Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Importance of Health and Relative Importance of Satisfaction with One’s Own Health: A Case of Frail Immigrant Older Adults

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the current study is to investigate (1) the relative or perceived importance of health, and (2) the relative importance of health-related quality of life (HRQOL, in relation to satisfactions with other non-health-related life domains) in a longitudinal context. Based on longitudinal survey data of a group of frail immigrant older adults, this study found that (1) the perception of health being most important among major life domains did not vary with time, and (2) the fact that in comparison with satisfactions with other major life domains, satisfaction with one’s own health was not the strongest predictor of overall life satisfaction, did not vary with time either. These findings continue to support the main points suggested by Hsieh (Soc Indic Res 87:127–137, 2008): the importance of health as a major domain of life must not be overlooked; but the association between HRQOL and quality of life must not be overestimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (1999). Statistical methods for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atchley, R. C. (1982). The aging self. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 19, 388–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckie, T. M., & Hayduk, L. A. (2004). Using perceived health to test the construct-related validity of global quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 65, 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, M., & Coad, A. (2011). From average Joe’s happiness to miserable Jane and cheerful John: Using quantile regressions to analyze the full subjective wellbeing distribution. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 79, 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rogers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russel Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Health-related quality of life. Retrieved December 15, 2017, from http://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/about.htm.

  • Cheung, F., & Lucas, R. E. (2014). Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from three large samples. Quality of Life Research, 23, 2809–2818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2005). Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 49, 699–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., McCabe, M. P., Romeo, Y., & Gullone, E. (1994). The comprehensive quality of life scale: Instrument development and psychometric evaluation on tertiary staff and students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 372–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrans, C., & Powers, M. (1985). ’Quality of Life Index: Development and psychometric properties’. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C., Higuera, L., & Lora, E. (2011). Which health conditions cause the most unhappiness? Health Economics, 20, 1431–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torris, G. (2018). On the methodological framework of composite indices: A review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R., & Land, K. C. (2007). Constructing summary indices of quality of life: A model for the effect of heterogeneous importance weights. Sociological Methods and Research, 35, 455–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, A. R., & Markus, H. R. (1999). The self-concept in life span and aging research. In V. L. Bengtson & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 227–252). New York: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2003). Counting importance: The case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance. Social Indicators Research, 61, 227–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2004). To weight or not to weight: The role of domain importance in quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 68, 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2005). Age and relative importance of major life domains. Journal of Aging Studies, 19, 503–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2008). The relative importance of health. Social Indicators Research, 87, 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2009). Health, quality of care and quality of life: A case of frail older adults. Social Indicators Research, 94, 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2012). Should we give up domain importance weighting on QOL measures? Social Indicators Research, 108, 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2013). Issues in evaluating importance weighting in quality of life measures. Social Indicators Research, 110, 681–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2015). The often overlooked issue of statistical power: This and other issues regarding assessing importance weighting in quality of life measures. Social Science Research, 50, 303–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2016). Domain importance in subjective well-being measures. Social Indicators Research, 127, 777–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2017). Synthesis of indicators through weighting: The experiences of quality of life measures. In F. Maggino (Ed.), Complexity in society: From indicators construction to their synthesis. Social indicators research series (Vol. 70, pp. 231–249). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M., & Kenagy, G. P. (2014). Measuring quality of life: A case for re-examining the assessment of domain importance weighting. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9, 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Wellbeing Group. (2013). Personal Wellbeing Index (5th ed.). Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimi, M., & Brazier, J. (2016). Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: What is the difference? PharmacoEconomics, 34, 645–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamu, A. N., & Olsen, J. A. (2016). The relative importance of health, income and social relations for subjective well-being: An integrative analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 152, 176–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. (1978). Thirty years of research on the subjective well-being of older Americans. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewe, N., Bagherzadeh, M., Araya-Castillo, L., Thieme, C., & Batista-Foguet, J. M. (2014). Life domain satisfactions as predictors of overall life satisfaction among workers: Evidence from Chile. Social Indicators Research, 118, 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2012). Estimating the reliability of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from four national panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 105, 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markides, K. S., & Martin, H. W. (1979). A casual model of life satisfaction among the elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 86–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (2004). Social indicators research and health-related quality of life research. Social Indicators Research, 65, 27–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S., Diener, E., Suh, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Value as a moderator in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 67, 157–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okun, M. A., & Stock, W. A. (1987). Correlates and components of subjective well-being among the elderly. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 6, 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmore, E., & Luikart, C. (1972). Health and social factors related to life satisfaction. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 13, 68–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2006). Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: Is it a simple relationship? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 467–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, L. B., & Hubley, A. M. (2005). Importance ratings and weighting: Old concerns and new perspectives. International Journal of Testing, 5, 105–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, L. B., Hubley, A. M., Palepu, A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2006). Does weighting capture what’s important? Revisiting subjective importance weighting with a quality of life measure. Social Indicators Research, 75, 146–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherpenzeel, A., & Saris, W. (1996). Causal direction in a model of life satisfaction: The top-down/bottom-up controversy. Social Indicators Research, 38, 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J., & Mullen, B. (1982). From the cradle to the grave: Comparison and self-evaluation across the life-span. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, pp. 97–128). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taillefer, M. C., Roberge, M.-A., & May, S. (2003). Health-related Quality of life models: Systematic review of the literature. Social Indicators Research, 64, 293–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, T. V. (1992). Subjective health and subjective well-being among minority elderly: Measurement issues. Journal of Social Service Research, 16, 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2010). Life is getting better: Societal evolution and fit with human nature. Social Indicators Research, 97, 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voicu, B. (2015). Priming effects in measuring life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 124, 993–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jane Addams College of Social Work, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1040 West Harrison Street (M/C 309), Chicago, IL, 60607-7134, USA

    Chang-ming Hsieh

Authors
  1. Chang-ming Hsieh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang-ming Hsieh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hsieh, Cm. Importance of Health and Relative Importance of Satisfaction with One’s Own Health: A Case of Frail Immigrant Older Adults. Soc Indic Res 143, 81–93 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1973-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1973-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation