Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

The paper aims to present the legal theories of legal argumentation constructed in the last century, organised into two groups: the precursors (Viehweg, Perelman and Toulmin) and the authors of the standard theory (MacCormick and Alexy). Then, some criticisms about all these conceptions are presented. And finally, an outline of a theory of legal argumentation is made, capable of overcoming some of the previous criticisms. The fundamental idea for this is to build a very abstract concept of argumentation that could then allow various interpretations or conceptions of legal argumentation. From here, one would be in a position to find an answer to the three main argumentative questions raised by legal practice: how to analyse an argument, how to evaluate it, how to argue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. But the interested reader can find them in the work mentioned above.

References

  1. Atienza, Manuel. 1991. Las razones del Derecho. Teorías de la argumentación jurídica. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atienza, Manuel. 2006. El Derecho como argumentación. Concepciones de la argumentación. Barcelona: Ariel.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atienza, Manuel. 2013. Curso de argumentación jurídica. Madrid: Trotta.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atienza, Manuel. 2015. Robert Alexy y el ‘giro argumentativo’ en la teoría del Derecho contemporánea. http://lamiradadepeitho.blogspot.com.es.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Atienza.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atienza, M. What is the Theory Legal Argumentation For?. Int J Semiot Law 33, 147–153 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-019-09669-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-019-09669-6

Keywords

Navigation