Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Income Distribution and Social Tolerance

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social tolerance, i.e. the tolerance for the intrinsic diversity of large social groups, can be viewed as a synergic effect of the features of both individuals and socio-economic environment. This paper proposes a twofold contribution to the literature. First, it advances a conceptual framework in which tolerance at individual levels is explained by social polarization—in the form of income distribution—and the perceived quality of the social relationships and structures. Second, the regression analysis—involving micro-data from World Values Survey covering a time span between 2010 and 2014, for 48 countries—provides robust evidences for a non-linear impact of income distribution on social tolerance. This impact appears to be U-shaped and displays a pronounced degree of asymmetry. Also, labour market position, education, class self-identification, gender, age, marital status, levels of individuals’ personal security and sharing of post-materialist values matter in explaining social tolerance. The same main determinants contribute to the formation of both social tolerance and social capital. The differences are related to the amplitude as well as to the degree of symmetry for the corresponding non-linear transmission channels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afridi, A. (2011). Social networks: Their role in addressing poverty. Joseph rowntree foundation programme paper: Poverty and ethnicity, March. http://www.drugsandalcohol.ie/14830/1/JRF_poverty-social-networks-full.pdf. Accessed September 25, 2014.

  • Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 847–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hamzawi, R., Benoit, D. F. & Yu, K. (2012). Bayesian adaptive Lasso quantile regression. Statistical Modelling, 12(3), 279–297.

  • Antecol, H., Jong, A., & Steinberger, M. (2008). The sexual orientation wage gap: The role of occupational sorting and human capital. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 61(4), 518–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basilevsky, A. T. (1994). Statistical factor analysis and related methods: Theory and applications. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, G., & Koenker, R. (1978). Asymptotic theory of least absolute error regression. Journal of American Statistical Association, 73, 618–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, P. (2000). Sustainable livelihoods and political capital: Arguments and evidence from decentralisation and natural resource management in India. ODI working paper 136, ODI: London. http://www.odi.org/publications/2025-sustainable-livelihoods-political-capital-arguments-evidence-decentralisation-natural-resource-management-india. Accessed September 24, 2014.

  • Benoit, D. F., Al-Hamzawi, R., Yu, K. & Van den Poel, D. (2014). Bayesian quantile regression. R package ‘bayesQR’. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/bayesQR/index.html. Accessed September 24, 2014.

  • Benoit, D. F., & Van den Poel, D. (2012). Binary quantile regression: A Bayesian approach based on the asymmetric laplace distribution. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 27(7), 1174–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, N., & Elinder, M. (2012). Is tolerance good or bad for growth? Public Choice, 150(1–2), 283–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, N., & Nilsson, T. (2013). Does economic freedom foster tolerance? Kyklos, 66(2), 177–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, N., & Nilsson, T. (2014). Globalization and the transmission of social values: The case of tolerance. IFN working paper, 1007, February 18. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2407955. Accessed September 24, 2014.

  • Bjørnskov, C. (2006). Determinant of generalized trust: A cross-country comparison. Public Choice, 130(1–2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobo, L., & Licari, F. C. (1989). Education and political tolerance. Testing the effects of cognitive sophistication and target group affect. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornhorst, F., Ichino, A., Schlag, K., & Winter, E. (2004). Trust and trustworthiness among Europeans: South–North comparison. CEPR discussion papers, 4378, May. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=549282. Accessed September 24, 2014.

  • Calvo-Armengol, A., & Jackson, M. O. (2004). The effects of social networks on employment and inequality. The American Economic Review, 94(3), 426–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, C. R., & Tsai, Y. (2001). Social factors influencing immigration attitudes: An analysis of data from the general social survey. The Social Science Journal, 38, 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, K. K., & Guryan, J. (2008). Prejudice and wages: An empirical assessment of Becker’s. The economics of discrimination. Journal of Political Economy, 116(5), 773–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, K., Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2011). Social comparison: Motives, standards, and mechanisms. In D. Chadee (Ed.), Theories in social psychology (pp. 119–139). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corneo, G., & Jeanne, O. (2009). A theory of tolerance. Journal of Public Economics, 93(5–6), 691–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, J., DiRienzo, C., & Tiemann, T. (2008). A global tolerance index. Competitiveness Review, 18(3), 192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J. (1992). The social psychology of prejudice. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J. (2010). Historical overview. In J. F. Dovidio, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 27–44). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espenshade, T. J., & Hempstead, K. (1995). Contemporary American attitudes toward US immigration. International Migration Review, 30, 535–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. (2007). Human motivation and social cooperation: Experimental and analytical foundations. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2003). Cities and the creative class. City and Community, 2(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L. (2001). The formation of the social capital. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D., & Sacerdote, B. (2002). An economic approach to social capital. The Economic Journal, 112, F437–F458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2004). The role of social capital in financial development. The American Economic Review, 94(3), 526–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazama, Y. (2011). Determinants of political tolerance: A literature review. Institute of developing economies discussion paper, 228, March. http://www.ide.go.jp/English/Publish/Download/Dp/288.html. Accessed September 12, 2014.

