Abstract
Global science is pluralising. More nations increasingly contribute to scientific endeavours worldwide. Muslim-majority nations are no exception, but their contributions to global science have been understudied. This study produced an overview of scientific papers published by 15 purposefully selected Muslim-majority science systems. Specifically, it examined the quantity and scientific influence of papers published between 1990 and 2020 and provided a research-area-based analysis of trends in paper publications. Findings revealed that the share of Muslim-majority contributions to global science is still modest because systems only published 5.15% of all web of science (WoS) papers globally in the last three decades, although their combined population represents 14.16% of the world population. However, the increasing trend in quantity and scientific influence of publications is promising. The findings also indicated that Turkey-based scientists have the highest number of WoS papers published among the selected systems. Iran has been the fastest growing system, and Saudi Arabia-based scientists have published the highest number of internationally collaborated papers per year since 2012. Regarding scientific influence indicators, relatively smaller but well-funded science, such as Qatar, United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia, come to the fore. The analysis results indicate that six science systems, in alphabetic order, Egypt, Iran, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey, consistently differentiated themselves from others in area-based publication analyses and overall trends, Turkey and Iran being the outliers in the group.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Source: Own calculations based on InCites WoS (2021) and World Bank data (2021)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelman, L., & Verkuyten, M. (2020). Prejudice and the acceptance of muslim minority practices: A person-centered approach. Social Psychology, 51(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000380
Ahmar, A. S., Kurniasih, N., Irawan, D. E., Sutiksno, D. U., Napitupulu, D., Setiawan, M. I., Simarmata, J., Hidayat, R., Busro, A., Rahim, D. R., & Abraham, J. (2018). Lecturers’ understanding on indexing databases of SINTA, DOAJ, google scholar, SCOPUS, and web of science: A study of Indonesians. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/954/1/012026
Akturk, S. (2015). Religion and nationalism: Contradictions of islamic origins and secular nation-building in Turkey, Algeria, and Pakistan*. Social Science Quarterly, 96(3), 778–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12191
AlRyalat, S. A., & Malkawi, L. (2018). International collaboration and openness in jordanian research output: A 10-year publications feedback. Publishing Research Quarterly, 34(2), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-018-9572-5
Bashir, M. (2013). Bibliometric study of Pakistan’s research output and comparison with other selected countries of the world. Asian Journal of Science and Technology, 4(5), 1–7.
Bhattacharjee, Y. (2011). Saudi universities offer cash in exchange for academic prestige. Science, 334(6061), 1344–1345. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.334.6061.1344
Bornmann, L., & Bauer, J. (2015). Which of the world’s institutions employ the most highly cited researchers? An analysis of the data from highlycited.com. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2146–2148. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23396
Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.12.003
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What Is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships: What Is STEM? School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
Cavacini, A. (2016). Recent trends in middle eastern scientific production. Scientometrics, 109(1), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1932-3
Chankseliani, M. (2019). Big business in a small state: Rationales of higher education internationalisation in Latvia. European Educational Research Journal, 18(6), 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119830507
Chankseliani, M., Lovakov, A., & Pislyakov, V. (2021). A big picture: bibliometric study of academic publications from post-Soviet countries. Scientometrics (Issue 0123456789). Springer International Publishing.
Clarivate. (2020a). Impact indicators. https://incites.help.clarivate.com/Content/Indicators-Handbook/ih-impactindicators.htm. Accessed 3 Dec 2021.
Clarivate. (2020b). Normalised indicators. https://incites.help.clarivate.com/Content/Indicators-Handbook/ih-normalized-indicators.htm. Accessed 3 Dec 2021.
Countrymeters. (2021). Religion of the world. https://countrymeters.info/en/World#religion. Accessed 6 Dec 2021.
Dang, Q. A. (2015). The bologna process goes east? From “third countries” to prioritizing inter-regional cooperation between the ASEAN and EU. In A. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi, & P. Scott (Eds.), The European higher education area: Between critical reflections and future policies (pp. 763–783). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2020). Democracy index 2020. https://www.eiu.com/topic/democracy-index
Freedom House. (2020). Freedom in the World 2020. https://freedomhouse.org/country/turkey/freedom-world/2020
Gingras, Y. (2014). The abuses of research evaluation. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20140204141307557
Gray, A., & Price, R. (2020). Using incites responsibly: A guide to interpretation and good practice. Imperial College London.
Gul, S., Nisa, N. T., Shah, T. A., Gupta, S., Jan, A., & Ahmad, S. (2015). Middle East: Research productivity and performance across nations. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1157–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1722-3
Gümüş, S., Bellibaş, M. Ş, Gümüş, E., & Hallinger, P. (2020). Science mapping research on educational leadership and management in Turkey: A bibliometric review of international publications. School Leadership and Management, 40(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1578737
Hackett, C., & Grim, B. J. (2012). The global religious landscape: A report on the size and distribution of the world’s major religious groups as of 2010. Pew Research Center. https://assets.pewresearch.org/wpcontent/uploads/sites/11/2014/01/global-religion-full.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2021
Haq, I. U., & Tanveer, M. (2020). Status of research productivity and higher education in the members of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). Library Philosophy and Practice, 1(1), 1–11.
Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. W. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39(5), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.012
Hyslop-Margison, E. J., & Leonard, H. A. (2012). Post neo-liberalism and the humanities: What the repressive state apparatus means for universities. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 42(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v42i2.183579
Khoubnasabjafari, M., Sadeghifar, E., Khalili, M., Ansarin, K., & Jouyban, A. (2012). Research performances of Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) members. BioImpacts: BI, 2(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.5681/bi.2012.017
Koljatic, M. M., & Silva, M. R. (2001). The international publication productivity of Latin American countries in the economics and business administration fields. Scientometrics, 51(2), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012753601797
Kumar, S., & Jan, J. M. (2014). Research collaboration networks of two OIC nations: Comparative study between Turkey and Malaysia in the field of “Energy Fuels”, 2009–2011. Scientometrics, 98(1), 387–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1059-8
Kwiek, M. (2020). What large-scale publication and citation data tell us about international research collaboration in Europe: Changing national patterns in global contexts. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1749254
Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of International scientific collaboration. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 17(1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700106
Marginson, S. (2020). The world research system. In C. Callender, W. Locke, & S. Marginson (Eds.), Changing higher education for a changing world (pp. 35–51). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
Marginson, S. (2021a). Global science and national comparisons: Beyond bibliometrics and scientometrics. Comparative Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2021.1981725
Marginson, S., & Xu, X. (2021c). Moving beyond centre-periphery science: Towards an ecology of knowledge (No. 63; Issue April).
Marginson, S., Carpentier, V., Huang, F., Liu, N. C., Horiuchi, K., Yang, L., Tian, L., Valenzuela, C., & Guzman, K. S. (2021b). Local and global public good of higher education: 10 nation study. https://www.researchcghe.org/research/2020-2023/project/local-and-global-public-good-of-higher-education-10-nation-study/. Accessed 1 Dec 2021.
Meo, S. A., Al-Masri, A. A., Al-Rouq, F., Usmani, A. M., Hassan, A., Arain, S. A., & Zaidi, S. Z. (2014). Status of research publications in various science subjects among Muslim countries (1996–2010). Asia Life Sciences, 23(1), 39–48.
Mohsen, M. A. (2021). A bibliometric study of the applied linguistics research output of Saudi institutions in the Web of Science for the decade 2011-2020. The Electronic Library, ahead-of-p. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-06-2021-0121
National Science Board. (2019). Publications output: US trends and international comparisons. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20206/
Nussbaum, M. C. (2016). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754x-1305490
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). Revised Field of science and technology (FOS) classification in the Frascati manual. OECD. Retrieved September 2, 2021 from http://www.oecd.org/science/inno/38235147.pdf
Ogan, C., Willnat, L., Pennington, R., & Bashir, M. (2014). The rise of anti-Muslim prejudice: Media and Islamophobia in Europe and the United States. International Communication Gazette, 76(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048513504048
Olavarrieta, S., & Villena, M. G. (2014). Innovation and business research in Latin America: An overview. Journal of Business Research, 67(4), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.005
Oldac, Y. I., & Yang, L. (2021). Two edges of Asia in a multipolar world: The interconnections between Chinese and Turkish higher education systems. Higher Education Governance and Policy.
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. (2021). History of Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. https://www.oic-oci.org/page/?p_id=52&p_ref=26&lan=en
Riaz, H. (2008). Inside Muslim Mind. Melbourne University Publishing.
Sadowski, J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data and Society, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549
Sarwar, R., & Hassan, S. U. I. (2015). A bibliometric assessment of scientific productivity and international collaboration of the Islamic World in science and technology (S&T) areas. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1059–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1718-z
Sirin, S. R., & Fine, M. (2008). Muslim American youth: Understanding hyphenated identities through multiple methods. New York University Press.
Sweileh, W. M., Al-Jabi, S. W., Shanti, Y. I., Sawalha, A. F., & Zyoud, S. H. (2015). Contribution of Arab researchers to ophthalmology: a bibliometric and comparative analysis. SpringerPlus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0806-0
UNESCO Institute of Statistics. (2021). UNESCO UIS. http://uis.unesco.org/
van der Wende, M., Kirby, W. C., Liu, N. C., & Marginson, S. (Eds.). (2020). China and Europe on the new silk road: Connecting universities across Eurasia. Oxford University Press.
Wagner, C. S. (2018). The collaborative era in science: Governing the network. Springer International Publishing.
Wagner, C. S., Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). The continuing growth of global cooperation networks in research: A conundrum for national governments. PLoS ONE, 10(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131816
Wagner, C. S., Whetsell, T. A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Growth of international collaboration in science: Revisiting six specialties. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1633–1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2230-9
World Bank. (2021). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/
Worldometer. (2021). Countries in the world by population. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/
Xu, X. (2020). China ‘goes out’ in a centre–periphery world: Incentivising international publications in the humanities and social sciences. Higher Education, 80, 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00470-9
Zavadskas, E. K., Kirvaitis, R., & Dagienė, E. (2011). Scientific publications released in the Baltic States. Scientometrics Scientometrics, 88(1), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0394-x
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Funding
The author has no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article. The author’s current post as a Post-Doctoral Fellow at Lingnan University is funded by Hong Kong Research Grants Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
See Fig. 12
Distribution of journal articles published in Q1–Q4 journals in all 15 countries in the last 3 decades, by area of study. Quartile distribution in humanities research area is not published in WoS database since impact factors are seen as poor reflections of quality for this research area
Appendix 2
See Fig. 13
Percentage of top 10% papers between 1990 and 2020 by the OECD research area
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Oldac, Y.I. Global science and the muslim world: overview of muslim-majority country contributions to global science. Scientometrics 127, 6231–6255 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04517-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04517-0