Abstract
The differences between local and reference geopotential values are the fundamental quantities of interest in the geodetic boundary value problem approach for connecting independent height reference frames. The local gravity potential values are usually derived from gravimetric and geometric geoid undulations. In determining the short-wavelength components of the gravimetric geoid, a harmonic or analytical downward continuation of the external harmonic functions of gravity to the geoid is necessary. This study analyses the stability of the Poisson downward continuation technique with respect to varying the spatial resolution of surface gravity data in Ireland in order to estimate an effective grid resolution on this reduction. Results of the study show that the minimum range of 500-m resolution provides an unconditionally stable solution to downward continuation without the need for regularisation of the computation algorithm. In this case, downward continued data contribute from −13 to 12 mm to geoid heights and from −0.128 to 0.118 m2s−2 to local gravity potential value at Malin-Head tide gauge station in Ireland.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ågren J., 2004a. The analytical continuation bias in geoid determination using potential coefficients and terrestrial gravity data. J. Geodesy, 78, 314–332, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-004-0395-0
Ågren J., 2004b. Regional Geoid Determination Methods for the Era of Satellite Gravimetry: Numerical Investigations Using Synthetic Earth Gravity Models. PhD Thesis. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:14396/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Ågren J. and Sjöberg L.E., 2014. Investigation of gravity data requirements for a 5 mm-quasigeoid model over Sweden. In: Marti U. (Ed.), Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, 141. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 143–150, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10837-7_18
Bjerhammar A., 1965. A new theory of gravimetric geodesy. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 9, 112–113, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02607317
Cruz J.Y., 1985. Disturbance Vector in Space from Surface Gravity Anomalies Using Complementary Models. PhD Thesis. Ohio State University, OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1487261553060066
Engels J., Grafarend E., Keller W., Martinec Z., Sansò F. and Vaníček P., 1993. The geoid as an inverse problem to be regularized. Math. Res., 74, 122–122
Farahani H.H., Klees R. and Slobbe C., 2017. Data requirements for a 5-mm quasi-geoid in the netherlands. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 61, 675–702, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-016-0171-7
Freeden W. and Nutz H., 2018. Geodetic observables and their mathematical treatment in multiscale framework, In: Freeden W. and Nashed M.Z. (Eds), Handbook of Mathematical Geodesy. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 315–458, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57181-2_4
Gradshteyn I.S. and Ryzhik I.M., 1979. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products: Corrected and Enlargred Edition. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-10754-4
Heiskanen W.A. and Moritz H., 1967. Physical Geodesy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA
Ilk K., 1987. On the regularization of ill-posed problems. In: Holota P. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Figure and Dynamics of the Earth, Moon and Planets, 365–383, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234423030_On_the_Regularization_of_Ill-Posed_Problems
Janák J., Pitoňák M. and Minarechová Z., 2014. Regional quasigeoid from GOCE and terrestrial measurements. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 58, 626–649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-013-0543-1
Kellogg O.D., 1929. Foundations of Potential Theory. Frederick Ungar Publ., Berlin, Germany
Martinec Z., 1996. Stability investigations of a discrete downward continuation problem for geoid determination in the canadian rocky mountains. J. Geodesy, 70, 805–828, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00867158
Martinec Z., 1998. Boundary-Value Problems for Gravimetric Determination of a Precise Geoid. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, 73. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2FBFb0010337
Michel V. and Telschow R., 2016. The regularized orthogonal functional matching pursuit for ill-posed inverse problems. SIAM J. Num. Anal., 54, 262–287, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/141000695
Moritz H., 1980a. Advanced Physical Geodesy. H. Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe, Germany
Moritz H., 1980b. Geodetic Reference System 1980. J. Geodesy, 54, 395–405, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521480
Nahavandchi H., 1998. On some methods of downward continuation of mean free-air gravity anomaly. Int. Geoid Ser. Bull., 8, 1–17, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:8435/Fulltext01.pdf
Novák P., 2000. Evaluation of Gravity Data for the Stokes-Helmert Solution to the Geodetic Boundary-Value Problem. PhD Thesis. University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada, http://www2.unb.ca/gge/Research/GRL/GeodesyGroup/SHGeo/3_Topographical_Effects/2000_Novak.pdf
Novák P., Kern M. and Schwarz K.P., 2001. Numerical studies on the harmonic downward continuation of band-limited airborne gravity. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 45, 327–345, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022028218964
Nyström E.J., 1930. Über die praktische auflösung von integralgleichungen mit anwendungen auf randwertaufgaben. Acta Mathematica, 54, 185–204, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547521 (in German)
Pavlis N.K., Holmes S.A., Kenyon S.C. and Factor J.K., 2012. The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). J. Geophys. Res.-Soild Earth, 117, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008916
Pitoňák M., Novák P., Eshagh M., Tenzer R. and Šprlák M., 2020. Downward continuation of gravitational field quantities to an irregular surface by spectral weighting. J. Geodesy, 94, Art.No. 62, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01384-6
Pitoňák M., Šprlák M., Hamáčková E. and Novák P., 2016. Regional recovery of the disturbing gravitational potential by inverting satellite gravitational gradients. Geophys. J. Int., 205, 89–98, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw008
Rummel R., 2001. Global unification of height systems and GOCE. In: Sideris M.G. (Ed.), Gravity, Geoid and Geodynamics 2000. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, 123. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 13–20, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04827-6_3
Sacher M., Ihde J., Marti U. and Schlatter A., 2003. Status Report of the UELN/EVS Data Base. Publications of the IAG-Subcommission for Europe (EUREF), 12, 140–146, http://www.euref.eu/symposia/book2002/140-146.pdf
Sajjadi S., 2020. Unifying the Irish Vertical Datum with the Normaal Amsterdams Peil (NAP). Ph.D. Thesis. Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, http://hdl.handle.net/2262/93232
Sajjadi S., Martinec Z., Prendergast P., Hagedoorn J., Šachl L., Readman P., Edwards R., O’Reilly B. and Horan C., 2020. The unification of gravity data for ireland-northern ireland. The Leading Edge, 39, 135–143, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/tle39020135.1
Sansò F. and Sideris M.G., 2016. Geodetic Boundary Value Problem: The Equivalence between Molodensky’s and Helmert’s Solutions. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46358-2_1
Sebera J., Pitoňák M., Hamáčková E. and Novák P., 2015. Comparative study of the spherical downward continuation. Surv. Geophys., 36, 253–267, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-014-9312-0
Sebera J., Šprlák M., Novák P., Bezděk A. and Val’ko M., 2014. Iterative spherical downward continuation applied to magnetic and gravitational data from satellite. Surv. Geophys., 35, 941–958, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-014-9285-z
Sjöberg L.E., 1975. On the Discrete Boundary Value Problem of Physical Geodesy with Harmonic Reductions to an Internal Sphere. Royal Institute of Technology (KIT), Stockholm, Sweden
Sjöberg L.E., 2003. A solution to the downward continuation effect on the geoid determined by Stokes’ formula. J. Geodesy, 77, 94–100, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-002-0306-1
Sjöberg L.E., 2007. The topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy. J. Geodesy, 81, 345–350, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0112-2
Vaníček P. and Kleusberg A., 1987. The Canadian Geoid-Stokesian approach. Manuscripta Geodaetica, 12, 86–98, http://www2.unb.ca/gge/Research/GRL/GeodesyGroup/SHGeo/1_Stokes-Helmert_Technique/1987_Vanicek_et_al.pdf
Vaníček P., Sun W., Ong P., Martinec Z., Najafi M., Vajda P. and Ter Horst B., 1996. Downward continuation of Helmert’s gravity. J. Geodesy, 71, 21–34, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900050072
Wang Y., 1990. The effect of topography on the determination of the geoid using analytical downward continuation. Bull. Geod., 64, 231–246, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02519178
Wang Y.M., 1988. Downward Continuation of the Free-Air Gravity Anomalies to the Ellipsoid Using the Gradient Solution, Poisson’s Integral and Terrain Correction-Numerical Comparison and Computations. Technical Report AFGL-TR-88-0199. Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235133946_Downward_Continuation_of_the_Free-Air_Gravity_Anomalies_to_the_Ellipsoid_Using_the_Gradient_Solution_Poisson’s_Integral_and_Terrain_Correction-_Numerical_Comparison_and_Computations
Acknowledgments
This work has been carried out within the framework of Sajad Sajjadi’s Ph.D. research in Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Geophysics Section under the supervision of Professor Zdeněk Martinec and financed by Limerick Institute of Technology. The first author appreciates these supports. The authors would like to thank Dr. Nic Wilson (UCC) and Dr. Pat Gill (LIT) for the comments that have helped improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sajjadi, S., Martinec, Z., Prendergast, P. et al. The stability criterion for downward continuation of surface gravity data with various spatial resolutions over Ireland. Stud Geophys Geod 65, 219–234 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-020-0769-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-020-0769-7