Failure of an oil or gas pipeline due to low uplift resistance of soil has serious economic and environmental consequences; hence, increasing the uplift resistance through soil reinforcement is of interest. The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the possible use of geogrid to enhance the uplift resistance of buried pipelines. For this reason, 11 small-scale laboratory tests were performed. The tests were conducted to investigate the effect of pipe diameter, burial depth, as well as length and number of geogrid layers on the uplift resistance of sandy soils. The experimental results suggest that although pipe diameter and burial depth are directly related to uplift resistance, the direct effect of geogrid incorporation is more pronounced. While Peak Uplift Resistance (PUR) is of interest, findings indicate that the number of geogrid layers does not have a pivotal influence on PUR. In addition, for verification purpose, the PUR of 11 laboratory tests were back analyzed numerically using finite element software PLAXIS 3D TUNNEL. The findings show that numerical and experimental results are in good agreement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Finch, “Upheaval buckling and floatation of rigid pipelines: The influence of recent geotechnical research on the current state of the art,” Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas (1999).
D. J. White, A. J. Barefoot, M. D. Bolton, “Centrifuge modeling of upheaval buckling in sand,” Int. J. Phys. Model. Geotech, No. 21, 019-028 (2001).
M. F. Bransby, T. A. Newson, M. C. R. Davies, P. Brunning, “Physical modelling of the upheaval resistance of buried offshore pipelines,” 4th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geomechanics, St. Johns, (2002), pp. 899-904.
C. Y. Cheuk, D. J. White, M. D. Bolton, “Deformation mechanisms during the uplift of buried pipelines in sand,” Proc. XVIth Int. Conf. Soil Mech. and Geotech. Eng, Osaka, No. 2, 1685-1688 (2005).
H. Lee, Finite element analysis of a buried pipeline, Master’s Thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester (2010).
D. J. White, C. Y. Cheuk, M. D. Bolton, “The uplift resistance of pipes and plate anchors buried in sand,” Geotechnique, No. 58, 771–779 (2008).
A. S. Vesic, “Breakout Resistance of Objects Embedded in Ocean Bottom,” J. Soil. Mech. Found. Division., No. 97, 1183-1205 (1971).
M. F. Randolph, G. T. Houlsby, “The limiting pressure on a circular pile loaded laterally in cohesive soil,” Geotechnique, No. 34, 613-623 (1984).
E. A. Dickin, “Uplift resistance of buried pipelines in sand,” Soils. Found, No. 34 041-048 (1994).
T. C. Maltby, C. R. Calladine, “An investigation into upheaval buckling of buried pipelines –II Theory and analysis of experimental observations,” Int. J. Mech. Sci, No. 37, 965-983 (1995).
A. J. Baumgard, “Monotonic and cyclic soil responses to upheaval buckling in offshore buried pipelines,” Ph.D thesis, University of Cambridge, England (2000).
M. F. Bransby, T. A. Newson, P. Brunning, M. C. R. Davies, “Numerical and centrifuge modeling of the upheaval resistance of buried pipelines,” Proceedings of OMAE pipeline symposium, Rio de Janeiro (2001).
T. A. Newson, P. Deljoui, “Finite element modelling of upheaval buckling of buried offshore pipelines in clayey soils,” Soil and Rock Behavior and Modeling, pp. 351-358 (2006).
I. Thusyanthan, S. Mesmar, D. Robert, J. Wang, S. Haigh, “Upheaval Buckling Assessment Based on Pipeline Features,” Offshore Technology Conference (2011).
A. P. S. Selvadurai, “Enhancement of the uplift capacity of buried pipelines by the use of geogrids,” ASTM. Geotech. Test. J, No. 12, 211-216 (1989).
N. I. Thusyanthan, S. A. Ganesan, M. D. Bolton, P. Allan, “Upheaval buckling resistance of pipelines buried in clayey backfill,” 18th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 006-011 (2008).
M. L. Ommundsen, Upheaval buckling of buried pipelines, Master’s Thesis, University of Stavanger, (2011).
P. Schaminée, N. Zorn, G. Schotman, “Soil response for pipeline upheaval buckling analyses: full-scale laboratory tests and modelling,” Offshore Technology Conference (OTC), 6486, 22nd Annual OTC, Houston, Texas, pp. 563-572 (1990).
A. V. Choobbasti, M. Vahdatirad, S. Firouzian Bandpey, A. Barari, D. Rezaei, “Modeling of the uplift response of buried pipelines,” Electron. J. Geotech. Eng, No. 14, 001-015 (2009).
C. H. Trautmann, T. D. O'Rourke, F. H. Kulhawy, “Uplift force-displacement response of buried pipe,” J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE, No. 111, 1061–1076 (1985).
R. K. Rowe, E. H. Davis, “The behaviour of anchor plates in sand,” Geotechnique, No. 32, 025-041 (1982).
K. Faizi, Evaluation of Pile Failure Mechanism by PIV Method, LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Germany, (2013).
H. Niroumand, K. A. Kassim, R. Nazir, “The influence of soil reinforcement on the uplift response of symmetrical anchor plate embedded in sand,” Measurement, No. 46, 2608-2629 (2013).
G. S. Babu, V. P. Singh, “Simulation of Soil Nail Structures using PLAXIS 2D,” Plaxis Bulletin Spring issue, 16-21 (2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Translated from Osnovaniya, Fundamenty i Mekhanika Gruntov, No. 4, p. 18, July-August, 2014.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Faizi, K., Armaghani, D.J., Momeni, E. et al. Uplift Resistance of Buried Pipelines Enhanced by Geogrid. Soil Mech Found Eng 51, 188–195 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-014-9276-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-014-9276-6