Abstract
Clarifying the mechanism of how emerging topics in science and technology research fields are generated is useful for both researchers and agencies to identify potential emerging topics of the future. In the present study, we use bibliometric analyses targeting data of about 30 million published articles from 1970 to 2017 on PubMed, the largest article database in the life science field, to test our hypothesis that existing emerging topics contribute to the generation of new emerging topics in that field. We first collected emerging keywords from medical subject headings attached to each article using our previously reported methodology (Ohniwa et al. in Scientometrics 85(1):111–127, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0252-2), and performed co-word analyses of each emerging keyword 1-year prior to it becoming an emerging keyword. About 75% of total emerging keywords, at 1-year prior to becoming identified as emerging, co-appeared with other emerging keywords in the same article. Furthermore, most of the keywords co-appeared again at the point when the target keyword was identified as emerging, which is consistent with our hypothesis regarding the mechanism that emerging topics generate emerging topics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2002). Pajek—Analysis and visualization of large networks. Graph Drawing,2265, 477–478.
Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,18(3–4), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002.
Cozzens, S. E., Gatchair, S., Kang, J., Kim, K.-S., Lee, H. J., Ordónez, G., et al. (2010). Emerging technologies: Quantitative identification and measurement. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,22(3), 361–376.
Daim, T. U., Rueda, G., Martin, H., & Gerdsri, P. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,73(8), 981–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.04.004.
Furukawa, T., Mori, K., Arino, K., Hayashi, K., & Shirakawa, N. (2015). Identifying the evolutionary process of emerging technologies: A chronological network analysis of World Wide Web conference sessions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,91, 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.03.013.
Glanzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2012). Using ‘core documents’ for detecting and labelling new emerging topics. Scientometrics,91(2), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0591-7.
Guo, H. N., Weingart, S., & Borner, K. (2011). Mixed-indicators model for identifying emerging research areas. Scientometrics, 89(1), 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0433-7.
Jang, H. J., Woo, H. G., & Lee, C. (2017). Hawkes process-based technology impact analysis. Journal of Informetrics,11(2), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.03.007.
Lee, C., Kim, J., Kwon, O., & Woo, H. G. (2016). Stochastic technology life cycle analysis using multiple patent indicators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,106, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.024.
Lee, C., Kwon, O., Kim, M., & Kwon, D. (2018). Early identification of emerging technologies: A machine learning approach using multiple patent indicators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,127, 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.002.
Lee, H. J., Lee, S., & Yoon, B. (2011). Technology clustering based on evolutionary patterns: The case of information and communications technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,78(6), 953–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.02.002.
Leydesdorff, L., Rotolo, D., & Rafols, I. (2012). Bibliometric perspectives on medical innovation using the medical subject Headings of PubMed. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 2239–2253. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22715.
Lowe, H. J., & Barnett, G. O. (1994). Understanding and using the medical subject-headings (Mesh) vocabulary to perform literature searches. Journal of the American Medical Association, 271(14), 1103–1108. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.271.14.1103.
Morris, S. A., Yen, G., Wu, Z., & Asnake, B. (2003). Time line visualization of research fronts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,54(5), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10227.
Ohniwa, R. L., Hibino, A., & Takeyasu, K. (2010). Trends in research foci in life science fields over the last 30 years monitored by emerging topics. Scientometrics,85(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0252-2.
Petersen, A. M., Rotolo, D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2016). A triple helix model of medical innovation: Supply, demand, and technological capabilities in terms of medical subject headings. Research Policy,45(3), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.12.004.
Rotolo, D., Hicks, D., & Martin, B. R. (2015). What is an emerging technology? Research Policy,44(10), 1827–1843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.006.
Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., Sakata, I., & Matsushima, K. (2011). Detecting emerging research fronts in regenerative medicine by the citation network analysis of scientific publications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,78(2), 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.07.006.
Shin, J., Coh, B. Y., & Lee, C. (2013). Robust future-oriented technology portfolios: Black–Litterman approach. R&D Management,43(5), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12022.
Small, H., Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2014). Identifying emerging topics in science and technology. Research Policy,43(8), 1450–1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.005.
van Lente, H., & Rip, A. (1998). The rise of membrane technology: From rhetorics to social reality. Social Studies of Science,28(2), 221–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631298028002002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
11192_2019_3248_MOESM1_ESM.tif
The networks of the top 50 emerging keywords in 1971–1975. Only keywords that obtain links with other keywords are shown. The labels on the clusters represent the name of topics. The threshold for making edges was set as 10% of the number of keywords (selecting smaller sized nodes) linked by the edges. (TIFF 238 kb)
11192_2019_3248_MOESM2_ESM.tif
The networks of the top 50 emerging keywords in 1976–1980. See Supplemental Figure 1 legend for the conditions of links and labels. (TIFF 203 kb)
11192_2019_3248_MOESM3_ESM.tif
The networks of the top 50 emerging keywords in 1981–1985. See Supplemental Figure 1 legend for the conditions of links and labels. (TIFF 200 kb)
11192_2019_3248_MOESM4_ESM.tif
The networks of the top 50 emerging keywords in 1986–1990. See Supplemental Figure 1 legend for the conditions of links and labels. (TIFF 348 kb)
11192_2019_3248_MOESM5_ESM.tif
The networks of the top 50 emerging keywords in 1991–1995. See Supplemental Figure 1 legend for the conditions of links and labels. (TIFF 330 kb)
11192_2019_3248_MOESM6_ESM.tif
The networks of the top 50 emerging keywords in 1996–2000. See Supplemental Figure 1 legend for the conditions of links and labels. (TIFF 312 kb)
11192_2019_3248_MOESM7_ESM.tif
The networks of the top 50 emerging keywords in 2001–2005. See Supplemental Figure 1 legend for the conditions of links and labels. (TIFF 258 kb)
11192_2019_3248_MOESM8_ESM.tif
The networks of the top 50 emerging keywords in 2006–2010. See Supplemental Figure 1 legend for the conditions of links and labels. (TIFF 229 kb)
11192_2019_3248_MOESM9_ESM.tif
The networks of the top 50 emerging keywords in 2010–2015. See Supplemental Figure 1 legend for the conditions of links and labels. (TIFF 235 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ohniwa, R.L., Hibino, A. Generating process of emerging topics in the life sciences. Scientometrics 121, 1549–1561 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03248-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03248-z