolitan Planning Council. (2008). A guide to neighborhood placemaking in Chicago. Chicago.

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. American Prospect, 13, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranjha, S. (2016). Green infrastructure: Planning for sustainable and resilient urban environment. Brief for GSDR—2016 update. Retrieved September 6, 2017 from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/95599_Ranjha_Green%20infrastructure_planning%20for%20sustainable%20and%20resilient%20urban%20environment.pdf.

  • Reddy, T. L., & Thomson, R. J. (2015). Environmental, social and economic sustainability: Implications for actuarial science. Presented to the Actuaries Institute ASTIN, AFIR/ERM and IACA Colloquia, 23–27 Augustus 2017, Sydney. Retrieved May 22, 2018 from https://www.actuaries.asn.au/Library/Events/ASTINAFIRERMColloquium/2015/ReddyThompsonActuarialSciencePaper.pdf.

  • Rudofsky, B. (1969). Streets for people: A primer for Americans. New York: Doubleday & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, I. (1999). Social sustainability and whole development: Exploring the dimensions of sustainable development. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sack, R. D. (1997). Homo geographicus. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saloojee, A. (2012). Place-making in the everyday: A case study of Fordsburg, Honours Mini-dissertation. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg.

  • Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology,30(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, J. (2010). Towards a greener green space planning, Masters dissertation. Lund: Lund University.

  • Schofield, J., & Szymanski, R. (Eds.). (2011). Sense of place in a changing world. In Local heritage, global context: Cultural perspectives on sense of place (pp. 1–11). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberberg, S., Lora, K., Disbrow, R., & Muessig, A. (2013). Places in the making: How placemaking builds places and communities. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved February 10, 2019 from https://dusp.mit.edu/sites/dusp.mit.edu/files/attachments/project/mit-dusp-places-in-the-making.pdf.

  • Simons, G. F. & Bird, S. (2008). Toward a global infrastructure for the sustainability of language resources. In Proceedings of the 22nd Pacific Asia conference on language, information and computation, 20–22 November 2008, Cebu City, Philippines. Retrieved February 2, 2019 from https://scholars.sil.org/sites/scholars/files/gary_f_simons/preprint/paclic22.pdf.

  • Smith, D. M. (2000). Moral geographies: Ethics in a world of difference. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soholt, H. (2004). Life, spaces and buildings: Turning the traditional planning process upside down. Paper presented at Walk21-V Cities for People, The fifth international conference on walking in the 21st century, 9–11 June 2004, Copenhagen, Denmark.

  • Sohrabi, N. M. (2017). Public art: Place making or focus on values (Case study: Vali-Asr Street, Tehran). Arts and Social Science Journal,8(3), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, B. (2007). City Squares in Cape Town’s townships—Public space as an instrument of urban transformation: The origins, objectives and implementation of the City of Cape Town’s Dignified Places Programme. Retrieved May 12, 2017 from http://www.treasury.gov.za/divisions/bo/ndp/TTRI/TTRI%20Oct%202007/Day%202%20-%2030%20Oct%202007/7.10%20Reading%20Public%20Spaces%20CoCT.PDF.

  • Spicker, P. (2014). Cohesion, exclusion and social quality. International Journal of Social Quality,4(1), 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, N. (2003). Urban design between theory and practise: From conceptualisation to realisation and back again. Paper for the AESOP-ACSP Third Joint Conference, 8–12 July 2003, Leuven, Belgium. Retrieved April 17, 2018 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1cda/46907d89053ac1061bea465c823771256863.pdf.

  • Stone, W., & Hughes, J. (2002). Understanding community strengths: Can existing theories provide an overall framework for achieving and identifying strong communities? Family Matters,62(6), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strydom, W. J. (2014). Towards place-making in urban planning through participatory action research, Masters dissertation. Potchefstroom: North-West University.

  • Suire, R., Rallet, A., Rochelandet, F., & Guibert, G. (2017). Places and third-places, are they the missing puzzle pieces in dynamic of cultural and creative clusters?. Retrieved February 12, 2017 from http://asrdlf2017.com/asrdlf2017_com/inc/resumes/24.pdf.

  • Thatcher, A. (2014). Theoretical definitions and models of sustainable development that apply to human factors and ergonomics. Retrieved August 15, 2016 from http://proceedings.dtu.dk/fedora/repository/dtu:2471/OBJ/x152.747-752.pdf.

  • The World Bank. (2012). Inclusive green growth: The pathway to sustainable development. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2003). Performance and …. Environment and Planning A,35(11), 2019–2024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Town and Country Planning Association. (2012). Planning for a healthy environment—Good practice guidance for green infrastructure and biodiversity. Retrieved May 12, 2017 from https://www.wildlifetrusts.org/sites/default/files/Green-Infrastructure-Guide-TCPA-TheWildlifeTrusts.pdf.

  • Trancik, R. (1986). Finding lost space: Theories of urban design. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y. F. (2005). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2012). Learn about sustainability. Retrieved September 24, 2017 from https://www.epa.gov/sustainability/learn-about-sustainability.

  • Vallance, S., Perkins, H. C., & Dixon, J. E. (2011). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum,42(3), 342–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R., & Ehrhardt, J. (1995). The cross-national pattern of happiness: Test of predictions implied in three theories of happiness. Social Indicators Research,34(1), 33–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: “Our common future”. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, W. (2010). What is green urbanism?. Retrieved March 26, 2018 from https://www.planetizen.com/node/46245.

  • Wiersum, K. F. (1995). 200 years of sustainability in forestry: Lessons from History. Environmental Management,19(3), 321–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities “just green enough”. Landscape and Urban Planning,125, 234–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcraft, S., Hackett, T., & Caistor-Arendar, L. (2011). Design for social sustainability: A framework for creating thriving new communities. S.l.: Future Communities. Retrieved February 5, 2019 from https://ucalearningandteaching.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/design_for_social_sustainability.pdf.

  • Zupancic, T., Kingsley, M., Jason, T., & Macfarlane, R. (2015). Green city: Why nature matters to health—An evidence review. Retrieved March 16, 2018 from http://www.ecohealth-ontario.ca/files/Green_City_Why_Nature_Matters_to_Health_An_Evidence_Review.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research (or parts thereof) was made possible as a result of a financial contribution from the NRF (National Research Foundation) South Africa. Any opinion, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and therefore the NRF does not accept any liability in regard thereto.

Funding

This research (or parts thereof) was funded by the NRF (National Research Foundation) South Africa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

    Z. Goosen & E. J. Cilliers

Authors
  1. Z. Goosen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. J. Cilliers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. Goosen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This research conformed to the ethical guidelines of the North-West University’s Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management. For the purpose of this research paper, forming the first part of a series of papers to be published, no ethical concerns are included due to the strong literature orientated approach in this research paper to establish a theory-based framework for enhanced social sustainability through the planning of Third Places.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goosen, Z., Cilliers, E.J. Enhancing Social Sustainability Through the Planning of Third Places: A Theory-Based Framework. Soc Indic Res 150, 835–866 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02350-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02350-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation