Skip to main content
Log in

The citation impact of social sciences and humanities upon patentable technology

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the citation impact of papers published in scientific-scholarly journals upon patentable technology, as reflected in examiner- or inventor-given references in granted patents. It analyses data created by SCImago Research Group, linking PATSTAT’s scientific non-patent references (SNPRs) to source documents indexed in Scopus. The frequency of patent citations to journal papers is calculated per discipline, year, institutional sector, journal subject category, and for “top” journals. PATSTAT/Scopus-based statistics are compared to those derived from Web of Science/USPTO linkage. A detailed assessment is presented of the technological impact of research publications in social sciences and humanities (SSH). Several subject fields perform well in terms of the number of citations from patents, especially Library and Information Science, Language and Linguistics, Education, and Law, but many of the most cited journals find themselves in the interface between SSH and biomedical or natural sciences. Analyses of the titles of citing patents and cited papers are presented that shed light upon the cognitive content of patent citations. It is proposed to develop more advanced indicators of citation impact of papers upon patents, and ways to combine citation counts with citation content and context analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • De Rassenfosse, G., Dernis, H., & Boedt, G. (2014). An Introduction to the Patstat database with example queries. Australian Economic Review, 47, 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Patent Office. (2018) Data Catalog PATSTAT Global. Versión 5.11. EPO PATSTAT.

  • Guerrero-Bote, V. P., Sánchez-Jiménez, R., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2019). The citation from patents to scientific output revisited: A new approach to the matching Patstat/Scopus. El Profesional de la Información. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero-Bote, V. P., Moed, H. F., & Moya-Anegon, F. (n.d.). New indicators of technological impact of scientific production. Scientometrics (submitted).

  • Halevi, G., & Moed, H. F. (2012). The technological impact of library science research: A patent analysis. In E. Archambault, Y. Gingras, & V. Larivière (Eds.), Proceedings of 17th international conference on science and technology indicators (Vol. 1, pp. 371–380). Montréal: Science-Metrix and OST.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinze, S., & Schmoch, U. (2004). Opening the black box. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 215–235). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, B., & Tarasconi, G. (2016). PATSTAT revisited: Suggestions for better usage. World Patent Information, 46, 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1992). Status report: Linkage between technology and science. Research Policy, 21, 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy, 26, 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Breitzman, A., & Thomas, P. (2004). Using patent citation indicators to manage a stock portfolio. In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 553–568). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patent families. (n.d.). Retrieved April 1, 2020, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_family.

  • Price, D. J. D. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TotalPatent. (n.d.). Lexis Nexis IP. Retrieved April 1, 2020, from https://www.lexisnexisip.com/products/total-patent-one/.

  • Van Looy, B., Debackere, K., Callaert, J., Tijssen, R., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Scientific capabilities and technological performance: An exploration of emerging industrial relevant research domains. Scientometrics, 66(2), 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2017). Patent citations analysis and its value in research evaluation: A review and a new approach to map technology-relevant research. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2, 13–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henk F. Moed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Moya-Anegon, F., Lopez-Illescas, C., Guerrero-Bote, V. et al. The citation impact of social sciences and humanities upon patentable technology. Scientometrics 125, 1665–1687 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03530-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03530-5

Keywords

Navigation