Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using altmetrics for assessing impact of highly-cited books in Chinese Book Citation Index

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the rapid development of Internet technology, online academic communications are increasingly prevalent, the traditional ways of academic evaluation can’t comprehensively reflect the multi-dimensional impact of scientific publications, therefore altmetrics is widely concerned by scholars because of its objectivity, timeliness and openness. Based on Douban Reading platform, this paper uses descriptive statistical analysis, grouping analysis, correlation analysis and other statistical methods to conduct the altmetrics evaluation of 1000 highly-cited books in Chinese Book Citation Index. The results show that there is a weak correlation between citations and altmetrics indicators, suggesting that they reflect different aspects of books’ impact and they are complementary in the academic evaluation. What’s more, altmetrics indicators are different on discipline and year, the more applicable the discipline is, the higher the values of altmetrics indicators are. Meanwhile, compared with old books, new books published in recent years have an advantage in the altmetrics evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banshal, S. K., Singh, V. K., Muhuri, P.K. & Mayr, P. (2019). Disciplinary Variations in Altmetric Coverage of Scholarly Articles. In Proceedings in 17th international conference on scientometrics & informetrics (ISSI), September 2019, Rome, Italy, (pp. 1870–1881).

  • Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015). Do "altmetrics" correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2003–2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Didegah, F., Bowman, T. D., & Holmberg, K. (2018). On the differences between citations and altmetrics: An investigation of factors driving altmetrics versus citations for finnish articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(6), 832–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammarfelt, B. (2014). Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities. Scientometrics,101(2), 1419–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, Y., Zhou, Y., Yang, W., & Liu, X. (2018). Analysis of altmetrics indicators for academic books. Library and Information Service, 62(14), 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, J., & Cai, R. (2016). Research on evaluation system of Chinese books. Journal of Academic Library, 34(3), 51–58+15.

  • Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2015). Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 3: books and non standard outputs. El Profesional de La Información,24(6), 724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, S., & Lv, X. (2017). Research on the impact evaluation of academic books from the perspective of Altmetrics. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Natural Science Edition),38(6), 225–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Chen, M. (2018). Exploration of hierarchical framework of altmetrics evaluation indicators for academic books. Journal of Modern Information,38(5), 106–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Chen, M. (2019). Analysis of advantages, system and difficulties of Altmetrics evaluation for Chinese academic books. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Natural Science Edition),40(2), 236–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, X. (2016). Construction of academic impact evaluation system of electronic books based on altmetrics: Taking Springer electronic books as an example. Publishing Research,4, 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, N., & Song, Z. (2019). Research on impact evaluation of electronic books in mathematics based on Bookmetrix. Library Journal,38(3), 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, I., Kraker, P., Lex, E., Gumpenberger, C., & Gorraiz, J. (2016). Research data explored: An extended analysis of citations. Scientometrics,107(2), 723–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priem, J., Groth, P., & Taraborelli, D. (2012). The altmetrics collection. PloS One,7(11), 48753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh, P., Vedika, G., Kumar, S. V., David, P., Kumar, S. V., et al. (2018). Book impact assessment: A quantitative and text-based exploratory analysis. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems,34(5), 3101–3110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shema, H., Bar-Ilan, J., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,65(5), 1018–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijder, R. (2016). Revisiting an open access monograph experiment: Measuring citations and tweets 5 years later. Scientometrics,109(3), 1855–1875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2016). Interpreting correlations between citation counts and other indicators. Scientometrics,108(1), 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-Garcia, N., & Gorraiz, J. (2017). Filling the citation gap: Measuring the multidimensional impact of the academic book at institutional level with PlumX. Scientometrics,113(3), 1371–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, X., Gao, F., & Guo, L. (2016). Discussion on evaluation methods of academic impact of foreign e-books: Comparison of examples based on BKCI, Scopus Article Metrics and Bookmetrix. Journal of Modern Information,36(10), 118–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, L., & Chen, Z. (2016). Research on impact evaluation system of national library of achievements in philosophy and social sciences. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Natural Science Edition),37(6), 232–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Pan, Y., Yuan, J., Su, C., Ma, Z., Liu, N., et al. (2015). On the construction of academic impact evaluation system of Chinese science and technology books from multi-dimensional perspective. Library and Information Service,59(7), 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuccala, A. A., Verleysen, F. T., Cornacchia, R., & Engels, T. C. E. (2015). Altmetrics for the humanities: Comparing Goodreads reader ratings with citations to history books. Aslib Journal of Information Management,67(3), 320–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is financially supported by research Grants from the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 18FTQ005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, Jiangsu Province, China

    Xia Nan, Ming Li & Jin Shi

Authors
  1. Xia Nan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ming Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jin Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Shi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nan, X., Li, M. & Shi, J. Using altmetrics for assessing impact of highly-cited books in Chinese Book Citation Index. Scientometrics 122, 1651–1669 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03347-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03347-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation