Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Predicting Attitudes toward the Masculine Structure of the Military with Turkish Identification and Ambivalent Sexism

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Why do people support the masculine structure of the Turkish military? Why do women hold inferior positions in the military? How are sexism and Turkish identification relevant to attitudes toward the masculine structure of the military? Focusing on these questions, the current study explored the associations among Turkish identification, ambivalent sexism (including hostile and benevolent sexism), and attitudes toward the masculine structure of the military in Turkey after controlling for gender, political views, and military affiliation. University students (316 women; 262 men; M age = 22.02, SD = 2.20) completed the Attitude toward The Masculine Structure of the Military, Turkish Identification, Ambivalent Sexism scales and provided information about age, gender, political view, and military affiliation. The results showed that Turkish identification, hostile sexism, and benevolent sexism predicted attitudes toward the masculine structure of the military after controlling for gender, political view, and military affiliation. Participants who scored higher on Turkish identification and hostile and benevolent sexism supported the masculine structure of the military. The findings may be useful for researchers who aim to better understand why Turkish military personnel is primarily male, how some improvement can be provided for the process of recruitment and retention of military personnel, and how to improve the positions of women in the military or women who would like to join military.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alauddin, M., & Son Ngheim, H. (2010). Do instructional attributes pose multicollinearity problems? An empirical exploration. Economic Analysis and Policy, 49, 351-361. doi:10.1016/S0313-5926(10)50034-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almonitor. (2016, August 9). Turkey’s women expand role in the military. Retrieved from http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2014/12/turkey-military-woman-power-personnel-increasing.html.

  • Altınay, A. G. (2004). The myth of the military-nation: Militarism, gender and education in Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Altınay, A. G. (2013). Askerlik yapmayana adam denmez: Zorunlu askerlik, erkeklik ve vatandaşlık [Men cannot be called men without military service: Compulsory military, manhood and citizenship]. In N. Y. Sünbüloğlu (Ed.), Erkek millet, asker millet: Türkiye’de militarizm, milliyetçilik, erkek(lik)ler [Men, nation, solder nation: Militarism, nationalism and manhood in Turkey] (pp. 205-260). İstanbul: İletişim.

  • Ankara Kuzgun, Y. (1987). Sosyo-ekonomik düzey ve psikolojik ihtiyaçlar [Socioeconomic level and psychological needs]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(1), 55-68. doi:10.1501/Egifak_0000001076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askerlik Law. (2016, July 19). Retrieved from http://www.msb.gov.tr/Content/Upload/Docs/askeralma/1111_As.Kanunu.pdf.

  • Barker, E. N. (1963). Authoritarianism of the political right, center, and left. Journal of Social Issues, 19, 63-74. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1963.tb00439.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., De Boef, S., & Lin, T. M. (2004). The dynamics of the partisan gender gap. The American Political Science Review, 98, 515-528. doi:10.1017/S0003055404001315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, M. J., & Henry, P. J. (2012). Gender inequality and gender differences in authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1301-1315. doi:10.1177/0146167212449871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braungart, R. G. (1986). Moderate-extreme and left-right source of youth politics: A typology. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 14(2), 199-213. Retrieved fom  http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/10424307/moderate-extreme-left-right-sources-youth-politics-typology.

  • Cinnirella, M. (1998). Manipulating stereotype rating tasks: Understanding questionnaire context effects on measures of attitudes, social identity and stereotypes. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 8, 345-362. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(1998090)8:5%3C345::AID-CASP441%3E3.0.CO;2-F.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.5.

  • Dalmış, İ., & İmamoğlu, E. O. (2000). Yetişkinlerin ve üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyo-politik kimlik algıları [The percieved socio-political identity domains of Turkish adults and university students]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi (Turkish Journal of Psychology), 15, 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ender, M. G., Rohall, D. E., & Matthew, M. D. (2013). The millennial generation and national defense: Attitudes of future military and civilian leaders. New York: Palgrave Pivot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. (2000). Maneuvers: The international politics of militarizing women’s lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, I. R. (2000). Citizenship rites: Feminist soldiers and feminist antimilitarists. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109-118. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., ... López, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 763-775. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763.

  • Glick, P., Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Ferreira, M. C., & de Souza, M. A. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 292-297. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Fire Power. (2016, July 19). Turkey military strength. Retrieved from http://www.globalfirepower.com/country-military-strength-detail.asp?country_id=Turkey.

  • Hagemann, K. (2007). The first citizen of the state: Paternal masculinity, patriotism, and citizenship in early nineteenth-century Prussia. In S. Dudink, K. Hagemann, & A. Clark (Eds.), Representing masculinity: Male citizenship in modern Western culture (pp. 68-88). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-26. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O. R., & Rosenau, J. N. (1995). Gender and the political beliefs of American opinion leaders. In F. D’Amico & P. R. Beckman (Eds.), Women and politics: An introduction (pp. 113-142). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husnu, S. (2006). National stereotypes, in-group identification, intergroup bias, social categorization and in−/out-group attitudes: The case of Cyprus (Unpublished master’s thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

  • İlkkaracan, P. (1998). Doğu Anadolu’da kadın ve aile [Women and family in East of Anatolia]. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • İnalcık, H. (1964). The nature of traditional society: Turkey. In R. E. Ward & D. A. Rostow (Eds.), Political modernization in Japan and Turkey. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivarsson, S., Estrada, A. X., & Berggren, A. W. (2005). Understanding men’s attitudes toward women in the Swedish armed forces. Military Psychology, 17, 269-282. doi:10.1207/s1532787mp17042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandiyoti, D. (1982). Kadınlarda psikososyal değişim: Kuşaklar arasında bir karşılaştırma [Psychosocial change in women: Comparison between generations]. In N. Abadan-Unat (Ed.), Türk toplumunda kadın [Women in Turkish society] (pp. 311-339). Istanbul: Sosyal Bilimler Araştırma Dizisi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, U. (1999). "Our best boys": The gendered nature of civil-military relations in Israel. Men and Masculinities, 2(1), 47-65. doi:10.1177/1097184X99002001004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuloğlu, C. (2005). The military in Turkey from a gender perspective (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müftüler-Baç, M. (2012). Gender equality in Turkey. In Note for the European Parliament’s Committee on Gender Equality. Directorate: General for International Policies. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201202/20120207ATT37506/20120207ATT37506EN.pdf.

  • Nagel, J. (1998). Masculinity and nationalism: Gender and sexuality in the making of nations. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21(2), 242-269. doi:10.1080/014198798330007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Security Knowledge. (1998). İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.

  • North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (2016, July 19). Financial and economic data related to NATO defence. Retrieved from http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_2012_04/20120413_PR_CP_2012_047_rev1.pdf.

  • O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rule of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity, 41, 673-690. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özdemir, F. (2013). The predictors of attitudes toward military: Turkish identity, uninational ideology, ambivalent sexism, conservatism and religious orientation (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., & Sidanius, J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49-68. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01118.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sakallı, N. (2001). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: The effects of patriarchy, sexism and sex difference. Sex Roles, 44(9/10), 599-611. doi:10.1023/A:1012295109711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakallı, N. (2002). The relationship between sexism and attitudes toward homosexuality in a sample of Turkish college students. Journal of Homosexuality, 42(3), 51-62. doi:10.1300/J082v42n03_04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2002). Çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Ambivalent Sexism Scale: A study of validity and reliability]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi [The Journal of Turkish Psychology], 17(49), 47-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2014). Stereotypes of women and men in Turkey. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Sezer, Ö. (2010). The relationship between adolescents’ self-perception, parental attitudes, and other variables. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1, 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C. G., Overall, N. C., & Duckitt, J. (2007). When women become more hostilely sexist toward their gender: The system-justifying effect of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 57, 743-754. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9306-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigillo, A., Miller, M. K., & Weiser, D. (2012). Attitudes toward non-traditional women using IVF: The importance of political affiliation and religious characteristics. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4, 249-263. doi:10.1037/a0027940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steihm, J. H. (1982). The protected, the protector, the defender. Women's Studies International Forum, 5, 367-376. doi:10.1016/0277-5395(82)90048-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sünbüloğlu, N. Y. (2013). Erkek millet asker millet: Türkiye’de militarism, milliyetçilik, erkek(lik)ler [Men nation soldier nation: Militarism, nationalism and manhood in Turkey]. İstanbul: İletişim Yayıncılık.

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taşdemir, N., & Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2010). The relationships between ambivalent sexism and religiosity among Turkish university students. Sex Roles, 62, 420-426. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9693-6.

  • Turkish Statistic Institution. (2016, July 19). Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr.

  • Walby, S. (1996). Women and nation. In G. Balakrishnan (Ed.), In mapping the nation (pp. 235-254). New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. L., & Nauta, M. M. (2013). Sexism as a predictor of attitudes toward women in the military and combat. Military Psychology, 25(2), 166-171. doi:10.1037/h0094958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeiger, S. (1996). She didn’t raise her boy to be a slacker: motherhood, conscription, and the culture of the first world war. Feminist Studies, 22, 6-39. http://www.academicroom.com/article/she-didnt-raise-her-boy-be-slacker-motherhood-conscription-and-culture-first-world-war.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, Middle East Technical University, 06531, Ankara, Turkey

    Nuray Sakallı Uğurlu & Fatih Özdemir

Authors
  1. Nuray Sakallı Uğurlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fatih Özdemir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuray Sakallı Uğurlu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Author declared no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakallı Uğurlu, N., Özdemir, F. Predicting Attitudes toward the Masculine Structure of the Military with Turkish Identification and Ambivalent Sexism. Sex Roles 76, 511–519 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0676-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0676-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation