Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A scientometric analysis of reproductive medicine

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Here, we carried out a scientometric analysis of the scientific literature published in the field of reproductive medicine (RM), an important and rapidly evolving branch of Medicine. To this aim, we analysed the research papers published in the period 1996–2011 in RM and we assessed the bibliometric parameters (number of citable documents, cites per document and H-index) and the extent of international collaboration among different geographical Regions and Countries. Further, we studied the link of RM with other disciplines in a Journals co-citation study, then the keyword citation bursts were assessed. Ultimately, the social behaviour of Authors involved in RM was analysed in a social network study. As a result, we found that still it exists marked differences in term of quantity and quality of production in RM among the different Regions and Countries, likely due to the different economic effort to sustain research. The most productive ones, Western Europe and Northern America and USA and UK, respectively, display a slow decrease in production, while Asia (and China) are amazingly growing. Unfortunately, Eastern Europe, Latin America and Africa are still very backward. In addition, RM is directly connected with basics disciplines but not with other medical specialities and the most cited keywords suggest the shift from basic to more applied research. Finally, the Authors involved in RM originate a small world community, in which it is possible to identify the brokers of information flow. In conclusion, this analysis could contribute to the knowledge of scientific production related to RM field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source SCImago (http://www.SCImagojr.com)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Source SCImago (http://www.SCImagojr.com)

Fig. 4

Source CiteSpace 3.9 and Google Earth

Fig. 5

Source SCImago (http://www.SCImagojr.com

Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Source Cytoscape 2.8.3

Fig. 8

Source Cytoscape 2.8.3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleixandre-Benavent, R., Simon, C., & Fauser, B. C. (2015). Trends in clinical reproductive medicine research: 10 years of growth. Fertility and Sterility, 104(1), 131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alenzi, F. Q., Lotfy, M., Nasif, W., El-Shahat, M., Abusini, H., & Alenazi, M. (2010). Biomedical research in the Middle Eastern countries: Update and insight using SCImago Journal Rank indicator. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, 22(3), 100–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartneck, C., & Kokkelmans, S. (2011). Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 87(1), 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernabò, N., Greco, L., Ordinelli, A., Mattioli, M., & Barboni, B. (2015). Capacitation-related lipid remodeling of mammalian spermatozoa membrane determines the final fate of male gametes: A computational biology study. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 19(11), 712–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernabò, N., Mattioli, M., & Barboni, B. (2010). The spermatozoa caught in the net: the biological networks to study the male gametes post-ejaculatory life. BMC Systems Biology, 4, 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernabò, N., Ordinelli, A., Di Agostino, R., Mattioli, M., & Barboni, B. (2014). Network analyses of sperm-egg recognition and binding—Ready to rethink fertility mechanisms? OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 18(12), 740–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busardò, F. P., Gulino, M., Napoletano, S., Zaami, S., & Frati, P. (2014). The evolution of legislation in the field of medically assisted reproduction and embryo stem cell research in European Union Members. BioMedical Research International, 2014, 307160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buster, J. E. (2006). Fertility and sterility: An evaluation. Fertility and Sterility, 86, 790–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaouat, G. (2008). European funding for reproduction research—A multinational perspective. Nature Medicine, 14, 1218–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C. (2014). The CiteSpace Manual. http://cluster.ischool.drexel.edu/cchen/citespace/CiteSpaceManual.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2015.

  • Duncan, F. E., Derman, B., & Woodruff, T. K. (2014). A small field for fertile science: The low visibility of reproductive science in high impact journals. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 31(5), 511–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glujovsky, D., Riestra, B., Coscia, A., Boggino, C., Comandé, D., & Ciapponi, A. (2012). Assessment of research quality in major infertility journals. Fertility and Sterility, 98(6), 1539–1543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Alcaide, G., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., Navarro-Molina, C., & Valderrama-Zurián, J. C. (2008). Coauthorship networks and institutional collaboration patterns in reproductive biology. Fertility and Sterility, 90(4), 941–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • http://www.who.int/topics/reproductive_health/en/.

  • https://www.google.it/intl/it/earth/.

  • Horizon 2020. (2015). http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/. Accessed 21 Jan 2015.

  • Jamali, J., Salehi-Marzijarani, M., & Ayatollahi, S. M. (2014). Factors affecting journal quality indicator in Scopus (SCImago Journal Rank) in obstetrics and gynecology journals: A longitudinal study (1999–2013). Acta Informatica Medica, 22(6), 385–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, J. A., Braat, D. D., & Evers, J. L. (2000). Geographical distribution of publications in human reproduction and fertility and sterility in the 1990s. Human Reproduction, 15(8), 1653–1656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marom, R., Lubetzky, R., Mimouni, F. B., Ovental, A., Mandel, D., & Cohen, S. (2014). Secular trends in impact factor of breastfeeding research publications over a 20-year period. Breastfeed Medicine, 9(2), 98–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, V. (2013). Biology: The big challenge of big data. Nature, 498(7453), 255–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 101(Suppl 1), 5200–5205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013, OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/9213051e.pdf?expires=1437648618&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=5AC6E7E4E9D1666CBB9FE09EA5E6C888. Accessed 21 Jan 2015.

  • Pendlebury, D. A. (2008). WHITE PAPER using bibliometrics in evaluating research. Philadelphia, PA: Research Department, Thomson Reuters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piñeirúa, A., Sierra-Madero, J., Cahn, P., Guevara Palmero, R. N., Martínez Buitrago, E., et al. (2015). The HIV care continuum in Latin America: Challenges and opportunities. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 15(7), 833–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sci2 Team, Science of Science (Sci2) Tool, Indiana University and SciTech Strategies. (2009). https://sci2.cns.iu.edu. Accessed 21 Jan 2015.

  • SCImago, SJR—SCImago Journal & Country Rank. Retrieved 23 Feb 2015. http://www.SCImagojr.com. Accessed 21 Jan 2015.

  • Sekercioglu, C. H. (2008). Quantifying coauthor contributions. Science, 322(5900), 371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., et al. (2003). Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Research, 13(11), 2498–2504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sippel, L., Kiziak, T., Woellert, F., Klingholz, R. (2011). Africa’s demographic challenges Published by the Berlin Institute for Population and Development.

  • Tulandi, T., Shehata, F. F., & DeCherney, A. (2010). Fertility and sterility and impact factor. Fertility and Sterility, 93, 2105–2106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uyar, A., & Seli, E. (2014). The impact of assisted reproductive technologies on genomic imprinting and imprinting disorders. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 26(3), 210–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Web Of Science. https://apps.webofknowledge.com/UA_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=UA&search_mode=GeneralSearch&SID=Y1D48dLWfbrB1mGOp1e&preferencesSaved. Accessed 21 Jan 2015.

  • Wendl, M. (2007). H-index: However ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H., & Pan, B. (2006). Citation classics in fertility and sterility. Fertility and Sterility, 86, 795–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacca-González, G., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2014). Bibliometric analysis of regional Latin America’s scientific output in Public Health through SCImago Journal and Country Rank. BMC Public Health, 14, 632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Via Renato Balzarini 1, 64100, Teramo, Italy

    Nicola Bernabò, Luana Greco, Mauro Mattioli & Barbara Barboni

Authors
  1. Nicola Bernabò
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luana Greco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mauro Mattioli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Barbara Barboni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola Bernabò.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 50345 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 60 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bernabò, N., Greco, L., Mattioli, M. et al. A scientometric analysis of reproductive medicine. Scientometrics 109, 103–120 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1969-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1969-3

Keywords

Mathematics subject classification

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation