Abstract
The aim of this paper is to extend the conversation about the correlation between collaboration and citation impact in articles in Information Science & Library Science journals by analyzing this correlation’s behavior using a power scaling law approach. 28,131 articles that received 215,693 citations were analyzed. The number of these articles that were published through collaboration accounts for 69%. In general, the scaling exponent of multi-authored articles, both international and domestic, increases over time while the exponent of single-authored papers decreases. The citation impact and collaboration patterns exhibit a power law correlation with a scaling exponent of 1.34 ± 0.02. Citations to multi-authored articles increased \(2^{1.34}\) or 2.53 times each time the number of multi-authored papers doubled. The Matthew Effect is stronger for multi-authored papers than for single-authored. The scaling exponent for the power law relationship of domestic multi-authored papers was 1.35 ± 0.02. The citations to domestic multi-authored articles increased \(2^{1.35}\) or 2.55 times each time the number of domestic multi-authored articles doubled. Contrary to previous studies we found that the Matthew Effect is stronger for domestic multi-authored papers than for international multi-authored ones.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J., & Gurney, K. (2013). Leading research economies in a changing knowledge network. Spain. Global research digest. Retrieved from http:www.researchanalytics.thomsonreuters.com/grr.
Ardanuy, J. (2011). Scientific collaboration in Library and Information Science viewed through the Web of Knowledge: The Spanish case. Scientometrics, 90(3), 877–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0552-1.
Barabási, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509.
Bettencourt, L. M. A., Kaiser, D. I., Kaur, J., Castillo-Chavez, C., & Wojick, D. E. (2008). Population modeling of the emergence and development of scientific fields. Scientometrics, 75(3), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1888-4.
Bornmann, L. (2017). Is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration? An analysis based on data from F1000Prime and normalized citation scores. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 1036–1047. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23728.
Brzezinski, M. (2015). Power laws in citation distributions: Evidence from Scopus. Scientometrics, 103(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1524-z.
Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., & Newman, M. E. J. (2009). Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review, 51(4), 661–703. https://doi.org/10.1137/070710111.
Coccia, M., & Bozeman, B. (2016). Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1065–1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2027-x.
de Solla-Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 14(3683), 510–515. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3683.510.
de Solla-Price, D. J. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 27(5), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630270505.
Egghe, L. (2005). The power of power laws and an interpretation of lotkaian informetric systems as self-similar fractals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(7), 669–675. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20158.
Egghe, L. (2007). Dynamich-index: The Hirsch index in function of time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(3), 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20473.
Egghe, L., Liang, L. M., & Rousseau, R. (2009). A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2362–2365. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21144.
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1986). A characterization of distributions which satisfy Price’s Law and consequences for the Laws of Zipf and Mandelbrot. Journal of Information Science, 12(4), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158601200406.
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2013). An informetric model for the Hirsch-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0143-8.
Gibrat, R. (1931). Les Inégalités économiques. Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey.
Han, P., Shi, J., Li, X., Wang, D., Shen, S., & Su, X. (2013). International collaboration in LIS: Global trends and networks at the country and institution level. Scientometrics, 98(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1146-x.
Hart, R. L. (2007). Collaboration and article quality in the literature of academic librarianship. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(2), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2006.12.002.
Katz, J. S. (1999). The self-similar science system. Research Policy, 28(5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00010-4.
Katz, J. S. (2005). Scale-independent bibliometric indicators. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3(1), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0301_3.
Katz, J. S. (2006). Indicators for complex innovation systems. Research Policy, 35(7), 893–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.007.
Katz, J. S. (2016). What is a complex innovation system? PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0156150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156150.
Katz, J. S., & Cothey, V. (2006). Web indicators for complex innovation systems. Research Evaluation, 14(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781775922.
Leguendre, P., & Leguendre, L. (2012). Numerical ecology (3rd ed., Vol. 24). London: Elsevier B. V.
Levitt, J., & Thelwall, M. (2009). Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 434–442. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21000.
Levitt, J., & Thelwall, M. (2010). Does the higher citation of collaborative research differ from region to region? A case study of economics. Scientometrics, 85(1), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0197-5.
Levitt, J., & Thelwall, M. (2016). Long term productivity and collaboration in information science. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1103–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2061-8.
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frecuency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Academy of Sciences, 16(1), 317–323.
Mayernik, M. (2010). The distributions of MARC Fields in bibliographic records a power law analysis. Library Resources & Technical Services, 54(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.54n1.40.
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56.
Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79(4), 606–623. https://doi.org/10.1086/354848.
Milojevic, S. (2010). Power law distributions in information Science: Making the case for logarithmic binning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2417–2425. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21426.
Naranan, S. (1971). Power law relations in science bibliography: A self-consistent interpretation. Journal of Documentation, 27(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026510.
Newman, M. E. J. (2005). Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics, 46(5), 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510500052444.
Nomaler, O., Frenken, K., & Heimeriks, G. (2014). On scaling of scientific knowledge production in U.S. metropolitan areas. PLoS ONE, 9(10), e110805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110805.
Ronda-Pupo, G. A., & Katz, J. S. (2016a). The power-law relationship between citation-based performance and collaboration in articles in management journals: A scale-independent approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(10), 2565–2572. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23575.
Ronda-Pupo, G. A., & Katz, J. S. (2016b). The scaling relationship between citation-based performance and international collaboration of Cuban articles in natural sciences. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1423–1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1939-9.
Ronda-Pupo, G. A., & Katz, J. S. (2017). The scaling relationship between citation-based performance and scientific collaboration in natural sciences. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(5), 1257–1265. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23759.
Sahal, D. (1981). Patterns of technological innovation. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Simon, H. A. (1955). On a class of skew distribution. Biometrika, 42(3–4), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333389.
Sin, S.-C. J. (2011). International coauthorship and citation impact: A bibliometric study of six LIS journals, 1980–2008. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1770–1783. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21572.
Smith, R. J. (2009). Use and misuse of the reduced major axis for line-fitting. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 140(3), 476–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21090.
Sutter, M., & Kocher, M. G. (2001). Power laws of research output. Evidence for journals of economics. Scientometrics, 51(2), 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012757802706.
Thelwall, M. (2016a). Are the discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions plausible for citation data? Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 454–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.03.001.
Thelwall, M. (2016b). Are there too many uncited articles? Zero inflated variants of the discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 622–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.014.
Thelwall, M. (2016c). The discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions for complete citation data: Best options for modelling and regression. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.007.
van Raan, A. F. J. (2006). Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators: Research group indicator distributions and correlations. Journal of the American Asociation ofr Information Science and Technology, 57, 408–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20284.
van Raan, A. F. J. (2008). Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest european research universities: Prevalent scaling rules in the science system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(3), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20761.
van Raan, A. F. J. (2013). Universities scale like cities. Plos One, 8(3), e59384. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059384.
Ye, F. Y., & Rousseau, R. (2008). The power law model and total career h-index sequences. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.09.002.
Zhao, S. X., & Ye, F. Y. (2013). Power-law link strength distribution in paper cocitation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1480–1489. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22846.
Acknowledgements
We thank two anonymous reviewers for their interesting suggestions on a previous version of the manuscript.
Funding
Funding was provided by Universidad Católica del Norte, Chile (Grant No. 01-01-230203-10301440-NADA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ronda-Pupo, G.A., Katz, J.S. The power law relationship between citation impact and multi-authorship patterns in articles in Information Science & Library Science journals. Scientometrics 114, 919–932 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2612-7
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2612-7