Abstract
The time variation of a source of alternating current produces an electromagnetic coupling between the transmitting and receiving systems in induced electrical polarization and resistivity surveys that employ horizontal electrical sounding. The coupling alters, sometimes significantly, the resistivity and chargeability values and, consequently, compromises the interpretation of the data. This work develops the analysis of this coupling on the time domain for both a homogeneous Earth and an Earth constituted of several homogeneous horizontal layers. Based on the results, it evaluates the theoretical variation of the voltage and compares it to observed data of an induced electrical polarization and resistivity survey with horizontal electrical sounding. The comparative study of the voltage decay curves assesses the contribution of the electromagnetic coupling to the values of the chargeability and apparent resistivity as a function of the bipole length and the period of the source current. Besides that, the respective pseudosections have delineated the horizontal and vertical variations of those two electrical properties, providing the interpretation of the geoelectrical section. This research is important for the oil industry because it may furnish information that help to: (i) define the structure of the sedimentary strata; (ii) estimate the clay content of the sandstones; and (iii) detect the possible presence of metallic sulphide halos at fractured zones of the sediments above the oil reservoir. It may be adapted to analysis of EM coupling in both resistive and induced electric well logs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dey A. and Morrison H.F., 1973. Electromagnetic coupling in frequency and time-domain inducedpolarization surveys over a multilayered earth. Geophysics, 38, 380–405.
Çaglar I., 2000. A method to remove electromagnetic coupling from induced polarization data for an “exponential” earth model. Pure Appl. Geophys., 157, 1729–1748.
Fullagar P.K., Zhou B. and Bourne B., 2000. Electromagnetic coupling removal from time domain IPdata. Explor. Geophys., 31, 134–139.
Haloff P. 1957. On the Interpretation of Resistivity and IPMeasurements. PhD Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
de Lima O.A.L., Sato H.K. and Dias C.A., 2013. Uso de métodos elétricos e eletromagnéticos de baixo impacto ambiental no monitoramento de injeçãao de fluidos em reservatórios de petróleo (Use of Electrical and Electromagnetic Methods with Low Environmental Impact for Monitoring Fluid Injection into Oil Reservoirs). Final Report. Centro de Pesquisa em Geofísica e Geologia da Universidade Federal da Bahia (CPGG/UFBA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil (in Portuguese).
Marchant D., Haber E. and Oldenburg D.W., 2014. Three-dimensional modeling of IPeffects in time-dmain electromagnetic data. Gephysics, 79, 303–314.
Millet F.B. Jr., 1967. Electromagnetic coupling of collinear dipoles on a uniform half-space. In: Hansen D.A., Heinrichs W.E., Holmer R.C., MacDougall R.E., Rogers G.R., Sumner J.S. and Ward S.H. (Eds), Mining Geophysics, Volume II,Theory. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, 401–419, DOI: 10.1190/1.9781560802716.ch2e.
Parasnis D.S., 1997. Principles of Applied Geophysics. 5th Edition. Chapman & Hall, London U.K.
Reynolds J.M., 2011. An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons Chichester, U.K.
Routh P.S. and Oldenburg D.W., 2001. Electromagnetic coupling in frequency-domain induced polarization data: a method for removal. Geophys. J. Int., 145, 59–76.
Sampaio E.E.S., 2006. Campo eletromagnético devido a uma linha de dipolos elétricos em um meio condutor (Electromagnetic Field Due to a Line of Electric Dipoles in a Conductive Medium). EDUFBA, Salvador, Brazil (in Portuguese).
Sumner J.S., 1972. A comparison of electrode arrays in IPsurveys. AIME Annual Meeting, San Francisco CA(http://www.zonge.com.au/docs/rpip_tdip/electrodearraysip.pdf).
Veeken P.C.H., Kudryavceva E.O., Putikov O.F, Legeydo P.Y. and Ivanov S.A., 2012. Modelling induced polarizaton effects due to Pyrite in geochemical alteration zones above hydrocarbon accumulations. Petrol. Geosci., 10, 59–72.
Wait J., 1982. Geo-Electromagnetism. Academic Press, New York.
Ward S.H., 1967. Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications. In: Hansen D.A., Heinrichs W.E., Holmer R.C., MacDougall R.E., Rogers G.R., Sumner J.S. and Ward S.H. (Eds), Mining Geophysics, Volume II,Theory. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK,10–196, DOI: 10.1190/1.9781560802716.ch2a.
Wynn J.C., 1979. Electromagnetic Coupling with a Collinear Array on a Two-Layer Anisotropic Earth. USGS Professional Paper 1077. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1077/report.pdf).
Xiang J., Jones N.B., Cheng D. and Schlindwein F.S., 2002. A new method to discriminate between a valid IPresponse and EMcoupling effects. Geophys. Prospect., 50, 565–576.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mocitaiba, L.S.R., Sampaio, E.E.S. & de Lima, O.A.L. Effect of coupling noise on the interpretation of results of electromagnetic horizontal sounding and modeling. Stud Geophys Geod 61, 801–825 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-015-0348-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-015-0348-5