Skip to main content
Log in

A New Multidimensional Measure of Development: The Role of Technology and Institutions

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper constructs four structural indices by using 42 socioeconomic variables for 129 countries and the 10 years period from 2003 to 2012. Each structural index can be considered as a measure of a certain dimension of development. The first two indices are the most useful in explaining gaps in development across countries. The first captures the role of technology and institutional quality while the second provides a measure of the basic level of development. The contrast between them signifies that the notion of development is not only multidimensional, but also changing with the stage of development. These two indices are combined to form a development index (DI). A comparison of DI to income per capita and the Human Development Index highlights the importance of institutions in the transition of countries from merely having high income to full development. A methodological contribution of the paper is to use a Jackknife approach within the factor analysis routine to test for the significance of the extracted factors/indices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Internationally comparable, PPP adjusted.

  2. A more detailed explanation of the estimation of factors can be found in Ganegodage (2008).

  3. This is a visual aid to determine the appropriate number of factors. In a Scree Plot (Cattell 1966) eigenvalues from largest to smallest are plotted. Using this plot, the decision on the number of factors is taken to be the point at which the remaining eigenvalue are relatively small and all about the same size. This is determined through discontinuity or breaks in the plot.

  4. For \(\alpha =0.05\), and an orthogonal rotation \(d_u = pm-m(m-1)/2\) where p is the number of variables, and m is the number of factors; for oblique rotation \(d_u = pm-m(m-1)\).

  5. The rotated loading matrix, \(\hat{L}\) is obtained from \(\hat{L} = (\hat{L}{^o}' \hat{L}{^o})^{-1} \hat{L}{^o} P\), where \(\hat{L}^o\) is the orthogonal factor loading matrix, P is known as the pattern matrix and it has elements \(| l^{\kappa +1}_{ij} | / l_{ij}\); \(\kappa > 1\), and its value determines the degree of correlation amongst the factors.

  6. PPP adjusted GDP is typically referred to as ‘real’ in the international comparisons literature, and the series can be in current prices or in constant prices.

References

  • Adelman, I., & Morris, C. T. (1967). A quantitative approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P. (2006). On institutions and growth. In T. S. Eicher & C. Garcia-Penalosa (Eds.), Institutions, development, and economic growth (Vol. 3-31). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguna, C. G., & Kovacevic, M. (2011). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the human development index. Human Development Research Paper 2010/47.

  • Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2013). A multidimentional approach: Poverty measurement and beyond. Social Indicators Research, 112, 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, J., & Ng, S. (2002). Determining the number of factors in approximate factor models. Econometrica, 70(1), 191–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booysen, F. (2002). An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development. Social Indicators Research, 59(2), 115–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R. J., Cowan, K., & Kearns, J. (2005). Fear of Sudden Stops: Lessons from Australia and Chile. Journal of Policy Reforms, 8(4), 313–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, M. B., & Sanchez, N. (2001). Using principal components to produce an economic and Social Development Index: An application to Latin America and the US. Atlantic Economic Journal, 29(3), 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenery, H. B. (1979). Structural change and development policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudeck, R., & O’Dell, L. L. (1994). Application of standard error estimates in unrestricted factor analysis: Significant tests for factor loadings and correlations. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 475–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, E. F. (1964). Capital theory and the rate of return. American Economic Review, 54(5), 721–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, E. F. (1980). The contribution of capital to economic growth. American Economic Review, 70(2), 220–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1981). Nonparametric estimates of standard error: The jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods. Biometrica, 68(3), 589–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echevarria, C. (1997). Changes in sectoral composition associated with economic growth. International Economic Review, 38(2), 431–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forni, M., Hallin, M., Lippi, M., & Reichlin, L. (2000). The generalised dynamic factor model: Identification and estimation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(4), 540–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galor, O., & Weil, D. N. (2000). Population technology and growth: From Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. American Economic Review, 90(4), 806–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganegodage, K. R. (2008). Constructing Multidimensional Indexes of Development: A Factor Analysis Approach. PhD Thesis, School of Economics, The University of Queensland.

