Skip to main content
Log in

Why do People Get Married? An Inframarginal Perspective

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper constructs an economic model to study the emergence of marriage based on a new infra-marginal general equilibrium analysis. By depicting the commonness and complementarity of marriage, we explain how a single person shifts from being single to being married based on the division of labor. Meanwhile, reduced learning costs will make an individual more willing to abandon the single status, and the number of families in the marriage market will increase. The model reveals the necessary conditions for the existence of marriage and marital stability and explains the dynamic changes in the relative population and the prices of parties in the marriage market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The transaction costs include material investments, learning costs and search costs.

  2. This paper conducts the model to explain the essence of marriage, which has been general issues. We not only focus on China’s marriage phenomenon, but also other countries.

  3. The transaction cost the must parameters in the infra-marginal analysis model not just the marriage, but it is important to consider it in the marriage model. While the other three factors are mainly for the nature of marriage.

  4. In this paper, the attraction parameter is equal to the similarity of the two parties as the influential factor.

References

  • Baker, M. J., & Jacobsen, J. P. (2007). Marriage, specialization, and the gender division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(4), 763–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barham, V., Devlin, R. A., & Yang, J. (2009). A theory of rational marriage and divorce. European Economic Review, 53(1), 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1974). A Theory of marriage, economics of the family: Marriage, children, and human capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerk, D. (2009). Beauty vs. earnings: Gender differences in earnings and priorities over spousal characteristics in a matching model. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 69(3), 248–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. X. (2005). Marriage, moral and social classes: Analysis of the social evolution based on labor division. Social Science Front, 1, 206–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, W., & Yang, X. (2004). Inframarginal analysis of division of labor: A survey. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(2), 137–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigno, A. (1991). Economics of the family. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvrcek, T. (2012). America’s settling down: How better jobs and falling immigration led to a rise in marriage, 1880–1930. Explorations in Economic History, 49(3), 335–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drewianka, S. (2003). Estimating social effects in matching markets: Externalities in spousal search. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2), 409–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, É. (1893). The division of labor in society. Shanghai: Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (2003). The origin of the family, private property and the state. Beijing: People Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D. D. (2006). The life economics of Friedman. Beijing: CITIC Publishing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Y. L. (2007). Comparative advantage theory and division of labor in the family. Economic Survey, 4, 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield, G. K. (1999). A coordination model of the sexual division of labor. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 40(2), 125–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. (2003). A sutdy on the model of Merrital asymmetric and inframarginal analysis in the Chinese society. Kaohsiung: National Sun Yat-Sen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishida, J. (2003). The role of social norms in a model of marriage and divorce. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51(1), 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1797). Metaphysics of morals. Beijing: Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, X. F., Liu, X., & Xiang, Y. B. (2011). Economic analysis of marriage. Frontier, 4, 71–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, A. (2008). Marriage commitment and divorce in a matching model with differential aging. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(3), 614–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matouschek, N., & Rasul, I. (2008). The economics of the marriage contract: Theories and evidence. Journal of Law and Economics, 51(1), 59–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, D. (2004). The relationship between marriage market prospects and never-married motherhood. Journal of Human Resources, 39(4), 938–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosaka, H. (2007). Specialization and competition in marriage models. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(1), 104–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. A. (1985). A transaction cost approach to families and households. Journal of Economic Literature, 6, 581–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, K. Y. (2008). The law and economics of marriage. Institutional Economics Research, 4, 125–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, H. Y., Liu, J., & Li, M. (2003). Economics of marriage and family relations. Jiangxi Social Science, 12, 166–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, A. Q., & Ye, W. Z. (2002). The quality of marriage: The main predictors of marital stability. Journal of Shanghai Social Sciences, 4, 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X. (1988). A microeconomic approach to modeling the division of labor based on increasing returns to specialization. Princeton: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X. (2003). Economics: New classical and neoclassical framework. Beijing: Social science document press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y. (2009). Economic analysis on marriage. Enterprise Reform and Management, 12, 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi-Wei Su.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, TY., Chang, HL. & Su, CW. Why do People Get Married? An Inframarginal Perspective. Soc Indic Res 130, 1281–1295 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1232-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1232-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation