Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic imaging of complex structures with the CO-CDS stack method

  • Published:
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various seismic imaging methods are introduced to resolve some of the possible ambiguities of seismic interpretation in complex structures. Reducing dependency of imaging techniques on velocity or using diffraction energy for imaging more structural details are the main topics of the imaging research. In this study, we try to improve the seismic image quality in semi-complex structures by combining the common reflection surface (CRS) method with a diffraction based scheme in the common-offset domain. Previously introduced partial CRS and common offset CRS methods exhibited reliable performance in imaging complex media. Here, we were looking for stable and efficient solutions, preserving advantages of the previous methods. Herewith, the proposed operator fits better to diffractions than to reflections. Therefore, we call it the commonoffset common diffraction surface stack (CO CDS). In a previous study, improvement of the quality of seismic image by the CRS method was achieved by combination of the CDS method with the partial CRS. This resulted in the introduction of the partial CDS. Initially, in this study, the common-offset CRS traveltime equation was modified to the common-offset CDS. The hypothetical shot reflector experiment in the CRS method was changed to shot diffraction point experiment. In the introduced operator, two wavefront curvatures, observed at receivers positions, are set equal in order to satisfy the diffraction condition. In the proposed method, we search for accurate attribute sets for each considered offset individually, and then form a new operator by four coherent attributes. Application of the common- offset CDS method on synthetic and field data shows more details of the geological structures with higher quality, while preserving continuity of reflection events. The proposed method is, however, more expensive than the partial and common offset CRS for large dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adibi Sedeh E., Soleimani M., Mann J., and Piruz I., 2010. Improving the seismic image quality in semi-complex structures in north east Iran by the CDS stack method. Extended Abstract. 72nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition 2010}. EAGE Publications, EAGE, Houten, The Netherlands, DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201401253

  • Asgedom E.G., Gelius L.J. and Tygel M., 2013. 2D common-offset traveltime based diffraction enhancement and imaging. Geophys. Prospect., 61, 1178–1193. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asgedom E.G., Gelius L.J. and Tygel M., 2011. Higher-resolution determination of zero-offset common-reflection-surface stack parameters. Int. J. Geophys., 2011, 819–831, DOI: 10.1155/2011/819831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtiari Rad P., Schwarz B., Vanelle C. and Gajewski D., 2014. Common reflection surface (CRS) based pre-stack diffraction separation. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014, 4208–4212, DOI: 10.1190/segam2014-0700.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Baykulov M., 2009. Seismic Imaging iComplex Media with the Common Reflection Surface Stack. Ph.D. Thesis, Hamburg University, Hamburk, Germany.

  • Baykulov M. and Gajewski D., 2009. Prestack seismic data enhancement with partial commonreflection-surface (CRS) stack. Geophysics, 74, V49–V58, DOI: 10.1190/1.3106182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baykulov M., Brink H.J., Gajewski D. and Yoon M.K., 2009. Revisiting the structural setting of the Glueckstadt Graben salt stock family, North German Basin. Tectonophysics, 470, 162–172, DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.05.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baykulov M., Dümmong S. and Gajewski D., 2011. From time to depth with CRS attributes. Geophysics, 76, S151–S155, DOI: 10.1190/1.3580607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkovitch A., Belfer I. and Landa E., 2008. Multifocusing as a method of improving subsurface imaging. The Leading Edge, 27, 250–256, DOI: 10.1190/1.2840374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergler S., Duveneck E., Höcht G., Zhang Y. and Hubral, P., 2002. Common reflection surface stack for converted waves. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 46, 165–175, DOI: 10.1023 /A:1019845818278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergler S., 2001. The Common-Reflection-Surface Stack for Common-Offset - Theory and Application. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.

  • Dell S. and Gajewski D., 2011. Common-reflection-surface-based workflow for diffraction imaging. Geophysics, 76, S187–S195, DOI: 10.1190/GEO2010-0229.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte L.T., Lopes R.R., Faccipieri J.H., Romano J.M.T. and Tygel M., 2013. Separation of reflection from diffraction events via the CRS technique and a blind source separation method based on sparsity maximization. Expanded Abstract. 13th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society & EXPOGEF, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 26-29 August 2013. 1439–1443, DOI: 10.1190/sbgf2013-296.

  • Duveneck E., 2004. Velocity model estimation with data-derived wavefront attributes. Geophysics, 69, 265–274, DOI: 10.1190/1.1649394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccipieri J.H., Gelius L.J. and Tygel M., 2013. Diffraction separation based on perturbed CRS attributes. Expanded Abstract. 13th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society & EXPOGEF, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 26-29 August 2013. 1524-1529, DOI: 10.1190/sbgf2013-312.

  • Faccipieri J.H., Coimbra T.A., Tygel M., and Gelius L.J., 2014. Common-Refection-Surface (CRS) stacking with diffraction move-outs of varying aperture. Extended Abstract. 76th EAGE Conference & Exhibition 2010. EAGE Publications, EAGE, Houten, The Netherlands, DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20140587.

  • Faccipieri J.H., Coimbra T.A., Gelius L.J. and Tygel M., 2015. Bi-parametric traveltimes and stacking apertures for reflection and diffraction enhancement. Expanded Abstract. 14th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society & EXPOGEF, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3-6 August 2015. 1355-1360, DOI: 10.1190/sbgf2015-269.

  • Garabito G., Stoffa P. and Söllner W., 2013. Global optimization of the common-offset CRSattributes: Synthetic and field data application. Expanded Abstract. 13th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society & EXPOGEF, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 26-29 August 2013. 1565-1568, DOI: 10.1190/sbgf2013-320.

  • Garabito G., Oliva P.C. and Cruz J.C.R., 2011. Numerical analysis of the finite-offset common reflection surface traveltime approximations. J. Appl. Geophys., 74, 89–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.03.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelius L.J. and Tygel M., 2015. Migration-velocity building in time and depth from 3D (2D) Common-Reflection-Surface (CRS) stacking - theoretical framework. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 59, 253–282, DOI: 10.1007/s11200-014-1036-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilmann Z., 2007. CRS Stack Based Seismic Reflection Imaging for Land Data in Time and Depth Domain. PhD Thesis. University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.

  • Hertweck T., 2004. True-Amplitude Kirchhoff Migration: Analytical and Geometrical Considerations. Logos Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

  • Höcht G., 1998. The Common Reflection Surface Stack. MSc Thesis. University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.

  • Hubral P., 1999. Macro-model independent seismic reflection imaging. J. Appl. Geophys., 42, 137–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger R., 1999. The Common Reflection Surface Stack - Theory and Application. MSc Thesis. University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.

  • Jäger R., Mann J., Höcht G. and Hubral P., 2001. Common-reflection-surface stack: Image and attributes. Geophysics, 66, 97–109, DOI: 10.1190/1.1444927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaidukov V., Landa E. and Moser T.J., 2004. Diffraction imaging by focusing-defocusing: An outlook on seismic super resolution. Geophysics, 69, 1478–1490, DOI: 10.1190/1.1836821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klokov A., Baina R., Landa E., Thore P. and Tarrass I., 2010. Diffraction imaging for fracture detection: synthetic case study. Expanded Abstract. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2010. 3354-3358, DOI: 10.1190/1.3513545.

  • Landa E., Fomel S. and Moser T.J., 2006, Path-integral seismic imaging. Geophys. Prospect., 54, 491–503, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2006.00552.x.

  • Leite L.W.B., Lima H.M., Heilmann B.Z. and Mann J., 2010. CRS-based seismic imaging in complex marine geology. Extended Abstract. 72nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition 2010. EAGE Publications, EAGE, Houten, The Netherlands, DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201401251.

  • Li D., Li Z., Sun X., Qin N. and Zhou X., 2010. Prestack seismic data enhancement with the common-offset common reflection surface (CO CRS) stack. In: Yu W., Zhang M., Wang L. and Song Y. (Eds), 2010 3rd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 3065-3069, DOI: 10.1109/BMEI.2010.5639361.

  • Lima E., Santos L.T., Schleicher J. and Tygel M., 2011. A comparison of semblances of different order in common-reflection-surface parameter estimation. J. Geophys. Eng., 8, 175–184, DOI: 10.1088/1742-2132/8/2/005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann J., 2002. Extensions and Applications of the Common-Reflection Surface Stack Method. Logos Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

  • Menyoli E., Gajewski D. and Hübscher C., 2004. Imaging of complex basin structures with the common reflection surface (CRS) stack method. Geophys. J. Int., 157, 1206–1216, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02268.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perroud H., Hubral P., Höcht G. and de Bazelaire E., 1997. Migrating around in circles - part III. The Leading Edge, 16, 875–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robein E., 2010. Seismic Imaging: A Review of the Techniques, their Principles, Merits and Limitations. EAGE Publications, EAGE, Houten, The Netherlands, ISBN: 978-90-73781-78-8.

  • Santos L.A., Mansur W.J. and McMechan G.A., 2012. Tomography of diffraction-based focusing operators. Geophysics, 77, R217–R225, DOI: 10.1190/GEO2011-0392.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos L., Schleicher J., Costa J. and Novais A., 2011. Fast estimation of common-reflectionsurface parameters using local slopes. Geophysics, 76, U23–U34, DOI: 10.1190/1.3553001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz B., Vanelle C., Gajewski D. and Kashtan B., 2014. Curvatures and inhomogeneities: An improved common-reflection-surface approach. Geophysics, 79, S231–S240, DOI: 10.1190 /GEO2013-0196.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soleimani M. and Mann J., 2008. Merging aspects of DMO correction and CRS stack to account for conflicting dip situations. Annual WIT Report, 159-166 (http://wit.zmaw.de/fileadmin /user_upload/wit/reports/AnnualReport_2008.pdf).

  • Soleimani M. and Rafiei M., 2016. Imaging seismic data in complex structures by introducing the partial diffraction surface stack method. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 60, DOI: 10.1007/s11200-015-0942-6 (in print).

  • Soleimani M., Mann J., Adibi E., Shahsavani M. and Piruz I., 2010. Applying the CRS stack method to solve the problem of imaging of complex structures in the Zagros overthrust, south west Iran. Extended Abstract. 72nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition 2010. EAGE Publications, EAGE, Houten, The Netherlands, DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201401297.

  • Soleimani M., Piruz I., Mann J. and Hubral P., 2009. Common-Reflection-Surface stack: accounting for conflicting dip situations by considering all possible dips. J. Seism. Explor., 18, 271–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinner M., Tomas C., Marchetti P., Gallo C. and Arfeen S., 2012. Common-Offset CRS for advanced imaging in complex geological settings. Expanded Abstract. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2012, 1–5, DOI: 10.1190/segam2012-1099.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun X., Li Z. and Wang X., 2013. Extension of common-reflection-surface technology from stack to prestack time migration. J. Earth Sci. Res., 1, 6–9, DOI: 10.18005/JESR0101002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taner M.T., Fomel S. and Landa E., 2006. Separation and imaging of seismic diffractions using plane wave decomposition. Expanded Abstract. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2006, 2401–2405, DOI: 10.1190/1.2370017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomas C. and Gallo C., 2014. 3D common-offset CRS for data pre-conditioning. Extended Abstract. 76th EAGE Conference & Exhibition 2010. EAGE Publications, EAGE, Houten, The Netherlands, DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20140581.

  • Tygel M., and Santos L.T., 2007. Quadratic normal move-outs of symmetric reflections in elastic media: A quick tutorial. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 51, 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang W., Wang R., Wu J., Chen Y., Gana S. and Zhong W., 2015. An efficient and effective common reflection surface stacking approach using local similarity and plane-wave flattening. J. Appl. Geophys., 117, 67–72, DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.02.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang K., Chen B.S., Wang X., Yang X.J. and Liu J.R., 2012. Handling dip discrimination phenomenon in common-reflection-surface stack via combination of output-imaging-scheme and migration/demigration. Geophys. Prospect., 60, 255–269, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00981.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon M.K., Baykulov M., Dümmong S., Brink H.J. and Gajewski D., 2009. Reprocessing of deep seismic reflection data from the North German Basin with the Common Reflection Surface stack. Tectonophysics, 472, 273–283, DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.05.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y., Bergler S. and Hubral P., 2001. Common-reflection-surface (CRS) stack for commonoffset. Geophys. Prospect., 49, 709–718, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00292.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Shahbazi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shahbazi, A., Ghosh, D., Soleimani, M. et al. Seismic imaging of complex structures with the CO-CDS stack method. Stud Geophys Geod 60, 662–678 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-015-0452-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-015-0452-6

Keywords

Navigation