  • Hallin, M., & Lika, R. (2007). Determining the number of factors in the general dynamic factor model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102(47), 603–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennrich, R. I. (1973). Standard errors for obliquely rotated factor loadings. Psychometrika, 38(4), 593–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennrich, R. I. (1974). Simplified formulae for standard errors in maximum likelihood factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27(1), 122–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennrich, R. I., & Clarkson, D. B. (1980). A feasible method for standard errors of estimates in maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 45(2), 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2002). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1965). Image factor analysis. Research Bulletin 65–5. Princeton, N. J: Educational Testing Service.

  • Joreskog, K. G. (1969). Efficient estimation in image factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(1), 51–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacevic, M. (2011). Review of HDI critiques and potential improvements. Human Development Research Paper 2010/33.

  • Kaufmann, D., Mastruzzi, M., & Zavaleta, D. (2003). Sustained macroeconomic reforms, tepid growth: A governance puzzle in Bolivia? In D. Rodrik (Ed.), In search of prosperity: analytic narratives on economic growth (pp. 334–398). New Jersey: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1951). The state as a unit in the study of economic growth. Journal of Economic History, 11(1), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. Y. (2012). New structural economics: A framework for rethinking development. A framework for rethinking development and policy, The World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-8955-3

  • Massell, B. F. (1970). Export instability and economic structure. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 60(4), 618–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan, D. V., Pizarro, E., & Richard, C. (1985). Measurement and analysis of socio-economic development, Report no. 85.5. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

  • McGranahan, D. V., Richard-Proust, C., Sovani, N. V., & Subramanian, M. (1972). Contents and measurement of socio-economic development. New York: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizobuchi, H. (2014). Measuring world better life frontier: A composite indicator for OECD better life index. Social Indicators Research, 118, 987–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, S. (2013). Towards a multidimetional measure of governance. Social Indicators Research, 112, 477–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. (1979). Measuring the condition of the world’s poor: The Physical Quality of Life Index. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. (1996). Measuring the changing condition of the world’s poor: the Physical Quality of Life Index, 1960–1990, Brown University, Working Paper No. 23/24.

  • Prebisch, R. (1950). The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. New York: United Nations, Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, D. S. P., Rambaldi, A. N., Huynh, L. T., Doran, H. E., & Ganegodage, K. R. (2014). UQ International Comparisons Database: UQICD Version 2.1.0, School of Economics. St Lucia, QLD: The University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (Ed.). (2003). In search of prosperity: Analytic narratives on economic growth. New Jersey: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M. (2003). A survey of economic growth. Economic Record, 79(244), 112–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas-Bourgoin, M. A. (2014). A proposal for a modified Human Development Index. CEPAL Review, 112, 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, R., & Ferreira-Lopes, A. (2014). A Regional Development Index for Portugal. Social Indicators Research, 118, 1055–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syrquin, M. (1988). Patterns of structural change. In H. Chenery & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. 1, pp. 203–273). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Heritage Foundation. (1995). Index of Freedom. http://www.heritage.org/Index

  • Taylor, L. (1983). Structuralist macroeconomics: Applicable models for the third world. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. (2004). Reconstructing macroeconomics: Structuralist proposals and critiques of the mainstream. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todaro, M. P., & Stephen, S. C. (2003). Economic development (8th ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (1990–2013). Human Development Report, United Nations Development Programme, New York.

  • World Bank. (2014). World development indicators. http://devdata.worldbank.org/wdi2006/contents/cover.htm

  • World Health Organisation. (2010). World Health Statistics 2010, Switzerland. ISBN 978-92-4-156398-7.

  • World Health Organisation. (2014). HIV/AIDS Factsheet No 30.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alicia N. Rambaldi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 79 KB)

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Descriptive statistics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ganegodage, K.R., Rambaldi, A.N., Rao, D.S.P. et al. A New Multidimensional Measure of Development: The Role of Technology and Institutions. Soc Indic Res 131, 65–92 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1139-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1139-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation