Abstract
The Internalized Misogyny Scale (IMS) is one measure developed to assess internalized sexism among non-heterosexual identified women. To use any instrument across various groups, however, it must exhibit cross-group equivalence in how its items relate to the latent traits it measures. Thus, measurement invariance across heterosexual identified and non-heterosexual identified women was examined in a sample of 712 women (503 heterosexual identified women and 209 non-heterosexual identified women). The results showed that internalized sexism was perceived the same across the groups, providing evidence that the IMS subscales that were previously developed only with non-heterosexual identified women can be used for heterosexual identified women as well. Results of tests for structural invariance—lower factor levels of internalized sexism among non-heterosexual identified women as compared to heterosexual identified women—are also discussed. In addition to the measurement invariance, item factor analysis revealed adequate model fit of the hypothesized three-dimensional structure of the IMS. Researchers interested in translating the scale into other languages or revising the scale into a different version need to consider four residual relations that the current study demonstrated. Helping professionals can use the IMS to assess internalized sexism of themselves and their clients to increase their awareness and reduce the detrimental impact of sexism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author.
References
Bearman, S., Korobov, N., & Thorne, A. (2009). The fabric of internalized sexism. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences, 1(1), 10–47. https://jiss.org/documents/volume_1/issue_1/JISS_2009_1-1_10-47_Fabric_of_Internalized_Sexism.pdf
Beren, S. E., Hayden, H. A., Wilfley, D. E., & Grilo, C. M. (1996). The influence of sexual orientation on body dissatisfaction in adult men and women. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 20(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199609)20:2%3c135::AID-EAT3%3e3.0.CO;2-H
Brantenberg, G. (1985). Egalia's daughters: A satire of the sexes. Seal Press.
Brown, L. S. (2018). Feminist therapy. American Psychological Association.
Calogero, R. M., & Jost, J. T. (2011). Self-subjugation among women: Exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021864
Choate, L. H. (2009). Girls’ and women’s issues in counseling: A theory-based course design. Counselor Education and Supervision, 48(3), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2009.tb00073.x
Crenshaw, K. W. (2017). On intersectionality: Essential writings. The New Press.
David, E. J. R., & Derthick, A. O. (2017). The psychology of oppression. Springer Publishing Company.
Dehlin, A. J., & Galliher, R. V. (2019). Young women's sexist beliefs and internalized misogyny: Links with psychosocial and relational functioning and political behavior. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 24(4), 255- 264. https://doi.org/10.24839/2325-7342.JN24.4.255
Dimitrov, D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43, 121–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175610373459
DiStefano, C., Shi, D., & Morgan, G. B. (2020). Collapsing categories is often more advantageous than modeling sparse data: Investigations in the CFA framework. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1803073
Dowell (2022, January 27). Women consistently earn less than men. United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2022/01/gender-pay-gap-widens-as-women-age.html
Duran, E., & Duran, B. (1995). Native American postcolonial psychology. Suny Press.
Dusenbery, M. (2018). Doing harm: The truth about how bad medicine and lazy science leave women dismissed, misdiagnosed, and sick. Harper Collins.
Fischer, A. R., Tokar, D. M., Mergl, M. M., Good, G. E., Hill, M. S., & Blum, S. A. (2000). Assessing women’s feminist identity development studies of convergent, discriminant, and structural validity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb01018.x
Gilligan, C. (1982). New maps of development: New visions of maturity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(2), 199–212.
Herman, J. L. (2015). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence - from domestic abuse to political terror. Hachette UK.
Hill, M. S., & Fischer, A. R. (2008). Examining objectification theory: Lesbian and heterosexual women’s experiences with sexual-and self-objectification. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(5), 745–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000007301669
Homan, P. (2019). Structural sexism and health in the United States: A new perspective on health inequality and the gender system. American Sociological Review, 84(3), 486–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312241984872
Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18(3), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610739208253916
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
Klonoff, E. A., & Landrine, H. (1997). Preventing misdiagnosis of women: A guide to physical disorders that have psychiatric symptoms. Sage Publications.
Krieger, N. (2014). Discrimination and health inequities. International Journal of Health Services, 44(4), 643–710. https://doi.org/10.2190/HS.44.4.b
Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375
Liebow, N. (2016). Internalized oppression and its varied moral harms: Self-perceptions of reduced agency and criminality. Hypatia, 31(4), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12265
Liu, K. A., & Dipietro Mager, N. A. (2016). Women’s involvement in clinical trials: Historical perspective and future implications. Pharmacy Practice, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2016.01.708
Maliniak, D., Powers, R., & Walter, B. (2013). The gender citation gap in international relations. International Organization, 67(4), 889–922. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000209
McCullough, K. M., Wong, Y. J., & Stevenson, N. J. (2020). Female video game players and the protective effect of feminist identity against internalized misogyny. Sex Roles, 82(5), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01055-7
Mezzich, J. E., & Caracci, G. (Eds.) (2008). Cultural formation: A reader for psychiatric diagnosis. Jason Aronson.
Millar, P., & Barker, J. E. (2020). Gender and academic promotion to full professor in Ontario. The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 45(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs29365
Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2017). Mplus (pp. 507–518). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Nadal, K. L. (2010). Gender microaggressions: Implications for mental health. In Paludi, M. (Eds), Feminism and women’s rights worldwide (Vol. 2, pp. 155–175). ABC-CLIO.
National Institutes of Health. (2011). Monitoring adherence to the NIH policy on the inclusion of women and minorities as subjects in clinical research. http://orwh.od.nih.gov/research/inclusion/pdf/Inclusion-ComprehensiveReport-FY-2009-2010.pdf
Noffsinger-Frazier, N. A. (2004). Objectification theory and disordered eating: The impact of feminist identification, internalization of sociocultural standards of appearance, and sexual orientation. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Memphis]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Paek, I., Cui, M., Gübes, N. O., & Yang, Y. (2018). Estimation of an IRT model by Mplus for dichotomously scored responses under different estimation methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(4), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417715738
Piggott, M. (2004). Double jeopardy: Lesbians and the legacy of multiple stigmatized identities. [Unpublished bachelor’s thesis]. Swinburne University of Technology.
Pitman, G. E. (1999). Body image, compulsory heterosexuality, and internalized homophobia. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 3, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1300/J155v03n04_17
Prediger, D. J. (1994). Multicultural assessment standards: A compilation for counselors. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 27(2), 68–73. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-15091-001
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
Reid, L. L. (1998). Devaluing women and minorities: The effects of race/ethnic and sex composition of occupations on wage levels. Work and Occupations, 25(4), 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888498025004005
Rusticus, S. A., & Hubley, A. M. (2006). Measurement invariance of the multidimensional body-self relations questionnaire: Can we compare across age and gender? Sex Roles, 55(11), 827–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9135-7
Schwarz, J. (2017). Counseling women across the life span: Empowerment, advocacy, and intervention. Springer Publishing Company.
Sedlacek, W. E. (1994). Issues in advancing diversity through assessment. Journal of Counseling & Development, 72(5), 549–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1994.tb00990.x
Solnit, R. (2014). Men explain things to me. Haymarket Books.
Sözbir, Ş. Y., Vural, G., & Toprak, F. Ü. (2020). A study for testing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Internalized Misogyny Scale. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00257-5
Spence, J. T., & Hahn, E. D. (1997). The attitudes toward women scale and attitude change in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00098.x
Striegel-Moore, R. H., Tucker, N., & Hsu, J. (1990). Body image dissatisfaction and disordered eating in lesbian college students. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 9(5), 493–500. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(199009)9:5%3c493::AID-EAT2260090504%3e3.0.CO;2-C
Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M. B., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271
Szymanski, D. M. (2005). Heterosexism and sexism as correlates of psychological distress in lesbians. Journal of Counseling & Development, 83(3), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2005.tb00355.x
Szymanski, D. M., Gupta, A., Carr, E. R., & Stewart, D. (2009). Internalized misogyny as a moderator of the link between sexist events and women’s psychological distress. Sex Roles, 61(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9611-y
Szymanski, D. M., & Henrichs-Beck, C. (2014). Exploring sexual minority women’s experiences of external and internalized heterosexism and sexism and their links to coping and distress. Sex Roles, 70(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0329-5
West, S. G., Wu, W., McNeish, D., & Savord, A. (2023). Model fit in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.) Handbook of structural equation modeling (2nd ed., pp. 184–205). Guilford Press.
Worthen, M. G. (2021). Rape myth acceptance among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and mostly heterosexual college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1–2), NP232-NP262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517733282
Worthen, M. G., & Wallace, S. A. (2021). “Why should I, the one who was raped, be forced to take training in what sexual assault is?” Sexual assault survivors’ and those who know survivors’ responses to a campus sexual assault education program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5–6), NP2640-NP2674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518768571
Xia, Y., & Yang, Y. (2018). The influence of number of categories and threshold values on fit indices in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(5), 731–755. https://doi.org/10.1080//00273171.2018.1480346
Xia, Y., & Yang, Y. (2019). RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose and no competing interests to declare relevant to this article’s content. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Research Involving Human Participation
The study was approved by the University Institutional Review Board. All participants voluntarily participated in the survey and provided their informed consent.
Transparency on Material
We confirm that this work is original and neither the submitted material nor portions of it have been published previously or are under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Authorship
All listed authors have agreed to manuscript authorship and the authorship order, and the corresponding author confirms that all who deserve authorship are listed. The authors made substantial contributions to the work including the design of the work, analysis, and interpretation of data. They approved the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Han, E., Hoffman, L. & Wood, S.M. Using the Internalized Misogyny Scale Across Sexual Orientations: Measurement Invariance and Item Factor Analysis. Sex Roles 88, 290–304 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01357-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01357-x