Abstract
This paper basically aims to construct a realistic profile of children working in the agriculture labour force in the area selected, and to establish how and to what extent children participate in the process of agricultural production, and to raise awareness of the current and potential threats and risks which children face when working in the agricultural sector. The research is based on data of original quality obtained from face-to-face interviews through a survey. A field study was conducted in the districts of Kinik and Kiraz with a low Development of a Socio-Economic Index in the province of Izmir, Turkey. Numerous findings were found in the paper, and significant findings were obtained, i.e. that those children who work in the agricultural sector are neglected within the scope of the studies on combating child labour; that the mean age of the interviewed child labours, 11.12 years, is quite below the minimum age of working; that 81 % of the interviewed children both go to school and are waged labours in agricultural jobs; that the children could not go on receiving education after compulsory education for economic reasons and owing to the problems they had experienced in education, and sexual discrimination; that they are exposed to dangers and risks resulting from mental, physical, chemical and environmental factors as they are very young; that they did not take any measures to protect them from the factors concerned and that they have some health problems because of their long working hours as well as hard and intensive working conditions and inadequate and imbalanced nutrition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acikalin, N. (2008). Poverty and the social mobility chances of youth generations: A case study in Istanbul and Gaziantep. The Journal of International Social Research, 1/3. http://www.sosyalarastirmalar.com/cilt1/sayi3/sayi3_pdf/icindekilerenglish_sayi_3.pdf.
Amaryllis, T. T., et al. (2012). Rapid appraisal of child labor in the tobacco industry: Case studies in two ilocos provinces (pp. 1–41). A project of Partners International, Incorporated, Policy Advocacy, Research, Training and Networking Resource and Services. http://www.eclt.org/filestore/PARTNERS_Appraisal_CL_Tobacco_Philippines.pdf.
Bilir, N. (2008). Young employees: A risk group in working life. http://www.tr.undp.org/content/dam/turkey/docs/Publications/nhdrs/backgroundpapersforNHDR2008/NHDR_BP_Nazmi_Bilir_Doc2.pdf.
Candas, A. (2010). Inequalities in Turkey: Search for a comprehensive conceptual framework. Istanbul: Bogazici University Social Policy Forum.
Del Rosario, R., & Bonga, M. (2002). Child labor in the Philippines: A review of selected studies and policy papers. Manila: UP-AUSAIDUNICEF.
Development Ministry. (2004). Socio-economic development ranking study of districts and provinces. Ankara: IKA-State Planning Organization.
Diallo, Y., et al. (2010). Global child labour developments: Measuring trends from 2004 to 2008. Statistical Information and Monitoring Programme on Child Labour (SIMPOC). International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC). Geneva: ILO.
Dincer, M. A., & Uysal Kolasin, G. (2009). The determinants of student achievement in Turkey. Istanbul: Education Reform Initiative.
Eldring, L., et al. (2010). Defending the vulnerable group: Child labour in the tobacco growing sector in Malawi, child labour in the tobacco growing sector in Africa. Report prepared for the IUF/ITGA/BAT conference on the elimination of child labour, Nairobi.
EU. (2009). Turkey 2009 progress report, No. SEC-20091334. Brussels: Commission of the European Union.
Fors, H. C. (2010). Child labour: A review of recent theory and evidence with policy implications. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(4), 570–593. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-419.2010.00663.x/pdf.
Gee, K. A. (2010). Reducing child labour through conditional cash transfers: Evidence from Nicaragua’s Red de Protección Social. Development Policy Review, 28/6, 711–732. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.14677679.2010.00506.x/pdf.
Goksen, F., et al. (2008). Türkiye’de İlköğretim Okullarında Okulu Terk ve İzlenmesi ile Önlenmesine Yönelik Politikalar. AÇEV, KA-DER ve ERG, Istanbul. http://spm.ku.edu.tr/wp-content/uploads/pdf/okulterk.pdf.
Gumus, S. G. (2010). Child labor as an input in the agriculture production in the poor rural areas of Turkey. İzmir: Ege University.
Gumus, S. G., et al. (2010). Possibilities income diversification and employment creation for rural poverty alleviation in Turkey. Izmir: Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) & ZMO.
HAK-IS. (2000). Report on child labor in Industry, HAK-IS education series, No. 44, First publication, Ankara.
ILO. (2009a). International programme on the elimination of child labour in agriculture. http://www.ilo.org/ipec/areas/Agriculture/lang–en/index.htm.
ILO. (2009b). Child labour data country briefs. http://www.ilo.org/%20ipec/childlabourstatistics%20SIMPOC/langen/index.htm.
ILO. (2009c). Give girls a chance: Tackling child labor—A key to the future. Geneva: International Labour Office.
ILO. (2010). International programme on the elimination of child labour in agriculture. http://www.ilo.org/ipec/areas/Agriculture/lang-en/index.htm.
ILO. (2014). Child labour persists around the world. http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/media-centre/press-releases/WCMS_008058/lang-en/index.htm.
IPEC. (2009). Child labour on tobacco plantations in Lebanon. International Labour Organization International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC). http://www.opportunities.com.lb/lebanon/bhb/docs/Child%20Labour%20on%20Tobacco%20Plantations%20in%20Lebanon.doc#Sec12.
Islam, M. (2009). School attendance of child labor: A pilot survey in Gaibandha District of Bangladesh. International NGO Journal, 4/4. http://www.academicjournals.org/INGOJ.
Karabulut, O. (1996). Working children in Turkey. Istanbul: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Turkey. http://www.fes-tuerkei.org/pages/tuerkce/yayinlarimiz/arastirma-sonuclari.php?lang=TR.
Mull, L. D. (2005). Child labor in Ghana cocoa production: Focus upon agricultural tasks, ergonomic exposures, and associated injuries and illnesses. Public Health Reports. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1497785/.
NCFH. (2009). Child labor. Buda: National Center for Farmworker Health, Inc.
Nkamleu, B. G. (2009). Determinants of child labour and schooling in the native cocoa households of Côte d’Ivoire. AERC research paper, No. 190. Nairobi: African Economic Research Consortium.
OECD. (1996). Employment outlook. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2009). Doing better for children. Geneva: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Olgun, A., et al. (2010). Schooling and factors affecting decisions on schooling by household members in the rural areas of Turkey. Social Indicators Research, 98, 533–543. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9564-0.
Reynolds, P. (1991). Child labor in the Zambezi Valley. London: Zed Books.
Sumagaysay, M. (1992). An in-depth situational analysis of the incidence of child labor in Region VIII, Tacloban City. Breaking Ground for Community Action on Child Labor, Unpublished publication.
TURKSTAT. (2013). Child Labour Force Survey, 2012. Turkish Statistical Institute, No. 13659. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=13659.
UNICEF. (2006). United Nations Children’s Fund, Child Poverty in Turkey 2006, Ankara.
USDOL. (1995). By the sweat and toil of children, United States Department of Labor, Volume II. The use of child labor in U.S. agricultural imports and forced and bonded child labor. A report to the Committee on Appropriations U.S. Congress, Washington.
USDOL. (2009). Child labor in commercial agriculture. United States Department of Labor. http://www.dol.gov/ilab/media/reports/iclp/sweat2/commercial.htm.
USU. (2004). Study of child workers in tobacco plantations in Sumatra, Indonesia. University of North Sumatra. http://eclt.lemansoft.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Indonesia_ResearchECLT_Oct05.pdf.
Wilk, V. A. (1993). Health hazards to children in agriculture. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 24(3), 283–290.
Yap, Y. T. (2001). Limiting child labor through behavior-based ıncome transfers: An experimental evaluation of the PETI program in rural Brazil. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTISPMA/Resources/383704-53333441931/11375_orazem-peti-brazil.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gumus, S.G., Wingenbach, G. The Child Labor Problem in Turkish Agriculture: What Can We Do?. Soc Indic Res 127, 1193–1215 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0999-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0999-1