  • Helliwell, J. F. & Putnam, R. D. (1999). Education and social capital. NBER working paper, 7121. http://www.nber.org/papers/w7121. Accessed September 14, 2014.

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. (2010). Education and social capital: Empirical evidence from microeconomic analyses. Thela Thesis, Amsterdam School of Economics Research Institute (ASE-RI)/Tinbergen Institute research series, 472. http://dare.uva.nl/record/1/325471. Accessed September 24, 2014.

  • Inglehart, R. (1971). The silent revolution in Europe. Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. American Political Science Review, 65(4), 991–1017.

  • Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Changing values and political styles among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1981). Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity. American Political Science Review, 75(4), 880–900.

  • Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1997). The trend towards postmaterialist values continues. In N. T. Clark & M. Rempel (Eds.), Citizen politicsin post-industrial societies. Boulder and Oxford: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (2008). Changing values among western publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics, 31(1–2), 130–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factor simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, K. (2008). Asymptotics of the regression quantile basic solution under misspecification. Applications of Mathematics, 53(3), 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R., & Bassett, G, Jr. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F. L. F. (2014). Tolerated one way but not the other: Levels and determinants of social and political tolerance in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 118(2), 711–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeVine, R. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes and group behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, L. M. (2003). Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces, 81(3), 909–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. (1990). The lever of riches: Technological creativity and economic progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K., & van Deth, J. W. (2010). Foundations of comparative politics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano, G. I. P., & Peri, G. (2006). The economic value of cultural diversity: Evidence from U.S. cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(1), 9–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paas, T., & Halapuu, V. (2012). Attitudes towards immigrants and the integration of ethnically diverse societies. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 3(2), 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parts, E. (2013). Social capital, national values and attitudes towards immigrants: Empirical evidence from the European Union and Neighbouring Countries. WP 3/19 SEARCH working paper. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/WP_3.19.pdf. Accessed September 14, 2014.

  • Porter, M. E., Stern, S., & Green, M. (2015). Social progress imperative index 2015. Social progress imperative/social progress network. http://www.socialprogressimperative.org/ publications. Accessed September 22, 2014.

  • Portnoy, S. (1991). Asymptotic behavior of regression quantiles in non-stationary, dependent cases. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 38(1), 100–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, M., Denson, N., Kilpatrick, S., Matthews, K. E., Stehlik, T., & Zyngier, D. (2014). “I am working-class” subjective self-definition as a missing measure of social class and socioeconomic status in higher education research. Educational Research, 43(4), 196–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez Pérez, E. J. (2007). The determinants of social capital formation. ASP research paper, 75(b). www.asp-research.com/pdf/Asp%2075b.pdf. Accessed September 24, 2014.

  • Scheve, K. F., & Slaughter, M. J. (2001). Labor market competition and individual preferences over immigration policy. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(1), 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. L. (2008). Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: Outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 24(1), 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1967). Group conflict and co-operation their social psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics: A practical approach to using multivariate analyses (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, A. A. (1990). Least absolute error estimation in the presence of serial correlation. Journal of Econometrics, 44, 127–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Values Survey Association (2014). World values survey wave 6 2010–2014 official aggregate v.20140429. World Values Survey Association (www.worldvaluessurvey.org). Aggregate File Producer: Asep/JDS, Madrid Spain. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVS DocumentationWV6.jsp. Accessed September 24, 2014.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Finance Department, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara, 300115, Timisoara, Romania

    B. Dima

  2. East-European Center for Research in Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara, 300115, Timisoara, Romania

    Ş. M. Dima

Authors
  1. B. Dima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ş. M. Dima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Dima.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. No third part is related in a financial or non-financial way with this paper. All the used data are from public available sources and these sources are indicated in the references section.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 World values surveys and variables coding
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dima, B., Dima, Ş.M. Income Distribution and Social Tolerance. Soc Indic Res 128, 439–466 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1038-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1038-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation